The July13 photo was taken by Pulitzer Prize winning photographer Evan Vucci.
On January6 2021, half a million people believed that the 2020 election was stolen and collected in DC for a vote fraud protest.
There are many many ways to rig or to steal an election.
1. You can produce statistically skewed opinion polls designed to under or over estimate the vote share of a candidate to give the false impression that either the election is a foregone conclusion or that the candidate has no hope..
2. You can hide critical information from the electorate.
3. You can manufacture false smears against your opponent
4. You can arrest and charge your opponent with crimes if you are the government (Iran, Russia, Brazil, USA, EU etc). The UK does this with Tommy Robinson at every possible opportunity.
5. You can try and bankrupt your opponent with lawfare, or simply debank him and blame it on the bank.
6. You can arrest some of the activists who helped your opponent get elected in the past, in order to send a clear message to your opposition, that if you want to feed your children, do NOT campaign against the present government
7. You can make yourself so popular that people rise from the dead to vote for you.
8. You can produce such an appealing manifesto that 110% of the electorate vote for you in some areas.
9. You can promise to deliver a policy which you know you cannot possibly deliver.
10. You can send spoilers into your opponents campaign or party to ruin it from the inside through malicious leaks, fake documentaries, perfectly timed defections etc..
11. You can politicise education at all levels and turn schools and universities into political Madrassas.
12. You can politicise the public sector, the organs of state, and turn them all into campaign offices for your party.
13. You can politicise law enforcement to the point where anyone who votes for your opponent is considered to be some kind of deranged domestic terrorist and is put on a watch list.
14. You can politicise the justice system, so that judges, attorneys and tea trolley operatives who work in legal firms, will lose their practice licences and their jobs if they act for your opponent
15. You can politicise the taxation system and taxation enforcement, so that key demographics who vote for your opponent pay more tax and suffer more tax investigations. This is equivalent to bribing people to vote for you.
16. You can censor and close down media outfits and media posts which depart from your fake narrative.
17. You can shadow ban every negative comment about yourself and amplify until trending every positive comment by gaining control of as many social media companies as possible with lucrative contracts using tax payers money
18. You can just spend huge amounts of tax payers or fine payers money advertising how wonderful you are (The MAYOR of LondON)
19. You can invent and fund the study of academic subjects which falsely give your politics the facade of being a science (social sciences and socialistology)
20. You can of course corrupt the MSM and literally write the news for them, whilst falsely representing that they are impartial.
And at this point I would expect to be concluding by saying: But the worst method of them all is that you can connect all your vote counting machines to the internet and leave them connected all through the counting process on election night. That is incredibly dangerous because computers have no conscience. They do not know or care if they are being fair or if they are cheating. They simply produce the numbers they are programmed to produce by the programmer who logged in last or by the most dominant vote counting or vote tampering software they are running.
The American software engineer, Clint Curtis, gave evidence under oath in court, that for the 2000 election, the soon to be very successfully elected Florida congressman, Tom Feeney, contracted his company to write a program that returned the result of 51:49 in any election in favour of the candidate specified by the user. He wrote that program thinking it was for machine checking purposes. But after having delivered the software, his boss informed him that he did not think it was going to be used for those purposes.
I ran some polling companies at the time (The British Fax Directory and 20th Century Fax) and became very familiar with election and other polling statistics. I remember thinking that far too many election results were 51:49 in the US and elsewhere. I hardly ever got those results in my polling. It was always more polarised than that. 51:49 was actually a very uncommon outcome from our polls. But it was happening all over America. I actually thought that they must be cheating just enough to win by 1% in most of those cases. What I did not know was that Curtis had written software for US vote counting machines that ensured precisely that result. His experiences has been dramatised in several movies:
Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections
Unprecedented: The 2000 Presidential Election
Murder, Spies & Voting Lies: The Clint Curtis Story.
These movies provide good evidence that elections which involve computerised vote counting machines in the US are rigged. The Dutch government once invited Curtis to advise them on how to make election results counted by computers secure in Holland. He said there is only one way to do that: You have to throw all the computers you have into your canals.
But something far more blatant, something far more obvious, something that had previously been the preserve of 3rd world dictatorships, occurred on election night on 2020November3. The vote counters in 6 swing states, MI WI NV GA PA NC. in all of which Trump was leading, stopped counting in the middle of the night at around 4 pm UK time (I was watching it). This was an absolutely unprecedented event in televised US presidential elections which began in 1948. But ignoring that for the minute, the chances of any event randomly occurring only in 6 swing states and not in any non swing state and occurring only in states where Trump was winning and not occurring in any state where Biden was winning are actually 1 in 360,000. So I knew the interruptions were not random but were coordinated. For a mathematical proof that the 2020 election was rigged, which I emailed to every academic in the maths departments of Harvard. Yale, Princeton and the stats lab at Cambridge which nobody could afford to be interested in please see here. For a great twitter video presentation which captures it beautifully with less mathematics see here.
