(W) THE FAITHFUL AND DISCREET SLAVE IS CUT IN TWO

Copyright: G.S. Ritchie, 1996, London

All rights reserved

INDEX

Section Page Title

[0000] 3 The Accusation

[000] 7 Relative submission and the sacred secret police

[00] 12 How Jesus is present or absent

[0] 16 Introduction

[1] 17 It's the same slave

[2] 21 Who really is the FDS?

[3] 22 Chronology of FDS3&4

[4] 23 1Samuel3: Pronouncing judgement on Eli

[5] 24 The application of the 7 stars and the 7 lampstands to the Lord's

day

[6] 30 Ephesus

[7] 31 Smyrna

[8] 31 Pergamum

[9] 33 Thyatira

[10] 35 Sardis

[11] 38 Nicolaus

[12] 39 Philadelphia

[13] 42 The 7 seals of Revelation

[14] 43 7 Possible FDS presidents of the first century

[15] 43 Matthew 25: The parable of the slaves given the talents

[16] 47 Luke 19: The 10 slaves the 10 minas and the 10 cities

[17] 50 2 Temple cleansings per presence

[18] 51 Revelation 11, Zechariah 4 & Revelation 17: The two witnesses

[19] 54 Zechariah 4:

[20] 56 Revelation 17:

[21] 63 The wild beast 'is not':

[22] 67 The second 1000 year prison sentence on Satan

[23] 68 The 8th king

[24] 70 Revelation 13: Satan's suicide

[25] 74 The timetable from 1991 Tishri to the arrival of this letter

[26] 75 Conclusion

Ref: [1] 80 Every scripture has a further fulfilment, and 2 recitals means 2

fulfilments

Ref: [2] 85 Distributive Symbolism

Ref: [3] 88 Omission Symbolism

Ref: [4] 91 Elementary Counting

Ref: [5] 93 Daniel 5: Mene, Mene, Tekel & Parsin

[0000] The Accusation

The purpose of this booklet is to provide the evidence for a formal accusation which I am making against 9 brothers, to be heard at a judicial committee in the 9 relevant congregations. These 9 are the 10 members the governing body, with the exception of Dan Sydlik. I have followed the procedure laid out by Jesus in Matthew 18:15-17:

Moreover, if your brother commits a sin, go lay bare his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have gained your brother. But if he does not listen, take along with you one or two more, in order that at the mouth of two or three witnesses every matter may be established. If he does not listen to them, speak to the congregation. If he does not listen even to the congregation, let him be to you just as a man of the nations and as a tax collector (Matthew 18:15-17).

I have written individually to each of the 9, giving them each a copy of an earlier version of this booklet. That letter was dated 1995Heshvan6 and was sent Fedex to 25 Columbia heights to arrive 1995Heshvan7. Dan Sydlik is a witness that he for his part received his, but none of them listened, and neither did they even acknowledge receipt. I then presented each one of the 9 with a revised version of this booklet on Wednesday 22 November, handing their booklets individually addressed to them, to Travis at the reception of 25 Columbia Heights on that day. There are 4 other witnesses to this laying bare of the fault, namely Todd Ellison, Don Adams, Dan Sydlik, and a brother who whilst hoping to have his named inscribed in the heavens is not prepared to reveal it to any brother who rings him on the earth, who goes by the Designation of EZF. They also received booklets individually addressed to them, and all 13 received a letter dated 1995Heshvan20, which was 1995November17, telling them that I would be sending each of them this booklet and that whereas they had instructions from the slave not to read it, they are holding opposite instructions from the master of that slave, and I was asking them to obey the master in this case. The contents of that letter are included in this booklet in the section on relative submission.

We have now, therefore, reached the point in this procedure when I should speak to the congregation, and this I do by means this booklet and by the covering letter. I should like to present my case personally to each congregation, please respond quickly and let me know when this can be done.

If the accusation is found to be true, then none of the 9 brothers would be able to serve as an overseer any congregation:

Also, let these be tested as to fitness first, then let them serve as ministers, as they are free from accusation (1 Timothy 3:10).

Do not admit an accusation against an older man, except only on the evidence of two or three witnesses (1 Timothy 5:19).

If there is any man free from accusation, a husband of one wife, having believing children that were not under a charge of debauchery nor unruly. For an overseer must be free from accusation as God's steward, not self-willed, not prone to wrath, not a drunken brawler, not a smiter, not greedy of dishonest gain (1 Titus 1:6,7).

As can be seen from this booklet I have as witnesses to the sin which I am making accusation about: Matthew, Luke, John, Jesus and the holy spirit. In addition to myself and my brother Tony, who has seen the accusation and the booklet and helped me in the research behind it.

The Accusation itself is made in my covering letter and repeated here for the sake of completeness:

As regards each of the 9 brothers, Henschel, Jaracz, Barr, Klein, Barry, Swingle, Booth, Barber, Schroeder:

[1] They have no authority from Jesus to sit on the governing body of God's people any more, because the old faithful and discreet slave has fallen.

[2] The FDS which they are the head of has become the evil slave of Matthew 24, the wicked slave of Mathew 25.

[3] They are therefore each individually fixed with being reprehensible and belligerent

As regards brother Milton Henschel, the 5th president, the 5th angel, the angel of Sardis:

[1] He has the name that he is alive but he is dead, he is not a party to the new covenant, he is not in the remnant, he is not a part of the bride class, he was not anointed under Sarah, he is not a member of what we call spiritual Israel. He is not in the '144,000'.

I present this accusation to you elders of their congregations because Jesus instructs me that this is how accusations should be dealt with in Matthew. It is more than apparent that this accusation cannot safely be handled by the FDS itself, since if the accusation is true, then the FDS is the Evil slave and therefore it will ignore or reject the accusation dishonestly and it will wickedly come to the wrong conclusion. Therefore it must be judged by an independent body, since no man, no body, and no slave can judge himself, and the scriptures dictate whom this judging body is, it is the relevant body of elders in each of the 9 congregations (if they are all in different congregations that is). In England we have a police complaints authority which investigates itself, but it's conviction rate is considerably lower than that achieved by the police when investigating anybody else.

If the accusation is false (in the absolute sense), then you men should be capable of providing me a full scriptural rebuttal, which I would like to have the chance to discuss personally. Although the slave has not managed to do this, and they took 2.5 years even to acknowledge receipt of my first letter, which was a 400 page book which extended the work of Charles Russell, to deduce many new dates, in particular the date of the last day of this system, which Mathew 24:36, when translated in the correct tense, the past tense, the perfect tense, does not prohibit a knowledge of after 33Nisan11. In fact nobody knows the date of their marriage, not even the lamb, until he has made his marriage proposal and got engaged, and this did not occur until 33Nisan14, when he made the new covenant, some 3 days after Nisan11, when he gave the signs of the times to the disciples. Although God knows the date of all of our marriages even before we make a marriage proposal. If you wish to know this date, please read 'Letter to the Elders', it has 7 different methods of calculating this date, one for each of the Elders in my congregation, in Leyton, London, England.

The politicians among you will wish to just hand this accusation to the writing committee and ignore it, in order to maintain an easy life, protect what you preceive to be your theocratic advancement, etc. But please remember that there is more to life than just pain or pleasure, there is good and bad to be considered, which really equates to future pain or pleasure for everybody. Please therefore, decide to be good and serve God with your whole mind, and make an assessment, and do not put the commands of the slave above the commands of the master of that slave. If the Captain says don't jump but the Admiral says jump, then what should you do?? In this regard please read the section on relative submission and the sacred secret police. For the Master says: read and judge:

Why do you not judge also for yourselves what is righteous (Luke 12:57)?

But the slave says: leave that to us. And may I suggest that you are in danger of opting not for an easy life but rather for an easy death, if you do not use your own mind on this rather important matter, because this is the first commandment, and it is not without weight at this time.

Furthermore, although I do not adduce this as an accusation, the great crowd have been called to be baptised in holy spirit, in the blood of the Christ, and I have told the slave about this and they are deliberately ignoring this call, I use 'call' in the sense of the Gentile call etc., because they are more interested in their own position than they are in the salvation of the great crowd. A new covenant has been made, the greater covenant of Keturah, Abraham's third wife, as opposed to Hagar and Sarah who are the Law covenant and the New covenant respectively, the greater covenant of Rachel as opposed to Leah who is the New covenant, the greater covenant with Jacob, as opposed to the one with Isaac, who prefigures Jesus, and the one with Abraham who fathered the physical Jews, and today fathers all Jews through his covenant. Even the greater covenant with the house of Judah, rather than the one with the house of Israel, which was the new covenant. It is the greater covenant of salt, for salt preserves flesh, and this covenant will save the great crowd, yes even the great crowd have a covenant. And the great crowd are called to be sanctified into this covenant, for they are washed in the blood of the lamb in this system, and this is the baptism by holy spirit into the name of Jesus, the son. And they become a holy nation of priests, for their robes, even their priestly robes are washed in this blood. For Jesus said the haunting words:

Remember the wife of lot (Luke 17:32)

And Lot stands for the great crowd, because he physically survived the fire, whereas Abraham was with God looking down on the proceedings and he stands for spiritual Israel, all of whom are in heaven looking down on us before Armageddon, but they won't admit it because they love their position more than they love the truth. And Lot was not his brother, but his nephew, and guess what:

Lot had a wife, a covenant, a covenant of salt, hence her final demise.

In the interest of simplicity I am not charging the FDS with the attempted Genocide of the great crowd at this time. This subject is adressed in my book 'Letter to the Elders'. And the writer is the messenger of this covenant.

Before we go into the scriptural basis for my accusation, there are 5 structures of the code of the bible which I would like to show you, the reader, and I suggest that you read the sections on relative submission and How Jesus is present or absent. These are not necessary to see that the old FDS has fallen and that a new one has been appointed by Jesus, but they will help the reader to see why this has occurred and what he should do about it. All that is neccessary by way of ability to see that the old FDS has fallen is for the reader to be able to count to 7. However, due to the implications of a realisation that the FDS may have fallen, the reader will also need to love the Master more than that slave in addition to possessing the said level of numeracy, if he is truly to grasp this state of affairs. The 5 aspects of the code which we will have a quick look at are:

Distributive symbolism

Ommission symbolism

Every scripture has a further fulfilment

Two recitals mean two fulfilments

Elementary counting

If the reader wishes he can skip these sections which are called Ref:1,2,3,4 and go straight to the next section on relative submission and the sacred secret police. Nearly all of the information in this booklet has already been given to the whole governing body individually, it is included here as the scriptural justification for the above accusation. The majority of this letter is written as to the governing body themselves, if you are not on the body please excuse the format!

[000] Relative submission and the sacred secret police

God's true people have identified that the submission to Caesar is a relative one:

Let every soul be in subjection to the superior authorities, for there is no authority except by God, the existing authorities stand placed in their relative positions by God. Therefore he who opposes the authority has taken a stand against the arrangement of God (Romans 13:1,2).

We recognised that since God is not divided against himself, if he says: Do not kill, and Caesar says: Kill, then we should in fact oppose Caesar's authority, because we are not in this case opposing his God given authority, through Satan. Rather Satan, the manslayer, has incited Caesar to exceed his God given authority in telling us to kill.

Likewise we are under the authority of the FDS, but Just as Caesar has authority by the arrangement of God, so the FDS has authority by the arrangement of his master, the Christ. Since sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, we must also be in a relative submission to the FDS, but in total submission to Jesus. So for example if Jesus tells us to treat our fellow witnesses as our brothers, then we would tell them our names if they ask us for them, since everybody knows the names of his fleshly brothers. This we would do even if the FDS issues instructions to us not to do this. If we on the other hand, choose to obey the instructions of the FDS when these are at variance with the instructions of the Christ then we are no longer Christians, we are Catholics, obeying the priest, or the pope, in preference to our Lord, living by 'infallible' Papal decree, from the 'wide awake pope class' bearing witness that to us, the FDS is God.

How is it that when I ring up presumably an unbelieving woman in the main post office in New York City she says to me: Hello my name is Linda how can I help you? But when I ring up my believing sister in the writing department, she refuses to tell me her name, and says that I can refer to her as:

The girl who picks up the phone when the girl who normally picks up the phone does not pick up the phone?

I then ring back and ask to be put through to this girl and I am told: I am sorry sir, I did not put you through to her, I do not know who she is! So then I need to find the girl, who put me through to the girl who picks up the phone in the writing department when the girl in the writing department who normally picks up the phone does not pick up the phone!

You do not have to be a bible scholar to see that these women are not treating me as their brother, and that therefore they are all sinning. Because I don't know about you, but I do actually know the names of my fleshly relatives, and this is the template the the Christ gives for my spiritual relatives. And if you sin, disobeying God and Christ, because you are told to by the FDS, this is no excuse. The FDS cannot change God's standard of sin by a decree in opposition to him. God has not changed, his law is not overuled by men. The captain cannot overule the admiral. No one is ignorant of the command to treat each other as brother and sister. I hope the point is made.

It is not true to say that the FDS always issues instructions which are in harmony with God's will as expressed in the bible. The above example of hiding one's name from one's brother proves this, and there are many, many, many more. Furthermore they are divided against themselves both in a temporal way and in a spatial way. In the US there is food at conventions, in the UK there is not, both of these cannot be in harmony with God's will. Today smoking is a disfellowshipping matter, whereas the anointed remnant in the second half baptism, the sanctification of which lasted from 1895Tishri to 1955Tishri were chosen with cigarettes hanging out of their mouths. This did not appear to inhibit the spirit of God from giving them a clean conscience even if their lungs might have been somewhat defiled. So it is apparent that one of these two opposing positions was wrong, since God does not change, it is our understanding of him that changes.

So now the big test on the reader, on the judicial comittee who judge this accusation and on every witness of the true God is:

You will each individually have to choose whether to obey the slave or the master of that slave. You cannot contract this choice out to any committee, it is your choice, it is the choice between true worship and false worship. Here is our master's view:

Now the latter were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with the greatest eagerness of mind, carefully examining the Scriptures daily as to whether these things were so (Acts 17:11).

They each did this individually, they did not contract this examination out to the elders or to a committee of some of the elders. They did not appoint a Beroean scripture examination committee to report back to them, there was no Beroean public enquiry set up by the presiding overseer. They served God with their whole minds, their own minds, each one of them used their own power of reason. For this they are each individually pronounced noble-minded by the holy spirit.

Keep on the watch therefore because you do not know on what day your Lord is coming (Matt 24:42).

Everybody has to be on the look-out. You cannot contract out this watching. This is a command from Jesus to all Christians.

Then they grasped that he said to watch out not for the leaven of the loaves, but for the teaching of the Pharisees and the Sadducees (Matt 16:12).

The Pharisees were God's appointed priesthood under law at the time that this warning was given. We do not eat bread from Babylon, this warning relates to our own food, the food from the FDS. You cannot watch out for leaven from your priest, the remnant, by asking them to make your examinations for you, these examinations will be full of the leaven that you are supposed to be watching out for. This watching is a thing that you must do yourself. This too is a command from Jesus to all Christians.

Keep on seeking and you will find (Matt 7:7).

It is not sufficient to look up the results of the seeking of your priest, you must seek yourself. You break this command if you continually ask your priest to do a search for you of something, to see if it has any merit.

If you love your Master, then you will obey his commandments to keep on the watch and to keep on seeking personally, and you will read the booklet and assess it yourself, in harmony with your conscience. If you love his slave, then you will obey the slave's commandments not to watch or to seek yourself but to leave that duty to him, the self declared 'Wide awake John class', and you will give the booklet to a multi-headed committee. So which is it to be? Whom do you love more? Who do you worship? How noble is your mind? Now do you see the spiritual household meaning of the scripture:

Do not think I came to put peace upon the earth; I came to put, not peace, but a sword. For I came to cause division, with a man against his father, and a daughter against her mother, and a young wife against her mother-in-law. Indeed, a man's enemies will be persons of his own household. He that has greater affection for father or mother than for me is not worthy of me; and he that has greater affection for son or daughter than for me is not worthy of me. And whoever does not accept his torture stake and follow after me is not worthy of me (Matt 10:34-38)?

And don't you know that it is for this very day that Satan has been working for the last 40 years in particular, persuading all of you to rely totally on the FDS, which knew he could corrupt - because he corrupts every Adamic priest, and he ruins every Adamic priesthood, even the writer of this letter he will suceed with, but not until God has granted me victory in cutting the head off the present house of Eli.

He has lobotomised you, he has stolen not the bible, but your bible reasoning. Can you not see this? Do you want him to suceed in your case, you haters of Adam, your father? Will you, at one and the same time condemn your fleshly father for failing his test, dishonouring him, breaking the principle of the law to honour your parents, and like him fail the test that Satan has set up for you? Do not be fooled. And if you should sin, then let it be with your own mind at the very least! But don't sin brothers, show Jesus that it is him whom you love first, truly be a witness of Jehovah, not a witness of his witnesses. Be a slave of God and of his Christ, do not be a slave of a slave. Look what Peter said:

Whoever is overcome by another is enslaved by this one (2 Peter 2:19).

Do not continue to be enslaved by the now evil slave. Use your power of reason, let no man restrict it.

In the case of Paul and the circumcision, do you think that Paul blindly handed this issue to the governing body without using his whole mind on it first and coming to his own conclusion? Do you think that Paul had no opinion on the matter himself? The scriptures say:

When there had occurred no little dissension and disputing by Paul and Barnabus with them, they arranged for Paul and Barnabus and some others to go up to the apostles and the older men in Jerusalem regarding this dispute (Acts 15:2).

Therefore become an imitator of him, here is your precedent set by Paul. For in this he is certainly imitating the Christ (1 Cor 11:1, 1 Cor 4:16), who is known to have had a few disputes with Jews about the law of Moses. Paul did not refuse to think about the issue, or refuse to discuss the issue because it was going to have to go to the body. He served God not only with his whole mind but also with his whole mouth, nobody can dispute that. Likewise, you too, serve God with your whole mind. And serve him with your whole mouth, and dispute personally with me if you disagree with any aspect of the booklet, like Paul did. For if you pass this booklet on without reading it and without discussing it, then you are attempting to serve God not with your whole mind but with a whole committee of other people's minds, and this is idolatry, it is disgusting to God. For this issue laid before you is also about circumcision, not in the flesh made with hands for the first race of Jews, and not in the heart made by the spirit both with and without hands for the second race of Jews, but in the heart made with the spirit of God without hands for the Nethinim and through their hands for the third race of Jews, the Edenic Jews. This is the once only baptism in the holy spirit of the great crowd.

Possibly the most astounding scriptural precedent for open bible discussion that I have yet seen, and this one even shook me, comes again from Paul:

Brothers, when you come together in one place, one has a psalm, another has a teaching, another has a revelation, another has an interpretation. Let all things take place for upbuilding...Let two or three prophets speak and let the others discern the meaning. But if there is a revelation to another one while sitting there, let the first one keep silent (1Corinthians14:26-30).

This has the meaning that if a brother is giving a talk, and another brother in the audience suddenly realises some new understanding of relevance, then the brother giving the talk should shut up, and brother brainwave should stand up and talk. He should immediately tell the whole congregation his new understanding. He does not have to silently submit it to the writing comittee in order for them to consider it for a few decades first. This is the glorious freedom of the children of God as regards new understandings. This is the command from the scriptures. This does not mean that he should discuss it outside the congregation, for the passage is prefixed with 'come together in one place'. Incidentally this all being together in one place defines a congregation meeting. The book study is not a such a meeting, because it occurs in several different places, it would therefore for example be permissable for sisters to 'speak' in such meetings.

But we must be able to discuss anything with our brothers, although of course we should all recognise what is and what is not accepted doctrine by the slave. We are all big boys now. If a man refuses to discuss anything which has not yet been covered by the slave, then he is not a bible student he is a Watchtower student. He is not a Christian he is a slavian, is this not absolutely obvious? In the same way, if a body of elders refuses to allow discussion of anything from the bible, unless it has first been discussed by the slave, then they are not bible students they are Watchtower students. And of course this is what we have all become. And it is straight from Satan. He is the one who stops bible discussion. And what a great triumph he has had with us! He has eliminated all bible discussion from God's own people. We only discuss bible interpretations that have already been made by the Watchtower.

So here is your chance to show God that you love him more than you love your priest, and that you love the Master of the slave more than you love the slave itself, if you truly do. This is your test, and it is for this sin, about which they are fully aware, that the FDS has been rejected by God, and has become the evil slave of Matthew 24, and the wicked slave of Matthew25.

[00] How Jesus is present or absent

We witnesses believe that Jesus' second presence started in 1914Tishri, and that the Lord's day started then and that the time of the end started then, and that the last days started then, and that he 'came' then, this being the end of the Gentile times. This is really because we only have one date, so we fix everything to it. In fact Jesus' second presence began in 1884Tishri with the sanctification of brother Russell by holy spirit, the Lord's day started in 1895Tishri, with the beginning of the second half baptism of spiritual Israel, which was start of the greater Ephesian congregation. The time of the End started on 1992Shebat22, which was the day that I first worked out the date of Armageddon, this being 4600 solar days (Daniel8) before 1290 lunar days (Daniel12) before 2008Nisan14, the last day of this system. The time of the end is the time of the correct knowledge of the date of the end, said knowledge being first revealed to the last antetypical Daniel. Jesus came to the temple of his body, on 1918Nisan14 to throw out Bablyon, and on the third day, 1918Nisan16, he appointed the current FDS exclusively over all his belongings. And the Gentile times did end on 1914Tishri15. I am showing off here, the proofs for all of the above can be found in 'Letter to the Elders', and 'Letter to the Society', which the writing committee have several copies of, and so do I, if you want another one. I boast not because I want to be glorified, indeed I will not be glorified for this accusation, I will be reviled and ridiculed. But God has glorified me, to the extent that he has, and it is quite a large extent in terms of new bible understandings, because this was the level of glory that he judged that I would need to have, in order for there to be someone amongst his stiff-necked people who was prepared to listen to me. On the governing body there is one. Even one out of 10, God's farming percentage. I wonder how many will there be of you who listen?? The section on pages 340-343 of the reasoning book covers our current position on the return of Christ, and the aposite scriptures are examined there.

Let me start by saying this. Jesus' first presence must take the same form as his second presence because if not then his absence cannot be defined, this is a matter of logic. Therefore seeing how he was absent is the key to seeing how he is now present, since the two presences must be the opposite of the one absence and therefore they are both the same kinds of presence. His first presence did not end on 33Iyyar25 with the disappearance of Michael walking the earth in a human body, because if it did then the second presence would have to start with the appearance of Michael in another human body, and it didn't. Likewise the second presence cannot start with the end of the Gentile times, and be in fact a presence manifested by an increased preaching activity directed by a newfound kingly authority, because the first presence was during the Gentile times, and Jesus had no kingly authority in the first century.

So we need to find a common factor between the first century and the twentieth century presences, in order to define precisely what his 'presence' really is and was. We are helped here by two men in white garments, one of whom prefigures me, who said:

Men of Galilee, why do you stand looking into heaven[KI]? This Jesus who was received up from you into heaven will come thus in the same manner as you have beheld him going into heaven[KI] (Acts 1:11).

Jesus was ascending to heaven in a fleshly body that was not the one that he walked around in during his ministry. This is therefore the manner in which he will be present. So what fleshly body is Jesus currently present in, that is going to ascend to heaven, and that he did not walk around in during his ministry to the Jews? The answer to this question is: It's his fiancee. They eat his flesh, they drink his blood, and they are covenanted to him as his wife, like Sarah was to Abraham, to be joined as one flesh by agreement. It's like Paul said of the sons of Leah, in Jacobian symbolism:

We are members of his body (Ephesians 5:30).

He is the head of the body, the congregation (Collosians 1:18).

