The 10th Generation Bible Code

Philo (20 BC - 54 AD)Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727)Rev. John Aquila Brown (1781-1842)Charles Taze Russell (1852-1916)

Newton: 'It was revealed to Daniel that the prophecies concerning the last times should be closed up and sealed until the time of the end: But then the wise should understand, and knowledge should be increased (Daniel 12:4,9,10). And therefore the longer they have continued in obscurity, the more hopes there are that the time is at hand in which they are to be made manifest.

 If they are never to be understood, to what end did God reveal them?

Certainly he did it for the edification of the church. And if so then it is certain that the church shall at length attain to the understandings thereof. I mean not all that call themselves Christians, but a remnant, a few scattered persons which God hath chosen, such as without being led by interest, education, or human authorities, can set themselves sincerely and earnestly to search after truth. For Daniel hath said that the wise shall understand, so he said also that none of the wicked shall understand' - Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727)

Philo: "For Philo (20BC to 54AD), a bible passage was like a human being. It had a body (i.e. a literal meaning) and a soul (an allegorical meaning). He accepted the literal meaning of many scriptures (e.g. the Mosaic Law) but he also believed that only the allegorical method could reveal the true inner meaning that God had encoded in them. Further Philo believed that hidden meaning lay behind numbers and names - see U271-11. More ingeniously, he also found it by playing with the many possible meanings of the same word and by regrouping the words of a biblical passage - (Introduction to Biblical Interpretation: Klein Blomberg and Hubbard)

Philo listed 21 rules for biblical interpretation. They are not dissimilar to the principles of the bible code that we have discovered or perhaps rediscovered! They are quoted in the Jewish Encyclopedia - http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/12116-philo-judaeus

There are in addition special rules that not only direct the reader to recognize the passages which demand an allegorical interpretation, but help the initiated to find the correct and intended meaning. These passages are such as contain: 
(1) the doubling of a phrase
(2) an apparently superfluous expression in the text
(3) the repetition of statements previously made
(4) a change of phraseology—all these phenomena point to something special that the reader must consider. 
(5) An entirely different meaning may also be found by a different combination of the words, disregarding the ordinarily accepted division of the sentence in question into phrases and clauses. 
(6) The synonyms must be carefully studied; e.g., why λαοs used in one passage and γένος in another, etc. 
(7) A play upon words must be utilized for finding a deeper meaning; e.g., sheep (προβατον) stand for progress in knowledge, since they derive their name from the fact of their progressing (προβαίνειν), etc. 
(8) A definite allegorical sense may be gathered from certain particles, adverbs, prepositions, etc.; and in certain cases it can be gathered even from 
(9) the parts of a word; e.g., from διά in διάλευκος. 
(10) Every word must be explained in all its meanings, in order that different interpretations may be found. 
(11) The skilful interpreter may make slight changes in a word, following the rabbinical rule, "Read not so, but so" (Ber. 10a). Philo, therefore, changed accents, breathings, etc., in Greek words. 
(12) Any peculiarity in a phrase justifies the assumption that some special meaning is intended: e.g., where μία ("one") is used instead of πρώτη ("first"; Gen. i. 5), etc. Details regarding the form of words are very important: 
(13) the number of the word, if it shows any peculiarity in the singular or the plural: the tense of the verb, etc.; 
(14) the gender of the noun; 
(15) the presence or omission of the article; 
(16) the artificial interpretation of a single expression; 
(17) the position of the verses of a passage; 
(18) peculiar verse-combinations; 
(19) noteworthy omissions; 
(20) striking statements; 
(21) numeral symbolism. 

Origen: The early church father (185 - 254 AD) contended that God had inspired the original biblical writer to incorporate the allegorical meaning into his writing. thus what Origen considered the highest meaning of scripture, its deaper spiritual truth, was already implicit in scripture, not something invented by the interpreter. In fact he believed that every scripture had a 3 fold meaning (literal, moral and allegorical) (Klein, Blomberg and Hubbard). 

Augustine of Denmark: (13th century AD) penned the following verse in Latin which describes the 4 possible senses of scripture. It was popular amongst Latin speaking monks in Medieval times...

The Letter speaks of deeds
Allegory to the faith
The Moral of how to act
Anagogy (prophetic meaning) of our destiny (Catechism of the Catholic Church).

Littera geta docet, quid credas allegoria
Moralis quid agas, quo tendas anagogica

[C1] Why would God cause the bible to be written in a code?
[C2] What reason is there to suppose that the bible is in a code?
[C2a] Why is the bible code so complicated and why is the bible so ambiguous?

The Principles of the Code So Far Extracted - Principia Codicis

Here is how we symbolically decode the scriptures - we need more minds on this. The bible was written by the father of all human minds for all human minds not just for the minds of the Lords Witnesses. Please come and help us decode God's book. We cannot see everything. Some interpretation are given to us. Some will be given to you if you have faith enough to seek them. Prove for yourself that the doctrine of Papal exclusivity is false. God wants to speak to all of his children. He wrote the scriptures for you too you know - As Russell Brand would say with a cheeky grin. Now might be a good time to fulfil your destiny?

Definition: A Symbolic Meaning of a word, is a further meaning to the literal meaning which meaning is related to the literal meaning in a symbolic way

Definition: A Fulfilment of a symbolic meaning of a word, is a particular example of that symbolic meaning. 

Definition: A bible scene is a literal story (which may have symbolic components to it) set at one location at one time involving one set of characters involved in one type of endeavour. We also call a scene a subaccount.

Definition: A bible account is a self contained complete bible story. These are normally single scenes but can also be multiple connected scenes. There may be several of these in one chapter, or an account may span several chapters. These accounts may refer to other bible accounts 

Definition: The Event symbolic meaning of a symbolic part of a scene is the symbolic interpretation of the events in that illustration/parable/dream/vision.

Definition: The Word symbolic meaning of a literal or symbolic scene or account is the symbolic interpretation of the nouns of that scene or account. 

Definition: A prophetic form is a repetitive phrase whose grammatical structure has coded information about the word symbolic meanings of the scene its in. A prophetic form in a scene only affects that scene/subaccount for threads and fulfilments. It affects the entire account for noun counts. 

A literal prophetic form in a scene affects the number of word symbolic threads or fulfilments for the literal nouns in that scene
A symbolic prophetic form in a scene affects the number of word symbolic threads or fulfilments for the symbolic nouns in that scene

Definition: A 'countable noun' is a noun acting as a noun (and not for example as a possessive adjective).

Definition: A thread of an account is one of its meanings (literal, event symbolic or word symbolic)

Definition: A word symbolic thread of a scene/ subaccount is a word symbolic meaning of the entire scene/ sub account.

Definition: A further fulfilment of a word symbolic scene/ subaccount is a second temporal occurrence of the word symbolic meaning of that scene/ subaccount

Definition: The literal meaning of an account OR the event symbolic meaning of an account AND every word symbolic meaning of an account combine to make the total number of threads or strands or meanings of that account..

Definition: A Prophetic Time is 360 years.

One line descriptions:

[C3] The Consistency Principle: Any element of the code that is found to be true for one account, is true for every account in the whole bible. In other words: Every account in the bible is written in precisely the same code
[C4] The Power Principle: Every word in the bible has power in the greater meaning if not in the literal meaning.
[C5] The Literal, Event Symbolic and Word Symbolic meanings of a Bible Account, Bible Scenes, Prophetic Forms, Countable Nouns, Threads:
[C6a] The Designations Principle: If one character or item in an account is referred to by two or more nouns or possessive noun chains, then these nouns or possessive noun chains refer to two or more characters or items in the word symbolic...
[C6b] The Successive Designations Principle: If a character or item designated by: 1. A noun acting as a noun. 2. An adjective acting as a noun (which almost invariably means that it is preceded by 'the' i.e. is definite or is in the construct in Hebrew
[C7a] The Descriptions Principle: If a character or item, represented by a countable noun, in an account makes two or more non successive appearances with differing descriptors, one of which can be no descriptor, (which descriptors can be... 
[C7b] The Successive Descriptions Principle: If a countable noun is described by 2/3/4 successive descriptors in the form 'noun descriptor and descriptor and descriptor' or 'noun descriptor, descriptor, descriptor' (which descriptors are adjectives or participles used as adjectives), then all the word symbolic... 
[C7c]
The Successive Articulations Principle: If a phrase containing a verb is successively articulated (the two articulations being separated by either nothing or by the word 'and'), then there are two greater meanings to the articulation which appear... 
[C7d] The Successive Alternatives Principle: If an account contains a series of successive alternatives, then each alternative must occur at least once in one thread. Each alternative must be realised in one or other meaning of the account.
[C7e] The Repeated Articulation Principle: If a verbal phrase is articulated twice non successively (separated by a word other than 'and') in one account, then it takes a greater meaning different from the literal meaning in all the word symbolic...
[C7f] GrammatoV It's a grammatical code
[C8] The Noun Counting Principle: The total number of meanings that a countable noun takes in all the threads of an account is the highest factor of the number of recitals of that noun in the account, which is less than or equal to the number of....
[C9] The No Coincidences Principle: There are no coincidences in the bible. Every apparent coincidence is appointed by God
[C10] The Prophetic Times Substitution Principle, the Generalisation of Daniel4: The phrase 'n times' in an account can stand for '360n times' or 'n/360 times' or 'n/30 times' or '30n times' in the greater meaning. Where a time can be a day a...
[C11] The Numerical Principle and the Times Principle: A given number of living or inanimate items in a bible account can stand symbolically for that number of 'Times'. A 'Time' can stand literally or symbolically for a day, a month or a year... 
[C12] The Jigsaw Principle of the Code: A church doctrine is correct only if it satisfies every scripture in the bible relating to the subject of the doctrine.
[C12a] The History of the English Bible: From John Wycliffe to King James
[C13] Binary (Yes/No) Question Principle: Any unanswered question asked in the scriptures with two possible answers (normally yes and no), has the answer in one word symbolic thread, being the opposite of the answer in the literal meaning or... 
[C13a] The Question Answering Principle: Any question asked in a bible account is answered somewhere in that account - somehow - often in the very verse that asks the question!
[C13b] Multiple Options/Outcomes Principle: Any account which contains multiple options or outcomes has all the options or outcomes fulfilled in the greater meanings which were not fulfilled in the literal meanings.
[C14] Reader Questions from the holy spirit: These are questions that are asked of various characters in the bible, but that are really meant for the various readers of the bible. They are questions asked by the Holy Spirit of the bible reader:
[C15] The Parallel Account and Subaccount Principle: - Spot the Difference...
[C16] The Omission Principle: If an account describes sets up two events and goes on to describe what happens in the first event but omits to describe what happens in the second (and any parallel account omits to describe it), then the second...
[C17] Helpful Tips
[C18] The Symbolic meaning of 7: If there are ' 7 things' in a bible account, then these things are successive in time in all event symbolic and word symbolic meanings.
[C19] Elementary Sentence Counting and Cryptic Scriptures
[C20] The 'Bible Code' of Eli Rips and Michael Drosnin
[C21] The History of Event and Word Symbolism
[C22] Research Ideas to Improve the Code
[C23] Hebrew and Greek Name Translation Principle:
The Hebrew or Greek meaning of a place/character name/title gives you the greater meaning of that character or place in the symbolic interpretation of the scripture. It gives you the symbolic...
[C24] Dave's Nounless Number Principle: If a nounless number occurs in scripture, then the number takes two temporal values in the word symbolic meaning
[C25] The Ambiguity Principle: If a phrase in the bible is ambiguous, having two meanings, then both meanings are true in one or more threads. Every possible meaning has a literal symbolic or prophetic fulfilment. 
[C26] The Maximal Distribution Principle: If in the bible an event is described as involving "A and B". Then in one or more threads two events are being referred to. One involving A and the other involving B.
[C27] The Pronoun Principle: The word symbolic meaning of a pronoun in a bible account is that of the noun which it represents in the word symbolic meaning which may not be the noun it represents in the literal meaning
[C28] The Unfulfilled Hypothetical Principle: Any hypothetical scenario described in scripture must actually occur in a greater meaning if it does not occur in the literal or event symbolic meaning or the scripture describing the hypothetical event has...
[C29] The 10 Stringed Harp of the Bible and the 2 Sets of 6 Layer Show Bread...
[C30] The nth of the month principle:
The phrase nth of the month (omitting the word day) can mean the nth day of the month or the nth Sabbath of the month or the nth festival of the month or the nth festival Sabbath of the month etc. etc.
[C31] The List Specification Principle: If a defined item is further specified by a list of examples of it, then the sentence count of that list is precise to the day
[C32] The Identical Repeated Phrase Principle: If a scriptural phrase is repeated in the same account then it is a key symbolism and the phrase takes a different meaning in the word threads to the literal meaning.
[C33] Common parable symbolism principle: Parables in the same literal account or in the same set of parallel literal accounts share the same symbolism. For it is all one account.
[C34] The Patriarch Principle: A Patriarch generally means the genetic house of that patriarch, the patriarch and all his offspring, the patriarch and his genetic descendants. A Covenant Mediator generally means the covenant house of that mediator... 
[C35] The day and hour principle: A day in the bible can be a 12 hour daylight day or a 24 hour calendar day literally, or an entire period of functionality, such as the metaphorical creative days of Genesis1...
[C36] The Immediate Number Repetition Principle: If a number (n) is repeated immediately then it stands for a time period of precisely n times...
[C37] The 8 Happinesses Principle: If a type of phrase is repeated successively n times, then it stands for n times precisely, which times are months or years...
[C38] The 1 out of n items Choice Principle: One item being chosen from n items, represents n times precisely which may be months or years...
[C39] The Interchangeability Principle: The prophetic form: Word1........Word2 and Word2........Word1, makes Word1 and Word2 interchangeable in ALL scripture...
[C40] The Missing Dimension Principle: The missing dimension is an arithmetic function of the given dimensions ...
[C41] The Acrostic Code of the Bible: According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrostic, ‘acrostic’ comes from the late Greek akróstichon, from ákros, and stíchos, is a poem or other writing in an alphabetic script, in which the first letter...
[C42] Counting Checks

Full Descriptions:

[C3] The Consistency Principle: Any element of the code that is found to be true for one account, is true for every account in the whole bible. In other words: Every account in the bible is written in precisely the same code

[C4] The Power Principle: Every word in the bible has power in the greater meaning if not in the literal meaning.

[C5] The Literal, Event Symbolic and Word Symbolic meanings of a Bible Account, Bible Scenes, Prophetic Forms, Countable Nouns, Threads:

Every literal account in the bible has the normal literal meaning.
Every non literal account, such as a dream, a parable or a vision, has a straightforward symbolic meaning, which is the symbolic meaning of the events described in the account. We call this the Event Symbolic meaning, or the Event Symbolism.
Every account in the bible, which:

1, Contains a 'countable noun', which is a noun acting as a noun which is repeated an even number of times, and which account does not contain a double designation - see Code6b
2. Contains a double designation - see Code6b
3. Has a parallel account elsewhere in the bible

has a further set of 1,2,3 or 4 word symbolic meanings. 

The number of Word Symbolic meanings in a scene is determined by the Successive Designations Principle below - see Code6b. These greater meanings are in addition to the literal meaning, in the case of a literal scene, and are in addition to the straightforward symbolic meaning, the event symbolic meaning, in the case of a symbolic component to a literal scene such as a dream, a vision or a parable. 

If a bible account has a scene containing an interpretation (typically from Jesus, Daniel or Joseph), then except in the case of Jesus' interpretation of the Sower parable (which is the word symbolic interpretation of the nouns in the parable), the literal meaning of the interpretation gives the event symbolic meaning of the scene. Whereas the first word symbolic meaning of the interpretation gives the first word symbolic meaning of the symbolic nouns which it interprets (excluding Jesus' Sower parable interpretation). 

Every literal countable noun takes the same symbolic meaning in each of its occurrences in an account in each thread (meaning) of an account
Every symbolic countable noun takes the same symbolic meaning in each of its occurrences in an account in each thread (meaning) of an account

[C6a] The Designations Principle: If one character or item in an account is referred to by two or more nouns or possessive noun chains, then these nouns or possessive noun chains refer to two or more characters or items in the word symbolic threads of the account. So in particular there is at least one word symbolic thread to the account.

[C6b] The Successive Designations Principle: If a character or item designated by...

1. A noun acting as a noun
2. An adjective acting as a noun (which almost invariably means that it is preceded by 'the' i.e. is definite or is in the construct in Hebrew)
3. A participle, (a verb used as an adjective), which participle is acting as a noun, (which means that it must be preceded by 'the' i.e. is definite - such as 'the scorched [one]' or is in the construct in Hebrew)
4. A gerund (a verb acting as a noun such as a 'smoker')
5. The definite article acting as a noun in phrases starting 'The [one]' where '[one]' is implied and is of course acting as a noun.
6. The word 'tiV' meaning 'a certain one'.
7. The word 'eiV' meaning 'one' ????.

is referred to by 2, 3 or 4 successive such designations

And if all the designations when taken separately in the context of the verse act as nouns and the verse makes sense with each designation standing alone (which means that the designations must all be in the same case in Greek). 

And if any possessive pronoun in one of the successive designations is also in all other succeeding or preceding designations. So there is no pronoun imbalance. Or if there is a pronoun imbalance then there are no substitutions later in the account which fail to make sense as a result.

Then we have a double, triple or quadruple Successive Designation, which means there are 2, 3 or 4 Word Symbolic threads/strands/meanings to that account. 

The holy (one), the truthful (one), the (one) having the key of David, the (one) opening up and no one will shut up, and shutting up and no one is opening [a quadruple designation] (Revelation 3:7 KIT)

The first Word Symbolic thread has only the first designation of any successive designations, and substitutes all second and third etc. successive designations to be the first successive designation (until any further successive designation redefines these substitutions). If there are two conflicting double designations then their substitutions cannot occur, so they are both invalidated (we deduced this from the Good Samaritan account in Luke 10 - see U218). The second Word Symbolic thread takes only the second designation of any successive designations etc. and substitutes the first and third etc. successive designations to be the second successive designation (until any further successive designation redefines these substitutions). 

[C7a] The Descriptions Principle: If a character or item, represented by a countable noun, in an account makes two or more non successive appearances with differing descriptors, one of which can be no descriptor, (which descriptors can be adjectives or participles used as adjectives) then for each thread of the account each appearance in that thread takes a different meaning.