So there are 22 reasons why a vote fraud protest was appropriate in 2020. In fact the real question that needs to be asked, is why wasn't every American protesting the result and demanding proper audits of the vote counting machines and the midnight shenanigans in the 6 swing states, of which Biden was eventually deemed to have won 5? And more to the point why weren't the congressmen themselves protesting? Ever since Clint wrote his charming little political ditty, every election result depending on a vote counting machine was less than trustworthy.
So many labels. But none of them included the phrase: Vote Fraud protesters: Which is what they actually were. They were not rioters, because nothing got burnt. They were not insurrectionists because they were Americans and none of them were armed. They were not domestic terrorists, because they had no weapons. The only weapons used that day were the pipe bombs which look more and more like an inside job and which Steven Sund, the head of capitol police for the event regarded as a deliberate distraction for his under resourced staff, and the gun fired by the police officer whose name they hid for weeks, which killed an unarmed woman Ashli Babbitt. They were not election deniers, they were election probity protesters. Then were not conspiracy theorists, they were conspiracy realists. They were not enemies of democracy. They were its only friend in that building on that day other than the few senators who voted against the 2020 fraud ratification. They were slandered, slandered, slandered, slandered and slandered again. Then they were prosecuted criminally.
On 2024January6, the 3rd anniversary of the protest, 1265 of them had been charged with offences, 718 had been found or had plead guilty and 467 had been jailed for typically between 2 and 3 years, and 171 had been found guilty having plead innocent. In circumstances where it has been known since Jan6 that exculpatory video evidence of the capitol vote fraud protest has been withheld by congress (some of which was released to Tucker Carlson). So the DOJ is guilty of prosecutorial misconduct, because the part of that evidence released by Tucker showed the police facilitating the trespass and escorting the Shaman guy onto the senate floor, which is an absurd thing for them to do, and destroys the fake Jan6 narrative and the concept of breaking and entering or trespass. For the avoidance of doubt: The capitol police have authority to permit vote fraud protesters into the capitol building. And if they do that (which they did to some extent) there is not crime in entering the place.
The now fully exposed as Partisan Attorney General Merrick Garland described the DOJ as having conducted: "one of the largest and most complex and resource-intensive investigations in our history."
You bet it was. Second only to the resources he spends on prosecuting Trump, I suspect. But with all of those resources, the pipe bomber was never found and much of the video footage of Jan6 was never made available.
So these half a million defenders of American democracy from an unprecedented high tech fraud vulnerability combined with a most blatant 3rd world, 6 swing state coordinated, election night vote count suspension, have been criminalised, demonised and slandered to the maximum and beyond all reason, by a partisan AG running a partisan DOJ through a partisan judiciary. And many people around the world believe them to be what Hillary Clinton would call a basket of deplorables.
Then one fine day in Butler Pennsylvania, thousands more of these supporters of President Trump convene to hear him speak about his plans should he get reelected by them. And in what looks more and more like an obvious security service stand down, Trump gets shot and falls/dives to the ground. So what did these deplorables do? What did these domestic terrorists do? What did these insurrectionists and election deniers do? What did these rioters do? Riot did they? Save their skins did they? Run out of the rally screaming did they? Trample over their fellow republicans in their rush to save their own backsides did they? All go and hide in the basement of the nearest government building and leave the place deserted did they - like their representatives did on Jan6 in the absence of any gunfire from those protesters?
Nope. Not a one of them even flinched. Some ducked down. Some threw themselves over their families and some just sat there in sadness and in grief. No one showed any concern for their personal safety in that moment at all (other than by ducking down). Not one supporter. The only thing they were concerned about was the probity of American democracy. To a human being: To a man, to a woman and to a child, they put democracy above their own lives. And one of them, a fireman, Corey Comperatore gave his life protecting his family from the sniper's bullet. Whereas the senate, when faced with unarmed vote fraud protesters, scarpered faster than the house of commons before an Andrew Bridgen vaccine presentation.
Trump said at the RNC convention that it was the sadness he saw on the faces of the crowd when he was down on the ground that made him break protocol and stick his head up above the secret service scrum and punch the air and say fight fight fight! Trump is obviously a really courageous guy and a born leader. But on that day, it was his love for his supporters that gave him that courage and it was their love for him, for his presidency, for their country and for American democracy that gave them theirs.
35 By this all shall know that you are my disciples, if you have love among yourselves (John 13).
Yes. The very thing that they are accused of denying and being enemies to, they were prepared give their lives for, without a second thought.