Because a husband is head of his wife, as the Christ also is head of the congregation, he being a saviour of [this] body (Ephesians 5:23).

This is the body in which he is present the second time, and this body is his body, but not the one he walked around in, and this body goes into heaven to be his wife at the marriage of the lamb. This body was certainly present in the first century and is present now. In fact it was absent from 119Elul until 1884Tishri, when Russell was anointed (see Letter to the Elders). Jesus' absence is the lack of the remnant, and Leah, the first woman to give seed to Jacob, who prefigures the first covenant by which Jesus procreates as the eternal father, left off giving birth, and then restarted after the two maidservants who are subcovenants of Leah and Rachel, Rachel is the covenant the I am anointed under, she is the covenant of Keturah, the newer covenant, the covenant with the house of Judah, whereas the new covenant, which is now actually the old covenant, the covenant of Leah, was with the house of Israel, (Jeremiah 31:31,33).

The length of the presences is nicely deduced from Matthew 24:37-39:

Just as the days of Noah were, so the presence of the son of man will be. For as they were in those days before the flood, eating and drinking, men marrying and women being given in marriage, until the day that Noah entered into the ark, and they took no note until the flood came and swept them all away, so the presence of the son of man will be (Matt 24:37-39).

This period lasted 120 years, the warning period:

After that Jehovah said: My spirit shall not act indefinitely towards man in that he is also flesh. Accordingly his days shall amount to 120 years (Gen 6:3).

It also happens to be the maximum lifespan of any adamic human who lived after Moses, a thing which I am not proving here but also follows from Gen 6:3 [Jehoiada who lived for 130 years (2 Chronicles 24:15) was non-adamic - he was actually Melchizedek in one incarnation]. Jesus' human wife cannot live longer than 120 years, is the symbolic significance. So both presences had this length at most. Since we know that the constant feature ended 1290 lunar days before Armageddon (Dan 12:11, see Letter to the Elders), and since the remnant die a sacrificial death, they are all tucked up in death by 2004Elul14, 1290 days before the end.

So the presence started at the earliest in 1884Elul, and in fact Russell was anointed in 1884Tishri, in the antitypical pattern of the Christ and Adam, this being 30 years before the appointment of FDS3 as head of the domestics to feed them in 1914Tishri, and 33.5 years before, the appointment of FDS3 over all Jesus' belonging at the fall of Babylon in 1918Nisan (see Letter to the Elders section [7]). Incidentally the 1260 days of prophesying in sackcloth and ashes ran from 1914Heshvan25 to 1918Iyyar25, when the brothers were locked up, because Jesus' ministry was phase shifted by 42 days inclusive, due to his 40 day trip to the wilderness and his 40 day extension before his ascension, he was baptised on 29Tishri10. This really is the reason why the brothers were not locked up on 1918Nisan14 - that one is for Brother Reid, the CO who made me aware of this 42 day discrepancy over 4 years ago, a man who was actually a bible student rather than a Watchtower student, for he was frankly and honestly discussing things from the bible for which the Watchtower did not have the answer.

The second presence therefore runs from 1884Tishri to 2004Elul, and the first presence of Jesus in a flesh which is 'his', was from 2Tishri10BCE to 119Elul, it being the same length, this also being the exact lifespan of Moses who was born in 1593Nisan and died in 1473Veadar, I think, see 'letter to the elders' one month short of 120 years. Moses was a faithful and discreet slave of God you know - you don't think so? Read this:

And they are singing the song of Moses, the slave of God (Rev 15:3).

And for a fact he was neither faithless nor indiscreet.

OK so now we have two presences in the same form, namely the existence of a body belonging to Jesus, and they are both the correct length, and we have an absence in between. It's like John said:

Every inspired expression that confesses Jesus Christ as having come in the flesh originates with God (1 John 4:2).

For many deceivers have gone forth into the world, persons not confessing Jesus Christ as coming in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist (2John7).

These scriptures apply to the two presences and to the first comings of each presence. For Jesus comes twice in each presence to the temple, which is his body, his flesh. Just as he went twice to the temple to throw out the money changers in his 3.5 year physical presence. And this letter is about his last coming, which has occurred already, and he has already thrown out FDS3 and appointed FDS4. He is present each time in the flesh, through his wife, the anointed remnant.

These letters of John are not grounds to verbally shun disfellowshipped people, by not saying a greeting to them. Jesus said that we should treat disfellowshipped men 'just as' tax collectors and men of the nations (Matthew18:17). Nobody verbally shuns wordly people, and nobody in their right mind refuses to say a greeting to a tax collector!

It is most apparent from Matthew 24, that the faithful and discreet slave is appointed during the second presence, since it's definition is in the response to the question: what will be the sign of your presence? So the existence of an FDS is a 'sign of the times', just like wars, famines and earthquakes. The slave is a feature of a presence, not of the absence of Christ. In particular is Christ is absent then there is no FDS. It's like the parable says:

When the season of the fruits came, he dispatched his slaves to the cultivators to get his fruits (Matthew 21:34).

His faithful and discreet slaves appear in the seasons of fruits. Why, does not nature declare the impossibility of a continuous remnant baptism? Which tree produces fruit all year round?

It is also apparent that the appointment over all the belongings happens on the master's arrival, therefore there must be have been two faithful slaves at the least, one appointed at his first coming deposing the Jews and another at his second coming deposing Babylon. In fact there are 4 FDSs (faithful & discreet slaves) for there are 2 comings in each presence, just as Jesus came to his father's house to evict the money changers twice in his physical presence. James says:

Exercise patience brothers until the presence of the Lord, Look! The farmer keeps waiting for the precious fruit of the earth, exercising patience over it until he gets the early rain and the late rain (James 5:7).

So James identifies waiting for the presence of the Lord with waiting for the precious fruit of the earth. This precious fruit is the remnant. Their re-appearance is the second presence. The two rains, early and late, are their two baptisms both lasting 96 years (see Letter to the Elders).

[0] Introduction

Now that we are all at the Red sea, the place of baptism in blood of the great crowd, now that you have put in print that they will get everlasting life in this system after the Son of man has arrived, now that you have chased us to this point, it is time for me to lift up my Rod, so that the waters can be split, the waters of the Red sea, the people of the great crowd. For the son of man has already arrived, but you did not know at what hour he came upon you, or in what watch.

In doing this I will show you that your rod has been broken in half, and that you are cut in two. Not that I can show you anything, but perhaps this time the holy spirit will move you to examine this letter and find out the truth for yourselves. If not then ask my brothers, they will show you, the ones who like speculating about dates, the sons of Charles Taze Russell, the son of God, the father of many such speculations and for this reason God made him the father also of the truth today, not the father of the sacred secret police. For God said to Moses:

As for you, lift up your rod, and stretch your hand out over the sea and split it apart, that the sons of Israel may go through the midst of the sea on dry land (Exodus 14:16).

But what Moses actually did was:

Moses now stretched his hand out over the sea, and Jehovah began making the sea go back by a strong east wind all night long, and converting the sea basin into dry ground, and the waters were being split apart (Exodus 14:21).

Oh dear, he forgot to lift up his rod! What an oversight! Not so, the account deliberately omits describing this action, this is an ommission symbolism (see Ref:3). The two greater Moses' after Christ do this. Paul did it in the first presence, splitting FDS1 in two, and I do it today, in the last presence, splitting FDS3 in two. I do it on 1995Heshvan7, 390 days after we entered the promised land on 1994Tishri7, this being the 390 days tied on my left side, representing my administration. There is also a 40 months wherein I am tied on my right side representing your administration. Moses lifted up his rod when he could see that the Egyptians were chasing him, and I have seen this now in the positive from your Watchtower on the sheep and goats and in the negative from your Watchtower saying please, please don't speculate about dates, you must stop, stop now. So like Gideon, here goes.

As was the case in my letter to you of 1994Adar17, which sent you chasing off after me, I have known a lot of the contents of this letter for some time but my instructions were to delay it until now so that all of my 220 brothers the Nethinim could be chosen on the basis on their love for God exceeding their love for you, before your authority is seen to have been removed, at which time the above test would no longer be effective. Their sanctification lasted from 1993Nisan10 to 1995Tishri10, 900 days, 30 months, although their sealing continues until 2001Nisan, this being 96 months. They are in fact 30 pieces of silver in one symbolism. For my rod is like a reed and it has measured the sanctuary and the altar and those worshipping in it, the results in this presence were:

Sanctuary 96 years, from 1895Tishri to 1991Tishri

Altar 96 months from 1993Nisan to 2001Nisan

Those worshipping in it 220

We already knew the number of those worshipping in the sanctuary namely 144,001. The symbolism of Revelation 11, refers to the overall temple of the Kingdom of God which works as follows:

Physical temple Kingdom temple

High priest in Most holy Jesus Christ

Aaronic priests in Holy Spiritual Israel

Levites assisting Aaronic priests at altar Nethinim

Other Levites permitted in sanctuary courtyard Great crowd

Jews, could be ceremonially clean Other sanctified ones

Gentiles, could not be clean Unsanctified ones

[1] It's the same slave

Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one......

Happy is that slave if his master on arriving finds him doing so..

But if ever that slave should say in his heart....

The master of that slave will come on a day that he is not expecting and in an hour that he does not know and he will cut him in two (NWT/Kingdom Interlinear - Luke 12:45,46).

The slave that is happy is the slave that says in his heart: My master delays, and the master of that very slave comes when he is not expecting him and cuts him into two, into two slaves. Brothers truly I am saying to you today, it is this dichotomy that is the origin of the question: Who really is the FDS? For this is a question which has to be asked of two genuine FDSs (Faithful & discreet slaves). Babylon was never appointed over Jesus' belongings, Babylon is a prison, a place of detention, a place of removal from God's promised land, which today is not his physical food producer, but his spiritual food producer the FDS. Babylon the great is the prison between the faithful and discreet slaves in the first and second presences, this is the period when Jesus is sitting at his father's right hand, waiting for his enemies to be placed as a foostool for his feet. Therefore Babylon the Great cannot be the evil slave, because Jesus was never their master. The concept of Jesus presiding over Babylon the Great is totally ridiculous. They were never his slave, and the evil slave says in his heart that his master, Jesus, delays, and Jesus says that:

The master of that slave will come on a day that he does not expect and in an hour that he does not know (Matthew 24:50).

Thereby declaring himself to be their master. And this is a coming of Jesus. In fact Jesus says to his own disciples in the next chapter:

Keep on the watch, therefore, because you know neither the day nor the hour (Matthew 25:13).

So the evil slave have been Jesus' disciples, which is why we read:

If ever that evil slave....should start to beat his fellow slaves (Matthew 24:48,49).

The point being that prior to this abuse, the slave was not beating his fellow slave and was therefore not evil and was in fact faithful and discreet, the only other designation that we have for slaves of the master.

So since Jesus is the master of the Evil slave, this slave has to have been appointed by him, which means that it has to have been a faithful and discreet slave.

Therefore it is the FDS which becomes the evil slave, QED.

You are FDS3, there were two slaves in the first century presence. When Paul said:

I know a man in union with Christ who, fourteen years ago--whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know; God knows--was caught away as such to the third heaven (2 Corinthians 12:2)

My first guess at this was the heavenly resurrections, but in fact I had that timetable and the number of resurrections incomplete when I first calculated it, the correct version of these, I think, is given in Ref [5]. Heaven rules over the earth, so heaven can stand for rulership.

Physical Jerusalem was the first heaven ruling over Abraham's seed, the physical Jews, through the two mountains of the Aaronic priesthood on mount Moriah, and the Davidic kingship on mount Zion.

FDS1, the first part of spiritual Jerusalem, was the second heaven, appointed by Jesus to rule over God's people, the second race of Jews, the spiritual Jews.

FDS2, of which Paul was the first head, was the third heaven, ruling over Abraham's seed, over the third race of Jews, the Edenic Jews [the first century archetypes of the great crowd], the Israel of God (Galations 6:16). What we call spiritual Israel, is not the Israel of God, it is the Israel of Jesus, his wife. Of course FDS2 ruled over three races of Jews, the physical, the spiritual and the Edenic. And FDS1 ruled over two races of Jews, the Physical and the Spiritual.

The very name 'Faithful and discreet slave' means two slaves since this is a distributive symbolism (see Ref: [2]). The way that the two slaves in each presence come into existence is by a cutting in two in the symbolism of Matthew24 and Luke12. This cutting is actually done with their own sword, the double edged sword of the bible. For the very scripture which gives you the authority over all of Christ's belongings, also takes this authority away from you, and gives it to FDS4, as was the case with FDS1 & FDS2 in the first century. For Matthew says:

Happy is that slave if his master on arriving finds him doing so. Truly I say to you, he will appoint him over all his belongings (Matthew 24:47).

If ever that evil slave should say in his heart: My master is delaying (Matthew 24:48).

The same slave is first described as happy and appointed and then he is described as evil and cut in two, whereupon he is presumably rather disappointed. The point is that it is the same slave. So now we can see why the rock of the Christ was split in order for the water to come out, and why the waters were divided before the crossing into the new land could be made. And this crossing was made over dry land, which means that water baptism is suspended for a period. We are currently in this period (see section [9] on Thyatira).

And he proceeded to split a rock that water might stream forth (Isaiah 48:21).

And this is what Joshua said to the sons of Israel as regards the 12 stones in the river:

When your fathers ask their sons in time to come saying: what do these stones mean? You must then let you sons know saying: On dry land it was that Israel passed over this Jordan, when Jehovah your God dried up the waters of the Jordan from before them, until they had passed over, just as Jehovah your God had done to the Red Sea when he dried it up from before us until we had passed over (Joshua 4:21-23).

Look! the river Jordan has dried up, your water baptism is over. There is a new passover occurring, a passover for the Nethinim and the great crowd, for there is a swopping of 12 foundation stones, from the wet baptising Nation to the dry baptising nation.

In case your sons ask in time to come, saying: Why do you have these stones? You must also say to them: Because the waters of the Jordan were cut off from before the ark of Jehovah's covenant. When it passed through the Jordan, the waters of the Jordan were cut off, and these stones must serve as a memorial to time indefinite. Accordingly the sons of Israel did so, just as Joshua had commanded, and they took up 12 stones from the middle of the Jordan, Just as Jehovah has stated to Joshua, to correspond with the number of the tribes of the sons of Israel, and they went taking them over with them to the lodging place and depoisting them there. There were also 12 stones that Joshua set up in the middle of the Jordan on the standing place of the feet of the priests carrying the ark of the covenant, and they continue there until this day (Joshua 4:7-9).

So the 12 stones of the tribes of spiritual Israel will find a new lodging place on dry land. For you baptised the flesh with a bath of water but we will baptise the spirit, the conscience, in holy spirit through the laying on of hands. The foundation stones of Israel are changed yet again, and spiritual Israel is replaced with Edenic Israel, as we shall see in the counsel to Philadelphia. 12 years of baptism of the great crowd from 1994Elul to 2006Elul were decreed but sin has delayed the start. My first incorrect attempt to calculate the start of this baptism was 1994Chislev10, I have now recalculated, and this time I think I have it right, but I am not revealing the day [I was wrong, but I think that a division of the waters did occur 600 days after 1994Adar17, on 1995Heshvan17, but 'at length' the waters form a wall on the right and on the left (Exodus 14:22) - Ed]. Being explicit, the 12 stones removed from the Jordan represent spiritual Israel, and the 12 stones that replace them represent Edenic Israel for there are 3 Israel's, from 3 fathers, Abraham gave birth to the first Israel, fleshly Israel, Isaac, who is Jesus, gave birth to the second, spiritual Israel, and Jacob, who is me, will give birth to the third, for my wrestling is over now, and all my brothers are sanctified but not water baptised, they have broken this baptism, and we are ready.

The 12 stones that were in the river are taken out of the river, so their baptism is ended, and the 12 stones that were not in the river are now in the river so they take over the baptism. Of course nowadays Israel's are created by baptism, so this is the transferrence of procreation by baptism to a new Israel. It is the new seed, do not fight us accept us, we are the new FDS. Let us reconsider that famous question:

[2] Who really is the FDS?

Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics to give them their food at the proper time? (Matt 24:45).

Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom the master will appoint over his body of attendants/therapists to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time? (Luke 12:42).

Matthew has 'katesthsen' in a past tense, Luke has 'katasthsei' in a future tense. Both scriptures ask a question implying a choice between two slaves.

He will appoint him over all his belongings 4x

'All his belongings' counts as 4x, these are the 4 FDSs. This is the comparison:

Matthew Luke

Appointed Will appoint

Over Domestics Over curing staff

That evil slave That slave

Beats fellow slaves Beats menservants & maidservants

Give food Keep giving food

He should start to be beating his fellow slaves 2x

but may be eating and may be drinking 2x

with the ones getting drunk 2x

6x (Matt 24:49), 6th watch is when master comes and cuts in 2 (see Ref:4)

He should start to be beating

the boys and the maidservants 4x

to be eating and also to be drinking 2x

and to be getting drunk 1x

7x (Luke 12:45), 7th watch is when master comes and cuts in 2 (see Ref:4).

The Faithful and discreet slave of Matthew applies to FDS1&3. The Faithful and discreet steward of Luke applies to FDS2&4. We are the ones 'getting drunk' and FDS1&3 drink with us before they fall. FDS1 was already appointed when Jesus spoke in Matt24, FDS2 was to be appointed later. FDS1 did become the evil slave, in the wicked and sluggish 6th watch in the first century, FDS2 does not. FDS1&3 do become evil slaves, FDS2&4 do not. FDS1&3 are appointed over domestics to give food, in the house of spiritual Israel, the house of David, FDS2&4 are appointed over curing staff, baptisers, to keep giving food in the house of edenic Israel, the house of Jehovah, since FDS1&3 have ceased doing this at the time of new appointment, this being the reason for the new appointment. FDS1 beats his fellow slave FDS2, and FDS3 beats his fellow slave FDS4. FDS3&4 have no incoming slave to beat, they beat instead boys and maidservants...hmmm. The activities of the FDS of Matthew count as 6x before he is cut in two, this is the 6th watch, whereas the FDS of Luke has activites counting as 7x, the 7th watch, which also gets cut in two.

FDS1 is cut in two inasmuch as the first century slave was split FDS1&2, and in as much as the house of spiritual Israel is split into FDS1&3.

FDS2 is cut in two inasmuch as the house of Edenic Israel is split into FDS2&4, and the whole 'FDS' is split into the first and last century halves.

FDS3 is cut in two inasmuch as the last century slave is cut into FDS3&4.

FDS4 is not so easy. The cutting in 2 that befalls FDS4 could be the splitting into 2 watches, this does occur at the start of the 7th watch. But I think not, it more likely occurs within the 7th watch when Jesus spits the congregation of Laodicea out of his mouth. It is possibly the Zoar class, that accounts for this. Perhaps when FDS4 falls, it becomes non-exclusive?

[3] Chronology of FDS3&4

FDS1

2Tishri10 Jesus sanctified

10Tishri Jesus commissioned to build new temple

11Nisan Jesus teaches pharisees in temple, not feeding domestics

29Tishri10 Michael appointed head over Jesus' body

29Heshvan21 Jesus starts feeding at proper time, Peter Sanctified Jewish call

33Nisan14 Law ends, Jesus dies, Proselyte call

33Nisan16 FDS1 appointed over all belongings

FDS2???

33Nisan16 Paul sanctified

44Nisan Paul commissioned to build new temple

63Nisan Start of last week of Jewish system, Paul appointed FDS2 head

66Tishri22 Cestius arrives, FDS1 falls, at half of week

66Tishri24 FDS2 appointed exclusively over all belongings

I have not spent much time looking at FDS2, I have enough problems with the Chronology of FDS4 (see Letter to Elders section [10]).

Who really is the faithful & discreet slave, whom his master appointed over his domestics to give them their food at the proper time (Matt 24:45).

Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom the master will appoint over his curing staff to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time (Luke 12:42).

FDS3

Head/Elijah3 anointed 1884T

commissioned to build temple, teaches pharisees 1895T

head appointed over body to feed at proper time 1914Tishri15

starts feeding at proper time 1914Heshvan26

Babylon falls 1918Nisan14

appointed over all belongings 1918Nisan16

11 years, 30 years and 3.5 years

Jesus fed from 29Heshvan21 until 33Iyyar25, phase shifted by 41 days from his baptism on 29Tishri10 to his death on 33Nisan14, just like the first of the two witnesses of Revelation 11.

FDS4

Head/Elijah4 anointed 1991Tishri17

commissioned to build temple, teaches pharisees 1992Elul11/14

head appointed over body to feed at proper time 1994Nisan4

FDS3 falls 1994Tammuz19

appointed over all belongings 1994Tammuz21

11 months, 30 months and 3.5 months and third day

Truly I say to you 10 men of the governing body, you have become the evil slave, even the wicked slave, who hid his talent, his watch, in the ground. For now we will tie up Matthew 24, Luke12, Revelation2&3, Matthew25 and Luke19. We will tie together the faithful steward, the counsel to the 7 congregations, the talents and the minas. We start in Revelation, but first we revisit 1Samuel3, and the pronouncement by Samuel upon the house of Eli.

[4] 1Samuel3: Pronouncing judgement on Eli

Perhaps, if the reader has read 'Letter to the Society', he remembers that 1 Samuel 3 indicates that the Eli who is FDS3 will make a request and say to Samuel, who is me, after he had received the judgment from God on the house of Eli:

What is the word that he has spoken to you? (1 Samuel 3:17).

In the account this request precedes Samuel's pronouncement of judgement on the house of Eli. But the scripture describing Samuel's pronouncement that occurs after this request says:

So Samuel told him all the words, and he did not hide anything from him (1 Sam 3:18).

This implies that an earlier incomplete pronouncement had been made which did not contain all the words due to a hiding of some of them by Samuel. Also it is most important to realise that if there is a sequence of events which are represented by A,B,C,D,E, then a bible account can and often does describe only the sequence A,C,E, leaving out B & D. This is perfectly acceptable, it is just one piece in the jigsaw. In the case of 1 Samuel3, the account alludes to an earlier incomplete unrequested pronouncement, but does not explicitly mention it. Even if it hadn't alluded to it at all, this would not preclude it occuring. Likewise in the case of Ezra8, we saw 5 presidents of the Society:

Ezra, Sherebiah, Hashabiah, Jeshaih, Iddo (Ezra 8:15-20, Letter to the Society p301).

These stand for Russel, Rutherford, Knorr, Franz and Ritchie. They miss out Henschel and the 7th president. These miss the 5th and 7th presidents because those two make no appointments to the governing body, and the account is only of presidents who do make appointments. This is fulfilled in the case of Milton, for his watch has ended. I make 220 appointments, I hope. Now the account could have included a couple of other chaps who did not bring any sons or brothers, but then it would have been the whole jigsaw, and the the bible does not appear to be written in that way, although Artaxerxes was said to have 7 counsellors.

[5] The application of the 7 stars and the 7 lampstands to the Lord's day

Counting time in sevens was God's idea, he invented the week, the 7 creative days of the creative week are the first thing in the bible. It is not a natural thing for man, who counts in base ten, or in dozens, to count time in sevens, God instigated this 'base' for counting time. Time is what he counts in sevens, with release after 7 times, this being the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a concept which relates always to time. In the Hebrew language, the word for 'seven' and the word for 'Sabbath' are from the same root. Therefore the very language of God's people was and is declaring that 7 has to do with time. The concept that 7 relates to 7 things occurring one after the other with a release after or during the 7th one (depending on whether we count inclusively or exclusively), is enshrined in the language of the old testament.

But I fear that I have not laboured this seemingly trivial point enough. The Society already have 7 standing for 'divine completeness', but the sense in which this completeness occurs is the temporal sense, it is a completeness in time, with the 7 repetitions occurring one after the other, consecutively, successively. For example, Daniel 9 literally says:

Seventy sevens, he is decreed for people of you and for city of holiness of you ( Dan 9:24 NIVHEOT).