[C7b] The Double Description Principle: If a countable noun is described by two successive descriptors in the form 'noun descriptor and descriptor' ( which descriptors are adjectives or participles used as adjectives), then all the word symbolic threads have two fulfilments to the entire thread. The first fulfilment temporally of the thread takes only the first description of the countable noun (first in position in the account as written) and substitutes all incidences of the second description ( which occur after the double description), to be the first description (until any further successive description redefines these substitutions). The second fulfilment temporally of the thread takes only the second description of the countable noun (second in position in the account as written) and substitutes all incidences of the first description in the prophetic form ( which occur in the account after the successive description) to be the second description (until any further successive description redefines these substitutions).

20 And ate the cows the skinny and the bad 7 the cows the first the fat (Genesis 41)

[C7c] The Successive Articulations Principle: If a phrase containing a verb is successively articulated (the two articulations being separated by either nothing or by the word 'and'), then there are two greater meanings to the articulation which appear to be either a fundamental part of the bible code or fundamental to church doctrine and prophecy

[C7d] The Successive Alternatives Principle: If an account contains a series of successive alternatives, then each alternative must occur at least once in one thread. Each alternative must be realised in one or other meaning of the account.

[C7e] The Repeated Articulation Principle: If a verbal phrase is articulated twice non successively (separated by a word other than 'and') in one account, then it takes a greater meaning different from the literal meaning in all the word symbolic threads of the account. This greater meaning is a key symbolism in the word symbolic threads. (And there must be at least one word symbolic thread).

[C7f]  GrammatoV  It's a grammatical code 

[C8] The Noun Counting Principle: The total number of meanings that a countable noun takes in all the threads of an account is the highest factor of the number of recitals of that noun in the account, which is less than or equal to the number of threads.

Number of recitals of countable noun 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7
Number of threads in account 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Number of literal + symbolic meanings of the noun 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1

[C9] The No Coincidences Principle: There are no coincidences in the bible. Every apparent coincidence is appointed by God

[C10] The Prophetic Times Substitution Principle, the Generalisation of Daniel4: The phrase 'n times' in an account can stand for '360n times' or 'n/360 times' or 'n/30 times' or '30n times' in the greater meaning. Where a time can be a day a month or a year. In other words we can substitute a day for a year a day for a month, a year for a day or a month for a day in the greater meaning of any scripture. 

[C11] The Numerical Principle and the Times Principle: A given number of living or inanimate items in a bible account can stand symbolically for that number of 'Times'. A 'Time' can stand literally or symbolically for a day, a month or a year (occasionally also for an hour). Any single unit of time (It cannot stand for a Week which is 7 units of time)

[C12] The Jigsaw Principle of the Code: A church doctrine is correct only if it satisfies every scripture in the bible relating to the subject of the doctrine.

[C12a] The History of the English Bible: From John Wycliffe to King James

[C13] Binary (Yes/No) Question Principle: Any unanswered question asked in the scriptures with two possible answers (normally yes and no), has the answer in one word symbolic thread, being the opposite of the answer in the literal meaning or event symbolic meaning 

[C13a] The Question Answering Principle: Any question asked in a bible account is answered somewhere in that account - somehow - often in the very verse that asks the question!

[C13b] Multiple Options/Outcomes Principle: Any account which contains multiple options or outcomes has all the options or outcomes fulfilled in the greater meanings which were not fulfilled in the literal meanings.

[C14] Reader Questions from the holy spirit: These are questions that are asked of various characters in the bible, but that are really meant for the various readers of the bible. They are questions asked by the Holy Spirit of the bible reader:

[C15] The Parallel Account and Subaccount Principle - Spot the Difference: 

We combine all the parallel accounts of the same events to make one overall account which is one whole cake, with each individual parallel account being a distinct non overlapping slice of that cake in each thread. Being one cake, the parallel accounts share the same symbolic meanings in all threads that they each have.

Since all the parallel accounts are combined into one account, the literal and event symbolic meanings are common, and the word symbolic meanings of each noun apply to the combined account. If a scene in the combined account does not have a thread which another scene does have, then that scene is omitted from that thread.

If any scene has a successive designation or a successive description, then this prophetic form only affects the particular scene that it is in, not the entire account, unless it is only a one scene account.

The countable noun count for the Repetition Principle is the global total for the entire account (because symbolism is account wide). So if a countable noun is repeated a total of 3 times in all of the parallel accounts in a combined account wherein each parallel account has 3 threads in total (i.e. one literal/event thread and two word symbolic threads), then the noun takes 3 different symbolic meanings in these threads.

Parallel Parables do not have to have been recited at the same time or in the same place or to the same audience. These things are irrelevant to a parable. Repeated parables are parallel parables.

Pre-packaged Parallel Subaccounts: Combined parallel accounts are just a special case of multi scene accounts, such as Daniel 4 and Genesis 41. These two have dreams and recitals of dreams, which are both describing the same thing. So the dream and the recital are two parallel subaccounts of these accounts. So they share the same symbolism in all threads (literal/event and word) and their countable noun counts add. These cases, since they are created by God himself tell us what to do with parallel accounts in general and with parallel accounts which have differing numbers of threads in particular. One simply uses the threads that are there.

[C16] The Omission Principle: If an account describes sets up two events and goes on to describe what happens in the first event but omits to describe what happens in the second (and any parallel account omits to describe it), then the second event is resolved in the Word symbolic meaning.

[C17] Helpful Tips

[C18] The Symbolic meaning of 7: If there are ' 7 things' in a bible account, then these things are successive in time in all event symbolic and word symbolic meanings.

[C19] Elementary Sentence Counting and Cryptic Scriptures

[C20] The 'Bible Code' of Eli Rips and Michael Drosnin

[C21] The History of Event and Word Symbolism

[C22] Research Ideas to improve the code

[C23] Hebrew and Greek Name Translation Principle: The Hebrew or Greek meaning of a place/character name/title gives you the greater meaning of that character or place in the symbolic interpretation of the scripture. It gives you the symbolic meaning of that noun.

[C24] Dave's Nounless Number Principle: If a nounless number occurs in scripture, then the number takes two temporal values in the word symbolic meaning

[C25] The Ambiguity Principle: If a phrase in the bible is ambiguous, having two meanings, then both meanings are true in one or more threads. Every possible meaning has a literal symbolic or prophetic fulfilment. 

[C26] The Maximal Distribution Principle: If in the bible an event is described as involving "A and B". Then in one or more threads two events are being referred to. One involving A and the other involving B.

[C27] The Pronoun Principle: The word symbolic meaning of a pronoun in a bible account is that of the noun which it represents in the word symbolic meaning which may not be the noun it represents in the literal meaning

[C28] The Unfulfilled Hypothetical Principle: Any hypothetical scenario described in scripture must actually occur in a greater meaning if it does not occur in the literal or event symbolic meaning or the scripture describing the hypothetical event has no power.

[C29] The 10 Stringed Harp of the Bible and the 2 Sets of 6 Layer Show Bread:

Fulfilment 1 Fulfilment 2

Literal

Event Symbolic

Word1 Word1
Word2 Word2
Word3 Word3
Word4 Word4

[C30] The nth of the month principle: The phrase nth of the month (omitting the word day) can mean the nth day of the month or the nth Sabbath of the month or the nth festival of the month or the nth festival Sabbath of the month etc. etc. - Don't really know ??

[C31] The List Specification Principle: If a defined item is further specified by a list of examples of it, then the sentence count of that list is precise to the day

[C32] The Identical Repeated Phrase Principle: If a scriptural phrase is repeated in the same account then it is a key symbolism and the phrase takes a different meaning in the word threads to the literal meaning.

[C33] Common parable symbolism principle: Parables in the same literal account or in the same set of parallel literal accounts share the same symbolism. For it is all one account.

[C34] The Patriarch Principle: A Patriarch generally means the genetic house of that patriarch, the patriarch and all his offspring, the patriarch and his genetic descendants
A Covenant Mediator generally means the covenant house of that mediator, the mediator and all sons by covenant, the mediator and his covenant descendants

[C35] The day and hour principle: A day in the bible can be a 12 hour daylight day or a 24 hour calendar day literally, or an entire period of functionality, such as the metaphorical creative days of Genesis1.
An hour is therefore a 12th or a 24th of a metaphorical day. 

[C36] The Immediate Number Repetition Principle: If a number (n) is repeated immediately then it stands for a time period of precisely n times.

[C37] The 8 Isomorphic Happinesses Principle: If a type of phrase is repeated successively n times, then it stands for n times precisely, which times are months or years.

[C38] The Choice Principle: One item being chosen from n items, represents n times precisely which may be months or years. 

[C39] The Acrostic Code of the Bible: According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrostic, ‘acrostic’ comes from the late Greek akróstichon, from ákros, "top", and stíchos, "verse" is a poem or other writing in an alphabetic script, in which the first letter, syllable or word of each line, paragraph or other recurring feature in the text spells out another message.

 

[C1] Why would God cause the bible to be written in a code?

Everything that Jesus said to the crowds was in an illustration. Indeed without an illustration he would not speak to the crowds:

33 So with many illustrations of that sort he would speak the word to them, as far as they were able to listen. 
34
Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them, but privately to his disciples he would explain all things (Mark 4).

So Jesus decoded his symbolic parables for his disciples only, not for the public at large. By speaking symbolically, those who did not want to believe that he was God’s son, could write off his speech as meaningless ramblings about farm animals and horticulture. They would therefore never get to know God’s plans for men. They would therefore never be in a position to frustrate them. For the ones who do not want to believe in God, are God’s and mankind’s and their own enemies. For we men and women are designed in such a way that our beliefs betray our true motivations. After 911, 89% of Pakistani Muslims believed that Muslims were not responsible for the Twin Towers Tragedy.  This design feature of mankind is not unique to Pakistanis. Most of us believe what we want to believe rather than the truth. For men, and even more so women, much prefer a convenient lie to an inconvenient truth.  

So those of us who do not believe in God, do not want to believe in him because they do not want God to exist. They do not want him to exist, because if he does exist then they fear that they will have to serve him and obey him, rather than serving and obeying their own desires. They do not know that God is a kinder master to them than their own desires are. Dear reader, do not make this mistake. God gave you your desires to enjoy them whilst controlling them! He did not give you them to replace him! 

Even if all of your experience of people who have ever had power over you is bad, even if everyone of them has abused you, and even if everyone you have ever loved has abused you, there is yet in existence a God who behaves just as his son did whilst he was on earth. He does not abuse his power, and does not abuse your love. His name is Jehovah, it is he who is the Father of Jesus. But he does allow Satan to abuse you, your love, his power and anything else he gets his hands on. For Jesus was described by Paul with reference to God as:

3 He is the reflection of [his] glory and the exact representation of his very being (Hebrews 1).

These people who do not believe are, in the great finesse of our God, unwittingly, their own enemies. Because God is their friend and means of life and salvation. Without him they have no future. They are choosing not to believe in their own future.

But they are free to choose such a course if they wish, and most people do so choose. So it is because mankind has one main enemy, a lying murderer, Satan, and it is because this fraud has many unwitting followers, that God's book, the bible is written in a code. Satan has been trying to persuade God to wipe out the whole human race for nearly 6,000 years in order to justify his murderous act on Eve. He is trying to cheat us out of our inheritance, which is to be ageless humans on earth in the Kingdom of God after Armageddon, and to be angels in heaven and eventually to be God's ourselves, just like our Father. Beloved reader, do not be fooled by your physical weakness, the family you come from is a family of Gods, and like begets like. But it is because we are always at war in this system that coded messages are used. We are at war even when the world is at peace:

23 But I behold in my members another law warring against the law of my mind and leading me captive to sin's law that is in my members (Romans 7).

Our mind is at war with our body, as regards sin. God has created us this way to teach us about sin.

In the Second World War, the Germans and the British both used codes. The British cracked the German code using the enigma computer in Bletchley (according to the movies this was as a result of an American submarine crew which stole a German code machine from a U boat). There is a marvellous and tragic story of the great wisdom of Winston Churchill in relation to this. The British decoded a German message that they were going to completely carpet bomb the city of Coventry on a certain day and destroy it. Winston then had to decide whether to save the people of Coventry, by evacuating them or not. The problem with evacuating Coventry was that the Germans had spies, and would have found out that Coventry was evacuated and then deduced that the British had cracked their code.

Churchill therefore sacrificed the whole town of Coventry, in order to keep this secret undiscovered. Such was the value that he attached to knowing the Enigma Code. He knew that if he confined his actions resulting from the breaking of the Code to ones which would not reveal to the Germans that the British had cracked it, then he could continue to know their entire strategy possibly right to the end of the war! Such knowledge was of greater value to Britain than Coventry. Greater value in terms of saving lives (though not those of the citizens of Coventry) and in terms of shortening and winning the war, which amounted to the same thing.

Likewise God has encoded information in the bible for the purpose of saving our lives, it is for our protection. For God is not going to lose in this battle that he is having with his rebellious son Satan. But we are all caught up in this war. For war is the inevitable result of the tolerance of evil or of bad. History shows us this.

God would win this war whether the bible was in a code or not and whether Jesus just blurted out the whole plan for salvation verbatim or not. But God wishes to teach us good from bad with the minimum possible loss of life and damage to our souls. The degree of damage and death that we do experience as a race is the measure of the difficulty he has in teaching us and we have in learning this lesson. We would be the losers if this book was not in a code.

This code needs to be appealing to God’s friends and revolting to his enemies. Then his friends will be attracted to it and hopefully spend enough time looking at it to find out that it is in a code and then will be sufficiently motivated to crack the code and then pass on the information only to his friends. Whilst his enemies on the other hand will find the whole thing so revolting and distasteful that they will not study the information hard enough to even realise that it is in a code. Furthermore when they are told that it is in a code, they still will not believe it!

Well, since the distinction between God’s friends and enemies is their love or hate for him and his friends, it is obvious that the information that he sends out should be all about him and his friends, because this is the only sort of information which will have a different effect on the two groups. Also this information should look innocuous and intensely boring to his enemies, and be full of praises upon praises of him to drive off the enemies and pull in the friends.

God has done this with the bible. All of the praise in the bible is not because God has a big ego and needs a whole lot of praise which he effectively wrote himself!!!  It is to sort the sheep from the goats. He has given to everybody a book about his past dealings with his friends, who lived thousands of years ago, who had many camels and lived in tents and had children and basically did the sort of things that everybody else did back then. This is of no great consequence to the enemies of God. It just looks like an out of date soap opera, written by someone who they do not like. Of what interest to a 20th or 21st century currency speculator is it that Esau lost his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of soup, or that he crossed the Jabbok with 200 female sheep and 20 rams? This sort of information is hardly the sort of thing that would come up on his Reuters screen.

But hidden in amongst all of the banal, mundane and everyday tribulations of these friends of God, is the whole of his military plan for saving mankind from sin and death and retaking the earth from Satan. The plan for men to regain the birthright that Adam lost, namely everlasting human and angelic life. 

22 He is revealing the deep things and the concealed things, knowing what is in the darkness; and with him the light does dwell (Daniel 2).

[C2] What reason is there to suppose that the bible is in a code ?

Logically, if we examine God's Modus Operandi with men, we see that he hides from us. We see that he hides what he is doing from us. Nobody has seen him, and who really knows what he is up to? So given that he inspired the bible:

16 All Scripture is inspired of God (2 Timothy 3).

It should be no great surprise to anyone that the bible too contains hidden information, since it was ghost written by a hidden God. In other words it is written in a code. This is not a new idea. Sir Isaac Newton believed the same to be true, but was unable to discover the code. He could see gravity with his mind, and he knew God well enough to see that the bible was in a code, but he could not himself decode it. He died trying to work out the date of Armageddon. He failed not because he lacked faith and not because he lacked wisdom or intellectual capability, for he had them all in abundance. He failed because it was not God's time in the late 17th and early 18th centuries for this to take place. So instead the true God rewarded one of the most spiritual men of the last millennium with the code of his physical universe. For a spiritual man sees things with his mind, with his power of reason, things that he cannot detect with his senses. It is this capability that separates us from the animals. It is this capability that the reader will need to sharpen as he or she reads this website/book.

Here are two typical sections of the Old Testament:

11 Polish the arrows. Fill the circular shields, Oh men. Jehovah has aroused the spirit of the kings of the Medes, because it is against Babylon that his idea is, in order to bring her to ruin. For it is the vengeance of Jehovah, the vengeance for his temple. 
12 Against the walls of Babylon lift up a signal. Make strong the watch. Post the watchmen. Make ready those lying in Ambush. For Jehovah has both formed the idea and will certainly do what he has spoken against the inhabitants of Babylon. 
13 Oh woman residing on abounding waters, abundant in treasures, your end has come, the measure of your profit making (Jeremiah 51).

13 For I will tread as my [bow] Judah. The bow I will fill with Ephraim, and I will awaken your sons, Oh Zion, against your sons, Oh Greece, and I will make you as the sword of a mighty man.
14 And over them Jehovah himself will be seen, and his arrow will certainly go forth just like lightning. And on the horn the Sovereign Lord Jehovah himself will blow, and he will certainly go with the windstorms of the south (Zechariah 9).

These passages are written in colourful, poetic, symbolic language. Here is a typical section of the New Testament:

4 Therefore we were buried with him through our baptism into his death, in order that, just as Christ was raised up from the dead through the glory of the father, we should likewise walk in a newness of life. 
5 For if we have become united with him in the likeness of his death, we shall also be [united with him in the likeness] of his resurrection (Romans 6).

This passage is written in symbolic, logically contorted language. Most people who read the bible, believe that the reason it is hard to understand is that 2,000 years ago people wrote and spoke in this complicated symbolic or logically contorted way. But the truth is that they did not. Here is a typical passage from Josephus' book on the history of the Jews. He was a Jewish general born ten or twenty years after Jesus:

But as for the richer sort, it proved all one to them whether they stayed in the city or attempted to get out of it, for they were equally destroyed in both cases. For every such person was put to death under this pretense, that they were going to desert - but in reality that the robbers might get what they had. The madness of the seditious did also increase together with their famine, and both those miseries were every day inflamed more and more. For there was no corn which anywhere appeared publicly, but the robbers came running into, and searched men’s private houses. And then if they found any, they tormented them, because they had denied they had any. And if they found none, they tormented them worse, because they supposed they had more carefully concealed it. The indication they made use of whether they had any or not, was taken from the bodies of these miserable wretches. Which, if they were in good case, they supposed were in no want at all of food. But if they were wasted away, they walked off without searching any farther.

