It took a long time for mankind to accept that smoking drastically increases the risk of lung cancer an in fact of all cancers. Cancer Research UK says...
"More than four in five UK lung cancers are caused by smoking. Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death in the UK and accounts for around two thirds (68 per cent) of smoking-related cancer deaths.
People who smoke were first shown to be more likely to develop lung cancer than non-smokers in 1950. This study found that people who smoked around 20 cigarettes a day had 26 times the lung cancer risk of non-smokers. And people who smoked around three cigarettes a day still had six times the lung cancer risk of non-smokers.
After these first results came out, UK scientists began a large long-running study of smoking in British doctors, which Cancer Research UK has helped to fund, that has told us a lot about the dangers of smoking. This study has found similarly huge risks associated with smoking. Men who smoked at 25 or more cigarettes a day had over 24 times the risk of dying from lung cancer as people who had never smoked.
There are long time lags between changes in the number of people who smoke and the number of people who develop lung cancer due to smoking. So rates of lung cancer in the UK reflect smoking rates decades earlier.
We cannot exactly calculate a person’s lung cancer risk based on how many cigarettes they smoke or the number of years they have been a smoker. But research has shown that lung cancer risk is greatest among those who smoke the most cigarettes, over the longest period of time, having started at the youngest age.
Although both have an effect on risk, the number of years someone has spent smoking is more important than the number of cigarettes they smoke a day. This means that overall, smoking 20 cigarettes a day for 20 years is even worse for you than smoking 40 a day for 10 years.*
See http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/smoking-and-cancer/smoking-facts-and-evidence#smoking_facts2
Large studies looking at the health risks of smoking, such as the British Doctors Study and the Million Women Study, have found that people smoking between 1 and 14 cigarettes a day are at least seven times as likely to die from lung cancer than people who have never smoked. And one study found people who smoked between 5 and 9 cigarettes a day had a higher risk of dying from lung cancer, or any type of cancer - see http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/causes-of-cancer/smoking-and-cancer/smoking-facts-and-evidence#smoking_facts3
So let us say for argument's sake, that smoking increases your chances of getting lung cancer by 25x. So the correlation between smoking and lung cancer is 25x.
"Previous investigations have indicated that the ratio of sex offenders against female children vs. offenders against male children is approximately 2:1.
The proportions of heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles among sex offenders against children: An exploratory study (PDF Download Available). Available from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/21598484_The_proportions_of_heterosexual_and_homosexual_pedophiles_among_sex_offenders_against_children_An_exploratory_study
David Finkelhor: A sourcebook of Child Sexual Abuse. The data on pages 20-21 and 65 shows that the number of boys abused is 45% of the number of girls. This aggregates data from 19 studies. But the true percentage may be higher due to male pride hindering reporting according to the book - See - http://www.childmolestationprevention.org/pdfs/study.pdf
Of 4007 pedophiles studied by Abel and Harlow, 3952 were male and only 55 were female. See Abel GG, Harlow N. The Abel and Harlow child molestation prevention study. Excerpted from The Stop Child Molestation Book. Philadelphia, Pa: Xlibris; 2001.
In another study of admitted child molesters by Abel and Harlow, there were 5218 males and 103 females - The Stop Child Molestation Book. Philadelphia, Pa: Xlibris; 2001. So basically paedophiles are 98% male and 2% female.
The Family Research Council has a very thorough analysis of the research (http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=is02e3) ...
"Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.
The evidence indicates that homosexual men molest boys at rates grossly disproportionate to the rates at which heterosexual men molest girls. To demonstrate this it is necessary to connect several statistics related to the problem of child sex abuse: 1) men are almost always the perpetrator; 2) up to one-third or more of child sex abuse cases are committed against boys; 3) less than three percent of the population are homosexuals. Thus, a tiny percentage of the population (homosexual men), commit one-third or more of the cases of child sexual molestation." http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=is02e3
A new study quoted in the independent newspaper found that homosexuals and heterosexuals are quite different psychologically. "The new study analysed the behaviour of 33,000 American adults, and found 3% of men and 2.7% of women were not heterosexual." http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/hetrosexual-and-homosexual-people-categorically-different-and-not-on-a-sexuality-continuum-study-a6741961.html November 2015.
We now do the maths on the following data.
1. 33.3% of the victims of paedophilia are boys and 66.7% are girls.
2. 3% of the male population are homosexual and 97% are heterosexual.
3. 98% of paedophiles are male and 2% are female.
Since 98% of the perpetrators are male, at least 31.3% of all paedophilia is male on male. So 3% of men (homosexuals) carry out 31.3% of the child abuse and 97% of men (heterosexuals) carry out 66.7% of the child abuse and women carry out 2% of it.
So the chances of a homosexual male being an abuser are 31.3/3 times more than average, whereas the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser are 66.7/97 times the average (i.e. less than the average).
So the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser are 31.3/3 x 97/66.7 = 15.17 more than the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser.
So if a boy child is placed in the care of two male homosexual parents then his chances of being sexually abused are 30x greater than if he is fostered out to a heterosexual couple (since females hardly do any paedophilia).
Now the homosexual activists have come up with a paper thin deception to cover this up. They say that male paedophiles are not homosexuals, they are paedophiles. And therefore there are in fact no homosexual paedophiles at all. This neatly exonerates them (if you fall for it) and condemns the next generation of boys to further abuse my reclassified homosexuals.
Of course if you define a homosexual as being a homosexual who is not a paedophile, then no homosexual will be a paedophile. But you could just as well define a politician as being a politician who is not a liar. Then all politicians would be honest. It is a really pathetic attempt to defend the indefensible. But people seem to swallow it. The proof that male-on-male paedophiles are not just interested in children and are therefore homosexual, is the work of Abel and Harlow quoted above who state that...
"Pedophiles are subdivided into several classifications. One of the first distinctions made when classifying pedophiles is to determine whether they are “exclusively” attracted to children (exclusive pedophile) or attracted to adults as well as children (nonexclusive pedophile). In a study by Abel and Harlow of 2429 adult male pedophiles, only 7% identified themselves as exclusively sexually attracted to children, which confirms the general view that most pedophiles are part of the nonexclusive group."
A Profile of Pedophilia: Definition, Characteristics of Offenders, Recidivism, Treatment Outcomes, and Forensic Issues RYAN C. W. HALL, MD, AND RICHARD C. W. HALL, MD, PA Mayo Clin Proc. 2007;82(4):457-471 page 459.
http://www.abusewatch.net/pedophiles.pdf
Wikipedia also quotes: "According to a U.S. study on 2429 adult male sex offenders who were categorized as "pedophiles", only 7% identified themselves as exclusive; indicating that many or most child sexual abusers may fall into the non-exclusive category" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia .
These 2429 paedophiles were long term molesters who continues molesting for more than 6 months. The authors of the study state: "Only 7% of child molesters show no sexual interest in adults." http://www.childmolestationprevention.org/pdfs/study.pdf (page 11)
So plainly homosexual paedophiles are NOT only interested in children and therefore cannot be reclassified as paedophiles rather than homosexuals.
There is a good article on this subject at - http://rethinkingtheology.com/2012/10/22/links-between-homosexuality-and-pedophilia/
It took decades before government accepted the massive statistical link between smoking and cancer. According to scripture the day will never come in this system when governments accept the massive statistical link between homosexuality and paedophilia. Instead we will get town square acceptance of homosexuality (the account of Sodom in Genesis19). Well today the town square is the media. And the media now fully accepts homosexuality with the recent supreme court decision in the US to permit gay marriage in the eyes of Caesar. That is a sign that the greater volcanic eruption is about to befall the greater Sodom.