From issuing of decree to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until anointed one, ruler, sevens seven, and sevens sixty-two (Dan 9:25 NIVHEOT).

It is implicit, it is understood that these sevens refer to time, and are therefore consecutive, it does not have to be spelt out. Similarly in the definition of the Jubilee, we see:

And you must count for yourself seven Sabbath of years, seven times seven years, and the days of the seven Sabbaths of years must amount to forty-nine years for you (Leviticus 25:8).

A 'Sabbath' of years is here defined as 7 years. The holy spirit is actually equating, identifying 7 with the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a function of time, therefore the holy spirit is declaring 7 to be also a function of time, as regards its scriptural symbolism or significance.

We also have the example of the 7 headed wild beast. This beast did not have 7 heads all at once, it had 7 heads one after the other, Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Medo-Persian, Greek, Roman, Anglo-American. Only after the one power lost its headship, did the next power gain its headship, in fact the gain of the succeeding power was the loss of headship of the preceding power.

We have the example of the 7 sons of Sceva, the Jewish high priest:

The man in whom the wicked spirit was leaped upon them, and got the mastery of one after another (Acts 19;16).

'One after another' is the point I am trying to make. So since Monday and Tuesday do not occur together, but former entirely precedes the latter, we now turn our attention to the 7 stars in Jesus' right hand and the 7 congregations of Revelation 1,2 & 3, and it is not a great leap of inordinate intellectual brilliance to recognise that these 7 may be successive in time, and may in fact occur one after the other in the Lord's day. They would then make up a week and the Sabbath over which the Christ is Lord, the 1,000 year reign would follow, this being the release at the end of 7 times. Just as in the case of the Gentile Times, the release of the malediction on the Jews occurred after the end of 7 times, or just like the falling down of the walls of Jericho, they marched round 7 times and then the walls fell down. Again in both of these two further examples, the Gentile times and the fall of Jericho, the 7 times related to time, i.e. temporal repetition.

Fine, so here is the application to the 7 stars and the 7 congregations in the Lord's day, which is after all when the vision is said to be for (Rev 1:10). The 7 stars are the 7 presidents of the Watchtower Society, who will preside before Armageddon. They are actually the heads on earth, of the entire congregation, the lampstand, which is all of the baptised brothers during the presidency of the star or messenger or angel. For although in recent years the presidents have claimed only to be figure-heads, having no more authority than the other members of the governing body, who decide things together, this is not theocratic because there is no creature which God created with two heads. And the governing body should not be a 10 headed wild beast, but one should be their head on earth as one is their head in heaven, Jesus Christ. He does not take a vote of the apostles to decide what to do. For more on the evil of democracy see my letter about the theocrats and the democrats (apologies for my misunderstanding of the American political system).

Now we are in a position to perceive the full force of Jesus' counsel to the 7 congregations, because:

Ephesus Brother Russell's presidency, from 1895Tishri

Smyrna Brother Rutherford's presidency

Pergamum Brother Knorr's presidency

Thyatira Brother Franz's presidency

Sardis Brother Henschel's presidency

Philadelphia Iddo, Daniel, Joseph, Bezalel, Samuel, Joab

Laodicea Second Benaiah

In fact this is why Artaxerxes, 'the king of kings' had 7 counsellors (Ezra 7:12-14). The greater Ephesian congregation, which is symbolised by the first lampstand started in Tishri 1895 at the start of the second baptism. Because, only then, were 2 or 3 gathered together in Jesus' name, in fact in his Hebrew name (See 'Letter to the Elders'). Therefore whereas the inscription on brother Russell's tomb reads: 'The Laodicean messenger', he was in truth 'The Ephesian messenger'. This of course was his mistake, and mine too, he foreshortened the Lord's day to end in 1914. And had it done so he would have been the Laodicean messenger. Whereas I, 7 times have mistakenly believed that the society would have to call me in line with Eli finally calling Samuel, but this happens after a whole load of other events which are yet future, which are precipitated by this letter. I foreshortened my battle with spiritual Israel, because I didn't want a battle I wanted to go straight to the predetermined outcome, as did Charles Russell. Actually this proves that the brother knew that the 7 congregations were temporally successive, Russell knew it! We now know less than him, we are going backwards:

Woe to the sinful nation, the people heavy with error, an evildoing seed, ruinous sons! They have left Jehovah, they have treated the Holy One of Israel with disrespect, they have turned backwards (Isaiah 1:4).

This obviously has a fulfilment in the last days, because Isaiah chapters 1,2,3 are all the same vision, and chapter 2 is about the mountain of the house of Jehovah being established above the top of the other mountains in the last days. If chapter 2 has a current fulfilment today then so do chapters 1 and 3 (see section [26] - conclusion).

Russell did not have enough information to complete the puzzle back then. If he were a human now he would like me put you people to shame for sure. Since he is not and he can't shame you people personally, I hope that he is pleased with the Job that I am doing in his absence. And I hope you are ashamed of the mess that you have made of his beautiful baby.

But here we are, it's a big battle, a battle between the seeds, between Esau and Jacob, the latter of whom surplanted the former, this being the meaning of the name 'Jacob'. Yes, you have been the hunter, loads and loads of field service, but I am the dweller in a plurality of tents, beautifying God's house so that we become so attractive that we will hardly need to do any field service at all. For know this, a thing which was worked out by Massoud, the third mighty man, the greater Fortunatus/Achaicus (1 Corinthians 16:17) the firstfruits of Achia, the greater Crispus/Gaius (1 Corinthians 1:14) baptised by the angel Paul himself, on 1992Tammuz30, 250 days before 1993Nisan10, the start of the baptism of the other 218Nethinim, he and Tony are Solomon's princely deputies (2Chron 8:10, 1Kings 5:16) :

A really good restaurant does not have to advertise

If our food was any good, and if the price was reasonable, then we would not need to do any field service, our kingdom halls would be bursting at the seems, we would be double booked and we would have a waiting list, purely from recommendations. But right now we are trying to sell stale hamburgers at $50 a piece. What do you think that this scripture means all of you who believe that Jesus' only commandment is to preach the word, and that this is his only work for his people at this time? and that the field service is 'our work period'?:

Well, on getting out, he saw a great crowd, but he was moved with pity for them, because they were as sheep without a shepherd. And he started to teach them many things (Mark 6:34).

Here is a clue to the meaning: the 'great crowd' stands for the great crowd. These people do not need to do any more preaching, they desperately need someone to preach to them, and to teach them many things. For our brothers should not be hunted like animals, they should be home grown, reared like sons, they should be cultivated. I do not mean to belittle the great efforts in hunting that have been made, for Jacob liked Esau's food:

Isaac had love for Esau because it meant game in his mouth (Genesis 25:28).

But look! you will have to abandon your nets (Mark 1:18), because:

From now on you will be catching men alive (Luke 5:10),

alive judicially, alive in the spirit, we will baptise them in holy spirit, like Peter and Paul used to do. One of these things which the great crowd will have to be taught is that we are now able to declare the complete future history of the Watchtower Society in advance:

PRESIDENT START FINISH

Russell Chislev 1884 October 31, 1916

Rutherford January 6, 1917 January 8, 1942

Knorr January 13, 1942 June 8, 1977

Franz Tammuz 4, 1977 Chislev 22, 1992

Henschel Chislev 30, 1993 Shebat 10, 1994

Ritchie 1994 Tammuz19 2003Tishri

Benaiah 2003Tishri 2008Nisan

Brother Henschel, the angel of Sardis has a term of only 400 days as far as the true God is concerned, he being an Egyptian rather than a Jew, with a name that he is alive, i.e. one of the anointed remnant, judicially living, but in fact he was dead throughout this 400 days of affliction of the Jews, that was the congregation of Sardis. Gamaliel refers to this cryptically and to the subsequent bogus 6th watch of Judas saying:

For instance, before these days Theudas rose, saying he himself was somebody, and a number of men, about four hundred, joined his party. But he was done away with, and all those who were obeying him were dispersed and came to nothing. After him Judas the Galilean rose in the days of the registration, and he drew off people after him. And yet that man perished, and all those who were obeying him were scattered abroad (Acts 5:36,37).

Theudas is a very similar but not identical name to Thaddeus, who was Judas not the Iscariot, and the other conterfeit Christ was actually called Judas. Judas Iscariot himself is everywhere said to be 'one of the 12' (Matt 26:14, Matt 26:47, Mark 14:10, Mark 14:20, Mark 14:43, Luke 22:47). But there are 12 watches to spiritual Israel, the first 6 in the first century and the first 5 in the twentieth century, then finally Judas himself in the bogus 6th. So we can equate the 12 apostles to the 12 watches. And Judas not the Iscariot, Thaddeus, is standing for Milton, because the name is not quite right (c.f. Theudas and Thaddeus) and he is 'saying he himself is somebody', i.e. anointed, but was not. Whereas Judas the Galilean is standing for the true Judas who perishes and his supporters, 2000 swine, are scattered abroad. This is pretty cryptic, perhaps the reader won't accept it yet. Anyway the 400 men who followed Theudas are the 400 days of Milton's watch, before he was hamstrung in some way, and made into a puppet president.

God's view as I understand it is that the society is currently physically being run by another, one who hides his talent in the ground, for in the parable of the 5 and 2 and 1 talents, each talent is a watch of the watchtower Society, and when Jesus says:

Well done good and faithful slave (Matthew 25:21).

he is actually saying: Well done faithful and discreet slave (Matthew 24:45). And when he says:

Wicked and sluggish slave, you knew, did you, that I reaped where I did not sow and gathered where I did not winnow? (Matthew 25:26).

He is actually saying: Evil slave, you knew did you, that I reaped where I did not sow and gathered where I did not winnow (Matthew 24:48).

For these two are one and the same slaves. The extra talents that they earn or do not earn are the watches in the second presence, but it is not my purpose to go into this in this section, see section [15].

Tammuz 4, 1977 was June 22, 1977, the memorial in 1977 was on April 3. Please notice that the president of the 4th watch was inaugurated on the 4th day of the 4th month, this is not a coincidence. It means there will be 4 watches including his one, before the end. Just as the law covenant being concluded on the third day of the third month meant that there will be two further covenants, the covenant of Sarah, the new covenant, and the covenant of Keturah, the third wife of Abraham, the very new covenant. Just as the temple of Solomon being started on the second day of the second month, meant there would be two physical temples before the end of physical temples, and these were the temple of Solomon, and the temple of Zerubbabel.

With this perspective it is now possible to understand what John was saying to the 7 congregations. The reader can work this out for himself, or please read on.

[6] Ephesus

I hold this against you, that you have left the love you had at first (Rev 2:4).

This was the love which the whole society first had, the new love of getting to know God for the first time, like the love of every bible study.

I am coming to you and I will remove your lampstand from its place (Rev 2:5).

The FDS was 'born' at the sanctification of brother Russell in 1884Tishri (See 'Letter to the elders'), commissioned to build the second temple of the remnant in 1895Tishri, when the congregation of Ephesus began, at the start of the second half baptism of spiritual Israel and appointed as head over the body, the body of domestics, the body of Jesus, in 1914Tishri, after 30 years and started feeding the domestics and condemning Babylon on 1914Heshvan21 the first day of the 1260 days of prophesying in sackcloth (Rev 11:3). This was when Jesus came for 3.5 years, from 1914Tishri to 1918Nisan in the pattern for that time. The lampstand's place was to be over all belongings, this appointment occurred in 1918Nisan, but Russell was removed before then. This shows that the slave with Russell as head never became appointed over all Jesus' belongings because he left the love he had at first.

You cannot bear bad men, and you put those to the test who say they are apostles, but they are not, and you found them liars (Rev 2:2).

The bad men who said they were Jews, God's chosen people, but were not, were the clergy of Christendom, whom the beloved brother vociferously denounced, he proved them to be liars, like his predecessor John the baptist said to the Pharisees:

Do not presume to say to yourselves: As a father we have Abraham (Matthew 3:9).

In other words: do not say that you are a Jew. In particular these modern day non-jews were the Catholics who believe they come directly from the apostle Peter, and possess his authority, it is true they have authority, but it does not come from Peter. Amusingly enough Russell's authority was in the line from Peter, for Peter was the first president of FDS1, the first century administrator of the house of David on mount Zion. Whereas my authority is in the line form Paul, for he was the first president of FDS2, the first century administrator of the house of Jehovah on mount Moriah.

[7] Smyrna

The first and the last, who became dead and came to life again (Rev 2:8).

The death and resurrection in the Lord's day was in 1918Nisan, 33.5 years after brother Russell was anointed, through the 'two witnesses'. The Synagogue of Satan was Christendom, in particular the American church leaders, aided and abetted by the 4 apostates on the governing body who left the organisation after opposing Rutherford, in the battle that coincided with the appointment of the FDS, it's always a battle.

The blasphemy by those who say they are Jews, and yet they are not but are a synagogue of Satan (Rev 2:9).

The term 'Jew' is used to mean one of God's true people, i.e. one of Abraham's seed, i.e. a party to the Abrahamic covenant, i.e. having Abraham as a true father, i.e. being water baptised, i.e. being clean in the flesh, i.e. having one's sins in the past forgiven at any moment in time. This means being in the true congregation of the Christ, for membership of such is this baptism, and disfellowshipping is the breaking of this baptism. Some of the brothers of the governing body went to prison in this watch.

Look! the Devil will keep on throwing some of you into prison, that you may be fully put to the test (Rev 2:10).

[8] Pergamum

The throne of Satan is the UN, right next to the Watchtower, just across the East river. This juxtaposition started in this 3rd watch. Rockerfeller Junior donated 8.5 million dollars in 1946/7 and the building was completed in 1952. Brother Knorr was president from 1942 until 1977:

I know where you are dwelling, that is where the throne of Satan is...by your side where Satan is dwelling (Rev 2:13).

Unfortunately the fact that Satan dwells by their side is repeated, so there are two ways in which he dwells by their side. The first way is the physical position of the UN, the second is through Balaam, Balak, and Nicolaus, all teachers in the congregation for the scriptures say in the counsel to Pergamum and Thyatira:

You have those holding fast the teaching of Balaam (Rev 2:14).

You also have those holding fast the teaching of the sect of Nicolaus (Rev 2;15).

Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and misleads my slaves to commit fornication and to eat things sacrificed to idols (Rev 2:20).

All 3 of these warnings relate to those who teach. And the counsel is to the angel of the congregation, the head of those who teach, it therefore all applies to the FDS and the anointed remnant. Jezebel cannot be women in the congregation because women do not teach in the congregation. Jezebel is therefore a class of men who are the wife of the king of Israel. This is obviously the anointed remnant, who are promised in marriage to Jesus. Their/her fornication is a result of her posing as a prophetess, i.e. her calling herself the 'wide awake John class', a channel for God, a channel for the holy spirit, rather than a channel for food for men. By posing as a prophetess Jezebel dolls herself up to look more sexy, or spiritually attractive than God, in front of the remnant, therefore the slaves Franz and Henschel give their admiration to her, and they love her, whereas the first commandment is to love Jehovah.

In fact they love money (Balaam), prominence (Nicolaus) and their relatives and leaders (Jezebel) more than God, and they follow after these things rather than after God, and this is spiritual fornication, and in fact adultery given that they are covenanted to love God first. This counsel is not to Babylon, it is to anointed Christians, and it applies today.

Balaam, the one who loved money more than God is today the antetypical Judas Iscariot, who is the bogus, hidden counterfeit 6th president who is currently running the Society, the one in charge of the money box, the one who hid his talent in the ground, yes the wicked slave in the parable of the talents (Matthew 25) who is the evil slave of Matthew 24:48 in one application. Balak is Nicolaus who is brother Henschel, the king of the Moabites, relatives of the Jews but not Jews. He has the name that he is alive but was a dead president, being a member of the great crowd. Nicolaus was one of the 7 ministerial servants appointed in acts 6 to deliver food to tables because this was not convenient for the apostles since they wished to remain with the Word of God, who is Jesus. This 'word' is currently in heaven, and the apostles are remaining with him, and the 7 certified ministerial servants are the 7 stars in Jesus' right hand, the ones truly appointed to deliver food to tables at the proper time in the Lord's day:

It is not pleasing for us to leave the word of God to distribute [food] to tables (Acts 6:2).

Russell was Philip the evangeliser to the Samaritans, the second call, standing for the second half baptism of the spiritual Jews, and Nicolaus who is Henschel was the proselyte, a DIY Jew. The angel of the sixth congregation, Philadelphia, is Stephen.

The leaven of Pergamum progresses to corruption in Thyatira and death in Sardis. This is obviously a temporal progression. One bible describes the three churches of Pergamum, Thyatira and Sardis, as the compromising, the corrupt and the dead. This is the progression of sin, James puts it: desire then sin then death (James 1:14,15), its the same progression, a progression in time. Jezebel is currently dead in the flesh as we shall see.

Milton is the Egytpian whom I killed and later buried in the sand, by my two letters of 1994Adar17 and 1994Tammuz9 respectively. The sand is not such a bad place to be, for as such by the seashore are the seed of Abraham, the true seed. The Next guy who I spot fighting is Judas, the bogus 6th president, a Jew strugling with a Jew, I do not deal with him, God does.

[9] Thyatira

Kidneys remove waste material. They symbolise one's rejection of bad, not one's 'deepest thoughts' or one's 'innermost motivations' as the Watchtower propounds, the writer would respectfully suggest. This is a metabolic symbolism, a physiological symbolism. This counsel identifies the leaven as being the idolatry of Jezebel and in fact of all the high up one's in the organisation. This is the deep thing of Satan, idolatry of those in authority in the truth. The current worldwide increase, some 5%, in the last 'field service year' is fictitious because the whole congregation was disfellowshipped on 1994Adar13, at the start of the third Alienation times [See letter to the Elders section [6]], a thing that I am not proving here as regards the day, but we can certainly see that it occurs because Jesus says:

And her children I will kill with deadly plague, so that all congregations will know that I am he who searches the kidneys and hearts (Rev 2:23).

And Jezebel's permanent children are those of the great crowd who do not make it into the true 6th congregation of Philadelphia. But her tempoarary children are all of the great crowd, all of whom are disfellowshipped, i.e. killed by Jesus, in the bogus 6th watch. We have gone from 4.5 million to 5 million, and we will return to 4.5 million for the fifth watch has no increase, for all of the increases of all 7 watches are prophetically recorded in the bible see section [16]. Only 4.5 million make it into Philadelphia.

For at this time, although again I do not present the below as an accusation against the 9, all Jehovah's witnesses are not only unclean in the flesh, disfellowshipped by Jesus, but are also no longer Jews, no longer a party to the Abrahamic covenant. For any man baptised in water is a Jew, like John the Baptist, who was Elijah antetypically, who was actually Gabriel, said to the crowds coming to be baptised in water by him:

Therefore he began to say to the crowds coming out to be baptized by him: YOU offspring of vipers, who has intimated to YOU to flee from the coming wrath? Therefore produce fruits that befit repentance. And do not start saying within yourselves, 'As a father we have Abraham.' For I say to YOU that God has power to raise up children to Abraham from these stones (Luke 3:7,8).

Children to Abraham are created by water baptism which is the baptism into the name of the father, who is not God, but Abraham, this is membership of the Abrahamic covenant. The Jordan is the Euphrates in this symbolism. The Remnant in their arrogance and their ignorance have kept this knowledge from the flock. There were 4.5 million Jews in 1993, but now there are 5 million nobodies. The sin which has lead to this occurring is idolatry of the FDS, for we are no longer Christians, but we, like the Catholics, follow the priest, in our case the slave, rather than the master of that slave. We live by Papal decree, we have put our trust in mortals to whom no salvation belongs, it has been the blind following the blind and now we have all fallen into the ditch, in fact into the abyss. This is the fornication with Jezebel, the teacher, the wife of king Jesus, the remnant. Jesus says of Jezebel:

Look! I am throwing her into a sickbed (Revelation 2:22 KI/NWT).

He does not say: maybe I'll throw her into a sickbed. She is now in this bed, she became sick when my first letter arrived in 1992Elul, at this time her 70 years of land sabbath error which started in 1922Elul at Cedar point Ohio ended, and her false worship error started. These 70 years were the 70 sent out by Jesus, who prefigure the preaching campaign of FDS3 and the 12 sent out prefigure the preaching campaign of FDS4. This sickness ocurred in the 4th watch since it is counsel to this watch in the present tense. But the children are killed in the bogus 6th watch, since Jesus speaks of this death in the future tense to Thyatira, and so it must occur in Sardis or after.

Those who have good hearts but bad kidneys, are yes men, they cannot say no to bad. The congregations are full of such men. They can say no to physical fornication, but they cannot say no to spiritual fornication, they love the Watchtower more than the Bible, that is if they are even able to make a distinction between the two publications. They read the Bible only to confirm the doctrine of the Watchtower, whereas it should of course be the other way round. Of course they declare that they are reading the Watchtower to confirm the doctrine of the Bible, but they are liars. If they are put to the test and asked to follow the Bible, in the absence of any comment in the Watchtower they will not do it. And if they are following something in the Watchtower that conflicts with the Bible, they will keep on following the Watchtower not withstanding the Bible.

For the Catholics took the bible away from the eyes of the congregation by refusing to print it in English, but the Watchtower is more subtle, it puts the bible right in front of our eyes, but takes it away from our minds, by telling us that our minds will never grasp a new understanding from it, since only the remant can do this, Jezebel, the wife of the King, who 'calls herself' a prophetess. The remnant in fact call themselves a prophetess in their own book of Revelation:

He uses the John Class in unlocking the meaning of the prophecy ('Revelation book' page 16).

But they forget that whilst the FDS is exclusive over all of Jesus' belongings, interpretations do not belong to him, they belong to God, as Joseph said. And as Jesus said, when asked how a man who has not studied in the schools, has a knowledge of letters:

What I teach is not mine, but belongs to him that sent me (John 7:16).

But then Jesus says to the great crowd, Jezebel's temporary children whom she feeds and looks after, if that is the appropriate term:

I will give you individually according to your deeds (Rev 2:23).

So your master is here encouraging you, the reader, to consider your predicament, individually, not to ask the FDS what your predicament might be, they cannot save you, they are all in a sickbed.

[10] Sardis

Symbolism:

Angel of Sardis Milton

Outer garments Priestly garments

White outer garments Declared righteous

Defile outer garments Priests who commit disfellowshipping sin

Walk with me The true priesthood, as in first century

Things remaining Remnant

Have the name that you are alive but you are dead

Milton is a DIY Jew, he is not in the remnant

The thief in the night was Judas, he used to steal from congregation the money box. The one further fulfilment, the unique antetypical Judas, steals not money but something far more valuable, sanctified Christians, the Nethinim, all of whom are now sacntified, he also has stolen Milton's talent which Jesus himself gave him, for Milton had authority even though he was not sanctified (see section [15]). But Judas has usurped Henschel to take over this watch, by financial control, or perhaps by Nethinim control, this takeover occured between 1994Shebat10 and 1995Adar13. But Jesus comes as a thief to him and to Milton, and they do not know at what hour he comes upon them, the two sons of Eli. He takes away from Judas his hidden talent, his bogus watch. For he is an exacting man taking up what he did not sow, see section [15]. Milton is told to repent, and he will. Milton this is what Jesus says to you:

Become watchful and strengthen the things remaining that were ready to die (Revelation 3:3).

You will do this.

Certainly unless you wake up, I shall come as a thief, and you will not know at all at what hour I shall come upon you (Rev 3:3).

Look! I am coming as a thief, Happy is the one that stays awake and keeps his outer garments, that he may not walk naked and people look upon his shamefulness (Rev 16:15).