As you can see, it reads just like a modern History book. Likewise if one reads Latin or Greek historical works from the same period (which are mainly about wars) they read just like a history book might read today. Another good example are the books of I and II Maccabees. These describe the plight of the Jews starting from around 170 BC. They just read like normal history books. But the bible is written in a different way to any other book of its time or of any time. Even in the literal meaning of the book, it is hard to deduce precisely what is being said. One needs to think hard, one needs to think logically and think in abstract symbolic terms, just to understand the literal meaning. In other words even the literal meaning is somewhat coded. But there is another reason why this book is written so strangely, and it is that the bible is written in a symbolic, numeric and cryptic code. It is in fact a 4 dimensional book including the literal meaning. This is why sections of it are very strangely written. It is because there is more to this book than the literal meaning. The accounts have to work in the symbolically coded and numerically coded meanings too, which effects the way in which they are written literally. Basically the literal accounts look a bit weird because the words also form symbolic accounts.

Here are 7 further reasons that we can see to suppose that the bible is written in a code:

  1. Why would such a clever God write such a stupid book?

  2. Spirituality is defined as seeing with the mind things which are undetectable to the senses. The bible is unarguably a spiritual book from God. It is therefore written in a spiritual way. So it's written in such a way that its true meaning is not visible with the eye but is detectable only with the power of reason, the eyes of the mind. The literal meaning is clearly visible with the eye. It therefore has a further meaning which is invisible and is not the literal meaning. So this further meaning is a coded meaning. It is written in a spiritual code, which is a visible vehicle for an invisible meaning.

  3. Every word that Jesus spoke publicly was symbolic:

    33 So with many illustrations of that sort he would speak the word to them, as far as they were able to listen. 
    34 Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them, but privately to his disciples he would explain all things (Mark 4).

    And Jesus was responsible not only for his own words but for all of the words of every bible writer as we shall see.

  4. The bible itself says that it is written in a code!

  5. Paul describes one particular account in Genesis 16 as being a symbolic drama.

  6. Matthew 2:15 shows that Hosea 11:1 is in a code and a large number of old testament passages which are quoted in the new testament are given a greater meaning in that quote -see U281 through to U294.

  7. The book of Revelation had a first meaning which applied in John's day, actually to the state harlotry of the first true Christian church which was the genesis of the Roman Catholic church. And it has a second meaning which applies to the end times. So it is plainly a book with two meanings for if not then why give it to John 1900 years ago? The second  meaning is the coded meaning, which is simply a further symbolic fulfilment - see U151.

We now investigate each of the first 5 in more detail.

C2.1 Why would such a clever God write such a stupid book?

'God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh.' -Voltaire

We are looking at the whole book as being effectively written by one person, because Paul tells us that it was:

16 All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness (2 Timothy 3).

And Peter tells us:

21 For prophecy was at no time brought by man's will, but men spoke from God as they were borne along by holy spirit (2 Peter 1).

If you truly believe that God, whilst not being the physical author of the book, has inspired every bible writer to express his story in the writer’s own literary style, and in his own phraseology, even in the way he wanted to say it but in God’s words. Then given this, there is a question that is begging to be asked, and it is this:

How could the creator of the perfect universe, which is a gigantic and inordinately intricate example of hyper intelligence, perfection and complete understanding wisdom and control, write or inspire to be written such a daft book?

Or: Why would such a clever guy write such a stupid book?

How can the true God, the grand creator of the great works that Newton and Einstein could barely scratch into the surface of be an order of magnitude worse than Steven Spielberg when it comes to telling a story?

The reader might think that asking this question is an insult to God, or even a blasphemy. We would argue that not asking this question is the real insult, an insult that all mankind has been repeating every day for the past 2000 years. Because by not asking this question you are saying that you would expect God to inspire such a badly written book (in the literal meaning). You are saying that you are not surprised that he has written such a book. Which is saying that you do not think he is capable of telling a story properly. Whereas the more logical and more respectful explanation for the peculiar way in which the bible is written, is that just as Newton and Einstein knew that they were only scratching at the surface of the beauty and perfection of God’s universe, so the seeker of bible truth knows that he is only scratching at the surface of the beauty and perfection of God’s holy book. And this surface is the literal meaning of the book.

For the bible in the literal meaning, the surface itself, is written in an ambiguous, repetitive manner and is full of absolutely crucial omissions, and laden with really unnecessary and trivial detail.

One has to ask rhetorically:

Is God unable to properly focus on the key points in bible stories?

Is he the first person to write a history book with none of the important dates in it?

Why does he keep repeating himself in almost every account?

Does a person who can create hundreds of languages from nothing in one instant of time and simultaneously teach them to every living human in that very instant as described in the account of Babel in Genesis11:

1 Now all the earth continued to be of one language and of one set of words.…
5 And Jehovah proceeded to go down to see the city and the tower that the sons of men had built. 
6 After that Jehovah said: Look! They are one people and there is one language for them all, and this is what they start to do. Why, now there is nothing that they may have in mind to do that will be unattainable for them.
7 Come now! Let us go down and there confuse their language that they may not listen to one another's language. 
8 Accordingly Jehovah scattered them from there over all the surface of the earth, and they gradually left off building the city.
9 That is why its name was called Babel, because there Jehovah had confused the language of all the earth, and Jehovah had scattered them from there over all the surface of the earth (Genesis 11).

Does this person have a problem in telling a simple story in just one language when he has all the time in the world to tell it?

Consider please the following masterpieces:

12 However, they found out of the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead four hundred girls, virgins, that had not had intercourse with a man by lying with a male (Judges 21).

One wonders how else they could lose their virginity?

1 Now Joshua was old, being advanced in years. So Jehovah said to him: You yourself have grown old and have advanced in years (Joshua 13).

What an astute observation!

25 They stoned them with stones!! (Joshua 7)

8 Abraham's life that he lived!! (Genesis 25) Well what else could he have done with it?

8 Then Abraham expired and died! (Genesis 25)

49 The alien resident who is residing as an Alien?? (Exodus 12)

Why in Jeremiah chapter 41 is Ishmael the son of Nethaniah the son of Elishama, described as: Ishmael the son of Nethaniah 11 times and as plain old Ishmael 6 times in the same account, when there is no other Ishmael in the account? Why does the holy spirit have to tell us the same thing 11 times in one chapter of the bible? Why did mankind have to carry all this unnecessary repetitive information around for 2500 years? How could the God of recycling whose creation, nature, wastes absolutely nothing on this planet, waste all those holy words? Something is not right here!

There are four accounts in Matthew 14, Mark 6, Luke 9 & John 6 of the feeding of the 5,000. Why? Why was this particular account repeated 4 times, when the account of the man who had been lame for 38 years at the pool in Bethzatha in John 5 to whom Jesus said:

8 Get up, pick up your bed and walk (John 5).

is only mentioned once in the holy book? How can a perfect God be so inconsistent?

4 The Rock, perfect is his activity, For all his ways are justice (Deuteronomy 32).

How about this one:

1 In the 27th year of Jeroboam the king of Israel, Azariah the son of Amaziah the king of Judah became king. 
2 16 years old he happened to be when he began to reign, and for 52 years he reigned in Jerusalem. And his mother's name was Jecoliah of Jerusalem (2 Kings 15).

Great, so we get to know his mother’s name! But there was not a man alive for a long time until 1999 who knew when the 27th year of Jeroboam II actually was. It is extremely difficult to work this out from the bible. But we have done it (we think) and it’s 816 BC - see [91], [101]. It would have been so much more useful if the holy spirit had said: This was 181 years after Solomon died. Or better still: This was 697 years after the Jews left Egypt. Or better still: This being 3177 years after Adam sinned! Instead we get to know his mum’s name!

In this vein the bible tells us that a Philistine character called Ishbi-benob had a spear that weighed 300 shekels of copper (2 Samuel 21:16). Well, How fascinating! But it fails to tell us when Jesus was born! or what year he died in! Most people do not know this even today. But all literate mankind knows that Ishbi-benob's spear weighed 300 shekels of copper. What kind of a God could get his priorities so wrong? Who cares about the weight of this trogladite's spear? The dates of Jesus' birth and his death are absolutely crucial to any understanding of God's plan for mankind. The weight of this chap’s spear clearly is not (not in the literal meaning at least!) 

To sum it up, after every chapter of the bible there should be a comment in bold red ink saying: Remember the author is not thick!

C2.2 The Bible is a spiritual book

In section [1] which reconciles the millions of years of human fossils with the creation account in Genesis, see - Millions of years of human fossils reconciled with Genesis, we discover that God introduced himself to mankind through Adam and Eve once Homo sapiens had developed, or dare we say evolved? to the point where he had become 'spiritual'. By this we mean that he could deduce with his powers of reason the existence of things which he could not detect with his physical sensory powers. By this we mean that he became able to entertain a logical train of thought, a multi stage thought process. A good example of this is gravity. Isaac Newton 'saw' gravity with his mind, having first 'decoded' God's physical laws of motion. But the ability that modern man has to do what Newton did, was the trigger for God to introduce himself to us.

The reason that God did not introduce himself to us before we had developed spirituality, was that he did not want to introduce himself to us physically. He wanted to introduce himself to us spiritually, because firstly he wanted us all to retain the option of not seeing him if that was our desire, and secondly, he wished only to be seen by those who had a sufficiently great desire to see him that they were prepared to make the effort to use their powers of reason to deduce his existence with their mind from the physical clues which he had prepared for them. Hence Jesus said:

8 Blessed are the pure in heart for they shall see God (Matthew 5).

Those who are pure in heart, want to know the truth about their origins, as a matter of gratitude to a humble God. Those who pursue the truth regardless of any fears or misconceptions they may hold that such knowledge might prove detrimental to their relationship with their partner of their peers or their business colleagues. These ones, since their heart will not, out of fear, prevent them from searching with their mind, will find the truth. And the truth is that there is a God who created us, and created the current playpen in which we reside.

In the physical universe one can quite clearly see the character of God, the creator. He is perfect, he wastes nothing but recycles it all, he is incredibly hard working, he is very generous, he is kind, he loves us. But one cannot see God himself physically, one can only deduce what he might be like from what one can see of his works. The game which God is asking us to play is rather like trying to deduce the Character of Mozart from his sonata's or Van Gough from his paintings. Likewise we can deduce the character of Satan from the activities of Hitler or from a Pornographic Magazine proprietor who frustrates all of mankind with images of women which can be seen but not touched whilst he himself has half a dozen of these very women which he both sees and touches (we wish).

Now God's book, the bible, is his training manual, his instruction leaflet, his users guide, his online help button for mankind.  It was created by the same God who created the universe and therefore is manufactured using the same Modus Operandi. It is therefore a spiritual book. So one will likewise have to use one's powers of reason to see God even through his book. If we really want to know him we will have to look beneath the literal surface meaning of the book. It has a hidden meaning, discernable by the power of reason, a meaning that is not literally stated. So it is written in a code.

C2.3 Every word that Jesus spoke publicly was symbolic

Make no mistake, Jesus only spoke publicly (or to the crowds) in illustrations. His speaking like this was itself an illustration that the truth is not what you see on the surface:

33 So with many illustrations of that sort he would speak the word to them, as far as they were able to listen. 
34 Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them, but privately to his disciples he would explain all things (Mark 4).

But Jesus is called the word by John in the famous scripture:

1 In beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was [a]God (John 1).

And John is told by the angel in Revelation that he has the name: The word of God.

3 And he is arrayed with an outer garment sprinkled with blood, and the name he is called is The Word of God (Revelation 19).

But the word of God is the bible:

6 And so you have made the word of God invalid because of your tradition (Matthew 15).

17 Also, accept the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the spirit, that is, God's word (Ephesians 6).

But the word of God is Jesus:

1 On an occasion when the crowd was pressing close upon him and listening to the word of God, he was standing beside the lake of Gennesaret (Luke 5).

Jesus wasn’t quoting scriptures at them, he was speaking in illustrations as he always did, so here the word of God meant Jesus. So Jesus is the word of God which is the bible. So Jesus ‘is’ the bible. This identification is meant in the sense that God was the author, Jesus was the editor/publisher, and the writers were the journalists. As regards God’s son:

3 All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence (John 1).

So in particular the bible came into existence through him. Actually no, everything physical before Adam's sin came into existence through Satan, who was the firstborn son of God. But Michael, who is Jesus, became God's firstborn earning this right from his sacrifice as an angel - see [Intro19]. But now the reader will see why Michael was called the word. Because Satan lost his firstborn right (for God to act exclusively through him as described in John 1:3), when he killed Adam. The right was then no one's until Jesus died. But Jesus got the firstborn right (of God acting exclusively through him) as regards the writing of the bible as a result of his promising to make the sacrifice which he made on Friday April 1, 33 AD. So he became 'the word', due to his having this right. So every chapter of the bible, every verse of the bible, every word of the bible came into existence through him. And whether Jesus was speaking to the crowds or writing for the crowds through the prophets, he used the same illustrative modus operandi, he communicated symbolically.

The word of God is an example of a word or phrase in the bible which has two different literal meanings. Another such word is presence, which in the bible can mean either the presence of the Christ or the manifestation of the Christ during a presence. The concept of one word or phrase having two literal meanings depending on the context is unusual to English speaking people. We have a language which eliminates such ambiguities by using a larger vocabulary. But the Hebrew language often has one root word with several different meanings dependent on the context.

John calls Jesus the word of life, and the life and the everlasting life in the first verse of his first letter:

1 That which was from [the] beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have viewed attentively and our hands felt, concerning the word of life,
2 yes, the life was made manifest, and we have seen and are bearing witness and reporting to you the everlasting life which was with the Father and was made manifest to us, (1 John 1 NWT)

But what is the word of life if it is not the word of God, the bible? For Jesus said to Satan quoting Moses:

4 But in reply he said: It is written: Man must live, not on bread alone, but on every utterance coming forth through Jehovah's mouth (Matthew 4).

3 So he humbled you and let you go hungry and fed you with the manna, which neither you had known nor your fathers had known; in order to make you know that not by bread alone does man live but by every expression of Jehovah's mouth does man live (Deuteronomy 8).

These utterances from God’s mouth are the words of life. And all of such are in the bible. And yet Jesus is called by the same name! This is not a coincidence, it is because he is the one through whom the scriptures came. Because he was the head of the 2nd Holy Spirit. Hence John says, referring to the beginning of the world (Michael's agreement to ransom Adam)...:

1 In [the] beginning the Word was, and the Word was toward the God, and [a] God was the Word [actually he was the first angel with everlasting life].
2 This one was in [the] beginning towards the God (John 1 NWT)
3 All things came into being through him, and without him not even one [thing] came into being that has come into being.
4 In him was life, and the life was the light of men; (John 1 GLT)

So in particular the bible came into existence through him. Every chapter of the bible, every verse of the bible every word of the bible came into existence through him. So Jesus is the word of God, the word of life, and the bible is the word of God and the word of life.

What all of this means is that since Jesus, when he was a human, spoke entirely in illustrations, in parables. And since Jesus, in his pre - human existence, as the angel Michael, who was called the word, himself transmitted the words of the bible to the bible writers, then we have no reason to suppose that the words he transmitted as an angel to the bible writers were any less symbolic, any less illustrative, any less coded, than the words he directly transmitted with his mouth as a human. Because Jesus like God is consistent in his approach to men. In other words, the whole book is a series of illustrations or parables. For an illustration is a symbolic code. Even the account of David & Goliath for example. The parables of Jesus are examples explaining the structure of the whole book.

What is more, Jesus has shown us directly how to interpret his parables, namely by constructing a symbolic look up table for the nouns in the account which take all of the symbolism:

36 Then after dismissing the crowds he went into the house. And his disciples came to him and said: Explain to us the illustration of the weeds in the field.
37 In response he said: 

The sower of the fine seed is the Son of man;
38 the field is the world
as for the fine seed, these are the sons of the kingdom
but the weeds are the sons of the wicked one,
39 and the enemy that sowed them is the Devil. 
The harvest is a conclusion of a system of things
and the reapers are angels.

40 Therefore, just as the weeds are collected and burned with fire, so it will be in the conclusion of the system of things. (Matthew 13 NWT)

In the case of the bible book of Revelation, we are told directly how it was given to John:

1 A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John (Revelation 1).

So Jesus, gave it to an angel who presented it symbolically to John. But this is the same process that Stephen and Paul have disclosed was used to transmit the law to us. 

53 you who received the Law as transmitted by angels but have not kept it. (Acts 7 NWT)

19 Why, then, the Law? It was added to make transgressions manifest, until the seed should arrive to whom the promise had been made; and it was transmitted through angels in the hand of a mediator. (Galatians 3 NWT)

Moses did not transmit the law through angels. Michael did that being the head of the 2nd Holy Spirit.

The law really means the first five books. So the right question to ask now is:

Did Jesus have some different process that he used for all the other books of the bible?

The answer to this question is no. He is not inconsistent, he wasn’t developing processes as he went along like we humans do. He was acting on behalf of God who knows everything before he starts:

9 Remember the first things of a long time ago, that I am the Divine One and there is no other God, nor anyone like me
10 the One telling from the beginning the finale, and from long ago the things that have not been done; the One saying, 'My own counsel will stand, and everything that is my delight I shall do'; (Isaiah 46 NWT)

So not just Revelation but the whole book is presented in signs through Jesus the mediator and through his angel, it is all symbolic, it is all in a symbolic code! To sum it all up: God is the publisher of the bible, Jesus is the editor, and the bible writers are the journalists. Although the editing that Jesus did was in real time.

C2.4 The bible itself says that it is written in a code!

Solomon said:

2 The Glory of God is the keeping of a matter secret, and the glory of kings is the searching through a matter (Proverbs 25).

4 If you keep seeking for it as for silver, and as for hid treasures you keep searching for it, 
5 in that case you will understand the fear of Jehovah, and you will find the very knowledge of God (Proverbs 2).