So July13 exposes Jan6 for the setup that it really was, for the trap that they were ushered into. Because in the chess game of 21st century politics, the magnitude of the investigation into the protest by the democrat DOJ is directly proportional to the magnitude of the election fraud by the democrats that said investigation is designed to conceal. Trump was outplayed on Jan6. He was several chess moves behind the democrats. But deceptions have a limited lifespan in the modern world. And the set up on July13 has now busted the setup that was Jan6.
On Jan6 the state successfully assassinated US democracy through Mike Pence. On July13 their assassination of US democracy through Thomas Matthew Crooks was not so successful. But both of them were the same play..
On Jan6 US democracy was outplayed by Nancy Pelosi, the Pentagon and Congress. On July13 US democracy was saved by an act of God and by the courage of Trump and his supporters.
For the real crime that the Jan6 protesters committed in the eyes of the deep state, was that they saw through the rather obvious 3rd world style 2020 election fraud. And that, to them, is unforgivable.
George W Bush (who may well have never legitimately won a presidential election in his life) once attempted to say: Fool me once shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. Well we have now seen the same play from the Obama (Biden) administration twice. Here is the play: You set up a scenario for which it is statistically inevitable that somebody will pose a threat to the target you seek to hit. You then under resource sufficiently, or stand down specifically, or delay instructions for long enough to enable said attack. And Hey Presto! Your target is hit and it was nothing to do with me guv.
This play is called stochastic terrorism. You achieve your goal through random chance by rigging the tables so much that it is almost inevitable that your desired outcome will occur. So the result looks like random chance. But statistically it was actually more or less a definite.
So imagine now that you are the head of the CIA. And every year you get 3 nutters who look like they want to assassinate Trump and another 3 nutters who look like they want to assassinate Biden. First you rig the game a bit by dialling up the rhetoric against Trump. So you end up with 10 nutters who want to take him out each year, 3 of which look they might actually be able to achieve it. Then you simply under resource Trump's security detail at the moment when you know one of these nutters is planning to strike. You do not know if he will succeed on any one occasion. But you do know that statistically, if you play the game correctly and for long enough, his assassination is almost inevitable (barring acts of God).
I am not saying that this is what happened on July13. The truth will hopefully come out. But I do see a great similarity with the under resourcing on Jan6 when the DC national guard was sent out of the state and 5 requests from Steven Sund and one from Trump for national guard backup were denied by Pelosi and the Pentagon.
If you have half a million Trump supporters and only 1000 police and you leave the door open - then sure you haven't primed anyone in particular to trespass. But it is statistically inevitable that somebody will. Then if you add a whole bunch of FBI agitators to the mix, you have primed it. But you have not conspired with those who fall into your trap.
And if you do not believe there is a God. Ask yourself how a 78 year old man can decide to turn his head to the one and only angle that will save his life whilst leaning sufficiently in to the microphone, not before and not after, but precisely within the 390 millisecond window between the shooter deciding the pull the trigger with Trump's head unturned, and him pulling the trigger 250 milliseconds later and the bullet reaching his turned and leant forward head, 140 milliseconds after that, having travelled 420 feet at 3000 feet per second. I would be lucky to get that movement right once in a day if I practiced it all week. And I am not 78.
Remember too, that the bullet was supersonic. So Trump cannot have heard it before it hit him. He just had to guess! He had to guess to millisecond accuracy and then execute to millimetre accuracy within a fraction of a second aged 78. Of course what happened was that 'he' decided to look at his illegal immigration chart at precisely the right time and in precisely the right way.
We can calculate the chance of initiating a 250ms move in a 390ms window in the first 10 minutes of Trump speech as being 140ms in 600 seconds or 1 in 4286.
Then we can calculate the chances of moving the head to precisely the right angle (which is to say placing the screen with the immigration chart at the right angle) at say 5 degrees in 135 degrees or 1 in 27
Then we can calculate the chances of leaning in to the microphone sufficiently (which again has to do with the placing of the chart but also the comfort of Trump's posture) at I don't know maybe 1 in 5.
So to do all 3 things right on cue, the chances are 1 in 587610. 1 in half a million or 0.000002 or 0.0002%. So there is a 0.0002% chance that Trump got lucky and a 99.9998% chance that God intervened.
So either Trump is the luckiest man on the face of the earth or God intervened. And given how many of Trump's casinos went bust it is obviously the latter. This does not necessarily mean that God endorses Trump. It could mean that he did not want a civil war in the US. Or it could mean that God, who can see any number of steps into the future, knows that saving Trump will help for some future event. But God is into perfect justice (Deuteronomy 32:4). So I would say he wanted to give Trump the chance that the globalists denied him in 2020 and were trying to deny him again on July13.