So for a fact Jesus does come as a thief, removing their priestly garments. Therefore for a fact they do not wake up, and they do not know at all what hour he comes on them. Therefore he comes in the physical 5th watch. In fact he has already come, and I am telling you after the event. He came to appoint FDS4 head over the Nethinim on 1994Nisan4, 30 months after my sanctification and he appointed us exclusivley over all of his belongings on 1994Tammuz21, on the third day, after 1994Tammuz19, when FDS3 fell, this being 3.5 months after Nisan4. His comings are always to appoint a new priesthood, this priesthood has been appointed exclusively since 1994Tammuz21. It was the practice in Zerubbabel's temple to strip the Levites who fell asleep on the watch, although this is not referred to in the bible, and was not a feature of the law. Its like Jesus said just before defining both FDSs:

Keep on the watch therefore because you do not know on what day your Lord is coming. But know one thing, if the householder had known in what watch the the was coming, he would have kept awake and not been broken into, on this account you too prove yourselves ready, because at an hour that you do not think to be it the Son of man is coming (Matthew 24:42,43).

This clearly says that those who are commanded to keep on the watch fail to see the coming of the Lord, who is the Son of man, and they did not know in what watch he was coming, since he comes at an hour they 'do not think to be it'. I did see him, but I was not the householder then, you were. If the Son of man has already come, then he is trying to commence the judging of the sheep and the goats.

The scriptures which prove the symbolism that outer garments are priestly attire and white outer garments means declared righteous are as follows:

With the following Aaron should come into the holy place: with a young bull for a sin offering and a ram for a burnt offering. He should put on the holy linen robe, and the linen drawers should come upon his flesh, and he should gird himself with the linen sash and wrap himself with the linen turban. They are holy garments. And he must bathe his flesh in water and put them on (Lev 16:3,4). White outer garments

And the priest who will be anointed and whose hand will be filled with power to act as priest as successor of his father, must make an atonement and must put on linen garments (Lev 16:34). Nice proof the priesthood went from Father to son.

Yes, it has been granted to her to be arrayed in bright, clean, fine linen, for the fine linen stands for the righteous acts of the holy ones (Rev 19:8).

Also the armies that were in heaven were following him on white horses, and they were clothed in white clean fine linen (Rev 19:14).

Furthermore Jesus himself says to Milton himself:

He that conquers will thus be arrayed in white outer garments, and I will by no means blot out his name from the book of life (Rev 3:5).

One get's a name when one is sanctified, like Moses said:

And now if you will pardon their sin, and if not, wipe me out please, from your book that you have written (Exodus 32:32).

If Jesus swears not to rub your name out, then you are permanently in the book, for God does everything thorugh Jesus. If this is the case then you have everlasting life, which means that you are sealed, declared righteous. So now we are able to see the big picture in the counsel to Sardis:

Nevertheless you do have a few names in Sardis that did not defile their outer garments, and they shall walk with me in white ones, because they are worthy (Rev 3:4).

This means they 'shall' become the priesthood, and they will be declared righteous. This cannot refer to the remnant because they are already declared righteous, their baptism finished in 1991Tishri, during Thyatira. So it refers to the Nethinim, who are sanctified but not sealed and not yet walking with Jesus, as his true priests during Sardis. But they do do this in Philadelphia, the next watch.

One further thing: I have not been doing any field service, or reading any Watchtowers or since 1993Tishri10 because the food of FDS3 became totally unclean, rejected by Jesus, on that day at the start of the third Exedenic times. Not that it became significantly less apetising than it had been for the last 100 years on that day, but it passed it's sell-by date then. In fact the FDS rejected the food that I was offering on that day as I understand it, banning my work, and Jesus responded by rejecting their food. Because it was time to start distributing my food, the food of Joseph. This uncleaness, partial uncleaness, corruption, leaven, of the food of FDS3 even before it was rejected, is witnessed to in the counsels to Pergamum and Thyatira:

Those holding fast the teaching of Balaam who went teaching Balak to put a stumbling block before the sons of Israel, to eat things sacrificed to idols (Rev 2:14).

Jezebel who calls herself a prophetess, and she teaches and misleads my slaves to commit fornication and to eat things sacrificed to idols (Rev 2:20).

There then follows a beautiful ommission symbolism for we read:

But she is not willing to repent of her fornication (Rev 2:21).

What about eating things sacrificed to idols? Well Freddie did repent of this, he accepted that there was merit to my work, and directed that it should be looked at. I know this, from various scriptures, and it has been confirmed to me.

Here is something more about Nicolaus who is Milton.

[11] Nicolaus

Nicolaus was the seventh ministerial servant of Acts 6:5. This Nicolaus is the only one in the bible, other than the one mentioned in Revelation. The Insight book (Nicolaus) makes the statement: 'There is no reason to connect the sect with Nicolaus the Antiochian Christian just because he is the only person of that name in the bible, as has also been done by some early church writers'. By saying this, the FDS is condemned by its own mouth, as having less faith than 'some early church writers' in the perfection of the holy book.

The mere fact that there is only one other reference to a 'Nicolaus' in the whole bible is the strongest evidence that this reference must shed some light on the sect, because the bible is a self-contained book and it has no 'loose ends' in it. Nicolaus was a proselyte from Antioch, i.e. he was not born a Jew, he made himself one! He was a DIY Jew! Antioch was when we first took the divinely determined name 'Christians', but with Milton, his name lacked this divine determination. 7 ministerial servants are the 7 watches. Russell was Philip, these were and will be searched out by the governing body, and be appointed by the resurrected first century apostles.

So brothers, search out for yourselves, 7 certified (being witnessed to) men from among you, full of spirit and wisdom, that we may appoint them over this necessary business (Acts 6:3).

[12] Philadelphia:

These are the things he says who is holy, who is true, who has the key of David, who opens so that no one will shut, and shuts so that no one opens. I know your deeds - Look! I have set before you an open door, which no one can shut - that you have a little power (Revelation 3:7,8).

The key to the house of David the the baptism of spiritual Israel, the door to this house was actually closed in 1955Tishri, and the sealing ended in 1991Tishri, the door to that temple is well and truly shut, and no one can open it. But the door to the house of Jehovah, opened by the key of Solomon, namely widsom, is now open and no one can shut it. And it is set before me and this is my power, like the hair of Samson, to baptise the great crowd. The whole society is disfellowshipped they can only be rewater-baptised by Elijah4. No one else can do this. Their salvation is wholly, totally and utterly dependent upon me, in the physical outworking.

My ex-girlfriend in the truth correctly worked out the date of Armageddon for herself based on 1 Timothy 2:6 'Who gave himself a corresponding ransom for all', Adam sinned aged 33.5, this being the start of Satan's 6,000 year lease, (he was born on 4027Tishri10) she was a clever girl, she got this before I did, she fed me in fact. She must be in the 'Wide awake John class'!

Actually the ransom was not a sinless man for a sinless man. Because the statement 'sinless' man has no weight unless one knows for how long this man actually resisted sin. We know that Jesus obeyed the law of Moses for 33.5 years, but I am sure that Richard Nixon, or Madonna could have obeying it for 5 seconds, would they then, had they been non-adamic, have been a corresponding ransom for Adam, I think not. Likewise how long does one have to stay under test before one is sinless? If the test has no time limit then it would last forever and so one would never pass it. Therefore a sinless man must have an associated time period of sinlessness.

Let us presume therefore that Adam was sinless for x years. Then the true God would require as a judicial penalty, the body of a non-adamic man who had been sinless for at least x years in order that this body could replace Adam's body and effect the ransom. But if the ransom is a corresponding one, then the bodies would correspond in sinlessness, and therefore the ransomer would also have been sinless for x years. Since the ransomer was sinless for 33.5 years, we deduce that the ransomee was sinless for this period as well and so Adam sinned in fact on 3993Nisan14, he was born on 4027Tishri10, I am not proving this here (see letter to the Elders). From this we deduce that the last day of this system is 2008Nisan14, and actually the first day of the new system is 2008Nisan16, for kingdom changes happen on the third day.

Adam's sin was the original passover, because he was a firstborn condemned to death, but the angel passed over him, and zapped his genes to make him ageing rather than killing him immediately. This passover, or stay of execution, is the basis of all of our lives. This is the fundamental importance of the passover, and this is why he sinned on Nisan14, or should I say, he sinned on Nisan14, and this is why the passover is then. 2008Nisan14, is 2008March21, the vernal equinox.

Sadly this girl would never admit to having done this now, because as the reader will know, when you first go out with a girl everything that you do is totally brilliant, and then when you finish with her everything that you ever did was absolute rubbish, until such time as you go out with her again that is. Actually her father has had six incorrect attempts so far at the date he told me - a serious speculator. Anyway she once told me about a chap who was disfellowshipped because he thought that Isaiah 22 and the removing of Shebna from being the steward over the house, and his replacement with the servant Eliakim, referred to the fall of the FDS and its replacement with a new FDS.

He was speading this doctrine among the congregation. In fact even if he had been wrong, this still would not have been a sin, so long as he wasn't spreading this doctrine outside the congregation. He is entitled to his opinion, and he is entitled to share it with his baptised brothers. But he should not preach it to non-believers as if it was the society's doctrine, and neither should he attempt to woo outsiders with his personal brilliance. So he should not have been disfellowshipped even had he been wrong, unless he was using this prophecy to incorrectly undermine the authority of the FDS at that particular time, thereby constituting himself leaven, he may well have been doing that I do not know. I suspect he was merely acting as a prophet of the eventual downfall of the FDS, and like their forefathers did to the prophets of old, the spiritual Jews killed him. But as it happens he was absolutely right! For the scripture which says:

And I will clothe him with your robe, and your sash I shall firmly bind about him, and your dominion I shall give into his hand, and he must become a father to the inhabitant of Jerusalem and to the house of Judah. And I will put the key of the house of David [no less] upon his shoulder,

and he must open without anyone's shutting, and he must shut without anyone's opening (Isaiah 22:21,22).

who has the key of David, who opens so that no one will shut, and shuts so that no one opens (Rev 3:7).

The comparison of Isaiah22 with Revelation3 reveals that Eliakim is the president of Philadelphia. So today you are being told that God has extracted vengeance on behalf of that perspicacious lover of the truth, who was thorwn out of 'the truth' by hypocrites. And now those who disfellowshipped him whether in error or not, are themselves disfellowshipped, and there is no error in their case. He is welcome in the congregation of Philadelphia, which will be known as 'the life' and so is my ex-girlfriend for that matter and her speculating father, and the reader. Furthermore, I have got the key to your temple on my shoulder! What do you think that could mean my brothers in the spirit??

But there is more:

Look! I will give those from the synagogue of Satan who say they are Jews and yet are not but are lying - Look! I will make them come and do obeisance at your feet, and make them know that I have loved you (Rev 3:9).

I have always wished that this last phrase was in the present tense. Just like the true God said through Malachi:

But I loved Jacob and Esau I have hated (Malachi 1:2,3)

Actually this although it is distressing to me, is wonderful for the remnant, because though he hates you today, and he can, he is God, he will love you again, because this is in the past tense. And though he has loved me, I guess his love cools off when I become the president. This can only be because my love for him cools of at that time. Brothers, you, for the most part, and I are declared righteous. Our prayers have much force, please pray for me, as I pray for you. I feel it you know, this love, do you? I know you do. When I leave him, then I feel him having left me, and then when I come back to him, I am happy, for no apparent reason. When I really leave him my stomach churns and churns and I can't concentrate. It's like being love sick. Thank God for my stomach! Look! this love is bigger and better than the presidency of the Watchtower, for a fact. It conquers all fear. Now Jacob met Esau after he had crossed the river, the Jabbok, so come on brothers, I want to see your face like the face of God (Gen 33:10), before you see my face like the face of an angel (Acts 6:15).

You spiritual Jews are no longer Jews, just like the physical Jews. You ceased being Jews on 1994Heshvan8, when the call went out to all the world to be baptised in Jesus' blood, a call which you failed to make public. This was on the 4th day after 1994Heshvan4, which is the end of the week of months from 1994Nisan4 to 1994Heshvan4, at the mid-point of which on 1994Tammuz19, FDS3 was cut in two and on 1994Tammuz21 FDS4 was appointed by Jesus over all his belongings. 1994Heshvan8 was the start of the third Gentile times, a malediction which ended 7 months later, in fact on 1995Sivan29, when FDS4 took over from a food point of view, this being the start of the 100 months of authority of Cornelius, who is the 6th president. Its like Paul said:

For he is not a Jew who is one on the outside, nor is circumcision that which is on the outside upon the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one on the inside, and [his] circumcision is that of the heart by spirit, and not by a written code. The praise of that one comes, not from men, but from God (Romans 2:28,29).

When the call went out to the whole world to be baptised into FDS4 by Elijah4, then the water baptism of FDS3 and Elijah3 became void, and the witnesses were no longer disfellowshipped sons of Abraham, or unclean or dead sons, they were now not even sons. They are dead ex-sons. The remnant for the most part are sons of God, even declared righteous, but they are not sons of Abraham, they are therefore not Jews, they are a synagogue of Satan, as was the case with the members of Babylon the great. The reader may by now see that a Jew is any man who is a son of Abraham and it fact all witnesses baptised in water before 1994Adar13, have been Jews. Our understanding of the scripture in Zechariah 8:23, is correct for spiritual Israel were Jews, but so were what we call the great crowd.

[13] The 7 seals of Revelation

Once the reader realises that all the sevens in the book of Revelation are temporally succesive and that angels can be presidents of the Watchtower then the book starts to fall apart, and the 7 seals are broken. In Revelation14, the 6 successive angels from verses 6 to 18, are the first 6 presidents. In Revelation16, the 7 angels are 7 years of plenty under the 6th angel, from 1994Elul to 2001Elul, I think, hence the 'bowls of anger' who ever heard of anger being in a bowl? So this is the meaning of Revelation 5:

And I saw in the right hand of the one seated upon the throne a scroll written within and on the reverse side, sealed tight with 7 seals (Rev 5:1).

The 7 seals are the sealed up true meaning of the number 7 in the book of Revelation, as exposed above, written on the reverse side and within, i.e. coded, just like the ten commandments, written on both sides. Therefore the study question for the reader is:

Who is worthy to open the scroll and loose its seals? (Rev 5:2).

[14] 7 Possible FDS presidents of the first century

That is what YOU have learned from Epaphras our beloved fellow slave, who is a faithful minister of the Christ on our behalf (Coll 1:7).

All my affairs Tychicus, [my] beloved brother and faithful minister and fellow slave in [the] Lord, will make known to YOU (Coll 4:7).

Epaphras, who is from among YOU, a slave of Christ Jesus, sends YOU his greetings, always exerting himself in YOUR behalf in [his] prayers, that YOU may finally stand complete and with firm conviction in all the will of God (Coll 4:12).

Paul, a slave of God and an apostle of Jesus Christ according to the faith of God's chosen ones and the accurate knowledge of the truth which accords with godly devotion (Titus 1:1).

James, a slave of God and of [the] Lord Jesus Christ, to the twelve tribes that are scattered about: Greetings! (James 1:1).

Simon Peter, a slave and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who have obtained a faith, held in equal privilege with ours, by the righteousness of our God and [the] Savior Jesus Christ (2 Peter 1:1).

Jude, a slave of Jesus Christ, but a brother of James, to the called ones who are loved in relationship with God [the] Father and preserved for Jesus Christ (Jude 1).

A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John (Rev 1:1).

Paul, Peter, James, Jude, Epaphras, Tychicus, John, the only 7 men said to be slaves of God or of Jesus, in the new testament...hmmm.

[15] Matthew 25: The parable of the slaves given the talents

For it is just as when a man about to travel abroad, summoned slaves of his and committed to them his belongings (Matthew 25:14).

The man is Jesus. His belongings here in Matthew chapter 25 are the same belongings which are referred to as 'all his belongings' in Matthew chapter 24. How we haven't seen this before I really do not know, it is not difficult to grasp is it? Likewise the 'slaves' in the plural in this account who are described as 'good and faithful' in Matthew 25 are none other than the various constituents of the slave who is described as 'faithful and discreet' in Matthew 24, again this can hardly be described as a giant leap of abstract symbolic agility. Furthermore the slave who is described as 'wicked and sluggish' in Matthew 25 is none other than the slave who is described as 'evil' in Matthew 24. This sort of thing is I believe referred to in Watchtower parlance as a 'blinding flash of spiritual light emblazening the theocratic firmament', masters of the well crafted understatement. So here is the symbolism as I understand it today:

Man who travels abroad Jesus going to heaven

Slaves FDS1,2,3,4

Slaves summoned Appointed to feed at proper time

Belongings commited to them Appointed over all his belongings

5 talents given to 1st slave 5 watches of FDS1, spiritual Israel

2 talents given to 2nd slave 2 watches of FDS2, spiritual Rome

1 talent given to wicked and sluggish slave

Authorised 6th watch, 1st presence

Unauthorised 6th watch, 2nd pres.

5 talents gained by 1st slave 5 watches of FDS3, spiritual Israel

2 talents gained by 2nd slave 2 watches of FDS4, spiritual Rome

Silver monies Nethinim - worth less than the gold monies of spiritual

Israel

Silver money hidden in ground Nethinim hidden by the wicked slave

Talent hidden in the ground 6th watch is authorised but hidden, in 1st presence, and

unauthorised and stealth in the 2nd presence since no

extra talent is earned. Judas the thief steals Milton's

talent

Reaping where you did not sow Removing unsanctified bogus 6th president in first

presence

Gathering where you did not winnow Removing unsealed bogus 6th president in 2nd presence

Sowing Baptism into the name of the son

Winnowing Baptism into the name of the holy spirit, i.e. sealing,

righteous decree

Him that has 10 talents Spiritual Israel

Bankers Congregation overseers, elders bethelites etc.

Deposit silver monies with bankers Let overseers know that the baptism of the Nethinim is

accepted

Interest New ones baptised by Nethinim, The baptism of the

great crowd

The change in slaves is a temple cleansing, such things are the occassion of a coming of the Christ, the Son of man, he therefore comes in the fifth watch. For he came twice to the temple during his physical presence to overthrow the tables of the money lenders and he comes twice to the temple of his own body, the remnant, during his second presence, once to appoint FDS3 and once to appoint FDS4. He is trying to effect the judgement between the sheep and goats referred to in the recent Watchtower, leading to everlasting life for the great crowd in this system, and you are preventing him from doing it, so he is getting no interest right now, for interest is sanctified brothers.

So spiritual Israel take the blame for the wicked and sluggish slave, who is actually two slaves, the wicked slave and the sluggish slave, by distributive symbolism (see ref:[2]). Just as the 'good and faithful' slave it actually the good slave and the faithful slave by distributive symbolism. On eslave in each presence. The first century 6th watch is more sluggish than wicked, it does not effect a betrayal, Judas not the Iscariot, whereas the 20th century bogus 6th watch is more wicked than sluggish, it does effect a betrayal, Judas Iscariot. Because the slave with 5 talents does not get the wicked slave's talent, but the slave with 10 talents gets it. Of course in the account this is the same slave, but the symbolic meaning is that the 10th official watch of spiritual Israel, which is the 5th watch in the second presence the second Sardis, the watch of which Milton was the angel, gets has a talent hidden in it, and therefore becomes a puppet watch:

Take away the talent from him and give it to him that has 10 talents. For to everyone that has, more will be given, and he will have abundance, but as for him that does not have, even what he has will be taken away from him (Matthew 25:28,29).

At first sight this looks like rubbish, how can you take 'what he has' from a man who 'does not have'? We can solve this dilemma, by recognising that there must be an ambiguity of ownership going on. There is a 'having' in the sense of being the rightful owner, and there is a 'having' in the sense of having actual possession. The resolution is to recognise that a theft of a talent has occurred. As regards 'the one that received the one talent' (Matthew 25:24), this does not have to be the first century wicked and sluggish slave, because he was the only wicked slave to be given a talent, but he was not the only wicked slave to receive a talent, since the twentieth century wicked slave stole his talent from the previous watch, receiving it without being given it. Because the wicked slave with one talent did not earn an extra talent, so the bogus 6th watch in the second presence is unauthorised, having no talent of its own, so the talent that this wicked slave operates under must be stolen.

The 20th century wicked slave would therefore actually be the one that 'has' something that he does not 'have'/own. So his stolen talent is removed and returned to the rightful owner, the slave which has/owns 10 talents. The first century wicked slave had something that he did have/own, as so is ruled out of verse 29.

Milton, the 5th president wasn't sown by Jesus although this is not witnessed to in this account, he was the 5th talent gained by the first slave, it is witnessed to in Luke 19, the parable of the Minas. Judas, the bogus 6th president in the second presence, wasn't winnowed by Jesus, sealed, and his counterpart in the first presence wasn't sanctified. As shown above, the wicked slave with one talent did not earn an extra talent, so the bogus 6th watch is unauthorised in this presence. You 10 men have no authority to shepherd God's people, FDS4 is appointed to do that right now, with the 2 talents earned by the good and faithful slave who was given 2 talents in the first century.

The farming process is to sow and then harvest and then winnow. The baptism process is to sanctify and then judge and then seal. Isaiah explains:

You will tread down the mountains and crush them, and the hills you will make just like the chaff. You will winnow them and a wind itself will carry them away (Isaiah 41:15,16).

This wind is the holy spirit, the chaff is those who sin against it, breaking their blood baptism, they are carried away to Gehenna. Incidentally the reaping where he did not sow and gathering where he did not winnow is repeated and so has a second meaning, which is that brothers who are not a part of Jesus' body will sow, i.e. sanctify so that Jesus reaps, and also seal, wow! we must do this at Armageddon. Listen you Nethinim, you are all resurrected as angels half way through Armageddon with me, before we become perfect humans on 2009Nisan24, at the end of the greater flood, 370 days long like the first one. Looks like we will not only spectate, but also participate by sealing the great crowd.

An understanding of this parable and of the counsel to the congregations and of Matthew 24, is sufficient to show that FDS3 is to be replaced with FDS4, who have the 6th and 7th watches. Look! here are the 5 loaves of the bread partakers of spiritual Israel, and the 2 fishes of the wine drinkers who survive the greater flood, like the fishes did in Noah's day, the great crowd, in the administration of spiritual Rome.

So now we can understand the first verse of the book of Revelation:

A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place (Revelation 1:1).

Two FDSs.

[16] Luke 19: The 10 slaves the 10 minas and the 10 cities

This account is only about the 10 watches and congregations of spiritual Israel, 5 in each presence, because the master said:

Do business till I come (Luke 19:13).

And he comes to appoint the second slave in each presence. This proves that he comes to end the business of each slave, and that each business only lasts for 5 watches. So Jesus comes either in the 5th watch or after it should have ended but whilst it is still doing business. This is also apparent from the fact that advice to watch out for Jesus' coming ceases in the counsel to Sardis.