So this knowledge is hidden. And it is hidden in the bible, for Paul says of Jesus:

3 Carefully concealed in him are all the treasures of wisdom and of knowledge (Colossians 2).

Well, these treasures are not stuffed up his shirt or down his trousers, although in a sense, they are in his body, which is his church. Basically they are hidden in the information we have on him. This information is the bible. For as we have seen above, Jesus is the word of God, which is also 'the bible'. Paul describes how it is hidden and revealed:

7 But we speak God's wisdom in a sacred secret, the hidden wisdom, which God foreordained before the systems of things for our glory (1 Corinthians 2).

10 For it is to us God has revealed them through his spirit, for the spirit searches into all things, even the deep things of God (1 Corinthians 2).

So again we see that wisdom is hidden in this book, concealed or coded. For a code is hidden written information. This is why Jesus says:

2 There is nothing carefully concealed that will not be revealed, and secret that will not become known (Luke 12).

7 Keep on asking, and it will be given you; keep on seeking, and you will find; keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you (Matthew 7).

And really you do not have to look that far. But you do have to look, yourself! For God said to Adam:

19 In the sweat of your face you will eat bread (Genesis 3)

And Jesus said to Satan:

4 But in reply he said: It is written, 'Man must live, not on bread alone, but on every utterance coming forth through God's mouth' (Matthew 4)

From the two of which it is not hard to deduce that we will digest God's word in the sweat of our faces as well as digesting bread in this way. 

Gabriel said to Daniel:

4 And as for you, O Daniel, make secret the words and seal up the book, until the time of [the] end. Many will rove about, and the [true] knowledge will become abundant (Daniel 12).

We are now in this time, this book/website is the proof, see - Daniel 8, Daniel 12. Daniel said to Nebuchadnezzar:

28 However, there exists a God in the heavens who is a Revealer of secrets, and he has made known to King Nebuchadnezzar what is to occur in the final part of the days (Daniel 2).

And not only to him! But also to Jesus, who opened up the minds of his disciples:

45 Then he opened up their minds fully to grasp the meaning of the Scriptures (Luke 24).

It is quite a task.

25 The woman said to him: I know that Messiah is coming, who is called Christ. Whenever that one arrives, he will declare all things to us openly. 
26 Jesus said to her: I who am speaking to you am he (John 4).

So the scriptures do not declare things openly, but the Christ opened them up. So the scriptures are coded.

Jesus opened up the scriptures to their minds.

There is a holy code for the holy scriptures, and there is a bible within the bible!

The famous scripture says...

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known. (1 Corinthians 13 KJV)
12 For at present we see in hazy outline by means of a metal mirror, but then it will be face to face. At present I know partially, but then I shall know accurately even as I am accurately known. (1 Corinthians 13 NWT)
12 For now we see through a mirror in dimness, but then face to face. Now I know in part, but then I will fully know even as I also was fully known. (1 Corinthians 13 GLT)
12 for we see now through a mirror obscurely, and then face to face; now I know in part, and then I shall fully know, as also I was known; (1 Corinthians 13 YLT)
12 We are looking for right now through mirror in obscure expression, then but face toward face; right now I am knowing out of part, then but I shall know accurately according as also I was accurately known. (1 Corinthians 13 KIT)
12 ble,pomen ga.r a;rti di evso,ptrou evn aivni,gmati to,te de. pro,swpon pro.j pro,swpon\ a;rti ginw,skw evk me,rouj to,te de. evpignw,somai kaqw.j kai. evpegnw,sqhn (1 Corinthians 13 WHO)

Literally: Now we are looking through/by means of/via a mirror in an enigma. The Greek word is ainigma or ainigma. Liddell & Scott has riddle or dark expression. Plainly it is an enigma. So the meaning is that now we see a mirror image of an enigma, a riddle. But then we shall see face to face. So plainly the bible is in a code. It is a mirror image of an enigma of the truth.  

10 For just as the pouring rain descends, and the snow, from the heavens and does not return to that place, unless it actually saturates the earth and makes it produce and sprout, and seed is actually given to the sower and bread to the eater,
11 so my word that goes forth from my mouth will prove to be. It will not return to me without results, but it will certainly do that in which I have delighted, and it will have certain success in that for which I have sent it. (Isaiah 55 NWT)

How does God's word return to him? Answer the same way it is given to us. We read his word and he read our word. Our word which is the interpretation of his word. His word need interpretation. It needs decoding/translating/interpreting. He reads the fruits of our work on his word. He does not read the very words he already sent out for he has a perfect memory. He knows full well precisely what he sent out. 

C2.5  Paul describes one particular account in Genesis as a symbolic drama

22 For example, it is written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman; 
23 but the one by the servant girl was actually born in the manner of flesh, the other by the free woman through a promise.
24 These things stand as a symbolic drama; for these [women] mean two covenants, the one from Mount Sinai, which brings forth children for slavery, and which is Hagar.
25 Now this Hagar means Sinai, a mountain in Arabia, and she corresponds with the Jerusalem today, for she is in slavery with her children. 
26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4).

Hagar stood for the Law covenant mediated by Moses and Sarah for the new covenant mediated by Jesus, described as Paul’s mother. But what is so special about this particular account in Genesis? Is it the only one to be a symbolic drama? And what is so special about Genesis in the old testament. Might there not be some symbolic dramas in Exodus? In fact, we know that the bible is a consistent book having but one ghost writer - if the reader will pardon the metaphor! So any element of the bible code that we find to be true for one account is therefore true in every account. We call this the Consistency Principle of the code. So the whole book stands as one giant symbolic drama.

C2.6 Matthew 1:23 shows that Isaiah 7:14 is in a code

22 All this actually came about for that to be fulfilled which was spoken by Jehovah through his prophet, saying:
23 Look! The virgin will become pregnant and will give birth to a son, and they will call his name Immanuel, which means, when translated, With Us Is God (Matthew 1).

14 Therefore Jehovah himself will give you men [of the house of David] a sign: Look! The maiden herself will actually become pregnant, and she is giving birth to a son, and she will certainly call his name Immanuel.

1 And Jehovah proceeded to say to me: Take for yourself a large tablet and write upon it with the stylus of mortal man, 'Maher-shalal-hash-baz.' [written with the stylus of mortal man, so name due to water baptism not spirit baptism, name given before conception but not name called before conception]
2 And let me have attestation for myself by faithful witnesses, Uriah the priest and Zechariah the son of Jeberechiah.
3 Then I went near to the prophetess, and she came to be pregnant and in time gave birth to a son. Jehovah now said to me: Call his name Maher-shalal-hash-baz,
4 for before the boy will know how to call out, 'My father!' and 'My mother!' one will carry away the resources of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria before the king of Assyria.
5 And Jehovah proceeded to speak yet further to me, saying:
6 For the reason that this people has rejected the waters of the Shiloah that are going gently, and there is exultation over Rezin and the son of Remaliah;
7 even therefore, look! Jehovah is bringing up against them the mighty and the many waters of the River, the king of Assyria and all his glory. And he will certainly come up over all his streambeds and go over all his banks
8 and move on through Judah. He will actually flood and pass over. Up to the neck he will reach. And the outspreading of his wings must occur to fill the breadth of your land, Oh Immanuel!

So Isaiah went near to the prophetess, made her pregnant, and she had a son called both Mahershalalhashbaz (meaning quickly to the plunder) and Immanuel (meaning with us is God). But Matthew tells us that Jesus Christ was a further fulfilment of Isaiah 7 and 8. So these two chapters are written in a prophetic code. They tell a true story of Isaiah sleeping with a virgin and her having a son at the first attempt, so that the virgin became pregnant. But they also tell a further story of a future immaculate conception. The second fulfilment uses a different linguistically possible meaning of the prophecy that a virgin will become pregnant, by having her conceive whilst remaining a virgin! Certainly that is more miraculous, although understandable today with fertility clinics! Btu the point we are making is not that Isaiah 7 had a miraculous further meaning, but just that it had a further meaning and so is written in a code. Then, since Matthew tells us that Isaiah 7 and 8 have a greater meaning, the holy spirit is begging us to ask the question: What is so special about Isaiah 7 and 8? Does Isaiah 9 have a greater meaning for example?

C2.7 One mouth becomes two

16 And he [Jesus] had in his right hand 7 stars, and out of his mouth a sharp, long two-mouthed sword was protruding, and his countenance was as the sun when it shines in its power (Revelation 1).

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-mouthed sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4)

Obviously the thing in Jesus' mouth in Revelation1 is the word, the word of God in fact. For words come out of mouths not swords. But the word of God is a two mouthed sword according to Paul in Hebrews 4. So two mouths are coming out of one mouth. Or one mouth becomes two. Or one word becomes two words. Or one scripture becomes two, i.e. has two meanings. 

First Century Christian Writings

6. Abraham, the first to perform circumcision, was looking ahead in the Spirit to Jesus when he circumcised. For he received the firm teachings of the three letters. 
7
. For it says, “Abraham circumcised eighteen and three hundred men from his household”. What knowledge, then, was given to him? Notice that he first mentions the eighteen, and after a pause the three hundred. The number eighteen consists of an iota [I], 10 and an eta [E],
8. There, you have Jesus -- and because the cross was destined to have grace in the letter tau [T] he next says "and three hundred", tau. So he indicates Jesus in the two letters and the cross in the other (Barnabus 9:7,8).

So Barnabus was a bit of a bible decoder!!!

[C2a] Why is the bible code so complicated and why is the book so ambiguous?

Let's start with the famous words of Jesus which are mistranslated by almost all English bibles - see U237 - except Young's Literal Translation and the Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures (Watchtower)...

34 Truly I say to you that this generation will by no means pass away/come beside/arrive until all these things occur.
35
Heaven and earth will pass away/come beside/arrive, but my words will by no means pass away/come beside/arrive.
36
About but the day that and hour no one has known, neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, if not the Father only (Matthew 24 - Watchtower Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures).

So the angels did not know the date of Armageddon until around the time Jesus said this on 33Nisan10, 4 days before he was murdered. If the reader visits 14proofs, he will see 14 proofs of the date of Armageddon. One wonders how the angels could not have worked out some of these for themselves before Jesus died?

Well, without getting too technical the answer is given by Jesus when he said...

25 At that time Jesus said in response: I publicly praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have hidden these
things from the wise and intellectual ones and have revealed them to babes (Matthew 11).

21 In that very hour he became overjoyed in the holy spirit and said: I publicly praise you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, because you have carefully hidden these things from wise and intellectual ones, and have revealed them to babes. Yes, Oh Father, because to do thus came to be the way approved by you (Luke 10).

Since Jesus refers to his father as the 'Lord of heaven and earth', it is apparent that his subsequent words apply to both realms. In fact God is only described as 'Lord of heaven and earth' as above and in Acts 4:24 and Act 17:24 in the bible. So God hides bible truths from the angels and the demons, who are far wiser and far more intellectual than us, and reveals them to babes by angelic standards. All humans are babes by angelic standards. So the bible has to be sufficiently hard to decode and sufficiently ambiguous that even the angels cannot crack it. Then God can choose to give an insight to a baby human, and this lowly man, will than crack a part of the code first. The angels, on seeing this, will hit their spirit foreheads with their spirit hands and go doh! They then will race ahead of us humans using their superior intelligence and linguistic dexterity, only to get stuck at the next angelic road block until God chooses to reveal the next key to another lowly human.

For God and his children are not just fighting wicked humans, we are fighting the demons. That is why the bible code is so complicated, and why the bible is so ambiguous at first sight. Furthermore if you do not have faith and do not pray sincerely to God, to help you, then you will fare worse than the demons in your attempts to understand it. It is pointless to study the bible without prayer. The holy spirit must be present at every bible study, for progress to be made in accordance with God's will.

In this way, the demons are kept in the dark as to the precise methods God will use to defeat them. 

 

[C3] The Consistency Principle

Any element of the code that is found to be true for one account, is true for every account in the whole bible. In other words: Every account in the bible is written in precisely the same code

3 All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence (John 1).

16 All scripture is inspired of God (2 Timothy 3).

The Bible has one editor, Jesus Christ, and it has one ghost writer, inspirer - God. So it is consistent as a book, it does not contradict itself. This principle follows either from faith that God is the true author of the book, and that it is therefore consistent and therefore all in the same language or code. Or, in the alternative it follows from the academic axiom that 'the bible is perfect'. For if it is perfect then it is consistent, therefore it effectively has only one author and so it is all in the same language or code.

[C4] The Power Principle

Every word in the bible has power in the greater meaning if not in the literal meaning.

18 For truly I say to you that sooner would heaven and earth pass away than for one smallest letter or one particle of a letter to pass away from the Law by any means and not all things take place (Matthew 5).

17 Indeed, it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one particle of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled (Luke 16).

There are no wasted words in the bible. So repetitions have power, double descriptions have power. Seemingly trivial details have power. Every tense of every verb, every case of every word has power:

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).

10 For just as the pouring rain descends, and the snow, from the heavens and does not return to that place, unless it actually saturates the earth and makes it produce and sprout, and seed is actually given to the sower and bread to the eater,
11 so my word that goes forth from my mouth will prove to be. It will not return to me without results, but it will certainly do that in which I have delighted, and it will have certain success in that for which I have sent it. (Isaiah 55 NWT)

So the scriptures will be understood and will have the effect that God wants them to have and will achieve saturation of the congregation and will cause salvation through baptism and food for salvation. Furthermore the scriptures are sent down in two form, the snow and the rain, the solid and the liquid, the literal and the symbolic. And they return in yet another form, the vapour state, the gaseous state, the spirit state. So we must change the state of the scriptures by interpreting them, by decoding them, to extract the spirit from them. 

37 But that the dead are raised up even Moses disclosed, in the account about the thornbush, when he calls Jehovah 'the God of Abraham and God of Isaac and God of Jacob
38 He is a God, not of the dead, but of the living, for they are all living to him (Luke 20:37,38).

So we must look at tense, the angel did not say the he used to be the God of Abraham.

16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. It says, not: And to seeds; as in the case of many such, but as in the case of one: And to your seed; who is Christ (Galatians 3). 

So we must look at number, whether a word is singular or plural.

We will use the Power Principle to deduce other principles and symbolic understandings.

First example of the Power Principle

In the midst of years oh bring it to life, in the midst of years may you make it known (Habakkuk 3:2).

This scripture applies to the resurrection of Jesus and to God's means of salvation from death, Jesus' death, being made known in the midst of a period of years. Now in Hebrew the word brq translated 'midst of' means either 'amongst' or 'middle of'. Obviously if it means 'amongst' then the scripture is telling us very little if anything. But if it means 'middle of' and we know the period of years concerned then we are being told the dates of Jesus' death and his resurrection here. By the Power Principle if we do know the period of years concerned and it is a large period, then the latter meaning of the Hebrew must be correct.

Second example of the Power Principle

There are Irrelevant Details in the bible. The more irrelevant a detail appears to be in the literal meaning, the more relevant it must be in symbolic meaning

This follows from the Power Principle. The bible is full of seemingly irrelevant detail and crucial omissions. We saw in the case of King David's purchasing of the wood and cattle for the first sacrifice on the site of Solomon's temple (that today houses a mosque in Jerusalem) that he paid 50 shekels of silver for them - see [c11.1] or see [40]. Great, who wants to know this? Are we going to put in a counter offer 3000 years later? The temple mount in Jerusalem is not an easy place to purchase right now! But the account does not tell us when Joab handed David the results of the registration. And neither are we told how long after David received the registration he made this sacrifice. We want to know this in order that we can verify whether our understanding of the 1,100,000 men of Israel drawing sword at one day per man is correct  - see [c11.1] or see [40]. 

But actually, using the Numerical Principle of the code - [c11] the 50 shekels stand for the precise time period that we are looking for between David receiving the results from Joab, completing his registration sin, and him pacifying God with this sacrifice, 50 days, at a day for a shekel. So the price that David paid in shekels, is the period of time for which his sin remained unforgiven in days, a shekel for a day. So this seemingly irrelevant information, actually provides the answer in the symbolic meaning. This is how the bible is written. Here is another classic:

10 Jesus said: Have the men recline as at meal. Now there was a lot of grass in the place. Therefore the men reclined, about 5,000 in number (John 6).

Really, a lot of grass! Were people going to get hay fever? Were there any daisies? How about Dandelions? Was there any clover?

[C5] The Literal, Event Symbolic and Word Symbolic meanings of a Bible Account, Bible Scenes, Prophetic Forms, Countable Nouns, Threads

Definition: A bible scene is a literal story (which may have symbolic components to it) set at one location at one time involving one set of characters involved in one type of endeavour. We also call a scene a subaccount or a literal subaccount..

Definition: A bible account is a self contained complete bible story. These are normally single scenes but can also be multiple connected scenes. There may be several of these in one chapter, or an account may span several chapters. These accounts may refer to other bible accounts 

Definition: The Event symbolic meaning of a symbolic part of a scene or account is the symbolic interpretation of the events in that illustration/parable/dream/vision. It is the symbolic interpretation of the nouns AND the verbs in that scene or account.

Definition: The Word symbolic meaning of a literal or symbolic scene or account is the symbolic interpretation of the nouns only of that scene or account. The verbs take their normal literal meaning.

Definition: A prophetic form is a repetitive phrase whose grammatical structure has coded information about the word symbolic meanings of the scene its in. A prophetic form in a scene only affects that scene/subaccount for threads and fulfilments. It affects the entire account for noun counts. 

A literal prophetic form in a scene affects the number of word symbolic threads or fulfilments for the literal nouns in that scene
A symbolic prophetic form in a scene affects the number of word symbolic threads or fulfilments for the symbolic nouns in that scene

Definition: A 'countable noun' is a noun acting as a noun (and not for example as a possessive adjective).

Definition: A thread of an account is one of its meanings (literal, event symbolic or word symbolic)

Every literal account in the bible has the normal literal meaning.
Every non literal account, such as a dream, a parable or a vision, has a straightforward symbolic meaning, which is the symbolic meaning of the events described in the account. We call this the Event Symbolic meaning, or the Event Symbolism.
Every account in the bible, which:

1, Contains a 'countable noun', which is a noun acting as a noun which is repeated an even number of times, and which account does not contain a double designation - see Code6b
2. Contains a double designation - see Code6b
3. Has a parallel account elsewhere in the bible

has a further set of 1,2,3 or 4 word symbolic meanings. 