The symbolism is:

10 Slaves 10 presidents of the first 5 watches in both presences, of

FDS1 and FDS3

10 Minas 10 congregations of FDS1 & FDS3

Mina Congregation unit

First slave Peter

10 minas gained (inclusive) 10 fold increase in first watch, 3k to 30k

[proshrgasato, worked itself towards]

10 cities 10 watches, admins, of FDS1 & FDS3

Well done good slave Peter was 1st president of FDS1

Second slave Russell

5 minas made (inclusive) 5 fold increase in Russell's watch

[epoihsen, made] 2,250 in 1895Tishri to 11,250 in 1916

5 Cities 5 watches of FDS3

No 'well done good slave' FDS3 was appointed after Russell died

Different one Henschel, not sanctified

Cloth [Soudarion] Garment of death, Lazarus and Jesus

Called wicked slave Henschel is puppet head of evil slave

No increase 4.5 million at start of 5th watch and at the end of the bogus

6th watch

Take up what did not deposit Remove talent from bogus 6th watch which took over the

Watchtower without Jesus' authority in the second presence

Reap what did not sow Remove unsanctified Henschel

Do business till I come Jesus comes in 5th watch, both presences At the end of the

legitimate business of FDS1 & FDS3 respectively

The theme for both the FDSs of spiritual Israel appears to be that the first watch has a multiplicative increase equal to the total number of watches under authority of each FDS. We are taking FDS3 to be under the authority of FDS1, which they were from a baptism point of view, because FDS1 in heaven was sanctifying and sealing FDS3 upto the 4th watch. So FDS1 has authority over 10 watches, due to a ten times increase during its first watch, and FDS3 has authority over 5 watches due to a 5 times increase in its first watch. The 5th watch of FDS3 having no increase has no further watch afterwards. Very straightforward, but more prophetic than judicial I would suggest. The increases under the first 6 watches of the Lord's day are recorded in Numbers 11 when God says, referring to the feeding program, which you are trying to destroy:

You will eat not 1 day, nor 2 days, nor 5 days nor 10 days nor 20 days, but up to a month of days, until it comes out of your nostrils (Numbers 11:19,20).

Start 2,250 1895Tishri

Russell 5x 11,250 1916

Rutherford 10x 112,500 1942

Knorr 20x 2,250,000 1977

Franz 2x 4,500,000 1992

Henschel 1x 4,500,000 1996

Ritchie 30x 135,000,000 2003

Lord here is your mina, that I kept laid away in a cloth (Luke 19:20).

This cloth [Soudarion] is the burial clothing of Lazarus and Jesus, and represents disfellowshipping. The mina of the 5th watch, the 5th congregation, is disfellowshipped, dressed up in a death sheet.

So the big picture is:

FDS1 watch 1 OK

FDS1 watch 2 OK

FDS1 watch 3 OK

FDS1 watch 4 OK

FDS1 watch 5 OK

Sluggish slave Appointed, but president not sanctified, does nothing

FDS2 watch 6 OK

FDS2 watch 7 OK

FDS3 watch 1 OK

FDS3 watch 2 OK

FDS3 watch 3 OK

FDS3 watch 4 Demonised but OK

FDS3 watch 5 Demonised, disfellowshipped, president not sanctified

Wicked slave Not appointed, president sanctified & not sealed, Judas

FDS4 watch 6 OK

FDS4 watch 7 Luke warm and vommited out but OK

Finally we have the further meanings of taking up what he did not deposit and reaping what he did not sow. The taking up may refer to the Zilpah baptism in the Apostate times, where Christians were baptised in holy spirit by angels even though they were not in true congregations, i.e. there was no appointed watch for them, no wall round Jerusalem, no Elijah instigated water baptism. The reaping where he did not sow, for a further meaning over and above the extra meaning of Matthew 25 has got me beat.

We end on a good note for Milton. Matthew, referring to Judas has:

Throw the good for nothing slave out into the darkness outside (Matt 25:30).

But Luke does not say that the 'different one' should be thrown out, he says, referring to the body of ambassadors:

These enemies of mine that did not want me to become king over them, bring here and slaughter them before me (Luke 19:27).

For the Ambassadors said:

We do not want this [man] to become king over us (Luke 19:14).

For a fact you do not want me to be king over you. May I suggest to each one of you individually and to Milton in particular, that you recognise this desire as sinful, and against the desire of our Lord, and you kill it, because in rejecting me you are rejecting Jesus, the one who has sent me forth to you. For he has chosen me not only to teach you, and feed you, but also to rule over you and more. And as regards your current puppet president, Milton, Jesus judges him out of his own mouth, which says:

You reap what you did not sow (Luke 19:21).

So he was not sown. This and the counsel to Sardis, and the fact that Nicolaus was a proselyte and the account of Moses killing the Egyptian who was struggling with the Jew and burying him in the sand, are four witnesses in support of my revised accusation made on 1994Tammuz9, that Milton was not sanctified. Like I said, I suspect that rather than the holy spirit bearing witness with his spirit that he is sanctified, it has born witness with my spirit that he is not. Know this, a dead man cannot declare judgement on a living man, and an unsanctified man cannot declare any judgement to do with sanctification, by the dirty water principle (one cannot clean dishes with dirty water - a priest conferring or indeed removing a cleanliness must himself posses this cleanliness). If Milton is not sanctified, then the holy spirit has truly revealed this to me, and therefore I am sanctified. Not that any further proofs of that are required (see Letter to the Elders), for the Scripture which says:

You are my son, I, today, I have become your father (Psalms 2:7)

Which is recited by Paul also in Hebrews 1:5, and Hebrews 5:5, refers not only to Jesus, has a further fulfilment, referring also to Paul and to me, because I know upon what day I was sanctified, it was 1991Tishri17. Which one of you angels knows 'his day'?? But like Jesus said:

If I am not doing the works of my Father, do not believe me. But if I am doing them, even though YOU do not believe me, believe the works, in order that YOU may come to know and may continue knowing that the Father is in union with me and I am in union with the Father (John 10:37,38).

[17] 2 Temple cleansings per presence

There were only two temple cleansings physically carried out by Jesus in his first physical presence. The first temple cleansing of Jesus was in 30Nisan:

Now the Passover of the Jews was near, and Jesus went up to Jerusalem. And he found in the temple, those selling cattle and sheep and doves and the money brokers in their seats. So after making a whip of ropes, he drove all those with the sheep and the cattle out of the temple, and he poured out the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables. And he said to those selling doves: Take these things away from here! Stop making the house of my father a house of merchandise! (John 2:13-16).

The second temple cleansing was on 33Nisan10, which carries with it the cave of robbers accusation, i.e. hidden theft, financial or sanctificational Bethelgate.

And he entered into the temple and started to throw out those who were selling, saying to them: It is written: And my house will be a house of prayer, but you have made it a cave of robbers (Luke 19:45,46).

Now they came to Jerusalem. There he entered into the temple and started to throw out those selling and buying in the temple, and he overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves and he would not let anyone carry a utensil through the temple, but he kept teaching and saying: Is it not written: My house will be called a house of prayer for all the nations? But you have made it a cave of robbers (Mark 11:15-17).

And Jesus entered into the temple and threw out all those selling and buying in the temple, and overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves. And he said to them: It is written: My house will be called a house of prayer, but you are making it a cave of robbers (Matt 22:12,13).

I am not going fully to interpret these scriptures here. It suffices to point out that just as there were 2 visits to the temple of stone to cleanse it from defilement in the visible presence, so there are also 2 visits to the temple of living stones to cleanse it from defilement in each invisible presence. The first invisible presence was from 2TishriBCE to 119ElulCE, although the first 33.5 years were visible in this one. The second presence is the presence of his body members, from 1884Tishri to 2004Elul. In a sense these are both visible presences too, because one can see the remnant, they are visible. A temple cleansing is a removal of an old priesthood and an inauguration of a new priesthood. These were the fall of the physical Jewish priesthood and then the fall of FDS1 in the first century presence. And they were the fall of Babylon and then FDS3 in this presence.

[18] Revelation 11, Zechariah 4 & Revelation 17: The two witnesses

And when they have finished their witnessing [not prophesying but witnessing], the wild beast that ascends out of the abyss will:

make war with them

and conquer them

and kill them (Revelation 11:7)

An alarm bell is ringing, this wild beast has ascended out of the abyss, and the only beast that we are so far aware of to do this is the bible is the scarlet coloured wild beast of Revelation 17:

The wild beast that you saw, was, but is not, and yet is about to ascend out of the abyss and it is to go off into destruction (Revelation17:8).

In what was later billed as a brilliant flash of spiritual light that emblazened the theocratic firmament, brother Knorr, or his research people, realised that this wild beast was the League of nations and that it would be reformed, and they realised this in 1942, which implied that the allies would win the war, since Hitler was not in favour of power sharing.

But if this wild beast that ascends out of the abyss in Revelation 11:7 is the scarlet one of Revelation 17, and if it did so in 1945, and is the UN, then we would have lost the fulfilment to Revelation11 that occurred at the fall of Babylon, since the killing of the two witnesses would have to have occurred in 1918, 33 years before the existence of the murderer. For the league of Nations does not ascend out of the abyss, it descends into the abyss, into non-existence, into death. It is the UN that ascends out of it. So the beast cannot be the League of Nations, it can only be the UN, if it is either of them. And in any event neither was the League of Nations in existence at the fall of Babylon, in 1918Nisan.

Now the society has the wild beast that ascends out of the Abyss in Revelation 11 as the wild beast of Revelation13 which ascends out of the sea. It uses the argument that basically there are abysses in the sea, and that the Hebrew word for Abyss is often translated 'watery deep'. But Revelation is written in Greek, not Hebrew, and the book clearly defines three wild beasts, one that ascends out of the sea, one that ascends out of the earth and one that ascends out of the abyss. And if every letter of this book means something, then surely every phrase also means something, and so the wild beast that is said to ascend out of the abyss, does actually do this, rather than ascending out of the sea. Therefore the wild beast being referred to in Revelation11 is the world power wild beast, the one that ascends out of the sea, for it too goes into the abyss for a while in the time of its 6th head as we shall see (section [24] on Revelation13), and then ascends out of it. The abyss for this wild beast was its death due to the binding of Satan the dragon for 1000 years, which we look at in section [22]. Also the killing of the two witnesses occurs not after the 1260 days of prophesying, or when they have finished their prophesying, but 'when they have finished their witnessing' (Rev 11:7). With this understanding the beast could be the reformed UN, but it is not as we shall see.

However the 360 day period from 1918Nisan14 until the grant of bail, which I had believed was the change in times and law of Daniel 7, but now do not, is causing me problems right now, Revelation 11 does not appear to relate to this period because the 2 witnesses are killed not at the end of their prophesying but at the end of their witnessing. The look up table for Revelation11 is as follows:

Reed Baptism measuring device

Rod Authority of one who measures, head of FDS4

Temple sanctuary House of David, heavenly temple

The altar Sanctuary of house of Jehovah, earthly temple

Those worshipping in it Nethinim at the altar, spiritual Israel in sanctuary

Measure Length of baptisms

Sanctuary courtyard Great crowd

Not measured Baptism of those sanctified from 2001Nisan onwards continues

into the new system, they have washed robes but not made

white

42 months of trampling 1914Tishri to 1918Nisan

Two witnesses: olive trees FDS3 is the right hand olive tree

FDS4 is the left hand olive tree

Two witnesses: lampstands Congregation of FDS3

Congregation of FDS4

Olive oil Jesus' blood, baptism with holy spirit

Olive tree Food from anointed Christians

Lampstand Congregation throughout the Lord's day

1260 days FDS3: 1914Heshvan26 to 1918Iyyar25 inc

FDS4: 1992Elul14 to 1996Adar14

Shutting up heaven so that rain does not moisten:

Elijah3 (Russell), could stop help from holy spirit for Babylon

Elijah4 (Ritchie), can stop help from the holy spirit for FDS3

Authority to turn water into blood:

FDS3: water baptised members of the congregation of FDS3

all became blood baptised in the early days upto 1992Elul

FDS4: Water baptised brothers will be blood baptised on

entrance to FDS4, if they are old enough

Great city where their Lord was also impaled:

Jerusalem

Sodom FDS3, spiritual fornicators

Egypt FDS4, initially Egyptians in FDS3

Wild beast for FDS3&FDS4 World power wild beast of Rev13

Abyss for above wild beast Death of beast due to binding of Satan for 1000 years from

around 650CE to around 1650CE

Finish of witnessing FDS3: 1994Shebat10, end of Sardis, judicially

Finish of witnessing FDS4: 2004Tishri15, start of Great tribulation

Earth 'strike the earth' Food administration for God's people

Earth is: Babylon for FDS3 as witness FDS3 for FDS4 as witness

Since 'their Lord was also impaled' in the great city of Jerusalem (Rev 11:8), it is apparent that both witnesses are likewise impaled. It is also apparent that Jerusalem is being called Sodom and Egypt 'in a spiritual sense' (Rev 11:8).

The point is that there are two congregations of anointed and other Christians in the Lord's day, here symbolised by two lampstands. And there are two FDSs here symbolised by two trees. There are two baptisms in holy spirit, one associated with each lampstand and tree. As regards the Gentile times, Luke says:

Jerusalem will be trampled upon by the nations until the appointed times of the nations are fulfilled (Luke 21:24).

This statement actually refers to physical Jerusalem, in the literal meaning because it was this Jerusalem that was surrounded by encamped armies in fulfilment of Luke21:20. The FDS was not appointed to feed/rule as new earthly Jerusalem that could be trampled upon by nations until 1914Tishri, which was at the time that the Gentile times ended. Although the city had a wall from 1884Tishri onwards, (the water baptism of Russell), and a gate, the continuation of the second half baptism of the remnant from 1895Tishri onwards. Heavenly Jerusalem cannot be trampled upon by any earthly nations. So I suppose one could argue that the new earthly city was trampled upon by the nations from the erection of its wall in 1884Tishri until 1914Tishri. But certainly in the literal meaning Luke 21:24 was a prohibition on the physical city, that was of course fulfilled. The strong angel says referring to the nations:

And they will trample the holy city underfoot 42 months (Rev 11:2).

This period is consecutive to the Gentile times, running from 1914Tishri to 1918Nisan. This 42 months is fulfilled upon FDS3 the new Jerusalem, who became the administrative head of God's people, in 1914Tishri.

[19] Zechariah 4:

I have seen and look! there is a lampstand, all of it gold, with a bowl on top of it. And 7 lamps upon it, even 7, and the lamps that are at the top of it have 7 pipes/channels. And there are 2 olive trees, one on the right side of the bowl and one its left side (Zechariah 4:2,3)

What are the two branches [Benjamin Davidson Hebrew & Chaldee Lexicon], of the olive trees that by means of the two golden tubes are pouring forth from within themselves the golden [liquid] ? (Zechariah 4:12)

The answer given: 'These are the two anointed ones that are standing alongside the lord of the whole earth' (Zech 4:14), is not the answer to the question in verse 12, but is given in response to the earlier question: 'What do the two olive trees on the right side of the lampstand and on its left mean (Zech 4:11). This is the symbolism

Lampstand Entire Christian congregation in either presence

7 lamps, even 7 7 congregations in each presence

bowl It feeds

RHS olive tree FDS1/3 in presences 1/2

LHS olive tree FDS2/4 in presences 1/2

7 pipes 7 watches of each presence, All 7 congregations are fed from

the two trees in the exclusive FDS food channel arrangement,

we all know and love

Bowl Food

2 golden tubes pouring The last 2 watches can baptise with holy spirit

from within themselves. themselves

This is the big picture. First of all there are two FDSs, the two trees, for each lampstand. They are both anointed, since they are both olive trees, they are either side of Jesus. Secondly there are 7 watches in each presence, 7 presidents of the Watchtower Society, in this presence. Thirdly two of these watches can baptise in holy spirit, the golden liquid, 'from within themselves' (Zech 4:12). This is the ability of 'the life' the congregation after 'the truth' to baptise like Peter used to do, this is why we are called 'the life', currently 'the truth' has become 'the death', in addition to becoming 'the lie', like Paul said:

And turned the glory of the incorruptible God into something like the image of corruptible man and of birds and four-footed creatures and creeping things. Therefore God, in keeping with the desires of their hearts, gave them up to uncleanness, that their bodies might be dishonored among them, even those who exchanged the truth of God for the lie and venerated and rendered sacred service to the creation rather than the One who created, who is blessed forever. Amen (Romans 1:23-25).

You are worshipping yourselves. The four-footed creatures etc. are the contents of the Peter's vision in Acts 10, and represent the anointed who are the birds, the Nethinim who are the four footed fast runners, the great crowd who are the creepers, but they all move and are all sanctified in this system. It's like Stephen said before they stoned him:

So God turned and handed them over to render sacred service to the army of heaven, just as it is written in the book of the prophets, 'It was not to me that YOU offered victims and sacrifices for forty years in the wilderness, was it, Oh house of Israel? (Acts 7:42).

You are the army of heaven, you will fight the big battle to come, but before you do this there is another battle that you will fight. And this battle you fight on the wrong side. You ten kings on the governing body will fight against the lamb. Because you are worshipping each other, in fact you are worshipping yourselves, which is what Satan does. I think that masturbation is probably more appropriate than fornication as a metaphor for that sort of idolatry, but masturbation was not a sin under law, contrary to popular opinion. Gamaliel too has warned you in Acts 5, first there were 400 following after Theudas whose names is not quite Thaddeus who was Judas but not the Iscariot:

Saying he himself was somebody (Acts 5:36).

When of course he wasn't, just like Milton, who had power for 400 days from 1992Chislev30 to 1994Shebat10, and said that he had a name which he did not have, he being a DIY Jew. But then Judas the Galilean rose, he is the current hidden head, the bogus 6th president of stealth, and this is the advice to you 10 from the father of Paul, whom you do not know:

Do not meddle with these men, but let them alone, because if this scheme or this work is from men, it will be overthrown, but if it is from God you will not be able to overthrow them, otherwise you may perhaps be found fighters actually against God (Acts 5:38,39).

There are two fulfilments to this, the scheme and the work, one in each presence.

[20] Revelation 17:

The purpose of this account is to compare spiritual fornication in Babylon the Great, outside the true congregation, to the same practice inside the true congregation. It's like the second angel, who was Rutherford, said:

She has fallen! Babylon the Great has fallen! (Revelation 14:8).

She has fallen! Babylon the Great has fallen! (Revelation 18:2)

Two falls, one of the Babylon without, Babylon the Great, and the other is of Jezebel, the Babylon within, for she too is a harlot, like the scripture says:

At that he raised his face toward the window and said: "Who is with me? Who?" Immediately two or three court officials looked down at him. So he said: "Let her drop!" Then they let her drop, and some of her blood went spattering upon the wall and upon the horses; and he now trampled upon her (2 Kings 9:32,33).

Jezebel has fallen, or 'she has fallen' they might as well have said, these 2 or 3 court officials. Jezebel made a Jibe to Jehu about Zimri, like the struggling Jew who was in the wrong said to Moses about the Egyptian. In Revelation 14, the first 5 angels who come from the temple, who fly in mid-heaven are the first 5 presidents. But the 6th angel comes from the altar, and is me:

And still another angel emerged from the altar, and he had authority over the fire. And he called out with a loud voice to the one that had the sharp sickle saying: Put your sharp sickle in and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth, because it's grapes have become ripe (Rev 14:18).

This harvest of grapes or baptism is after the baptism that finished in the days of the 4th angel, Freddie Franz, of whom we read:

And another angel emerged from the temple, crying with a loud voice to the one seated on the cloud: Put in you sickle and reap, because the hour has come to reap because the harvest is thoroughly ripe. And the one seated on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth and the earth was reaped (Rev 14:15,16).

This is the finish of the second half baptism of the 144k in the presidency of Freddie, it ended on 1991Tishri15. He is alive as an angel along with Nathan right now, they were both resurrected on 1995Tishri17, and ascended into heaven on 1995Heshvan26, they can see this....Hi guys! The vine of the earth that is thrown into the winepress of the anger of God, is the degenerate vine:

And as for me, I had planted you as a choice red vine, all of it a true seed. So how have you been changed toward me into the degenerate [shoots] of a foreign vine? But though you should do the washing with alkali and take to yourself large quantities of lye, your error would certainly be a stain before me, is the utterance of the Sovereign Lord Jehovah (Jeremiah 2:21,22).

The grapes are saved but the tree/vine is burnt. You are that vine, you are Jezebel the wife of the king of Israel, you are the scarlet image of the wild beast. You guys with the biggest laundry in New York, if not in the universe. You could not work this out for yourselves because firstly it is very difficult and because secondly it is almost impossible for a man to interpret a scripture which condemns himself, these are the physical reasons anyway. It is much easier for me to do this, one day people will work out scriptures which condemn me, for I go astray too - we all do - Satan corrupts every adamic priesthood. Look you people blind though eyes themselves exist and deaf though you have ears (Isaiah 43:8), do you think that only the physical Jews are to be rejected as a nation by God?

What then? Are we in a better position? Not at all! For above we have made the charge that Jews as well as Greeks are all under sin; just as it is written: There is not a righteous [man], not even one; there is no one that has any insight, there is no one that seeks for God.

All [men] have deflected, all of them together have become worthless; there is no one that does kindness, there is not so much as one. Their throat is an opened grave, they have used deceit with their tongues. Poison of asps is behind their lips. And their mouth is full of cursing and bitter expression (Romans 3:9-14).

It is not true that 'individuals' in the FDS are worthless, but the FDS as a group will never go astray as asserted by the Society. It is not the case that there are a few 'worthless ones' and that these are in the 'worthless ones class'. No, the whole lot of you, as a group have become worthless. Paul tells us that 'All of them together have become worthless'. The whole nation of physical Israel became corrupt. Everything that is recorded in the bible as having been done by the nation of Israel has a prophetic fulfilment on a future nation of Israel. Today, the whole nation of spiritual Israel has become corrupt in fulfilment of Paul's words, and in fulfilment of the archetypical pattern set for them by their forefathers, and recounted for them by Stephen in Acts 6. Some of these forefathers recognised this and joined a new Israel, the one started by John the baptist. And now their sons in unfaithfulness will have to recognise their error and prove themselves to be their sons also in repentance, and you will have to make the same transition today that the Jews had to make some 2,000 years ago, if you are to once again become God's people.

Revelation 17 is a symoblic account, which poses a problem for our normal 4 dimensional bible interpretation. With a literal account, we have a literal, a symbolic, a cryptic and a coded-numeric interpretation to make. With a symbolic account there is no literal interpretation. The symbolic interpretation that we make of a literal account is made of the verbal description of the events, it is an interpretation of the account of the events rather than an interpretation of the events themselves, since these are fulfilled literally, this being how they exert their power (Hebrews 4:12). But in the case of a symbolic account, the events themselves do not exert power literally, having no literal fulfilment, and our normal symbolic interpretation is not of the events but of the account of the events, so hereagain the events themselves exert no power. Therefore we have to make a symbolic interpretation of the events themselves, seeing through the description, seeing behind the account, in order for these to exert power in accordance with Hebrews 4:12. The mistake I made when I first looked at this account was to miss this interpretation, this first dimension in the case of a symbolic account. Please accept my apologies for this brothers, I incorrectly wrote off Russell's correct interpretation of Revelation 17. For the society has more or less correctly interpretted the symbolism of the events in this chapter. It is as follows, I think:

The Harlot, woman, great city Babylon the great

The wild beast, that was but is not World power wild beast

8th mountain UN

First 7 mountains, 7 heads Egypt....Anglo-American

First 7 kings First 7 presidents of UN

8th King 8th president of UN is the whole wild beast

10 horns on world power beast Laban's times (Letter to Elders)

10 kings, 10 horns on 8th mountain 10 security council members in 1998Nisan, power

10 years

7 heads on 8th mountain 7 years of wild beast headship of UN

The wild beast becomes scarlet Physically kills anointed men

The rest is reasonably well described the in the Society's book. On the other hand the symbolic interpretation of not the events themselves but rather the account of the events, is the story of false worship in the true congregation, it is the story of the Babylon within. In this symbolism, the woman on the beast is not Babylon on the UN, it is Jezebel on the FDS, this is the sacred secret (Mystery).

The symbolism for Revelation 17 is:

Harlot Sarah/Keturah becomes harlot

Many waters Many water baptised groups

People, crowds nations and tongues The 4 water baptised congregations of John the baptist,

Paul, Russell and I, the 4 antitypical Elijah's

[All 4 true churches become harlot churches]

Kings of the earth Angels of the Watchtower

Earth True Christian food administration, FDS3 & FDS4

'Promised land'

Scarlet coloured wild beast Christian congregation in Lord's day, blood coloured,

only wild in the bogus 6th watch

Woman Sarah/Jezebel, the king's wife, Zion Then Keturah,

Moriah

(The sacred secret of the woman and the wild beast that is carrying her)

(Mystery/ Sacred secret, musthrion = sacred secret in Paul's letters)

(This beast is the congregation that is ridden by Sarah, the anointed remnant collectively, the new covenanters on earth, who become Jezebel. She rides in the first five watches and the bogus 6th watch and then it is ridden by Keturah, the newer covenanters, in particular the Nethinim, in last two watches)

Blaphemous names Unsealed ex-spiritual Israelites

Golden cup God's food channel

Purple outfit Sarah, all Davidic kings, royal purple

Scarlet outfit Keturah, all sanctified, scarlet

Gold Spiritual Israel

Precious stone Nethinim

Pearls Great Crowd

Mother of the harlots Mother of harlotry in false congregations

Disgusting things of the earth Uncleaness in the true congregations

Blood of the holy ones Blood of spiritual Israel

Blood of the witnesses of Jesus Blood of Sanctified Lord's witnesses

[the name of the new congregation]

Wild beast Rev 17:8 & Rev 13:8 World power wild beast

'That you saw' Refers to scarlet wild beast or waters

7 mountains 7 watches of the Watchtower Society

7 kings [of the earth] 7 presidents of the Watchtower

5 have fallen 4 in physical death, one from power

1 is The writer, president of Philadelphia

The other has not yet arrived President of Laodicea

8th king Wicked slave

10 kings who have not yet received a kingdom Current governing body

In the event symbolism the wild beast that you saw is the scarlet coloured wild beast which is the world power wild beast. But in the account of the event symbolism, the wild beast that you saw is the scarlet coloured wild beast which is the congregation, and the 'wild beast' when not qualified with 'that you saw', is the world power wild beast.

The wild beast that you saw (the scarlet one), was but is not, and yet is about to ascend out of the abyss and go into off destruction (Rev 17:8).

This one is the Jehovah's witnesses and then 'the Lord's witnesses', the new name we take in FDS4. It 'was' clean, water baptised, as FDS3 but right now, at the 6th head, it is entirely disfellowshipped, it 'is not'. At this time it is wild, not in the house, not domestic. It is in the abyss of disfellowshipping by its Master, but it will ascend physically therefrom as FDS4 and then be destroyed to make way for the kingdom. Also it is during the bogus 6th watch that the woman is in fact a part of Babylon the great, hence she has the name:

Babylon the great, the mother of the harlots

And of the disgusting things of the earth (Rev 17:6).

Because Babylon as well as spawning whole harlot churches, also spawns harlotry in the virgin church, this is the Babylon within. Right now the virgin church is a whore, it is a part of Babylon the great. And the scripture which says:

Get out of her my people (Rev 18:4).

Currently applies to the congregation of FDS3, for that slave fell on 1994Tammuz19, and the scripture which says:

Too bad, too bad, you great city, Babylon, you strong city, because in one hour your judgement has arrived (Rev 18:10).

refers to three cities. The great city and the strong city are spiritual Jerusalem, in the first and last presences, i.e. are FDS1 and FDS3, and Babylon is standing for Babylon. For you did not know at what hour your Lord came upon you, yet it was the hour of the authority of the darkness. And an hour is one of the 12 in a day, and Judas is said to be one of the 12 all over the gospels. He is one of the 12 watches of spiritual Israel, including the 2 wicked 6th watches as theirs. In his full betrayal in this presence, he is one of these 12, namely Judas Isacriot. In the wicked and sluggish 6th watch of the first presence, where he stops short of betrayal, he is Judas not the Iscariot.

So just like Nathan Knorr declared in 1942, that the league of Nations would be reformed. Here, today, October 21, 1995 in the evening, I can declare that the Watchtower Society will be reformed, although I have known this for years. Look! Satan's counterfeit League/UN is mirroring FDS3/FDS4. Nathan's interpretation was wrong, and his prophecy about the reforming of the league, was correct fortuitously only, or perhaps providentially.

The 10 kings who currently make up the governing body, are kings in addition to the 7 kings of the earth who are the 7 presidents of the 7 watches of the earth, which is the Society, because their declared head is not their head, they are not in submission to him, they are a 10 headed wild beast. They have no proper head, although Judas is taking the lead, but he is not taking any responsibility, a typical Satanic head, not a true head, he is hiding behind Milton, but I have seen him. This is how they 'receive authority as kings one hour' (Revelation 17:12), the hour being:

But this is your hour and the authority of darkness (Luke 22:53).

And he came and found them sleeping and he said to Peter: Simon, are you sleeping? Did you men not have the strength to stay on the watch one hour (Mark 14:37).

One hour, one of the 12 hours in the day, like Judas, one of the 12 watches. Almost every time that Judas Iscariot is mentioned in the bible, he is referred to as 'one of the twelve'. The holy spirit does this almost as many times as God's own people attempt to reach 'the heart'. Consider the following examples:

'Then one of the twelve, the one called Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests' (Matt 26:14).

'Look! Judas, one of the twelve, came and with him a great crowd with swords and clubs' (Matt 26:47).

'And Judas Iscariot, one of the twelve, went off to the chief priests in order to betray him to them' (Mark 14:10).

'Judas, one of the twelve, arrived and with him a crowd with swords and clubs' (Mark 14:10).

'But Satan entered into Judas, the one called Iscariot, who was numbered among the twelve' (Luke 22:3).

'Look! a crowd, and the man called Judas, one of the twelve, was going before them' (Luke 22:47)

'Jesus answered them: "I chose you twelve, did I not? Yet one of you is a slanderer." He was in fact speaking of Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot; for this one was going to betray him, although one of the twelve' (John 6:71).

As regards the 12 watches physically presided over by spiritual Israel, he is number 6 and number 12. Consider now the scriptures:

10 kings who have not yet received a kingdom (Revelation 17:12).

For God put it into their hearts to carry out his thought, even to carry out one thought, by giving their kingdom to the wild beast until the words of God have been accomplished (Rev 17:17).

The question that these two beg is, how can 10 kings, who are 10 horns 'that you saw', who have not yet received a kingdom, give their kingdom to anybody? The answer looks to me like they have failed the second test of Jesus that Satan made, offering him all the kingdoms of the earth if he would do one act of obeisance. These kings have seized power as kings, and made their own kingdom out of the Watchtower, because it was made available to them by Satan, they have no mandate from Jesus. The kingdom that they have not yet received is the kingdom of God.

There is also a fulfilment to this involving the 10 horns on the world power wild beast, from the repetition of carrying out a thought in verse 8 (see section [21]).

The other 7 headed wild beast of Revelation 13 and 17:8, the world power wild beast also 'is not' during its 6th head, and is described as follows:

And all those who dwell on the earth will worship him, the name of not one of them stands written in the scroll of life of the lamb who was slaughtered, from the seeding of the world (Revelation 13:8).

And when they see how the wild beast was, but is not, and yet will be present, those who dwell on the earth will wonder admiringly, but their names have not been written upon the scroll of life from the seeding of the world (Revelation 17:8).

This is Satan's kingdom over God's people, and it ceases to exist for a while, being in the abyss too. This is a consequence of the two different designations 'the wild beast' and 'the wild beast that you saw', in this account. Both of these go into the abyss, and both at the time of the 6th head. For the 5 heads have fallen and the 6th 'is' and the 7th is yet to come at the time that the wild beast 'is not'.

The wild beast that you saw, was, but is not, and yet is about to ascend out of the abyss, and it is to go off into destruction.

And when they see how the wild beast was, but is not, and yet will be present, those on the dwell on the earth will wonder admiringly (Rev 17:8).

The 7 heads are 7 mountains where the woman sits on top. And there are 7 kings, 5 have fallen, one is, the other has not yet arrived, but when he does he must remain a short while (Revelation 17:10).

Comparing the two events in the present tense in the above scriptures, forces us to conclude that the both the 'wild beast' and the 'wild beast that you saw', the scarlet one, are in the condition of being 'is not' at the time that the 6th head 'is'.

[21] The wild beast 'is not':

The Society's position is that this, being 'is not', does not occur in the case of the world power wild beast. This beast is supposed to have existed throughout the Apostate times in the form of the holy Roman empire.

My first idea was that the wild beast had no headship over God's people during the Apostate times {see Letter to the Elders}, by virtue of there being no true seed, seed of the anointed type that is. This was fairly brilliant seeing as I had no idea that the scriptures described this beast as being in an abyss. I was working on the basis that there was no world empire between the Romans and the British. Nonetheless I was wrong on two counts. Firstly the headship over God's people of the wild beast is over Abraham's seed, who are not anointed with holy spirit, of neccessity, but are merely water baptised by the greater river Euphrates. They are sons of the temporary father Abraham rather than the eternal father Jesus Christ, the son of man/Adam, from the seed point of view, who also replaces the temporary father Adam. Secondly there were anointed Christians in the Apostate times, anointed under Zilpah, but not under Leah, who is the new covenant.

So the next idea I had was that there were no sons of Abraham during most of the Apostate times, i.e. although there were those clean in the spirit under Zilpah, there was nobody who was clean in the flesh. But this does not work because anointed people who die unclean in the flesh go to Gehenna, which would negate the whole Zilpah baptism, and the anointing is also a water baptism for those not already clean in the flesh, notwithstanding that fact that Babylon had no Elijah to start a water baptism. In fact the weeds and wheat were not distinguishable in the Apostate times because of the lack of water baptism, which is a lack of true congregation. Babylon was a prison not a bath. Those who were sanctified by the angels in Babylon were also simultaneously water baptised becoming sons of Abraham, because all blessings are through him. But in the account of the wheat and the weeds we read that the one who oversowed the weeds, whom Jesus identifies as Satan, 'left' (Matthew 13:25). Which is a new one, where did he go?

The answer is to be found in Revelation 20:

And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven, with the key of the abyss and a great chain in his hand. And he seized the dragon, the original serpent, who is the Devil and Satan, and he bound him for 1000 years. And he hurled him into the abyss and shut it and sealed it over him, that he might not mislead the nations any more until the 1000 years were ended (Rev 20:1-3).

There are 2 designations for Satan, namely, the dragon and the serpent. Then we have a double explanation, namely the devil and Satan, which I think we treat as substituting one of the designations only, this gives three fulfilments. If it substitutes them both then we only have two designations, namely Satan and the devil, for the dragon and the serpent are both replaced. An explanation such as 'the woman who you saw is the great city' (Rev 17:18), is not a second designation in the account and so does not have a second fulfilment, I think. I am making a distinction between explanations and designations.

These three fulfilments on Satan in the case of the binding with the chain are:

1000 years pre-flood

1000 years 2008Nisan to 3008Nisan

1000 years 650CE to 1650CE approx

The hurling into the abyss only happens once, because the abyss is shut and sealed afterwards, preventing further re-entry ever, although not preventing exit. The abyss is hades. Paul says:

Do not say in your heart: Who will ascend into heaven, that is to bring Christ down. Or: Who will descend into the abyss, that is to bring Christ up from the dead (Romans 10:6,7).

The abyss is therefore Hades. The one who both ascends and descends is Gabriel, he resurrected Jesus, he ascended into heaven and he brought Christ down on 29Tishri10, he was John the baptist. Brothers when reading the letters of Paul please remember the words of Peter:

Just as our beloved brother Paul according to the wisdom given him also wrote YOU, speaking about these things as he does also in all [his] letters. In them, however, are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unsteady are twisting, as [they do] also the rest of the Scriptures, to their own destruction (2 Peter 3:16,17).

Paul was the president of the 6th watch in the first century, the first watch of FDS2, the Roman administration. He was my antetype in this respect. His letters are hard to understand and so are mine. His are already twisted up in knots, do not be afraid to try to untwist them, to unravel them. You twist a scripture when you bend its meaning to fit your preconceived doctrine. We are all guilty of this, I certainly am. If you allow all of its little structures to breathe, every little reference to have its power, then you can unravel it without twisting it. But Paul's letters are especially hard, and this means that it is especially dangerous to just take a literal meaning without much thought. Many of his words are stumbling blocks to FDS3, because on the face of it his letters look pharasaical and restrictive and hard. They can be used to beat the flock, they have been used to beat the flock, they are being so used today. The bible is a two edged sword, it shows up both good intentions and bad intentions of the heart. Paul's letters look like sticks for beating but on closer examination they are condemning such things. So if your heart is bad and your mind is lazy you will hit people with Paul's words. But if your heart is good, then you will not stumble but you will be like Moses. Because not Paul but almighty God said to him:

So let me be, that my anger may blaze against them, and I may exterminate them, and let me make you into a great nation (Exodus 32:10).

Where would blind obedience have got Moses?? Do what you are told?? No, look! his conscience and his love for God and his people was greater than his fear of arguing with a very angry omnipotence. This was perhaps his greatest triumph. God knew he could do it, this is why he tested him so. Here is a man who has learned what it is to love. I guess this is the result of 80 days face to face with God. It was a good result. So if Moses, for his part did not fear to take issue with his creator, will you, for your part be afraid to argue with Paul? Look carefully at what he says, look critically at what he says, if it is hard to understand then the true meaning is not immediately apparent.

Sorry for the lack of evidence presented here, this is just some advice, I have my hands full right now explaining the split in faithful stewards.

I have the keys of death and of hades (Revelation 1:18).

And I saw an angel coming down out of heaven with the key of the abyss (Rev 20:1).

The key of Hades is the key of the Abyss. The key of death, is the key of judicial death, the baptism into the name of the son.

Satan is thrown in there last, after the last human dies in 2008Elul, I think, I do not know when the last human goes into Hades, it could be on 2008Nisan14, in which case any who die during Armageddon go to Gehenna, in which case Satan could go into the abbys on that day too. This does not prevent humans from being saved during Armageddon, and becoming covenanters under Keturah at that time. Actually since all who were saved during the flood were in the ark, and since the great crowd is chosen for 14 years from 1994Elul to 2008Elul, 14 years of clean animals, it must be the case that all humans who are saved into the kingdom go into the angelic ark, so Hades gets its last human on 2008Nisan14, when the greater flood starts. So Satan and the demons do not fight Armageddon it appears, and he is abyssed on 2008Nisan14, it is going to be a rather one sided battle! No other creation ever goes into it after him, although all its inhabitants leave it during the 1000 year reign. No kingdom citizen dies during Armageddon. It is a matter of logic that it is pointless to bind somebody who is already in Hades. This is another reason why the binding with a chain for a 1000 years must have a fulfilment in addition to the one involving the abyss, in fact as we have seen there are two other fulfilments. A further witness to a non-kingdom fulfilment of the 1000 years of binding of Satan is:

Now as soon as the 1000 years have ended, Satan will be let loose out of his prison [fulakhV] and he will go out to mislead those nations in the four corners/extremities of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together for the war. The number of them is as the sand of the sea (Rev 20:7,8).

Firstly there are no national groups in the Kingdom of God, we are all one kingdom and one national group, one nation. Secondly the 'sand of the sea' are the Abrahamic covenanters, and since these are the entire group under threat, the war has to be Armageddon, because at the end of the Kingdom we will have the Adamic/Abelian/Enochian covenant group, and the Noahic/Mechizedaic covenant group as well. For just as physical Israel has three fathers so the earthly Kingdom of God has three fathers by covenant, Adam, Noah and Abraham.

Therefore the war is Armageddon, if fact Gog and Magog only occur in the bible in the Genealogies of Japheth and of Joel, a Reubenite who appears out of nowhere in 1 Chronicles 5:4, and they appear in Ezekiel 38,39, which is an account about Armageddon, not about the test at the end of the kingdom. So we are forced to conclude from Revelation 20:7,8 alone that Satan is in a prison for 1000 years before Armageddon in addition to being in the abyss for 1000 years during and after it.

Peter speaks about both non-kingdom 1000 year prison sentences on Satan saying:

He being put to death in the flesh but being made alive in the spirit. In this [state] he went his way and preached to the spirits in prison [fulakh] who had once been disobedient when the patience of God was waiting in Noah's days, while the ark was being constructed (1 Peter 3:18,19).

If they were in prison after his resurrection, then there is an chaining period between the two presences of the Christ. Likewise if the disobedience occured in the days of Noah, then the first 1000 year prison sentence on Satan, must have preceded Noah's birth, since Satan is the father of disobedience. Noah was born in the sacred year between 2971Tishri and 2970Tishri, Adam sinned in 3993Nisan, so there is a period of at least 1022.5 years between these two events. So Satan could have been bound from 3993Nisan to 2993Nisan.

Brothers as a further point I must stress this:

GOD DID NOT BUILD THE ARK FOR NOAH, HE BUILT IT HIMSELF ACCORDING TO THE PLANS GIVEN HIM BY GOD

We too have to build our own ark. This ark is angelic, I am not going into it here, but basically, we have to intepret the plans and build the boat or we all die. You 10 brothers on the governing body, are trying to sink the ark. Because you would rather scuttle the ship than have it run by someone other than you, just like Saddam Hussein in Kuwait. For goodness sake wake up! wake up will you!

[22] The second 1000 year prison sentence on Satan

This sentence was also on the demons as Peter relates (1 Peter 3:19). Brothers I am sorry that I am unable to find the beginning of this 1000 year period from the scriptures at this time. But as mentioned above we can nail down this 1000 year prison sentence a bit more from history. Certainly Satan was at large at the time the trinity was adopted in 325CE at the Nicene council, it's a demonic understanding, also Satan would not give his empire to anybody else he would destroy it before he was locked up, viz: Saddam Hussein, Armageddon, Hitler, David Koresh etc. Therefore he is locked up after 410CE. If we take the victory of Drake over the Spain in 1588CE followed by the singeing of the king of Spain's beard at Cadiz in 1596CE as determining our rulership of the waves, which was crucial for the trade domination of the empire to follow, then we see this could be a work inspired by Satan. But we are forgetting Mohammed. His first vision was in 610CE and his last was in 632CE (Cambridge history of Islam), the Quran was put together between 644 & 656CE. Even to the historian, it is plain that these visions were inspired (Cambride History of Islam), to the Christian it is likewise plain that they are inspired by Satan, which is no big deal because he inspired and is inspiring the 4th, 5th and bogus 6th watches of the Watchtower Society, and he inspired king David himself.

Therefore Satan must have been bound on or after 632CE, and therefore his release was on or after 1632CE. So the Renaisance was angelically inspired, presumably to cope with the imminent advent of Satan, his third coming in fact, since he had two absences.

So the early struggles of Britain against Spain were just human pride greed and ambition. Satan appeared later and picked the winning horse. However Napoleon was certainly fighting against Satan's anointed kingdom, so he did very well considering - good effort old chap! But there is no future in those sorts of battles today, for:

All those who take the sword will die by the sword (Matt 26:52).

So we've got the EEC instead. Le plus ca changes the plus c'est la meme chose. Actually the scriptures also prescribe an anointed head for the EEC, not Jacques Delors but the UN.

If Satan has a 6000 kingdom with two 1000 year prison sentences, then he spends 6,000 years, a legion of years, among men but 2000 of them are among swine only, his brothers the demons, having been expelled from interfering with men (compare Mark 5:13).

[23] The 8th king

The wild beast that was but is not, it is also itself an 8th [king] but springs from the 7 and it goes off into destruction (Rev 17:11).

This says that the 7 headed wild beast of Satan's political system is an 8th king of the Watchtower society, if we assume the 8th refers to the kings of the mountains referred to in verse 9. This is in fact the evil slave of Matthew 24, the wicked slave of Matthew 25 and Luke19, who is hiding his talent in the ground. He is the guy wearing my crown:

I am coming quickly, keep on holding fast what you have, that no one may take your crown (Rev 3:11).

It doesn't seem to be very quick to me! He has been wearing my crown since 1994Adar, although he is hiding it in the ground and pretending that it's Milton's crown! And Milton is pretending that he doesn't have a crown and that he is just a figurehead, and that the governing body is ruled by the holy vote. If we take 8th as referring to Satan's kings over God's people, the world power wild beast, the Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Medo-Persian, Greek, Roman, and latterly Anglo-American, being the first 7, then this 8th one is finally the UN. Incidentally the wild beast that 'was but is not' is a distirbutive symbolism (see ref:[2]), with 'but' instead of the more usual 'and'. It represents two wild beasts, the scarlet one and the world power one.

Now since the only king after the Anglo-American one is the UN, it was still nonetheless apparent during the second world war, that Hitler would not win the war, even though the wild beast that asends out of the abyss was not the league of Nations, but was the world power beast. The allies were always going to win it, and be superceded not by another head but by the 8th king, which is the UN. Therefore the League would have to be reformed, with more teeth. Furthermore the 8th king, being itself the whole wild beast (Rev 17:11), has 10 horns and 7 heads, i.e. has power 10 times and kingship 7 times. In the case of the UN it has power from 1998Nisan to 2008Nisan, and headship from 2001Nisan to 2008Nisan. This beast is the UN, the 8th king of the world power wild beast, which itself is an image of the beast. In the case of the scarlet beast, the 8th king of the Watchtower likewise has headship 7 times and power 10 times. I'll pass on the meaning of this for now.

Reading Time magazine, October 23rd 1995, I see that the UN has so far had 6 heads, namely Lie, Hammarskjold, U Thant, Waldhiem, Perez de Cuellar and Boutros-Gali, the current one. We are in the 6th head of the UN, this is looking like a Satanic counterfeit of the Watchtower Society, currently in its 6th presidency, something which might sound ridiculous to a non-witness, but there it is. Actually it probably sounds fairly ridiculous to wintesses as well! These secretary General's who don't know whether they are Secretaries or Generals, the astute observation of James Reston of the New York times, have one or two terms of 5 years each. Boutros-Gali was elected in 1992. I guess one might conclude from this that he will be re-elected in 1997 and after him there is to be only one further president of the UN. If this is true, then I would not like to have this 7th president's job, I can tell the journalist for a fact, he will be a General, the most powerful one ever. Apparently there is a proposal to make the next presidential term 7 years long!!!!

This account is mixing up the above 7 kings over Abraham's seed appointed by Satan throughout his covenant, and the 8th at the end, with the 7 kings over them in the Lord's day appointed by Jesus Christ, with the 8th at the end of FDS3, who is not so appointed. This is a classic knot from the holy spirit and it is the Job description of Daniel to untie such knots:

Forasmuch as an extraordinary spirit and knowledge and insight to interpret dreams and the explanation of riddles and the untying of knots has been found in him, in Daniel, whose name has been changed to Betleshazzar (Daniel 5:12).

And here it is untied for you. The battle between the 10 kings the wild beast and the lamb with the two titles is the battle between the seeds that is currently underway:

These will battle with the lamb, but, because he is Lord of Lord's and King of Kings, the lamb will conquer them. Also those called chosen and faithful with him [will do so] (Rev 17:14).

Those 'called' are the Nethinim, called by holy spirit.

Those 'chosen', are the sealed spiritual Israelites, chosen by the holy spirit.

Those 'faithful with him', are those who support this new work, the speculators about dates, like our father in this, Charles Russell, our first such speculator of the second presence. So here is the cryptic classic that first set me thinking about this account:

The woman whom you saw means the great city that has a kingdom over the kings of the earth (Revelation 17:18).

This is New Jerusalem, both mountains, both covenants, the new and the newer, both women, but one at a time, hence only one woman rides the beast of burden, the ass, (Solomon, Jesus, Balaam), in its domestic form, which becomes wild when it 'is not' domestic, and then becomes domestic again. But it could equally well have been Babylon the great, the two are both harlots, the one permanently so and the other temporarily so. And it is Babylon the great in the event symbolism of Russell, but it is New Jerusalem in the account symbolism of Ritchie.