The number of Word Symbolic meanings in a scene is determined by the Successive Designations Principle below - see Code6b. These greater meanings are in addition to the literal meaning, in the case of a literal scene, and are in addition to the straightforward symbolic meaning, the event symbolic meaning, in the case of a symbolic component to a literal scene such as a dream, a vision or a parable. 

If a bible account has a scene containing an interpretation (typically from Jesus, Daniel or Joseph), then except in the case of Jesus' interpretation of the Sower parable (which is the word symbolic interpretation of the nouns in the parable), the literal meaning of the interpretation gives the event symbolic meaning of the scene. Whereas the first word symbolic meaning of the interpretation gives the first word symbolic meaning of the symbolic nouns which it interprets (excluding Jesus' Sower parable interpretation).

So the Word symbolic meaning is the symbolic interpretation of the nouns used to describe the events in the account. Whereas the Event Symbolic meaning is the symbolic interpretation of the events themselves. Perhaps this extra bible within the bible is another reason why Jesus is called: The Word. Furthermore Paul tells us that..

The word of God is alive and exerts power... (Hebrews 4:12).

He does not say that the events which the words describe are alive and exerting power. The words themselves, which describe these events, are alive. So these words have the power, they are alive, having greater meanings, rather than the events. This is the philosophy of word symbolism. One interprets the words not the events. One divorces the words from the events, and interprets them out of context.

Every literal countable noun takes the same symbolic meaning in each of its occurrences in an account in each thread (meaning) of an account
Every symbolic countable noun takes the same symbolic meaning in each of its occurrences in an account in each thread of an account

This means that if an account contains several parables, then these parables all share the same symbolism in each particular word thread.

Here are some examples of bible accounts with their scene/subaccount  structure

Example 1: Luke 2:22-38 Mary and Joseph Present Immanuel to Jehovah

Narrative: 1 word symbolic thread

22 Also, when the days of the purification of them according to the law of Moses were fulfilled, they brought him up into Jerusalem to present [him] to the Lord,
23
according as/ just as [kaqwj] it is written in [the] law of [the] Lord: [which law says] Every male [andrej] opening a womb will be called holy to the Lord [the law itself was literal - not comparative!]
24
and [on account - implied epi] of the to offer sacrifice according to the [thing] having been said in the law of [the] Lord: [which law says] A pair of turtledoves or 2 chicks of pigeons.

LCNC = 11 
INC Days of purification, Law of Moses, Jerusalem, Lord (2), Male, Womb, Sacrifice, Law of Lord, Pair of Turtledoves, Chicks of Pigeons = 10

Scene1: 2 word symbolic threads from the double designation in verse 27

25 And, look! there was a man [anqrwpoj] in Jerusalem, [the] name to whom [was] Simeon, and this man was a righteous and reverent [one], waiting for [the] consolation of Israel, and holy spirit was upon him [new scene which merges with the trip to the temple by Mary and Joseph to present Jesus, since they meet Simeon who was Melchizedek].
26
Furthermore, it had been divinely revealed to him by [upo] the spirit, the holy [not a double designation, makes no sense singly] that he would not see death before he had seen the Christ of [the] Lord.
27
And he came in/under the spirit into the temple; whilst the parents were bringing-in the little-child, Jesus, in order for them to do for it according to the customary [way] [perfect participle used as a noun] of the law about it,
28
he himself received it into the arms and blessed God and said:
29
Now, Master [despota], you are freeing your slave in peace according to your declaration;
30
because my eyes have seen your saving [means]
31
that you have made ready according to face [meaning in front of the faces, metonym] of all the peoples,
32
a light into [the] revelation of the nations and a glory of your people, Israel.
33
And its father and mother continued wondering at the [things] being spoken about it.
34
Also, Simeon blessed them, but said to Mary, its mother [but not to Joseph who died before Jesus]: Look! This one is laid for a fall and the resurrection of many in Israel [ambiguous, the many in Israel or the resurrection in Israel?] and for a sign to be talked against
35
And a long-sword [long piercing means not necessarily metallic] will be run through the soul of you yourself, in order that the reasonings out of [ek] many hearts may be uncovered [Mary has the effect upon the hearts not Jesus. So this must be literal. No reasonings would be uncovered on her account by a metaphorical sword running through her soul as a result of the death and near immediate resurrection of her son. Neither could such a metaphorical sword be described as long, So Mary was killed by a long sword, almost definitely wielded by the corrupt early Roman Catholic church].

CNC (7,3,5,2,4,1,1,2,2,7,3) = 37 

Verse 22-35 CNC = 11 + 37 = 48 (3 threads)
Verse 25-35 INC Man, Jerusalem, Name, Simeon, Consolation of Israel, Spirit, Death, Christ of Lord, Temple, Parents, Little-child, Jesus, Arms, God, Master, Slave, Peace, Declaration, Eyes, Face, Revelation of Nations, Glory of people, Father, Mother, Mary, Fall, Resurrection, Israel, Sign, Long-sword, Soul, Reasonings = 32,  

Simeon is Watchtower 2NC saints, Jesus is remnant who become LWs, Mary=its mother=JWs, Father=Joseph=FDS3 (dies before long sword). Simeon recognises his Master Jesus, and goes as the new slave FDS4 in peace according to the word of Jesus.

Verse 22-35 INC Man, Jerusalem, Name, Simeon, Consolation of Israel, Spirit, Death, Christ of Lord, Temple, Parents, Little-child, Jesus, Arms, God, Master, Slave, Peace, Declaration, Eyes, Face, Revelation of Nations, Glory of people, Father, Mother, Mary, Fall, Resurrection, Israel, Sign, Long-sword, Soul, Reasonings = 32, Days of purification, Law of Moses, Lord, Male, Womb, Sacrifice, Law of Lord, Pair of Turtledoves, Chicks of Pigeons = 40  

Scene2: 3 word symbolic threads from the triple designation in verse 36

36 And [there] was Anna [Hannah: Grace/Prayer/Entreaty], a prophetess, a daughter of Phanuel [face of God], out of the tribe of Asher [the male carries the genealogy in Hebrew thinking]. This [one] had advanced in days, many, and had lived with a male/husband [Androj] years 7 from the virginity of her.
37
and she [had been] bereaved [chra] until years 84 [chra can be the noun meaning window or can be the adjective meaning widowed or bereaved. Since her condition ended after 84 years, the latter is correct. Because the appearance of Jesus did not stop her being a widow. But it did stop her bereavement!  So she was say 16+7+84=107], who not was-missing-from of the temple [genitive direct object], rendering-sacred-service night and day by fastings and by supplications .
38
And in that very hour [this minor temporal disconnect, this new timeframe, makes it a separate account] she came near and began returning-thanks to God and speaking about it [the child] to all the [ones] waiting for [the] deliverance of Jerusalem [this scene does merge with Mary and Joseph because they went into the temple and Anna was never absent from the place!].

CNC (7,6,3) =16. (4 threads from the triple designation)
INC Anna, Prophetess, Daughter of Phanuel, Days, Male, Years, Virginity, Temple, Night, Fastings, Supplications, Hour, God, Deliverance of Jerusalem = 14

Verse 22-38 CNC = 11 + 37 + 16 = 64 (4 threads)
Verse 22-38 INC Man, Jerusalem, Name, Simeon, Consolation of Israel, Spirit, Death, Christ of Lord, Temple, Parents, Little-boy, Jesus, Arms, God, Master, Slave, Peace, Declaration, Eyes, Face, Revelation of Nations, Glory of people, Father, Mother, Mary, Fall, Resurrection, Israel, Sign, Long-sword, Soul, Reasonings = 32, Days of purification, Law of Moses, Lord, Male, Womb, Sacrifice, Law of Lord, Pair of Turtledoves, Chicks of Pigeons = 40, Anna, Prophetess, Daughter of Phanuel, Days, Years, Virginity, Temple, Night, Fastings, Supplications, Hour, Deliverance of Jerusalem = 52 (4 threads)

The word symbolic thread of the scene for Anna, the prophetess (the HLC), Asher are the 2NC Overlords. They are the face of God in the Kingdom presumably because they visit the earth as heavenly intermediaries with messages from the 3rd Holy Spirit. She had a man for 7 years was bereaved of something for 84 years?

Example 2: A one scene account: Luke5: The deeper the water, the larger and more abundant the fish

1 Now/But [de] it happened in the pressing upon him, the crowd [oclon] [accusative - pressing is deponent] and hearing the word of God [Not the literal word, but the SYMBOLIC MEANING OF THE WORD - FINALLY! THIS IS THE WHOLE POINT OF THE ACCOUNT AND YOU CANNOT GET IT WITHOUT NOUN COUNTING], and he had been standing beside the lake of Gennesaret [literally the lake of the harp - the 10 stringed Harp of God of Psalm 33:" and Psalm 144:9 - 10 fulfilments literal, event symbolic, Word1-4 and a 2nd fulfilment of Word1-4 (if there is a double description). This is the lake of Galilee. Gennesaret is a Hebrew word transliterated into Greek so it does not make a Greek noun chain with lake].
2
And he saw boats [church administrations] 2, docked beside the lake, but the fishermen [literally - salty one - i.e. seaman, i.e. fisherman. Word1&2: Salt of the earth, genuine Christians, salty ones] had alighted from them and were washing off their nets [cleansing their neural nets for new understandings, they leave their administrative position, but not the church itself, to rethink].
3
Going aboard one [eij] [a pronoun] of the boats [quantitative genitive] [Must count 6x because a boat is held up by the sea, which cannot be literal in the word symbolism, it must be the masses of lawless, structureless mankind. A boat is a false church], which was [a boat] of Simon, he asked him to pull away a bit from land [Not far from the reappointment of Laodicea as a true church]. But [de] having sat down [to judge the 1NC reserves for the Passover], he was teaching the crowds out of [ek] the boat [from a distance, a journey of faith from the boat, the false church, to the land, the true church across the bible].
4
When he ceased speaking [], he said to Simon [meaning hearing in Hebrew]: Pull out to the deep-part, and lower your nets for a catch [deep understandings of FDS4].
5
But Simon answered: Instructor [Paul/Gordon], through [a] whole night [this must be a whole night with whole as an adjective and not the whole of the night with whole as a noun, since 'the' is absent] [of the gap in the presence] having toiled, we took nothing, but at your bidding I will lower the nets.
6
Well, when they did this, they enclosed a great multitude [plhqoj] of fishes. Actually, their nets began ripping apart.
7
So they signaled to the [ones] sharing [metocoj is an adjective, c.f. koinwnoj, a noun] in the other boat [the Watchtower], of the [ones] having come to assist them. And they came, and they filled both the boats [accusative], so that they began to sink.
8
Seeing this, Simon, Peter fell down at the knees of Jesus [Word1&2: To be rebaptized], saying: Depart from me, because I am a sinful male [anhr], Lord.
9
For astonishment overwhelmed him and all the [ones] with him at the catch of fishes which they took-together.
10
But similarly [it overwhelmed] both/and/also James [Iakwbon] and John, [the] sons of Zebedee [The saints and the unsanctified JWs, sons of Russell], who were partners [koinwnoj a noun which when used as an adjective takes the same meaning as koinoj - Liddell and Scott and Mounce and Strong's agree. Whereas Groves Wheeler incorrectly has this as an adjective] with [dative] Simon. But Jesus said to Simon: Stop being afraid. From now on you will be catching men [anqropoj] alive [with a non adamic baptism].
11
So having led down/beached the boats upon the land [of Zoar], having abandoned everything [in the previous churches of TCC1 and TCC3], they followed him.

CNC (2,4,4,4,4,2,2,5,2,8,2) = 39 (3 threads)
INC Crowd, Lake ( of Gennesaret), Boats, Fishermen, Nets, Land, Simon, Deep-part, Catch, Instructor, Night, Multitude of fishes, Peter, Knees of Jesus, Male [anhr], Lord, Astonishment, Catch of fishes, James, John, Sons of Zebedee, Partners, Jesus, Men [anqropoj] = 24

plhqoj Multitude, or 'a large number of' is invariant symbolically. So one might think that 'multitude of fishes' gives us 'fishes', and since we have 'catch', we have 'catch of fishes'. But one would be wrong. It matters not that multitude is invariant. Perhaps it is not as invariant as we imagine.

Crowd (2), Word of God, Lake (2) ( of Gennesaret), Boats (6), Fishermen (1), Nets (4), Land (2), Simon (5), Deep-part, Catch (2), Instructor, Night, Multitude of fishes, Peter (1), Knees of Jesus, Man [anhr] (1), Lord, Astonishment, Catch of fishes, James (1), John (1), Sons of Zebedee, Partners, Jesus (1), Men [anqropoj] (1)

The bible is the lake, the surface water is the literal meaning, then the event symbolic layer, then the word symbolic layer. The deeper waters have the larger fish.

Multiple Designations: Instructor and Jesus and Lord. Simon and Peter and Man.

The Greek word for fisherman [alieuj] literally means a salty-one. The word only appears once in the account and so can only take its actual Greek meaning. But since it has two Greek meanings, the literal one and the implied one and since it takes the implied one (fishermen) in the literal thread, we give it the literal meaning in the word threads. Salty-men, genuine Christians, the salt of the earth.

Due to the substitution of Peter for Simon in Word2 (after the double designation Simon, Peter), this chap called Simon, the President of Laodicea (the boat which Jesus gets into) does not catch men alive in Word2 (whereas a Peter - AOL - does). Simon may not immediately repent. But a Peter, does repent from the Watchtower and join TCC4. In other words Laodicea is split into arrogant Simons and humble Peters.

The second boat is not said to have left the land, the boats are not said to be led to the land, but led upon the land. However not everyone gets out of the Watchtower boat! 

Simon in verse 10 is in the dative. This noun is substituted in Word2 to be Peter in the dative (by the double designation before it). Peter is in the nominative in verse 8 which has the double designation.

Word2: Substituted

8 Seeing this, Peter fell down at the knees of Jesus [Word1&2: To be rebaptized], saying: Depart from me, because I am a sinful male [anhr], Lord.
9
For astonishment overwhelmed him and all the [ones] with him at the catch of fishes which they took-together.
10
But similarly [it overwhelmed] also [the] sons of Zebedee [The JWs, sons of Russell], who were partners [koinwnoj a noun which when used as an adjective takes the same meaning as koinoj - Liddell and Scott and Mounce and Strong's agree. Whereas Groves Wheeler incorrectly has this as an adjective] with [dative] Simon. But Jesus said to Peter: Stop being afraid. From now on you will be catching men [anqropoj] alive [with a non adamic baptism].
11
So having led down/beached the boats upon the land [of Zoar], having abandoned everything [in the previous churches of TCC1 and TCC3], they followed him.

These decoded understandings, these fishes that nearly break our brains, are the unleavened bread of the Cakes that is eaten in haste at and before the end. The acceptable year of Isaiah 61 is the time of the greatest bible research ever!!!

Example 3: Jesus calls Matthew, the apostle who is Levi the son of Alphaeus, the tax collector: 3 Parallel literal accounts with several symbolic subaccounts in each

9 And, the Jesus, passing along from there, saw a man seated at the tax-office called Matthew, and he said to him: Be following me. Thereupon he did rise up and follow him.
10
And when he was reclining in the house, look! many tax-collectors and sinful [ones] came and began reclining with Jesus and his disciples.
11
And having seen [this] the Pharisees began to say to his disciples: Why is it that your teacher eats with tax-collectors and sinful [ones]?
12
Hearing [them], he said: The [ones] being strong have no need of a healer, rather the [ones] having [fared] badly.
13
Go, then, and learn what this means, 'I want mercy, and not sacrifice.' For I came to call, not righteous [ones], but sinful [ones].

These two scenes in Matthew are joined up by the parallel account in Luke.

14 Then [tote] the disciples of John [some of whom were Pharisees] came to him and asked: Why is it that we and the Pharisees practice fasting but your disciples do not fast?
15
At this Jesus said to them: The sons of the bridal-chamber [male friends of the groom] are not able to mourn whilst the bridegroom is with them [are they]? But days will come when the bridegroom will be taken away from them [after the marriage feast, when the groom must make his bride rejoice for one year] [the gap in the presence or the gap between presences], and then they will fast.
16
Nobody sews a patch of unshrunk cloth upon an old outer-garment; for its filling would pull up from the outer-garment and the tear would become worse.
17
Neither do they pour young wine into old skins; for otherwise the skins burst and the wine spills out and the skins are ruined. But they pour young wine into new skins, and both are preserved (Matthew 9)

LCNC (4,4,4,0,2,3,0,0,0) = 17
SCNC 5+12=17
LINC: Jesus (2), Man, Tax-office, Matthew, House, Tax-collectors (2), Disciples (3), Pharisees (2), Teacher, Mercy, Sacrifice, Disciples of John = 12
SINC:  Need of Healer, Sons of Bridal-chamber, Bridegroom, Days, Patch of cloth, Outer-garment, Filling, Tear, Wine, Skins = 10

27 Now after these things he went out and beheld a tax-collector, Levi in name sitting at the tax-office, and he said to him: Be following me.
28
And leaving everything behind he rose up and went following him.
29
Also, Levi spread a big banquet for him in his house; and there was a great crowd of tax-collectors and others who were with them reclining.
30
At this the Pharisees and their scribes began murmuring to his disciples, saying: Why is it you eat and drink with tax-collectors and sinful [ones]?
31
In reply Jesus said to them: The healthy [ones] have no need of a healer, rather the [ones] having [fared] badly.
32
I have come to call, not righteous [ones], but sinful [ones] into repentance.
33
But [de] they said to him: The disciples of John fast frequently and offer supplications, and likewise [omoiwj] the [ones/disciples] of the Pharisees, but yours eat and drink.
34
Jesus said to them: You cannot make the sons of the bridal-chamber fast whilst the bridegroom is with them, [can you]?
35
Yet days will come when the bridegroom will indeed be taken away from them; then they will fast in those days.