[24] Revelation 13: Satan's suicide

Here is the look up table for Revelation 13:

Dragon stood still Bound for one thousand years approx. 650CE to 1650CE

Sand of the sea Abahamic covenanters

[Sand is next to sea and earth, it dwells on the earth]

Wild beast World powers over Abraham's seed

Sea Mankind, not sons of Abraham

Earth FDS3

Ascending out of the sea Born from faithless men

7 heads Egyptian to Anglo-American

10 horns Laban's times

10 diadems 1998Nisan to 2008Nisan, Universal kingship

Image of the wild beast Judas' 6th watch of the Watchtower

Wild beast 2 horns like lamb 4th and 5th watches of Watchtower

Began speaking as a dragon 6000 days of Legion demonisation

Death stroke, sword stroke Satan's suicide in Judas' body on 33Nisan14, dead dragon, 'as dead' beast

Got healed, revived Resurrected as angel by God

Those who dwell on the earth True Christian congregation in Lord's day

Those who dwell in the earth The remnant in the Lord's day

The 6,000 days of Legion, are from 1977Tammuz4, when the 4th watch started, to 1992Chislev22 when it ended and from 1992Chislev30 when the 5th watch started until 1994Adar13 counting this one inclusively, there were 6,000 men in a Roman legion. I am not showing any more of the meaning of that miracle here.

And it makes the earth and those who dwell in it worship the first wild beast whose death stroke got healed (Rev 13:12).

And the one seated on the cloud thrust in his sickle on the earth and the earth was reaped (Rev 14:16)

Put your sharp sickle in and gather the clusters of the vine of the earth, because its grapes have become ripe (Rev 14:18).

From these scriptures it is apparent that the 'earth' is an administration of God's people.

Since the dragon has 7 heads and 10 horns just like the wild beast, it is apparent that Satan is the head of each of the 7 world powers, and controls all of the power in the 10 horns of the wild beast. The scriptures say:

And I saw one of its heads as though slaughtered to death, but its death stroke got healed (Rev 13:3).

The wild beast that had the sword stroke and yet revived (Rev 13:14).

Firstly the scriptures do not say which head has this problem. It is not of neccessity the 7th head as we currently believe. Secondly there is a sword stroke and a reviving [literally ezhsen, it lived] but not to the head of the beast, but to the whole beast in verse 14. This is the 1000 year prison sentence on Satan and the demons, who are symbolised by the body of the dragon and control the body of the beast presumably.

If our current understanding that the death stroke was the first world war on the Anglo-American head (goodness knows what happenned to the Scots in this interpretation), was correct, then the authority to act for 42 months, which certainly does run from 1914Tishri to 1918Nisan, is coincident with the beast having no head. This is the position as described in pages 190-192 of the Revelation book. In other words the beast has its greatest authority when its head is cut off, and when it is 'as though slaughtered to death'. This is ridiculous, I think we will call it the headless head theory. So let us examine not the 7th head but the 6th head, the Roman head of the wild beast. Did this head get the chop?

But Satan entered into Judas, the one called Iscariot, who was numbered among the twelve and he went off to talk to the chief priests and captains about the effective way to betray him to them (Luke 22:3).

Having dipped the morsel he gave it to Judas, the son of Simon Iscariot. And after the morsel Satan entered into the latter. Jesus therefore said to him: What you are doing get done more quickly (John 13:27).

This is quite simply saying that Satan entered Judas twice, he demonically possessed him twice. The exact process which I am not going to provide evidence for here is that an angel is created for Judas, this angel possesses Judas, his spirit is then in this angel in his body, then the angel leaves the body, and in this case the angel goes to sleep, this being hades for Judas. Then the demon Satan takes over Judas' body completely. Judas has no consciousness of any of this, for his spirit is in the sleeping angel. When he gets his body back he will have effectively been anaesthetised, he will not have known what has happenned. Before we go into what this symbolises, we continue with what actually happenned.

When Jesus said: 'What you are doing get done more quickly' (John 13:27), this was actually two angels speaking to each other, it was Michael in the body of Jesus (the non-adamic human who likewise was existing as a sleeping angel at the time), he having taken on this form on 29Tishri10, when Micahel entered Jesus, when he 'commenced' (Luke 3:23), talking to Satan in the body of Judas. It was Satan who then betrayed Jesus, and not Judas the human, and the scripture which says:

Then Judas, who betrayed him, seeing he had been condemned, felt remorse and turned the thirty silver pieces back to the chief priests and older men, saying: I sinned when I betrayed righteous blood. They said: What is that to us? You must see to that! So he threw the silver pieces into the temple and withdrew, and went off and hanged himself. But the chief priests took the silver pieces and said: It is not lawful to drop them into the sacred treasury, because they are the price of blood (Matt 27:3-6).

Refers entirely to Satan, inside the body of Judas. Because it was Satan inside the body 'who betrayed him'. Although the scripture literally was referring to the condemnation of Jesus, it is deliberately ambiguous and also refers to the condemnation of Satan who himself says: 'I sinned when I betrayed righteous blood' (Matt 27:4). He himself has said it, he recognised it.

The hidden sub-plot in all of this is the argument not between Michael and Satan over Moses' body but presumably between Gabriel and Satan over Jesus' body. Because Judas had sold this body and the Aaronic priesthood had purchased this body for 30 shekels, the price of a slave. And the body was a slave, a slave for Michael, who took a slave's form (Philippians 2:7). And Michael did in a sense give authority to Satan to sell it saying: What you are doing get it done more quickly (John 13:27). If this body was owned by the priesthood, Michael could not use it as a ransom. But if you abuse your slave he is set free:

And in case a man should strike the eye of his slave man or the eye of his slave girl and he really ruins it, he is to send him away as one set free in compensation for his eye (Exodus 21:26).

So after the false condemnation of the Christ, the body was again free and so could be accepted as a ransom by God, I think. The above deductions may be wrong, but nonetheless there was an argument that Satan was making to destroy the ransom based on purchasing the body of Jesus for 30 shekels, and this argument is prefigured by the dispute over Moses' body. He lost this argument and realised it, and then was totally humiliated, and shown up as the betrayer of Michael. This time Satan could not blame it on the victim, saying that he was no good, like he attempted to do with Adam. So he was finished, and so he committed suicide in order to avoid any more shame. He hanged himself and did not choose consciously to leave the body of Judas, he went actually into Hades, his angel left the body asleep, being pulled out probably by Gabriel. I do not know how long it was before God resurrected him. But he was around when Ananias lied to Peter, for Peter said to him:

Why has Satan emboldened you to play false to the holy spirit (Acts 5:3).

So there it is, the suicide of Satan, the death stroke to the 6th head of the dragon and therefore the 6th head of the beast was 'as though slaughtered to death' (Rev 13:3).

In the symbolic meaning we have two Satanic possessions, one which tries to betray but doesn't quite get there, and another which does actually betray. These are the two wicked 6th watches, the two wicked slaves in the first and last presences. Only the current bogus, unauthorised 6th watch actually succeeds in achieving the betrayal. For the rib has to come out for the woman to be made, and a new woman was made in 1992Elul, which means that a rib has left Jesus' body, one of the 12 members of the governing body at that time. Just as the rebellion of the first Judas made a second wife for Abraham, Sarah, for the new covenant was validated by Jesus' death which would not have occurred without the betrayal. So the betraying rebellion of the third Judas, the second Judas Iscariot, makes a third wife for Abraham, Keturah. If there is a further new covenant, then there is a new betrayal. Of course there has to be a greater Judas, for every scripture has a further fulfilment, because the whole book is alive [Clifton, realised this first two years ago].

[25] The timetable from 1991 Tishri to the arrival of this letter

1991Tishri15 Baptism of remnant ends, no room at inn anymore, have to

go into cattle shed

1991Tishri17 Gordon Sanctified

1991Shebat22 Time of the end begins

1992Tammuz30 Tony and Massoud sanctified

1992Elul11 Letter to Society arrives, 3 times of denial start

1992Elul14 Covenant of Keturah made between Jesus & I

1992Heshvan24 Jesus seen walking on water in 4th watch

1992Chislev1 Gordon sealed, letter sent, 80 days mountain end

1992Chislev22 Freddie dies, corrupt 4th watch ends. He accepted my work before

he died, this saved his judicial life actually, three arrows to the heart. He recognised truth in John Edgar's book and he recognised the truth in mine.

1992Chislev30 Milton's 5th watch starts

1993Nisan One of Tony or Massoud is sealed

1993Nisan10 Nethinim baptism starts, my work is distributed

1993Ab30 A battle with acceptance of my work by body

1993Tishri10 My work banned, third Exedenic times starts, Food of

FDS3 becomes unclean

1994Shebat10 5th watch ends, headship of Milton over

1994Adar13 6000 days of demonisation end, 70 day sabbath begins, third

Alienation times begins, whole of Sardis is disfellowshipped

1994Adar17 Letter sent telling of my baptism, chase starts

1994Nisan4=1994Adar29 FDS4 appointed head over the Nethinim

1994Iyyar23 70 day sabbath ends, Exedenic times ends, ban on my work is lifted

1994Tammuz19 FDS3 falls

1994Tammuz 21 FDS4 appointed over all belongings

1994Elul Baptism of the great crowd authorised to start, call to ones in the

disfellowshipped congregations

1994Tishri7 Promised land of FDS4 entered, eat food of FDS4

1994Tishri10 3rd Alienation times ends, some acceptance of Nethinim baptism

must have occurred

1994Heshvan4 3.5 months after 1994Tammuz19, I realise that I will start the

baptism of the great crowd - I think it was then - Caroline called.

1994Heshvan8 Call to world to be baptised into great crowd. Spiritual Jews cease

being Jews. Third Gentile times starts.

1995Adar14 Secret, but its 3.5 months before 1995Sivan29

1995Sivan29 Feeding authority of FDS3 ends, FDS4 is source of food, from then

on, 100 months of Cornelius start. End of third Gentile times.

1995Elul 3 times of Denial of FDS3 end with Watchtower on sheep and Goats

1995Tishri10 End of sanctification of 220 Nethinim

1995Tishri17 Freddie and Nathan etc. resurrected as angels

1995Heshvan7 390 days on of restriction for left side end.

1995Heshvan17 600 chariot chase ends, division starts Mirrored by division is US

political system???!!

So here is Bezalel's latest tapestry for you. For his weaving is with the threads of time, and his tapestry is the plan which God gives to David, for the temple of his son, Solomon. It is the plans for the ark which is built by man, with the hands of men, but into which the animals came by the spirit of God, whether clean or unclean, sanctified or unsanctified. And we shall baptise in holy spirit with our very hands, and in this way God will again save mankind from the flood.

[26] Conclusion

If only you one thousanth part of the grace of David, you would see that your acceptance of your humiliation is not only your salvation but also God's glory, and ultimately your glory. Did he argue with God about who should build Solomon's temple? Did he complain that such magnificent glory should go to his son, rather than to him. Was it not the case that he was quite happy to be regarded as an idiot if this glorified God, even if it did not impress Michal?? And you for your part, will you follow in the footsteps of Potiphar's wife, and complain that Joseph has made you into a laughingstock?? Or will you rather listen to the words of Job:

A laughingstock to his fellowman I become. One calling to God that he should answer him. A laughingstock is the righteous unblamable one (Job 12:4).

Do not be like Satan, who when he saw that he had lost, committed suicide rather than face the humiliation of being universally seen to be a 'loser'. We are all losers in worldly terms, this is how we become winners in heavenly terms. The whole world already regards you, and because of you also me, as an idiot. What difference does it make if the congregations make the same assessment? Why your father Isaac's very name means laughter. For the assessment of the world is physical only and the assessment of the congregations is subjective in the extreme, but the righteous decree of God is absolute, and true and everlasting. This is the decree which you men have on the line now, this is his assessment. And you should know that temporary humiliation from men for the sake of God is glory from God for the sake of you, and that this glory is everlasting life.

Of course we are not idiots at all. You are, and I was, merely blinded by Satan, and your unintelligent heart has become darkened, the scripture does not say: your unintelligent 'mind' has been darkened. And you have become empty headed in your reasonings, which implies that you retain the capability to become complete headed once more. So let's see some of your reasoning actually being used please. For though Satan is blinding you, and though God himself has poured a spirit of deep sleep upon you, Jesus is going to wake you up and extinguish the flashlight of Satan, and open your eyes, and you will see. You will see the glorious transfigured beauty of his son. In fact some of this beauty you have already seen.

All of your water baptisms since 1994Adar13 have been into dead sons of Abraham. And all of your water baptisms since 1994Heshvan8 have been totally invalid. Anyone who has made the claim to be anointed in the heavenly baptism after 1991Tishri15 is making a false claim. Finally we examine which mountain really is the one which will become firmly established above the top of the mountains. Comparing the first verses of Isaiah chapters 1,2 & 3:

The Vision of Isaiah, the son of Amoz, that he visioned, concerning Judah and Jerusalem, in the days of Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz and Hezekiah, kings of Judah (Isaiah 1:1).

The thing that Isaiah, the son of Amoz, visioned concerning Judah and Jerusalem: And it must occur in the final part of the days, the mountain of the house of Jehovah will become firmly established above the top of the mountains, and it will certainly be lifted up above the hills, and to it all the nations will stream (Isaiah 2:1).

For look! the true Lord, Jehovah of armies, is removing from Jerusalem and from Judah, support and stay, the whole support of bread and the whole support of water (Isaiah 3:1).

We see that all three chapters are part of the same vision and therefore have the same fulfilments. We know that chapter two has a fulfilment in what we call the last days. We know that this fulfilment relates to us. Therefore all three chapters have a fulfilment that relates to us, and in particular chapter 1 has a fulfilment that relates to us. It is therefore a judgement on spiritual Israel, in the present fulfilment. Furthermore, the nations do not stream to the house of David on mount Zion, the mountain of FDS3, they stream to the house of Jehovah on mount Moriah, the mountain of FDS4. The 4 kings of Judah (Isaiah 1:1) are the 4th and 5th watches in the first and last centuries. Judah is the kingdom of spiritual Israel in this symbolism, not two tribes but two half baptisms. So here is your judgement from Isaiah:

Woe to the sinful nation, the people heavy with error, an evildoing seed, ruinous sons! They have left Jehovah, they have treated the holy one of Israel with disrespect, they have turned backwards (Isaiah 1:4).

The primary part of the seed was the Christ, the secondary part is spiritual Israel, so since he was not particularly evildoing this scripture refers to spiritual Israel.

When you spread out your palms, I hide my eyes from you (Isaiah 1:15).

Oh, how the faithful town has become a prostitute! (Isaiah 1:21).

For you will become like the foliage of a big tree which is withering, and like a garden that has no water (Isaiah 1:30).

No bread and no water, is no spiritual food and no baptising ability, i.e. the food become unclean, due to the Exedenic times, and the spiritual Israel are disfellowshipped by Jesus, the Alienation times, and therefore are unable to baptise. The big tree is that of Daniel 4, the Gentile times. The reader can make his own intepretation of how Isaiah chapter1 relates to spiritual Israel, based on the knowledge that if chapter 2 applies today, then since its all one vision, chapter1 must also apply today.

At the end of the day, Jerusalem had two mountains. There is no denying this. In fact the whole city was cut in two on this basis, just like the faithful slave. For the slave and Jerusalem are the current and ancient adminstrations of God's people. Two mountains mean two rulerships. So each time Jesus is present, he rules through his capital city, which has two mountains, two Faithful and Discreet Slaves. Therefore there are two such slaves in each presence, a mountain for a slave I am giving you.

So here they are brothers, the 4 corners of the earth, the greater promised land, the 4 administrations of FDS1,2,3,4. Yes, even the 4 types of land upon which the sower went to sow. Look! God's faithful slave adminstration is 4 dimensional, having 4 bases, North, South, East and West, just like the Aaronites, the Gershonites, the Kohathites and the sons of Merari, the physical priesthood around the tabernacle, just like the 4 dimensional bible, like 4D space-time, like the 4 base genetic code, like the 4 living creatures of his character, like the 4 walls of New Jerusalem, like baseball!?!?

And now I cannot be a hypocrit. I have lifted up my rod, I have exposed your rod as having been broken by God. I therefore am no longer required by God to be in submission to your unauthorised rod, it is past its expiry date like your food. And neither is anyone else required by God to be in submission to you. In fact you yourselves are no longer required by God to be in submission to FDS3, rather you are positively required by God and by Christ Jesus, in accordance with the understanding of the scriptures presented herein to be in submission to the rod of FDS4, which you have now seen. As for me, I am of course still in submission to the Christ, which is why I have written the above. I will, from the arrival of this letter, speak to anybody and everybody about this change in rulership. In the past I have not done this out of submission to your sacred secret policing rules that you borrowed from Satan, and more particularly because the scriptures were prohibiting it.

Being completely precise, Tony and Massoud and myself have taught each other from the start, about many new things which we have learned which are not the Society's doctrine, we have been co-researchers. The purpose of our discussions was not to preach or to teach others, it was to learn the truth in order that we might feed you. But I have always refused to teach anybody else about these things, because the Society were the exclusive channel for such teaching. I knew that you had been the feeding channel, although this channel should have been a two way channel. But from the day that this letter arrives I will no longer make such a refusal, because you are no longer that channel, and neither is the channel as restrictive as you imagine. The Channel exists in order to protect the congregation food supply, not in order to protect the mediocrity and poor service of the restaurant staff, by giving them a gravy train monopoly in the catering business. I will not misrepresent your position however, I will attempt to make it clear that my views are my views and not the Society's, where they diverge that is.

For the avoidance of doubt, let me say that even though in my understanding, all of the congregations are disfellowshipped, and even though in my understanding, the FDS has fallen, and the greater Judas Iscariot is the hidden 'president' of an unauthorised administration whose only function is betrayal. Even though he is cowering behind Milton, who was the president of Sardis, who is now a puppet president and who was not sanctified. Despite all of this, I have no wish to leave God's sorry people in their hour of greatest need. Quite the reverse in fact, like Ruth said to Naomi, after she had lost everything.

And Ruth proceeded to say: Do not plead with me to abandon you, to turn back from accompanying you; for where you go I shall go, and where you spend the night I shall spend the night. Your people will be my people, and your God my God. Where you die I shall die, and there is where I shall be buried. May Jehovah so do to me and add to it if anything but death should make a separation between me and you (Ruth 1:16,17).

The Symbolism of Ruth is:

Naomi New Covenant, Leah

Elimelech Jesus

Ruth Rachel, Newer covenant

Orpah Bilhah, Paul's slave covenant

Mahlon (Sickly, invalid) 2nd half baptism of spiritual Israel

Chilion (Frailty) 1st half baptism of spiritual Israel

Boaz Gordon

So and so (repurchaser) Paul

Naomi's land Administration of God's people

Try it out in the book of Ruth and see where you go!

Yours faithfully Gordon Ritchie

Reference: [1] Every scripture has a further fulfilment and 2 recitals means 2 fulfilments

Indeed, it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one particle of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled [to fall - KI] (Luke 16:17).

This means that every word in the law is prophetic having a fulfilment. Literally the law does not 'fall' even after it has ended. It continues to stand prophetically, because it is not dead it is alive as scripture even though it is dead as a physical law.

Do not think that I came to destroy the law or the prophets. I came not to destroy but to fulfil, for truly I say to YOU that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass away from the Law by any means and not [until - KI] all things take place (Matt 5:17,18).

So if one letter of the law is removed, any one letter, then something will not take place, that is supposed to take place in the future. So every letter has an effect on something that will take place, so every letter is prophetic, so every letter has a future fulfilment. Like Paul said:

The Law has a shadow of the good things to come (Hebrews 10:1).

A shadow or an archetype.

All the prophets and the law prophesied until John (Matt 11:13).

So it is not only the prophets that are prophesying. Now the two statements:

'Repetition is for emphasis'

'Every letter has a fulfilment'

Could be contradictory, for if a repetition has no prophetic effect, and emphasis has no prophetic effect, over and above the initial recital then it itself goes 'unfulfilled' if we attribute the prophetic fulfilment to the initial recital only. Putting this another way, if two recitals have only one fulfilment then one of them has no prophetic effect if removed. One can argue that a second recital does have a prophetic effect, the same effect as the first recital, i.e. the two recitals both have a fulfilment, the same fulfilment. But then the second recital exerts no power which is impossible, because all scripture is alive and exerts power (Hebrews 4:12). Therefore the two recitals do not have the same fulfilment, they each have different fulfilments. In fact being alive means being prophetic and exerting power means second recitals also have an effect and therefore they must have second fulfilments.

For truly I say to YOU that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass away from the Law by any means until all things take place (Matt 5:18 - KI/NWT).

One further implication of this is that a second recital if removed would effect things that were going to take place. In other words second recitals do have their own fulfilments, separate from the fulfilment to the first recital. So removing any scripture has a prophetic effect, an effect on things that are supposed to take place. More technically, since the scripture has two recitals of letters or bits of them passing away, there are two further fulfilments to the law of Moses.

Therefore each recital has it's own fulfilment. If this is true for the law, then since the whole bible is written in the same code, it must be true for all scriptures. Even as Elihu said to Job:

For God speaks once

And twice - though one does not regard it (Job 33:14).

This has been true for most of the past 3500 years but now, do regard it please, brothers! The two recitals of the further fulfilment of the law above in Luke and Matthew are declaring two greater laws, and these are mediated by Paul and myself. These, along with the literal fulfilment are the 3 days of sacrificing in the wilderness. Also the word 'law' is used to mean more than the law of Moses in the bible:

For this is the covenant that I shall conclude with the house of Israel after those days, is the utterance of Jehovah: I will put my law within them, and in their heart I shall write it (Jeremiah 31:33).

This is not referring to the law of Moses, the literal meaning refers to the new covenant and the new 'law' that the first century Christians were under. Not a physical law with physical penalties, but the commandments of the Christ, with no physical penalties at all.

And many peoples will certainly go and say: Come you people, and let us go up to the mountain of Jehovah, to the house of the God of Jacob, and he will instruct us about his ways, and we will walk in his paths. For out of Zion, law will go forth, and the word of Jehovah out of Jerusalem (Isaiah 2:3).

This relates the greater 'law', the one that comes from Zion, to the 'word of Jehovah' i.e. the whole bible. This new law is what Paul calls the law of faith:

Where then is the boasting, it is shut out. Through what law? That of works? No, indeed but through the law of faith. For we reackon that a man is declared righteous by faith apart from works of law (Romans 3:27,28).

Paul says:

For all things that were written aforetime, were written for our instruction (Romans 15:4).

This statement must be timeless. Therefore Jacob's crossing the Jabbok with 220 sheep was a matter for our instruction, therefore it has an instructive meaning today for us. Peter says:

This is my son, the beloved, whom I myself have approved. Yes these words we heard borne from heaven while we were with him in the mountain. Consequently we have the prophetic word made more sure, and you are doing well in paying attention to it as a lamp shining in a dark place until day dawns and a daystar rises in your hearts (2 Peter 1:17-19).

The current transfigured glory of Jesus, is the change in form of his word, the change to the Pure language of Zephaniah, the modern day transfiguration, this makes the prophetic word more sure. Also the phrase 'prophetic word' applies to the whole bible. Therefore the whole bible is prophetic and therefore it all has a further fulfilment, this being its prophetic import. Jesus said:

He now said to them: These are my words which I spoke to YOU while I was yet with YOU, that all the things written in the law of Moses and in the Prophets and Psalms about me must be fulfilled (Luke 24:44).

And why should they only be fulfilled if the apply to Jesus? What about if the apply to the remnant or the the wicked slave, or to Judas? In the case of fulfilments on Jerusalem he said:

Then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains, and let those in the midst of her withdraw, and let those in the country places not enter into her; because these are days for meeting out justice, that all the things written may be fulfilled (Luke 22:21,22).