36 But [de] he was also telling them a parable that: No one having torn a patch from a new outer-garment puts it upon an old outer-garment; for otherwise truly both the new [piece] will tear away and will not match with the patch, the [one] from the new [material].
37
And, no one pours young wine into old skins; for otherwise truly the wine, the young will burst the skins, and it will be spilled out and the skins will be ruined.
38
Rather young wine is poured into new skins.
39
No one having drunk the old wants [the] young. He says, 'The old is nice.' (Luke 5)

LCNC (4,0,4,4,1,1,2,1,0,1,0,0,0) = 18
SCNC 6+11 = 17
LINC Tax-collector (2), Levi (2), Name, Tax-office, Banquet, House, Crowd of tax-collectors, Pharisees, Scribes, Disciples, Jesus (2), Repentance, Disciples of John, Supplications, Parable = 15
SINC: Need of Healer, Sons of Bridal Chamber, Bridegroom, Days, Patch, Outer-garment, Wine, Skins  = 8  

Matthew, the apostle (be my follower) was Levi the son of Alphaeus, the father of the apostle James. 

13 And he went out again beside the sea; and all the crowd kept coming to him, and he began to teach them.
14
And passing by he saw Levi, the [son] of Alphaeus [Hebrew origin meaning Change] sitting at the tax-office, and he said to him: Be following me. And rising up he followed him.
15
And when he was reclining in his house, and many tax-collectors and sinful [ones] were reclining with Jesus and his disciples, for there were many of them and they were following him.
16
The Scribes of the Pharisees, having seen that was eating with the sinful [ones] and tax-collectors, began saying to his disciples: Does he eat with the tax-collectors and sinful [ones]?
17
Upon hearing this Jesus said to them: The [ones] being strong have no need of a healer, rather the [ones] having [fared] badly. I came to call, not righteous [ones], but sinful [ones].

18 And were the disciples of John and the Pharisees [nominative] fasting. And they came and said to him: Why is it the disciples of John and the disciples of the Pharisees are fasting, but your disciples are not fasting?
19
And Jesus said to them: The sons of the bridal-chamber are not able to fast whilst the bridegroom is with them [are they]? For whatever time [cronoj] they have the bridegroom with them they cannot fast.
20
But days will come when the bridegroom will be taken away from them [literally after veil lifting day when the groom must make the bride rejoice for a year], and then they will fast in that day [this shows that the bible uses 'day' to stand for several days. But it also shows that there is more than one absence of the groom, i.e. more than one gap between the first and 2nd presences, i.e a gap in at least one of the two presences]

5 In case a man takes a new wife, he should not go out into the army, nor should anything else be imposed onto him. He should continue exempt at his house for one year, and he must make his wife whom he has taken rejoice. (Deuteronomy 24 NWT)

21 Nobody places a patch of unshrunk cloth upon an old outer-garment; for otherwise the filling lifts up from it, the new from the old, and the tear becomes worse.
22
Also, nobody pours young wine into old skins; for otherwise, the wine will burst the skins, and the wine is being lost as well as the skins. Rather [they pour] young wine into new skins (Mark 2)

LCNC (2,2,4,4,1,5,1,0) = 19
SCNC = 20
Mark: LINC Sea, Crowd, Levi, Tax-office, House, Tax-collectors (3), Jesus (3), Disciples (3), Scribes of the Pharisees, Disciples of John (2), Pharisees, (Disciples of Pharisees) = 11
Mark: SINC Need of Healer, Sons of Bridal-chamber, Bridegroom, Time, Days, Patch of Cloth, Outer-garment, Filling, Tear, Wine, Skins = 11

Luke 5:27-39 and Matthew 9:9-17 and Mark 2:13-22 are parallel.
The literal narrative with 4 parables each of which is a symbolic subaccount.

Luke: LINC Tax-collectors (2), Levi (2), Name, Tax-office, Banquet, House, Crowd of tax-collectors, Pharisees, Scribes, Disciples, Jesus (2), Repentance, Disciples of John, Supplications, Parable = 15
Matthew: LINC: Jesus (2), Man, Tax-office, Matthew, House, Tax-collectors (2), Disciples (3), Pharisees (2), Teacher, Mercy, Sacrifice, Disciples of John = 12

Mark + Matthew + Luke
Total LCNC 19+17+18=54 (3 threads)
Total LINC: Sea, Crowd, Levi (3), Tax-office (3), House (3), Tax-collectors (7), Jesus (7), Disciples (7), (Scribes of the Pharisees), Disciples of John (4), Pharisees (4), (Disciples of Pharisees), Name, Banquet, (Crowd of Tax-collectors), Scribes, Repentance, Supplications, Parable, Man, Matthew, Teacher, Mercy, Sacrifice = 21 (3 threads)

So Levi, Tax Office and House take 3 meanings un the literal meaning and Word1 and Word2. Whereas John and Pharisees take 2 meanings (since 2 is the largest factor of 4, which is less than 3). All the other nouns are invariant in Word1 and Word2.

Matthew + Mark + Luke
Total SCNC 17+20+17=54 (3 threads)
Total SINC: Need of Healer, Sons of Bridal-chamber, Bridegroom, Time, Days, Patch of Cloth, Outer-garment, Filling, Tear, Wine, Skins, Patch = 12 (3 threads)

The Bridegroom, Patch and Wineskins parables are all in the same symbolic account since they are all in answer to the question why do John's disciples fast yet your disciples eat. 

The double designation in the narrative of Mark gives 2 word symbolic threads in Mark whereas there is one in Matthew and one in Luke. So there are 4 fulfilments all of which combine to give a whole picture, by the parallel account principle. These apply to the 4 true Christian churches. So a Matthew/Levi is called into each of the true churches

Word 1: Matthew, Mark and Luke

Luke is set after the fall of the Roman Catholic church on 84Nisan14.
Mark is set at the change of administration of FDS2 from ELCs to HLCs, from Bilhah to Zilpah. The 2EC water baptism of Paul did not fall during the transition. But the ELC slave did fall. It was rejected by God, after which any donations it received were merely a secular tax. Hence Levi was sitting at the tax office
Matthew is set after the fall of the law on 33Nisan14.

All 3 together make a complete picture of the church breakdowns and fixes of the first presence.

Tax-office is a Synagogue after the law fell on 33Nisan14 (at which point sacred contributions became merely a secular tax)/a Roman Catholic congregation after it fell on 84Nisan14/a congregation of TCC2 run by the ELC administration, after that slave was rejected and cut into two by Jesus (after 159Tishri10, the end of the first presence)
Tax collectors are the administrators of the congregation/the Elders
Eating AND drinking is the Roman Catholic Passover Banquets followed by escape into TCC2.
Banquet is the Roman Catholic Passover feasts

Word 2: Mark only

This is set after the fall of Laodicea. It is the story of the breakdown and fix of the Watchtower through Laodicea.

Tax-office is any Kingdom Hall after the Watchtower fell on 2005Sivan14 (when sacred donations merely become a secular tax)
Tax collectors are the Elders
Pharisees are the Bethelites
Scribes of the Pharisees are the writing committee Bethelites
John is Russell
Alphaeus (meaning change) is the mediator of the 2NC.
Levi is a 2NC saint
Levi's House is Laodicea
Eating but not drinking with Jesus is partaking of the feeding program of Laodicea.

Parables

The patch from a new garment on the old/new outer garment is a new Elijah
The new outer garment is a new Ephod, a new priesthood.
The new wine is a new spirit baptism covenant. The wineskin is a water baptism.
The bridegroom is Jesus of the 1NC.

When a true church falls the water baptism (old wineskin) is lost and therefore the bridegroom (Jesus) is lost (because Jesus cannot be present through 1NCs in unclean flesh). So a new patch is required (a new Elijah) and that means a new outer garment, a new priesthood. Also a new spirit covenant is made in the cases of the end of the law, the end of the Roman Catholic Church and the end of the ELC administrated FDS2 and the end of the Watchtower/Laodicea. There was no new covenant made for the Watchtower, it was the vessel to received the 2nd half of Jesus' wife, the 1NC saints. But TCC2 lost its 2EC water baptism on 435Iyyar21 and the Watchtower congregation began its 3EC baptism on 1875Iyyar21, 4 Prophetic Times of the Waterless times later, with the baptism of the 2nd Russellite. So there was no change of anybody sitting in a tax office from the previous church!

Bible Accounts with NO further meaning (that we can see)

Nearly all accounts in the bible do have word symbolic meanings (a greater meaning). It is hard to find an account which has no greater meaning. Here are some examples...

Example 1 

24 And the report of him went out into all Syria; and they brought him all the [ones] holding badly, and being afflicted by various sicknesses and torments, being-demon-possessed and being-epileptic and paralyzed [ones], and he cured them.
25
Consequently great crowds followed him from Galilee and Decapolis and Jerusalem and Judea and from the other-side [peran] [substantive] of the Jordan (Matthew 4).

Countable Noun Count CNC = 9 (1 thread).
Individual Noun Chains = 9

Example 2 


12
After this he and his mother and brothers and his disciples went down to Capernaum, but they did not stay there many days (John 2)

CNC = 5 (1 thread)
INC = 5

Example 3

7 Now he summoned the 12, and he initiated sending them out 2 [by] 2, and he was giving them authority of the spirits, the unclean [possessive genitive, the same authority to begin and end demonic possession as the unclean spirits have].
8
Also, he instructed them to carry nothing for the way except a staff alone, no bread, no food-pouch, no copper [money] in their girdle,
9
but to bind on sandals, and not to wear 2 undergarments.
10
Further, he said to them: Wherever you enter into a house, stay there until you go out from there.
11
And whichever place will not receive you nor hear you, on going out from there shake off the dirt [coun], the underneath your feet [pronoun imbalance] into a witness to them.
12
So they set out and preached in order that [ones] might repent;
13
and they would expel many demons and grease many sick [ones] with oil and curing [them] (Mark 6).

CNC = 16 (1 thread).
INC Authority, Way, Staff, Bread, Food-pouch, Copper, Girdle, Sandals, Undergarments, House, Place, Dirt, Feet, Witness, Demons, Oil = 16.
This account is stand alone with no repeated nouns and no greater meaning!!!

Matthew 10:5 -11:1 and Luke 9:1-6 are parallel but Mark 6:7-13 is stand alone. Because in Matthew they are not to take a staff or sandals but in Mark they are to take both. Whereas in Luke they are not to take a staff.
Mark and Luke have no repeated nouns.

Example 4

35 And having got up early, very much at-night [ennuca], he went off into a desolate place [topon], and was praying there.
36
However, Simon and those with him hunted him down
37
and found him, and they said to him: All are looking for you.
38 But he said to them: Let us go somewhere else, into the towns [un-walled cities] nearby, that I may preach there also, for it is due to this, I have gone out (Mark 1).

CNC = 3 (1 thread)
INC Place, Simon, Towns = 3

Luke 4:42-43 which occurred during the day and and Mark 1:35-38 which happened at night are not parallel.

Example 5

42 However, [at the time] of day having occurred, he went out and proceeded into a lonely place [having gone out to pray during the night and then returned - see Mark 1:35]. But the crowds began hunting about for him and came out as far as he was, and they tried to detain him from going away from them.
43
But the [one] said to them that also to other cities it is necessary [for] me to declare-as-good-news the kingdom of God, because for this I was sent forth (Luke 4)..

CNC = 5 (1 thread).
INC Day, Place, Crowds, Cities, Kingdom of God = 5

Luke 4:42-43 which occurred during the day and and Mark 1:35-38 which happened at night are not parallel.

Example 6

44 And he was preaching into the synagogues of Judea (Luke 4).

CNC = 1 (1 thread)
INC = Synagogues of Judea =1

Example 7

28 And having himself come into the other-side, into the country [cwran] of the Gadarenes, 2 demon-possessed [ones] coming out of the memorial-tombs met him, unusually fierce, so that nobody had the courage to pass by on that road.
29
And, look! they screamed, saying: What have we to do with you, Son of God? Did you come here to torment us before the appointed-time?
30
But far off [unlike Mark 5 and Luke 8 where the herd 'was there', 'on the mountain'] from them a herd of many swine was grazing.
31
Now the demons began to entreat him, saying: If you expel us, send us forth into the herd of swine.
32
Accordingly he said to them: Go away! So the [ones] having came out, went off into the swine; and, look! the entire herd rushed over [kata] the precipice into the sea and died in the waters.
33
But the [ones] feeding [them] fled and, having gone off into the city, they reported all [things], including the [things] of the demon-possessed [ones].
34
And, look! all the city came into meeting of the Jesus; and after having seen him, they entreated him to depart from their districts [orion].

MATTHEW CHAPTER 9
1
So, boarding into the boat, he crossed over and came into his own city.

CNC (3,2,1,2,5,1,3) = 17 (1 thread)
INC Country, Memorial-tombs, Road, Son of God, Appointed-Time, (Herd of Swine), Demons, Swine, Herd, Precipice, Sea, Waters, City (3), Meeting, Districts, Boat = 15

City appears 3x, every other word appears only once. So 1 thread, no word symbolic meaning.

Matthew 8:28-9:1 and Mark 4:35-41 are not parallel because the herd of swine in Matthew is said to be far off whereas in Mark it is there on the mountain.

Example 8

1 Whereas many have undertaken to compile a statement [dihghsin] about [peri] the facts fully-accepted among us,
2
just as they were given to us, the [ones] having become eyewitnesses and attendants of the word from [apo] the beginning.
3
It seemed-good to me also, having investigated all things from-above [anwqen] accurately chronologically, to write to you, most mighty Theophilus,
4
that you may know the certainty of the words about which you have been taught orally.

CNC=7 (1 thread). No greater meaning.
INC = 7.

Example 9

52 And Jesus went on progressing in wisdom and stature and grace with God and men.

CNC = 6 (1 thread)
INC Jesus, Wisdom, Stature, Grace, God, Men = 6 

Example 10

Luke 3:23-28, the maternal genealogy express in terms of the husbands of all his female ancestors.

CNC = 4 (1 thread)
INCJesus, Years, Son, Joseph

For more see U49 and Matthew or Mark or Luke or John

Event Symbolism vs Word Symbolism

If the reader is puzzling over what precise distinction we are making, between event symbolism and word symbolism then please consider the following non scriptural example:

King Nebuchadnezzar went fishing. The king caught a fish. Nebuchadnezzar put the fish back. His servants said: My Lord, why did you not eat the fish. Nebuchadnezzar the King of Babylon said: Because I didn't have any chips to eat it with!

In the literal meaning of this little (made up) story the character referred to variously as:

King Nebuchadnezzar (adjective and noun)
The King
Nebuchadnezzar
My Lord
Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon (double designation)

is just one character. He is Nebuchadnezzar, the King of Babylon, the Lord over his servants. But in the Word symbolism, we are talking about 5 different but related characters. 'My Lord', 'the King' and 'Nebuchadnezzar' may be totally unrelated, but King Nebuchadnezzar will be related to 'The King' and to 'Nebuchadnezzar' and to 'Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon', since it shares common words with these other designations. In Word1...

My Lord is Jesus
The King is the 3rd Holy Spirit
Nebuchadnezzar, the King is the all the 2nd presence 1NCs.
Nebuchadnezzar is the 2nd presence 1NC reserves
King Nebuchadnezzar is the 2nd presence 1NC reserves after they have married Jesus and become Kings

Event symbolism is referred to variously in this book and in the website www.truebiblecode.com as the first symbolism, the straight symbolism, the straightforward symbolism.

Word symbolism is referred to as the second symbolism, the coded symbolism, the account symbolism.

Peter says: 

19 Consequently we have the prophetic word [made] more sure and you are doing well in paying attention to it as to a lamp shining in a dark place, until day dawns and a daystar rises, in your hearts.
20 For you know this first, that no prophecy of Scripture springs from any private interpretation.
21 For prophecy was at no time brought by man's will, but men spoke from God as they were borne along by holy spirit (2 Peter 1).

So all of the word of God, the word of life, the bible, is prophetic. They are all prophetic words.

8 The sovereign Lord Jehovah himself has spoken who will not prophesy? (Amos 3).

The bible is the word of God, and is all delivered to us through Jesus, who is also called the word of God - see [C2.3]  so it is all prophetic. This is what Paul meant when he said:

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power and is sharper than any two-edged sword and pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, and of joints and [their] marrow, and [is] able to discern thoughts and intentions of [the] heart (Hebrews 4).

The word being alive, means that it has a further life over and above it’s literal meaning. This is how it exerts power in the prophetic sense. The bible is not a dead history book of past events. It is also a living history book of future events symbolically encoded in the stories of the past events. This works because history is fractal. Was it Churchill who said: The further back you look into history, the further forward you see? The same is true of the bible, but actually because each account has more than one life. They all have greater meanings. These meanings are normally prophetic and so are further fulfilments of the scriptures.

One can use the Consistency Principle to deduce that the whole bible is prophetic just from the fact that certain scriptures are prophetic. Likewise since certain scriptures are laws, we can deduce that the whole bible is the 'Law of God', using the same principle. And since certain scriptures are Psalms, we can deduce that the whole bible is a giant praise to God, it is one huge Psalm, by the Consistency Principle. 

Even when we are being told that Jacob crossed a river with 200 she goats, 20 he goats, 200 female sheep, 20 rams, 30 camels giving suck and their young ones, 40 cows, 10 bulls, 20 she asses and 10 full grown asses (Genesis 32:14,15), this is prophetic. It is symbolic. It stands for something greater.  Who actually wants to know the precise numbers of these animals that crossed a river 3800 years ago ? (except perhaps a historical agricultural economist). 

So either the word of God is alive and is exerting power today, through further fulfilments of words written thousands of years ago or it is dead and powerless. Either the flaming blade of the sword guarding the way back to the tree of life in the Garden of Eden (Genesis 3:24), the two edged sword (Hebrews 4:12) that pierces even to the dividing of soul and spirit, is continuously turning, or it has broken down and has come to a standstill. Either the word of God has a height and a breadth and a length and a depth, which we are able to grasp mentally (Ephesians 3:18), or it is flat and one dimensional, the Churchill's History of the English speaking people. Either this book has further meaning upon further meaning upon further meaning, or it has one meaning and we should all become Hasidic Jews and start declaring Sabbath-free zones everywhere.

Incidentally just because a bible account has no second meaning does not mean it is not in a code. On the contrary it is in a code, a code which prohibits it from having a further meaning. Here are some examples of word symbolic meanings...

Example 1

1 When Israel was a boy, then I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son. (Hosea 11).

These words from the prophet Hosea are a historical statement about the calling of the nation of Israel out of Egypt at the time of Moses. But Matthew knew that they had a further fulfilment involving a further son:

15 and he stayed there until the decease of Herod, for that to be fulfilled which was spoken by Jehovah through his prophet, saying: Out of Egypt I called my son (Matthew 2).