Whereas the context relates to things written about Jerusalem, the holy word says: 'that all the things written may be fulfilled'. And it can be taken as saying that everything in the bible therefore has a fulfillment. Jesus said again:

But it is in order that the Scripture might be fulfilled: He that used to feed on my bread has lifted up his heel against me (John 13:18).

Why should this psalm 41:9 relating to the experiences of David and the betrayal by Ahithophel have a further fulfilment, relating to Jesus? Or in the case of:

A little while longer and the wicked one will be no more (Psalm 37:10).

We know that this was fulfilled upon Solomon, who ruled after David for Solomon said:

And now Jehovah my God has given me rest all around. There is no resister, and there is nothing bad happening (1 Kings 5:4).

Why should there be a further fulfilment upon all of us in the Kingdom of God? But we know that both of the scriptures, neither of which are billed as prophecies but are merely Psalms, praises to Jehovah, have further fulfilments. And the logical argument that can then be made is that since all scripture is written in the same code, and since there is nothing special about the two scriptures above, then all scripture must have further fulfilments.

It's like Jesus said to Satan:

But in reply he said: It is written: Man must live, not on bread alone, but on every utterance coming forth through Jehovah's mouth (Matt 4:4).

Every utterance, therefore any utterance, any word means life, and has a life giving power and meaning. As a final proof that two recitals mean two further fulfilments we take a lesson from Joseph. He explains precisely the correct interpretation of a repetition in the bible by saying:

And the fact that the dream was repeated to Pharaoh twice, means that:

The thing is firmly established/decided upon on the part of the true God

And the true God is speeding to do it (Gen 41:32).

For a dream is a vision which does not emanate from one's conscious mind, it is a story which is 'inspired' by another source, which we call our subconscious mind. Jehovah is using this to symbolise the inspired scriptures, for they too are stories which do not emanate from the conscious mind of the bible writer, but rather are inspired by God. Pharaoh is standing for Jesus, our great spiritual leader, and Joseph is standing for our teacher, or for the holy spirit, if you like, or me if you prefer.

Dream Bible

Pharaoh Jesus

Joseph Teacher/holy spirit

Joseph is saying that the meaning of a repetition in the bible is that:

[1] The thing is firmly established on the part of the true God

[2] And the true God is speeding to do it

In this symbolism, we see that a repeated phrase in the bible, the greater dream of our greater Pharaoh, means that God is 'speeding to do it', in other words it is a prophecy with a future fulfilment. This is a great confirmation of what we have already elucidated above. But it tells us nothing new, because we already know that every scripture, whether repeated or not, has a further fulfilment, because the bible is not a dead history book, it is a living history and prophecy book. This is the first impact of what Joseph is saying. But there is more, for he describes a repetition as meaning two things:

[1] The thing is firmly established on the part of the true God

[2] And the true God is speeding to do it

However, if a thing is 'firmly established on the part of God' then he is certainly going to do it, in fact one could say that 'God is speeding to do it'. Also if God is 'speeding to do it', then it must be 'firmly established' for God does not speed to do things that he has not firmly established. Therefore [1] is [2]. And now the reader is treated to a typical exposition from the holy spirit. For Joseph, who being our teacher is standing for the holy spirit here, is saying that a repetition in the bible means:

[1] The true God is speeding to do it

and

[2] The true God is speeding to do it

But this itself is a repetition. So here God is defining the meaning of a repetition in terms of a repetition. He has therefore made an implicit definition, one defining a thing in terms of the very thing that it is defining. Now the explanation itself is repeated, so since it too is inspired, being a part of the bible, it therefore itself has a future fulfilment as we have deduced above. So there is a future or further fulfilment to the explanation. But thereagain the explanation is that: there is a further fulfilment, the thing that God is speeding to do. So there is a further fulfiment to the further fulfilment. But a futher fulfilment of a further fulfilment is simply a second further fulfilment. In other words there are two further fulfilments. So the meaning of a repetition in the bible is that there are two further fulfilments. And this is a far as we can go playing this game.

So the result is that Joseph has explained that when an account contains a repetition of a concept then that concept has not one, but two further fulfilments. And in general if an account has 3 or 4 repetitions of the same thing or general concept then there are 3 or 4 further fulfilments of that thing.

Now we can answer the question: Why is the phrase '7 times' mentioned 4 times in Daniel4? The answer is that there are 4 greater periods of 7 times witnessed to in that Chapter, one of which is the famous Gentile times. There are 4 Gentile times periods. We have just had the 3rd one which lasted 7 months and the last one is the last week, 7 years from 2001Nisan to 2008Nisan or from 2001Elul to 2008Elul, I am not sure which.

This concept of 'n' recitals means 'n' further fulfilments is again very easy to state, but shatteringly powerful to apply, if one can apply it properly, that is!

Let us therefore make no mistake, there must be a second Judas, a second Christ, a second impalement, a second new covenant and group of scribes and pharisees, etc, etc. And when Ezekiel recites: A day for a year, a day for a year (Ezekiel 4:6), this means that there are two periods of 390 years/days and 40 years/days wherein the houses of Israel and Judah have error.

Reference: [2] Distributive Symbolism

[1] The faithful and discreet slave

[2] The faithful steward, the discreet one

[3] All got baptised into Moses by means of the cloud and of the sea

(1 Corinthians 10:2)

[4] A chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for special possession (1 Peter 2:9).

[5] Look! There are days coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant (Jeremiah 31:31).

[6] Scribes and Pharisees

[7] And he must turn the heart of fathers back toward sons, and the heart of sons back toward fathers; in order that I may not come and actually strike the earth with a devoting to destruction (Malachi 4:6).

The above are all distributive symbolisms.

Definition: A Distributive symbolism, is a 'state' that is described in two ways or an 'event' that is described as ocurring in two ways in one sentence.

By 'state' I mean: person, thing, place, situation, anything that 'is'. And by 'event' I mean anything that occurs.

In the symbolic meaning of a distributive symbolism, rather than one state or one event being described in two ways, there are two greater states or events being referred to each one taking one of the two descriptions. This meaning of a distributive symbolism can be deduced from the principle that two recitals mean two fulfilments as follows:

'The faithful steward, the discreet one' is certainly two recitals of the same steward, and so refers to two stewards in the symbolic meaning since two recitals give two fulfilments. But this is also a distributive symbolism according to our definition because the same steward is described in two different ways. But we already have the symbolic meaning, it's the two fulfilment meaning. So this is the distributive symbolic meaning as well, since there is a unique symbolic meaning. Since the whole bible is written in the same code, all distributive symbolisms decode in the same way, so this is how distributive symbolisms work. Hence we have the new rule:

Two descriptions imply two fulfilments

Essentially we regard two descriptions of a state or an event as two recitals of the state or event one through each description. Putting this another way the phrase 'the faithful and discreet slave' is equivalent to the phrase 'the faithful slave and discreet slave'. The noun 'slave' is distributing over the adjectives, hence the name of the symbolism. For a multiplication distributes over addition according to the rule:

(B+C)xA=BxA+CxA

faithful and discreet slave = faithful slave and discreet slave

Similarly the scripture: 'Simon, son of Jonah' is referring to Simon in two ways and both ways are descriptions of him. So we have two recitals of him via the two descriptions. Applying this to our cited examples:

The faithful and discreet slave/steward is a state, a noun, which is described as being both faithful and discreet. In the literal meaning, one slave has both of these characteristics. In the symoblic meaning, two slaves are being referred to, a faithful one and a discreet one. Although this does not preclude both of them from being both faithful and discreet.

In the case of the baptism into Moses, literally this was one baptism by the cloud and the sea into his name, a name which he was given by his covenant with God, the law covenant. This covenant was a sub-covenant of the Abrahamic covenant and provided for the covenanter to receive the righteous decree in the flesh through a baptism of works perfected by faith. But in the symbolic meaning two baptisms are referred to, one by the heavenly water in the cloud, which is the baptism by holy spirit, a baptism of faith perfected by works, giving cleanliness in the conscience, this being a temporary forgiveness of sins in the future. And the other by the earthly water in the sea, which is a baptism in a bath, a baptism by men, giving cleanliness in the flesh, from dead works, this being a permanent forgiveness of sins in the past.

Peter described the temporary residents scattered about, the ones sanctified by the spirit, in four ways, and literally they were a chosen race and a royal priesthood and a holy nation and a people for special possession. But in the symoblic meaning, we have four sanctified groups, like the sheet let down from heaven 'by its 4 extremities' (Acts 10:11 - NWT) 'to 4 starts being let down upon the earth' (Acts 10:11 - KI), which he saw. These four groups are made up of only three races, for the 'royal priesthood' is not described as a race or a nation or a people. The three races are the anointed remnant the Nethinim and the great crowd, the spiritual Jews the spiritual Romans and the spiritual Greeks. The four groups of people who 'declare abroad the virtues of the one that called you out of darkness into his wonderful light' (1 Peter 2:9), are the sanctified congregations of the four faithful and discreet slaves, FDS1,2,3,4 who we will investigate later on. The four starters for the 4 starts are the 4 antetypical Elijah's, who are John the baptist, Paul, Russell, Ritchie.

As regards Jeremiah's declaration of the new covenant made with two houses, the literal meaning is well known. What is not so well known, and what I am the messenger of is that the symbolic meaning has two new covenants made with two houses. Because the great crowd do not have a subcovenant of the Abrahamic covenant in our current doctrine. The Jews had the law covenant, the spiritual Jews have the new covenant, what do the great crowd have? If they are going to get everlasting life as promised in Matthew25, and before this system ends, then they will need to be baptised in holy spirit, and enter into a subcovenant of the Abrahamic covenant with God. This covenant is the greater covenant of Keturah, Abraham's third wife/concubine (Gen 25:1/1 Chron 1:32). What Jeremiah is saying is look! he is making one new covenant with one house, the house of David, on mount Zion, and he is making another new covenant with another house, the house of Solomon, on mount Moriah.

We already know that there is a further new covenant, because every scripture, being alive, has a further fulfilment. In the case of Jeremiah 31:31, this means that there is to be a newer covenant, in addition to the new covenant. The distributive symbolism, tells us that it will be with a house, or temple, and a different race of Jews, in fact the Edenic Jews. For there were three fathers to Israel, and this is an event symbolism, rather than an account symbolism, for we can take any series of events that truly happened to the physical Jews and make a symbolic interpretation of them even if no one account describes all of the events. The three fathers make three races, not one race in the symbolic meaning. Abraham fathered the physical Jew, and Isaac, who is Jesus, fathered the spiritual Jew, and Jacob, who is me, fathers the Edenic Jew. All three races have their own subcovenant because God said to Moses:

And I shall indeed remember my covenant with Jacob; and even my covenant with Isaac and even my covenant with Abraham I shall remember, and the land I shall remember (Leviticus 26:42).

Three covenants with three fathers a classic distributive symbolism.

The 'Scribes and Pharisees' by their very description, refer to two further Pharisaical groups of God's true people.

In the case of Elijah, we read that he must turn the heart of fathers back upon sons and sons back upon fathers (KI). In the symbolic meaning one Elijah does the former and another Elijah does the latter. Neither of these is the Elijah of the literal meaning who was John the baptist. Elijah2 and Elijah4, Paul and I, save the 'earth' the administrations of FDS1 and FDS3 from destruction turning hearts around from fathers on Jesus' right to sons his left, in impalement symbolism, the two evildoers who die the same death as the Christ, one rebuking the other. We do this through FDS2,4. I am not explaining this here - see 'Letter to the elders'.

So when Isaiah says:

This is what Jehovah has said, your creator Oh Jacob, and your former, Oh Israel: Do not be afraid, for I have repurchased you. I have called you by your name (Isaiah 43:10).

Then the literal meaing relates to the physical Jacob, who was Israel. But there are two symbolic meanings, one for the greater Jacob and one for the greater Israel, these relates to spiritual Israel, and spiritual Jacob, if you like, the heavenly new covenant and the earthly new covenant, two new races of Jews.

Reference: [3] Omission symbolism

So David said: Anyone striking the Jebusites first, he will become head and prince/chief [רש]. And Joab the son of Zeruiah got to go up first, and he came to be head (1 Chron 11:6).

What happenned to the prince?

As for you, lift up your rod and stretch your hand out over the sea and split it apart, that the sons of Israel may go through the midst of the sea on dry land (Exodus 14:16).

Moses now stretched his hand out over the sea; and Jehovah began making the sea go back by a strong east wind all night long and converting the sea basin into dry ground, and the waters were being split apart (Exodus 14:21).

What happenned to the rod?

Look! There are days coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I will conclude with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah a new covenant (Jeremiah 31:31).

For this is the covenant that I shall conclude with the house of Israel after those days, is the utterance of Jehovah. I will put my law within them, and in their heart I shall write it (Jeremiah 31:33).

Fine, but what about the house of Judah?

How long will the vision be of the constant feature and of the transgression causing desolation, to make both the holy place and the army things to trample on?

So he said to me: Until 2300 evenings and mornings and the holy place will certainly be brought into its right condition (Dan 8:13,14).

Fine, but what about the 'army'?

Next he commanded the crowd to recline on the grass and took the 5 loaves and 2 fishes, and, looking up to heaven, he said a blessing, and, after breaking the loaves, he distributed them to the disciples, the disciples in turn to the crowds. So all ate and were satisfied, and they took up the surplus of fragments 12 baskets full (Matt 14:19,20).

Great, wonderful, miraculous, but what did he do with the 2 fishes?

This symbolism is recognisable only as a result of our faith in the perfection of God. For if the reader says in his heart: Oh, Jehovah did bother to tell us about the fishes, he is saying that the true God is negligent. The only conclusion possible for the man with faith it seems to the writer is that the true God is saying just as much by omission as he is saying by inclusion. This ommission is deliberate and calculated it is not an oversight. I know that as men we are used to seeing ommissions which are mistakes, or oversights, in all of the documents that we read. But we have to remember that the bible is a divine document, it is not like the News of the World, it is of course the News of the Heavens. It has no printing errors, no unconfirmed reports in it.

All of this is rather like the fine public declaration that Jesus made before Pontius Pilate, which consisted essentially of Jesus standing there whilst Pilate said: Ecce Homo, it was a silent public declaration, but never has more been said than on that day. Who has made a better speech than that silence?

The above omission symbolisms take the form that further information is supposed to be provided about A & B, but in fact the further information only involves A. Information about B is deliberately omitted.

In the case of Joab, he was supposed to become the head and the prince but he is only said to have become the head in the account, whereas in truth he became the prince as well:

So the king said to Joab the prince/chief [רש] of the military forces who was with him: Move about, please, through all the tribes of Israel, from Dan to Beer-sheba, and YOU men register the people, and I shall certainly know the number of the people (2 Samuel 24:2).

The symbolic meaning of this appears to be that there are two greater Joab's who become princes but experience some difficulty in becoming heads, since this for a fact is the fulfilment on me. The literal fulfilment described only in terms of headship is pointing to the symbolic fulfilment being one to do with becoming the prince.

Likewise when Moses is told to lift up his rod and to stretch out his hand, there are two greater Moses' who lift up their rods, the rods of FDS2,4, who are Paul and I, but we experience some difficulty in stretching out our hands over the sea to baptise.

Jeremiah 31:31 is a distributive symbolism, with further information then provided by the omission symbolism, which ignores the house of Judah. The Meaning is that the New covenant although literally made with the physical houses of Judah and Israel and every other physical house, is symbolically made with a greater house of Israel, namely spiritual Israel, the house of David, and then a further new covenant is made with a greater house of Judah, namely Edenic Israel, the house of Jehovah. This omission symbolism confirms as correct the distributive symbolism interpretation that two new covenants will be made, since the first fulfilment involves only one greater house in verse 33, and therefore there has to be a second fulfilment in order for the house of Judah to get a look in. It also shows us that the second fulfilment is the one on the greater house of Judah, rather than Israel, and it is saying that there is a difficulty with the fulfilment on the house of Israel, there is a difficulty with the new covenant. This difficulty is that it is broken, the memorial has failed.

Similarly the transgression that causes desolation is the betrayal of the evil slave - see later, and this renders the army that will fight Armageddon, namely the remnant, something to trample on, and this trampling ends 4600 solar days after 1992February1, which is 1290 lunar days before 2008Nisan14, which is 2004Elul14, because on this day the last remnant brothers dies and the constant feature of their sacrifice ends. But there is a difficulty in bringing the holy place into the right condition at that time, this problem is the great tribulation, which starts on 2004Tishri15, 1335 days before the middle of Armageddon (see - Letter to the Elders).

Finally the 5 loaves are distributed via the disciples, because these stand for the food of the first 5 watches of the 'loaf class' the bread partakers of FDS3. Who whilst they eat the loaf of Jesus' body, they do not appear to be able to use their loaf to any great extent themselves. But the 2 fishes which are the two watches of FDS4, are not distributed in this way. Self-feeding is allowed, in the last two watches. The omission symbolism is saying that there is a problem, a difficulty, with the feeding method of FDS3, the one that goes via the disciples. This problem is the leaven of the loaves:

Then they grasped that he said to watch out, not for the leaven of the loaves, but for the teaching of the Pharisees and Sadducees (Matt 16:12).

God's people have become Brooklynians, rather than Christians, we eat food from the disciples but not from the Christ himself, we follow the slave but not the master of that slave.

Reference: [4] Elementary Counting

And they will be given into his hand for a time, times and half a time (Dan 7:25).

It will be for an appointed time, appointed times and a half (Dan 12:7).

There is where she is fed for a time, times and half a time (Rev 12:14).

I can do no better here than to quote my first letter to the Society, that they actually received, to describe the meaning of this strange way of saying 3.5: If the man on the Clapham omnibus is asked: What is half of seven? he replies: It is three and a half, he does not reply: It is one plus ones plus a half of one. It is therefore manifestly apparent that the true God, who is most certainly able to do anything that the man on the Clapham omnibus is able to do, having created that man, is saying a lot more than "Three and a half times", when he says: A time, times and half a time. Hopefully the man on the Clapham omnibus will one day know what this greater meaning of this central expression in the bible really is (Dan 12:4)!

One of the things that is certainly being said is that plurals count as two times, since the word 'times' is interpretted as 720 days in the above scriptures. In this context singulars count as one time and halves count as half a time. But Solomon has said:

For everything there is an appointed time, even a time for every affair under the heavens (Ecclesiastes 3:1).

This is a repitition. So yes there is an appointed time for everything, but there is also another meaning to this scripture, a further fulfilment. This is that there is a time count on every sentence in the bible. This is the fourth dimension of the holy book. The first is the literal, the second is the symbolic, the third is the cryptic, and the fourth is the coded numeric, the time count. For Paul wants us to be able to thoroughly grasp mentally along with all the holy ones what is the:

Breadth and length and height and depth (Ephesians 3:18).

A scripture which reveals divine knowledge because it was Einstein who first found space-time to be 4 dimensional 1850 years after Paul wrote this, and Crick and Watson discovered that the Genetic code was 4 dimensional 1900 years after Paul wrote this. Even David spoke of this count under inspiration saying:

Show us just how to count our days in such a way as to bring a heart of wisdom in (Psalm 90:12).

Because days or years or months are all times. So the request is equivalent to: Show us how to count 'times'. It's like God said in the first chapter:

Let luminaries come to be in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night, and they must serve a signs for seasons and days and years (Gen 1:14).

And a day is one time round for the earth, a month is one time round for the moon and a year is one time round for the sun, so a day a month and a year are all 'times'. The meaning of this is that the physical fulfilment of Nebuchadnezzar behaving like an animal for 7 times, could have been 7 days, 7 months, or 7 years.

This booklet does not rely on this time count, but nonetheless we do use it for extra detail from time to time (if you will). The count works like this:

Singular words count as one time

Plural words count as two times

Halves of anything count as half a time

verbs multiply

The prepositions: and, but, upon, with, after; add

The prepositions: into, from, until; multiply

The prepositions: In and under; are special cases which we will not go into

There is a lot more to this count than the above.

The count works on the Hebrew and Greek original text, not on any translation unless it is a count transparent translation, and no-one has yet made such a translation. The General basis of the count is that any sentence represents a number of times. For example the sentence:

'The kings ate the potatoes'

counts a 4 times, because this action effectively occurs 4 times because two kings are eating two potatoes and so a king is eating a potatoe 4 times. We say two kings because 'times' counts as twice. This is actually an intergal part of Hebrew Grammar, which is the code of the language of the bible, from a linguistic point of view. Hebrew has singular, plural and dual mode. We take all plurals as duals from a counting point of view. The import of this is that in the greater meaning of the kings eating the potatoes, this meal could have lasted 4 days, 4 months or 4 years, or there might have been 4 greater meals.

'All' or 'Every' counts as 2x and multiplies, it is understood as 'some plus the rest'. So that 'all of the horses' counts as 4x. This letter is the case for an accusation more than a text book so I am not going to go into this counting much here.

Ref: [5] Daniel 5: MENE, MENE, TEKEL & PARSIN

This is the interpretation of the word [i.e. phrase]

MENE: He numbered the God, reign of you

and he brought to end her 2x

TEKEL: You were weighed in the scales

And you were found wanting 5x

PERES: She is divided, kingdom of you

And she is given to Mede and Persian 3x

(NIVHEOT)

10x, so 10 resurrections, the 10 fingers of Gabriel's hands in Daniel 12, which he holds up while floating, ascending above the river Hikkedel, (see Letter to the Elders):

Even there fire will devour you. A sword will cut you off. It will devour you like the locust species. Make yourself heavy in numbers like the locust species; make yourself heavy in numbers like the locust (Nahum 3:15).

Two heavenly locusts, one in each presence, each has 5 instars (see letter to the Elders). Both of these fledglings, having reached the 5th instar stage, one in 119Tishri and the other in 2004Tishri, do their final moult at Armageddon, becoming adult locusts, the 6th and last stage, which can fly. They get their angelic wings when they become kings, and then they chew up the whole planet. The kingdom is divided and numbered twice, Mene, Mene, and actually divided twice 'Parsin' is the plural of Peres. These are two groups of 5 resurrections, and both are numbered, and the first two resurrections in the first century are Jesus, and Jesus, in 29T and 33N.

No man has ascended into heaven but he that descended from heaven, the Son of man (John 3:13).

So Jesus the non adamic human ascended and Michael the angel descended. It's OK for a non-adamic human to enter into heaven before Jesus died.

We have 8 other resurrections, 5 shekels and 3 half shekels. And we know that each century is made up of entries of X and .5X only, and we know that there are two divisions in two. The solution is:

29T(30) Jesus M 1918N 16,000 S

33N Jesus M 1925T(30) 16,000 S

59T(60) 32,000 S 1955T(60) 16,000 S

99T(100) 32,000 S 1995T(100) 8,000 HS

119T 16,000 HS 2004T 8,000 HS 80,000 64,000

The first century 30,60,100 starts from the birth of Jesus, the start of the first half baptism, in 2TishriBCE. The second presence 30,60,100 starts from 1895Tishri, the start of the second half baptism of the remnant. Notice the two divisions in two: 'Parsin'. We take the first century 'shekel' [S] as 32,000 souls, and the twentieth century 'shekel' [S] as 16,000 souls. We then have 5 shekels and 3 half shekels. The Minas are Jesus here. Each resurrection table has entries of X and .5X. This is also a witness to the divisions in two of both the first and twentieth century FDSs. The Romans and Greeks get the kingdom from the Jews twice. Like Ahasuerus said twice to Esther at the two different banquets:

Then the king said to her: What do you have, O Esther the queen, and what is your request? To the half of the kingship--let it even be given to you! (Esther 5:3).

In time the king said to Esther during the banquet of wine: What is your petition? Let it even be granted you! And what is your request? To the half of the kingship--let it even be done! (Esther 5:6).

Like Herod said to the daughter of Herodias

Yes, he swore to her: Whatever you ask me for, I will give it

to you, up to half my kingdom (Mark 6:23).