This time the son was Jesus who was taken to Egypt by his parents to avoid persecution by Herod. So there can be no argument that this particular scripture has a further meaning. This second meaning cannot be literal since there can only be one literal meaning which is the historical meaning. So the second fulfilment results from a second meaning which is a symbolic meaning. In fact it is the word symbolic meaning of this verse of Hosea.

Example 2

Consider now the words of Jesus in Matthew 24:

21 For then there will be great tribulation such as has not occurred since the world's beginning until now, no, nor will occur again.
22 In fact, unless those days were cut short, not all [chosen] flesh would be saved; but on account of the chosen ones those days will be cut short (Matthew 24).

This looks like it applies to a great tribulation leading into Armageddon, since the 'world', which is biblical terms is the system of things post Adam's fall and pre Armageddon, is still ongoing, and we haven't all died yet (neither do we all die at the end). But in the same chapter we read:

15 Therefore, when you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation, as spoken of through Daniel the prophet, standing in a holy place, (let the reader use discernment,) 16 then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains (Matthew 24).

This looks like it applies to the end of the Jewish system of things, and the great tribulation on the inhabitants of Jerusalem from 66Tishri when the Roman General Cestius entered the temple in Jerusalem until to 70Ab when the Roman General Titus burned the temple in Jerusalem. Obviously fleeing to the literal mountains of Judea is not a viable option for people in Colorado at the end of the World. 

For these reasons and other reasons, many Christian churches understand that Matthew 24 applies both to the end of the Jewish system of things 66-70 AD and the end of this system of things (The great tribulation and Armageddon). However what they have hitherto failed to understand is that rather than some verses applying to one end and other verses applying to the other end, the whole account has a literal (although somewhat metaphorically stated) meaning applying to the end of the Jewish system of things and a symbolic meaning applying to this whole system of things, 'the world'. So actually every verse applies to the end of Jerusalem by the Romans in the first meaning and to the end of the World by the final corruption of the UN in the second meaning, which is the word symbolic meaning of Matthew 24. For the UN started as a great humanitarian organisation but ends as a corrupt worldwide dictatorship. If you do not believe that this sort of thing happens, then read animal farm by George Orwell, or go see Star Wars, the attack of the clones. The bad guys always begin by posing as saviours - the UK/US are also going rotten by the same route presently. The bible describes them as follows:

11 And I saw another wild beast ascending out of the earth, and it had two horns like a lamb, but it began speaking as a dragon (Revelation 13).

The two horns are the twin powers of the US and the UK. The horns of a lamb are sacrificial and saving. Both powers made great sacrifices and saved the world in two world wars. But the dragon is Satan's heavenly administration. And right now the US and the UK have ceased acting as a lamb and have started speaking as a dragon. In other words we lie. We lie about WMDs and procure war votes from congress and parliament using deception. Let us be more specific. The US and the UK were genuine true honest saviours in both World Wars. We used to be the good guys. We were also genuine true and honest saviours in the first Gulf War under Bush senior and stormy Norman. 

But in the second Gulf War war, under Bush junior and his generals, we are becoming the bad guys. During the run up to this war we posed as saviours but were in fact acting as aggressors on the basis of a deception. This is not to say that the removal of Saddam was not a good idea. There are many dictators that the world would be better off without and he was certainly one of them. But without getting involved in politics, it is a bad idea to lie to congress or parliament about WMDs and a bad idea to trick them both into declaring war on an unarmed man for the purpose of disarming him. For the full symbolic meaning of Revelation 13 (as far as we understand it) - see U158.

Now the writer is fully aware that the majority of UK and US nationals will not want to hear or believe or accept the above, because as a race, man believes what he is comfortable with and refuses to believe what he is uncomfortable with. This is why God chooses to save us on our faith, which is our belief. For if we love him, then we will be comfortable with him and so we will believe, but if we do not, then we will not be comfortable with him and so we will refuse to believe. 

But refusing to believe a truth has no effect on any reality, it only buries your head in the sand. So please, my brothers from every race, do not be like the Pakistani Muslims who were surveyed about 911, and 89% of whom believed that Muslims were not responsible for the Twin Towers Tragedy (actually it was a  controlled demolition so that Pakistani Muslims are not so far out!) And do not be like the sons of Jacob, most of whom believe that Jesus (whom their forefather's murdered) is not God's son. For we are all the same as them, and they are all the same as each other in genetic character predisposition. Believe instead in the truth, however uncomfortable it appears to be and however embarrassing it may be. Be like Daniel Barenboim the world class Jewish pianist who plays his music to the Palestinians because he will not hide from the truth. Now he truly is a son of Abraham, through the 1AC, and God himself will listen to his music for a very very long time - see [9], because one does not show courage and love like that without faith in God. And who cares about some minor embarrassment or about the loss of a few cushions under ones backside? Surely the truth is greater than these things? for the good book says:

32 Know the truth and the truth will set you free (John 8).

Here are another couple of famous examples from Matthew 24

2 Truly I say to you: By no means will a stone be left here upon a stone and not be thrown down (Matthew 24).

In the literal meaning, the temple was destroyed by the Roman General Titus in 70 CE, and the temple was knocked down, and no stone was left standing upon a stone. In the greater meaning the temple stones are the living stones of the Christian temple of the body of the Christ, which is all of the new covenant saints. And this is a prophecy that this temple will be knocked down, whilst the stones are still around. In other words what happened to the Jews, their rejection by God, will also happen to the first administration of the Christian church, under the New covenant Saints, these stones. Indeed the first true church compromised with Rome at the end of Nero's reign famous for his persecution of Christians and became the Roman Catholic church, headed by the Papacy initially of Pope St Linus on 67Tebbeth20 (4600 solar days of Daniel8 before they lost their constant feature of evangelism acceptable to God on 80Elul14, 1290 days of Daniel12 before they fell as a true church on 84Nisan14 - see U42 

Jesus when describing the signs of the times to his disciples said:

34 Truly I say to you that this generation will by no means pass away/come beside/arrive until all these things occur (Matthew 24).

In other words one generation will see all of the signs of the time and the end. Now we know that this was true in the case of the disciples and Jewish system of things. They saw the signs of the times and they saw General Titus destroy Jerusalem and burn the temple in 70CE. But there is a further meaning that applies to the generation that sees the signs of the times today during Jesus' second presence - which ended on 2013Adar10, when Laodicea lost its 4EC water baptism - see U45

Example 3

The apostle Paul in Galatians 4 informs us that 3 chapters of Genesis are written in a Symbolic Code. He says:

22 For example, it is written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman;
23 but the one by the servant girl was actually born in the manner of flesh, the other by the free woman through a promise.
24 These things stand as a symbolic drama; for these [women] mean two covenants, the one from Mount Sinai, which brings forth children for slavery, and which is Hagar.
25 Now this Hagar means Sinai, a mountain in Arabia, and she corresponds with the Jerusalem today, for she is in slavery with her children.
26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4).

Now we read about Hagar giving birth to Ishmael in Genesis 16, and we read about Sarah conceiving Isaac in Genesis 17 and her giving birth to Isaac in Genesis 21. So Paul is saying to us that these three chapters at the least, are a 'Symbolic Drama'. They have a greater meaning which is encoded symbolically. So these three chapters are not just dead history they are also living prophecy written in terms of dead history. They have a greater meaning relating to covenants. For our best attempt at the full story of Genesis 16 - see U210. Paul's actually says that the story of these women is an EXAMPLE of a symbolic drama, indicating that there are many other such examples. 

So come now dear reader, son or daughter of the greatest mind in the universe. Can you think of a question that is being begged of you by the holy spirit at this time?

What is so special about Genesis 16, Genesis 17, Genesis 21, Matthew 24 and Hosea 11?

Example 4

Here are the words of David before he became King of Israel. David was speaking about his own persecution as he hid in the wilderness for 7 years from the jealousy of King Saul.

1 My God, my God, why have you left me? (Psalm 22)

16 For dogs have surrounded me;
The assembly of evildoers themselves have enclosed me.
Like a lion [they are at] my hands and my feet.
17 I can count all my bones.
They themselves look, they gaze upon me.
18 They apportion my garments among themselves
And upon my clothing they cast lots (Psalm 22).

These words were uttered by David about his own personal situation. But they are inspired prophetic words, and they have a second fulfilment in the impalement/Crucifixion of Jesus Christ. For he said just before he died:

46 Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is, My God, my God, why have you forsaken me? (Matthew 27).

Not only this but the soldiers guarding him cast lots over his garments, none of his bones were broken on the stake (the legs of crucifixion victims were routinely broken by the Romans to speed up their deaths if necessary). The robbers on either side of him had their legs broken. Jesus was of course fastened by his hands and his feet to the stake. So here again is history which is also living prophecy. The literal Psalm applies to King David, the Word symbolic meaning applies to Jesus Christ. The application of this psalm of David to Jesus has been known for many years. But no man before 1992 realised that all scripture has a greater application, a greater meaning, not just Psalm 22.

So now we can ask the rhetorical question what is so special about Genesis 16, Genesis 17, Genesis 21, Matthew 24, Hosea 11 and Psalm 22?

Example 5

17 But as for the tree of the knowledge of good and bad you must not eat from it, for in the day you eat from it dying you will die (Genesis 2).

The literal meaning was that Adam died, not physically but judicially on the literal day that he ate. By Judicial death we mean that Adam was under a death sentence, and 'as good as dead' from then on. He was living merely by means of a stay of execution of that sentence. Jesus meant the same thing when he said:

22 Let the dead bury their dead (Matthew 8).

He meant: Let those who are still under Adam's death sentence bury their physically dead ones. The greater meaning of God's command in Genesis is that all of Adam's sons die physically during the period or 'day', wherein they continue to eat from this tree of knowledge of good and bad. So today, for example, even though we are no longer in the garden of Eden, we are still eating and we are still dying. The 'Day' of Genesis 2:17, is therefore the 'day' of this system of things, it is still ongoing! But not for much longer. And when we stop eating, then we stop dying. Putting this another way, once we have learned Good from Bad, then obviously God no longer needs to kill us Judicially. When God threw Adam out of the garden he temporarily stopped him gaining access not to the tree of knowledge of Good and Bad, but to the tree of life:

24 And so he drove the man out and posted at the east of the garden of Eden the cherubs and the flaming blade of a sword that was turning itself continually to guard the way to the tree of life (Genesis 3).

Example 6

Jesus regarded the whole bible as the prophetic law of God, he said:

44 He now said to them: These are my words which I spoke to you while I was yet with you, that all the things written in the law of Moses and in the Prophets and Psalms about me must be fulfilled.
45 Then he opened up their minds fully to grasp the meaning of the Scriptures (Luke 24).

How can the law of Moses be fulfilled? A law is supposed to be obeyed not fulfilled! But he says again: 

17 Indeed, it is easier for heaven and earth to pass away than for one particle of a letter of the Law to go unfulfilled (Luke 16).

So the law is all prophetic having a fulfilment. For Paul says further:

1 For since the Law has a shadow of the good things to come, but not the very substance of the things... (Hebrews 10).

But both Jesus and Paul show us that the 'Law' does not merely refer to the Law of Moses, in the Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers. It is the whole bible. The whole book is the law of God for mankind.

Paul says:

21 Tell me, you who want to be under law [of Moses]: Do you not hear the Law [of God]?
22 For example, it is written that Abraham acquired two sons, one by the servant girl and one by the free woman (Galatians 4).

But the account of Abraham and his sons and wives is not in the Law of Moses, it is in Genesis, which must therefore be a part of the 'law' of God. Jesus says:

34 Jesus answered them: Is it not written in your Law: I said: You are gods? (John 10).

But this wasn't written in the law of Moses, it was written in Psalm 82:6

6 I myself have said, You are gods, And all of you are sons of the Most High (Psalm 82).

And again Jesus says:

25 But it is that the word written in their Law may be fulfilled, 'They hated me without cause.' (John 15:25).

But this wasn't written in the law of Moses, no, it was written in Psalm 69:4

4 They that hate me without a cause are more than the hairs of my head (Psalm 69 - Septuagint bible LXX)

So Psalms must be a part of the 'law' of God. 

But  Isaiah said, over 700 years after Moses was given the law:

3 Out of Zion law will go forth and the word of Jehovah out of Jerusalem (Isaiah 2).

In one meaning this law out of Zion is the word of God out of heavenly Jerusalem, which is the whole bible. What we have just done is extend an element of the bible code, namely, that every scripture has a further fulfilment, from the Law of Moses to the whole bible, by considering other scriptures to define precisely what Jesus meant. But we could equally well have done this using the Consistency Principle above.

Opening up your mind fully to grasp the meaning of the scriptures

Every verse of the Law of Moses, every verse of Genesis, every verse of the Psalms, is to be fulfilled again. In fact the whole bible is the law of mankind and all of it, every letter of it, has to be fulfilled a second time.  And for the majority of scriptures, we are now living in that time, which is why the same one, Jesus Christ, is opening up our minds yet again. For if every scripture has a further fulfilment then so does Luke 24 when it says:

45 Then he opened up their minds fully to grasp the meaning of the Scriptures.
46 and he said to them: In this way it is written that the Christ would suffer and rise from among the dead on the third day  (Luke 24).

So how can our minds be opened up? In what way is the suffering and resurrection timing of Jesus written in the scriptures? Well Jesus has already explained...

40 For just as Jonah was in the belly of the huge fish 3 days and 3 nights, so the Son of man will be in the heart of the earth 3 days and 3 nights (Matthew 12).

30 For just as Jonah became a sign to the Ninevites, in the same way will the Son of man be also to this generation.

It is encoded symbolically in a historical account about a prophet who was eaten by a big fish! Yes, it is another symbolic drama. Jesus opened up the minds of his disciples by making them aware that the book was written in this symbolic way and that every account stood symbolically for something else. This indeed is one reason why Jesus spoke to the crowds entirely in illustrations. He was teaching them and teaching us, that the whole bible was written in this way. Even his famous parables have a greater meaning in addition to the obvious moral message!

34 All these things Jesus spoke to the crowds by illustrations. Indeed, without an illustration he would not speak to them (Matthew 13).

First Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

Jesus only explained the meaning of two of his parables to his disciples in the scriptures. Of course he explained the meanings of many other parables to them privately, but the holy word only records two of his explanations. These explanations are therefore fundamental to all Christians and especially to bible decoders which Christians should now become. He explained the meanings of the parable of the wheat and the weeds, and of the parable of the sower who went to sow. 

In his explanation of the parable of the wheat and the weeds, Jesus gives us the meanings of the words: Sower, Field, Fine Seed, Weeds, Enemy, Harvest, all of which are repeated NOUNS in the account - see [The Repetition Principle]. And he gives the meaning of one further noun: Reapers, which is not repeated - see [70]. 

In his explanation of the sower who went to sow, in all three cases (Matthew13, Mark4 and Luke8), Jesus gives the meaning neither of words, nor of repeated words, but of unrepeated phrases which describe events in the parable - see [63]. 

So in the case of the weeds Jesus explains the meaning of the words in the parable (the repeated nouns except one) and in the case of the sower Jesus explains the meaning of the events in the parable (which are not repeated).  It is not hard to see, therefore, that Jesus is explaining the word symbolic meaning of the weeds and the event symbolic meaning of the sower. Furthermore, since he only explains these two types of symbolism, these are the only two types of symbolism employed by the bible code.

In other words these two are the beginning and end of the matter as regards bible symbolism. 

In fact the event symbolic meaning of the sower relates to the sowing of the seed of the Kingdom message in the soil of the hearts of the faithful, the sons of the 1AC, the children of Abraham by faith. Whereas the word symbolic meaning relates to the sowing of the seed of the saints into the soil of the congregation of a true church, the earth that is overseen by the mountain of the true church administration.

But the event symbolic meaning of the parable of the wheat and the weeds relates to the harvesting of the saints who are oversown with the offspring of vipers, the seed of Satan, who has his own Demonic Angelic Covenant. Whereas the word symbolic meaning relates to the harvesting of the faithful, the true believers, who are oversown with the hypocrites, the false believers, sons of the world, who join churches for all sorts of socio-economic reasons, but have little genuine interest in God. The method of harvesting in both cases is mobility. The true believers and the saints will be prepared to move to a new church if they see that it is now the true church. The offspring of vipers in the DAC and the sons of the world will not see the point in moving and will be trapped by their love for the status they hold in their original church.

So Jesus explains the meaning which relates to the faithful in both cases and not the meaning which relates to the saints. But the Repetition Principle tells us that in a 2 threaded account (which both parables are), if a noun appears as a noun an odd number of times then it takes only one meaning in all the symbolisms (it is invariant symbolically). So for several of the nouns that Jesus interprets in the phrases of the event symbolism relating to the faithful in the parable of the sower, we can use the same interpretation for them in the word symbolism relating to the saints. And the same is true for the parable of the wheat and the weeds. So actually Jesus does around 50% of the work for us in the alternative symbolism as well!

Second Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

The first 2 verses of the book of Revelation read:

1 A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John,
2 who bore witness to:

the word God gave
and to the witness Jesus Christ gave,
even to all the things he saw (Revelation 1).

Obviously 'all the things he saw' is the literal account of the vision. But John is also bearing witness to 'The word God gave'. This therefore is a witness to God's words themselves which is the word symbolic meaning. John is also bearing witness to the (symbolically expressed) witness that Jesus gave him in the form of the vision, this then is the event symbolic account, the symbolic meaning of the events of the vision.  

All the things he saw Literal account of the vision
The Word God gave Coded word symbolic meaning of the vision
The Witness Jesus Christ gave Straight event symbolic meaning of the vision

But then the reader must consider the following question. Did God, like we men do in many of our great projects, only work out how to write the bible properly when he had almost finished the job? Did he only work out how to inspire a symbolic bible account when he reached Revelation, having not thought of it at the time Moses wrote Genesis? 

Obviously not for he is:

10 The one telling from the beginning the finale, and from long ago the things that have not been done (Isaiah 46).

He is the one who knew that Man would walk on the moon before he said: Let there be light. So we deduce that every symbolic account in the whole bible is written in this same way as Revelation. So all symbolic accounts have an event symbolic meaning and a word symbolic meaning. 

It is not hard to see that literal accounts, such as the history of Abraham or David etc. have the same set of meanings as symbolic accounts except that the literal account is the event symbolic meaning. For a literal account is a symbolic account with no symbolism if you see what we mean. In mathematical terms this would be the identity symbolism. A symbolism in which an apple is always an apple and an orange is always an orange etc.

Accounts which contain both literal and symbolic portions, such as dreams, explanations and fulfilments, obey the two rules above for their respective portions.

Third Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

Do you remember the famous words of Jesus:

16 In this way the last ones will be first, and the first ones last (Matthew 20).

There are many meanings of this scripture and other scriptures which repeat this last being first concept. But one interesting one is that the last words of the bible tell the reader how to decode it. Hebrew books are read from the back to the front, they are read backwards. And this is a living prophecy from God, the creator of both English and Hebrew, that the decoding of the bible works backwards from the end. Much of our Chronology works backwards from the date of Armageddon. And as regards the bible code, well like any good text book, the answer can be looked up in the back of the book!

18 I am bearing witness to everyone (panti masculine) that hears the words (logouV masculine) of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone adds/imposes upon them (auta neuter - words or hearers), God will impose upon him the plagues that are written in this scroll.
19 And if anyone takes anything away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God will take his portion away from the trees of life and out of the holy city, things which are written about in this scroll (Revelation 22).

The literal meaning of these two verses is that if you add words to the scroll of Revelation itself, you will get plagues, and if you take words from the scroll of Revelation, corrupting the text, you will lose your everlasting life. 

1 A revelation by Jesus Christ, which God gave him, to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place. And he sent forth his angel and presented [it] in signs through him to his slave John (Revelation 1).

11 saying: What you see write in a scroll and send it to the seven congregations, in Ephesus and in Smyrna and in Pergamum and in Thyatira and in Sardis and in Philadelphia and in Laodicea (Revelation 1).

6 And he said to me: These words are faithful and true, and the Lord, the God of the inspired expressions of the prophets sent his angel forth to show his slaves the things that must shortly take place.
7 And, look! I am coming quickly. Happy is anyone observing the words of the prophecy of this scroll.
8 Well, I John was the one hearing and seeing these things. And when I had heard and seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel that had been showing me these things (Revelation 22).

This scroll is the scroll of Revelation in the literal meaning that contains all the visions presented by the angel of Jesus (who must have been Gabriel) to John. More seriously, it appears that some bible versions of Revelation have bits added and bits removed. We shall have to investigate this further...

Since Revelation 22 is a literal account from verse 6 onwards, so the symbolic meaning is an account symbolism, and is further the very definition of how all the symbolic meanings of the bible work! For we have the words of the scroll of the prophecy and we have the words of the prophecy of the scroll. These two define the event symbolic and account symbolic meanings as follows:

Words Symbolic meaning
Scroll Account
Prophecy Events
Scroll of this prophecy Account of the events
Prophecy of this scroll Events of the account
Words of the scroll of this prophecy Symbolic meaning of the account of the events
Words of the prophecy of this scroll Symbolic meaning of the events of the account

So the bible has two symbolic grammars, if you like. There is a symbolic meaning of the prophecy of the scroll, which is the straight forward symbolism of the events in the account, the event symbolism. Then there is the symbolic meaning of the scroll of the prophecy, which is the symbolic meaning of the account of the events, the words that describe the events. Hence the name 'Word Symbolism' for this symbolic meaning. This may be another reason why Jesus is called the 'Word' of God.

So if anyone persecutes someone who understands the Event symbolism of Revelation then they get plagues. And if any sanctified person will not accept Word Symbolism then they get no more food from the tree of life, and they fail to join the holy city of FDS2/4 so they break their baptism.

The corollary of this is that the Holy City and the life giving food are derived from the Word Symbolic meanings of the bible.

Revelation makes the distinction between Event Symbolism and Word Symbolism using Word symbolism. It is an implicit distinction. But nonetheless, the distinction is there. 

For those who do not understand the meaning of explicit, consider the two equations below:

x=2+1   (explicit)
x+3=2x (implicit)

Both equations have the same solution, namely x=3, the latter equation defines x in terms of itself, this is the meaning of 'implicit'. Likewise Revelation 22:18,19 define event and account symbolisms through account symbolism. But verse 10 reads:

10 He also tells me: Do not seal up the words of the prophecy of this scroll, for the appointed time is near (Revelation 22).

Whereas Gabriel said to Daniel: 

4 And as for you, Oh Daniel, make secret the words and seal up the scroll, until the time of [the] end. Many will rove about, and the [true] knowledge will become abundant (Daniel 12).

The words of the prophecy of the scroll are the event symbolic meaning. This meaning is the straight symbolism, it is not sealed. In fact mankind saw that the wild beast of Revelation 13 and 17 was the League of Nations in 1920. This is the event symbolic meaning. But the account symbolic meaning, the word symbolism, was sealed up until the time of the end, which began in 2008Nisan14, the end of the 6,000 year ARC lease of Michael and the start of the 1,000 year sacred Sabbath of the Kingdom of God. Now Revelation22 deliberately does not say: Do not seal up the words of the scroll of the prophecy, because the Word symbolic meaning was sealed up. 

So the same account that tells us not to mess around physically with the physical holy words of Revelation (and it tells us that false churches will do this), also tells us how precisely to mess around symbolically with these words in order to get their symbolic meanings (and true churches will do this). And by the Consistency Principle, this symbolic methodology applies, the two symbolisms apply, not just to the book of Revelation, but to the whole bible.

Fourth Proof of the Symbolic Structure Principle

Finally we have the shortest parable in the bible which is:

33 Another illustration he spoke to them: The kingdom of the heavens is like leaven, which a woman took and hid in three large measures of flour, until the whole mass was fermented/leavened (Matthew 13).

Ok, you young paduan learners! If it is the most insignificant and smallest of the parables in the whole bible, then what does this tell you about its spiritual meaning in this upside down world in which we live?

Yes, it is the greatest of them all in meaning. Well, the event symbolic meaning is as follows:

The woman is the holy spirit, the leaven is the bible code, and the three lumps of flour are the literal, the event symbolic and the account symbolic meanings of the bible. When the whole mass is fermented/leavened (decoded), then we can truly eat the whole book and see both the code and the truth and God and the true religion and his plan and his love and his humour and his righteousness, and our total and utter pretentiousness and stupidity stretching over 3500 years. As regards the word symbolic meaning of Matthew 13:33 and the parallel account in Luke 13:20 please see section [69].

This leaven is not the wicked teachings of the Pharisees but is rather the good teachings of the true priesthood of God. This website is the result of such leaven. We are expanding the bread of heaven to make it fully digestible.

Question

If a 2 threaded parable is embedded in a 3 threaded literal account then it takes meanings 1,2,2 in that order. Just as a double designation takes designations 1,2,1 in a 3 word threaded account.????? 

[C6a] The Designations Principle

If one character or item in an account is referred to by two or more nouns or possessive noun chains, then these nouns or possessive noun chains refer to two or more characters or items in the word symbolic threads of the account. So in particular there is at least one word symbolic thread to the account.

This is because Word symbolism interprets the nouns themselves not the characters they refer to.

Example 1

Daniel 4 refers to the one character Nebuchadnezzar as:

Nebuchadnezzar, the king
King Nebuchadnezzar
Nebuchadnezzar
King
Lord

In the literal meaning all these designations refer to the same character. In the word symbolic thread - see U123

Daniel is Gordon
Belteshazzar is the mediator of the 2NC (a name of Gordon)
The Magic practicing priests are the 2NCs
My Lord is Jesus
The King is Jesus as sacred or secular king
Nebuchadnezzar the King is the all the 2nd presence 1NCs.
Nebuchadnezzar is the 2nd presence 1NC reserves

Example 2

Joshua 6 refers to the ark as

The ark
The ark of the covenant
The ark of Jehovah
The ark of the covenant of Jehovah

In the literal meaning all these designations describe the one acacia wood box made by Bezalel. But in the greater meaning in our current understanding of the account

The Ark = The greater ark of Noah.
The Ark of Jehovah is salvation from the 4EC
The Ark of the Covenant is salvation from 1AC
The Ark of the Covenant of Jehovah is the blessing of the CRC, CRC ark entry

[C6b] The Successive Designations Principle

The double or triple or quadruple designation (which we use to mean two, three, four successive designations), is the most important prophetic form in the bible. Here is the definition and the effect of this form... 

If a character or item designated by...

1. A noun acting as a noun
2. An adjective acting as a noun (which almost invariably means that it is preceded by 'the' i.e. is definite or is in the construct in Hebrew)
3. A participle, (a verb used as an adjective), which participle is acting as a noun, (which means that it must be preceded by 'the' i.e. is definite - such as 'the scorched [one]' or is in the construct in Hebrew)
4. A gerund (a verb acting as a noun such as a 'smoker')
5. The definite article acting as a noun in phrases starting 'The [one]' where '[one]' is implied and is of course acting as a noun.
6. The word 'tiV' meaning 'a certain one'.
7. The word 'eiV' meaning 'one' ????.

is referred to by 2, 3 or 4 successive such designations

And if all the designations when taken separately in the context of the verse act as nouns and the verse makes sense with each designation standing alone (which means that the designations must all be in the same case in Greek). 

And if any possessive pronoun in one of the successive designations is also in all other succeeding or preceding designations. So there is no pronoun imbalance. Or if there is a pronoun imbalance then there are no substitutions later in the account which fail to make sense as a result.

Then we have a double, triple or quadruple Successive Designation, which means there are 2, 3 or 4 Word Symbolic threads/strands/meanings to that account. 

The first Word Symbolic thread has only the first designation of any successive designations, and substitutes all second and third etc. successive designations to be the first successive designation (until any further successive designation redefines these substitutions). If there are two conflicting double designations then their substitutions cannot occur, so they are both invalidated (we deduced this from the Good Samaritan account in Luke 10 - see U218). The second Word Symbolic thread takes only the second designation of any successive designations etc. and substitutes the first and third etc. successive designations to be the second successive designation (until any further successive designation redefines these substitutions).

The first designation occurs first in position. If several items or characters have successive designations then all the first designations form the first word symbolic thread, and all the second designations form the second word symbolic thread etc. If an account has a quadruple designation and a double designation, the the double designation shows the first designation in the first and third threads and the second designation in the second and fourth threads of the account. 

A designating phrase cannot be a part of a multiple designation if it contains a pronoun imbalance since the substitution will then change the scripture and not make sense.. 

Past and Passive participles

These generally end in 'ed'. For example, 'Kicked' can be a past participle: We have kicked. Or it can be a passive participle: We were kicked. In general the verb 'to have' gives a past participle and the verb 'to be' gives a passive participle. A participle is a verb acting as an adjective. A Gerund is a participle acting as a noun. In the English language, only present participles can act as nouns (Driving is fun). Passive participles act as adjectives only in English. But in Greek passive participles can act as nouns (The Scorched [one] was sold last).

Example valid prophetic forms

The faithful steward, the discreet [one]
Lord! Lord!  (a repeated designation)
Moses! Moses!
Martha! Martha!
Nebuchadnezzar, the king
The King, Nebuchanezzar
Rebekah, a sister of Bethuel
A man, a householder
A maidservant, an Egyptian
Joseph, Son of David
Sarah, Abraham's wife
Jesus, Instructor!
Lord Jehovah, holy [one] of Israel (Hebrew)
The ram, one standing before the watercourse?
The Island, the [one] called Patmos
The 7 congregations, the [ones] in Asia
The false prophet, the one having deceived
Men of the city, men of Sodom
Angel of the God, the [one] travelling before army of Israel (Exodus 14)
The bull, the one
The bull, the other??
My lord, My brother (OK since both designations have the same pronoun)??
Father Abraham ('Father' is a noun!)
A son, a male (translating this as 'A male son' would be an insult to the reader)
Asenath, the daughter of Potiphera, the priest of On  (Asenath was not herself the priest of On, her father was. Potiphera is a possessive double designation - So the first thread has, Asenath, and the second has, the daughter of the priest of On)
James and John, the 2 sons of Zebedee
A ruler, a certain one
[eiV]
A priest, a certain one
[tiV]
Women, certain ones
A man, a certain one
A certain one, a man 
A Hostile (one), a man
The Hostile [one], the [one] having sown them

God, the [one] having given such [toiauthn] authority to men ['Such' is a pronoun imbalance. But there are no further verses in the account which mention God. So this is a double designation! If it was not then Matthew would count properly and therefore not be parallel]
The Son of me, the [one] having been chosen (Luke 9:35) [pronoun imbalance but no further substitutions]
Jehovah, God of your forefathers, God of Abraham, God of Isaac and God of Jacob [a quadruple designation] has sent me to you (Exodus 3:15 - NWT).
The holy (one), the truthful (one), the (one) having the key of David, the (one) opening up and no one will shut up, and shutting up and no one is opening
[a quadruple designation]
(Revelation 3:7 KIT)
The Amen, the witness, the faithful and the true [one], the beginning of the creation of God [a triple designation] (Revelation 3:14)

41 2 [ones] were debtors to a lender, a certain [one], the one owed 500 denarii, but the other for 50 [Classic Parable has 3 threads and 3 nouns!].(Luke 7:41)

The Dragon the great, the serpent the original, the [one] called [the] Devil and the Satan, the [one] misleading the entire inhabited earth [a quadruple designation] (Revelation12:9 NWT).

The last combination is the daddy of all successive designations. It is in fact the product of Jesus' sense of humour! The joke is that the phrase: The one called the Devil and Satan, which is actually declaring that it is giving us two designations in succession for Satan, is itself a successive designation for Satan! This sort of thing is a cryptic confirmation of the existence of the successive designation principle. The whole thing is rather like an Angus Deaton quiz show.

Consider the made up prophetic form:

The Dragon, the great [one], the hated [one], the lying [one], the [one] lying to everyone

This has a passive participle (Hated [one]) acting as a noun and a present participle (Lying [one]) acting as a noun. Both of these participles are therefore Gerunds. Finally it has 'the' acting as a noun through the implied '[one]'. The largest number of successive designations in the correct form that we have seen in the bible is 4. 

IN GENERAL, IF YOU CAN REMOVE ONE OF THE SUCCESSIVE DESIGNATIONS AND THE ACCOUNT STILL MAKES SENSE, THEN IT IS A SUCCESSIVE DESIGNATION

Not sure prophetic forms

A woman, but, a certain one (not successive but reads OK)
Men, Galilean [ones] (indefinite adjective but used substantively)

Example 1:

1 Belshazzar the king [aK'l.m;] made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.
2 Belshazzar, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king and his lords, his wives and his concubines, might drink therefrom. (Daniel 5 ASV)

Word1 would read:

1 Belshazzar made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.
2 Belshazzar, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that Belshazzar and his lords, his wives and his concubines, might drink therefrom. (Daniel 5 ASV)

Word2 would read:

1 The king made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.
2 The King, while he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which Nebuchadnezzar his father had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that The King and his lords, his wives and his concubines, might drink therefrom. (Daniel 5 ASV)

One interesting corollary of this is that one will never see a scripture like: King Belshazzar was hungry - in an account preceded by Belshazzar the king.. 
Because word2 would substitute to: King the king was hungry.- which would make no sense. Verse 9 literally says:

9 Then was the king [aK'l.m;], Belshazzar greatly troubled, and his countenance was changed in him, and his lords were perplexed. (Daniel 5 ASV)

Which is a further double designation which resets the substitution. It does not say: Then was King Belshazzar greatly troubled - as most translations put it. For that would substitute to be:

Then was King the King greatly troubled - which is nonsense.

2Peter 1:17 proves that double designations can have pronoun imbalances?

VatB, WHO, NA27, UBS4 have... 

17 For receiving honor and glory from God [the] Father such a voice/phrase being borne to him from the magnificent glory, "The son of me, the beloved of me, into whom I have delighted," (2Peter 1:17)
17 labwn gar para qeou patroj teimhn kai doxan fwnhj enecqeishj autw toiasde upo thj megaloprepouj doxhj o uioj mou o agaphtoj mou outoj estin eij on egw eudokhsa (2 Peter 1 Vatican B)

18 Yes, these words we heard borne from heaven while we were with him in the holy mountain [the transfiguration]. (2 Peter 1 NWT)

The Sinaiticus and various other codices follow Matthew 17:5 and Mark 9:7 with the words: the Son of me, the beloved [one], in whom I have delighted 

Nowhere in scripture other than 2Peter 1:17 is the voice of God quoted as saying 'the son of me, the beloved of me'. At the baptism of Jesus and at the transfiguration, we read 'the son of me, the beloved [one]. 

The fascinating thing about Peter's choice of words 'my Son my beloved', is that they have no pronoun imbalance and are therefore most certainly a double designation. Whereas 'my Son, the beloved' has a pronoun imbalance and therefore might not be a double designation and could also be read 'the beloved son of me' i.e. 'my beloved son' at a stretch. But Peter deliberately misquotes these words and by saying a voice or phrase such as 'my son. my beloved' is telling us that Matthew 17:5 and Mark 9:7 for the transfiguration and Matthew 3:17 and Mark 1:11 for the baptism are double designations. For they are a phrase, a prophetic form, such as 'my son, my beloved', which has no pronoun imbalance and therefore is a double designation.

L45794  fwnh,  fwnh  fwnh,, h`, (fa,w) a sound, tone, properly the sound of the voice, mostly of men, Lat. vox, Hom., etc.; of a battlecry, Xen.; fwnh.n r`hgnu,nai, Virgil's rumpere vocem, to utter an articulate sound, Hdt., Ar.; fÅ i`e,nai, Lat. vocem edere, Hdt., etc.: pl. ai` f. the tones of the voice, Plato:-proverb., fwnh/| o`ra/n, of a blind man, Sophocles.
2. the voice or cry of animals, Od., Heroditus., etc.
3. any articulate sound, as opposed to inarticulate (
yo,foj), Sophocles., etc.
4. of sounds from inanimate objects,
fÅ suri,ggwn Euripides.; ovrga,nwn Plato.
II. the faculty of speech, discourse, Lat. sermo, Sophocles.
2. language, Lat.
lingua, Heroditus.
3. a kind of language, dialect, Aeschylus., Thucydides., etc.
III. a phrase, saying,
th.n Simwni,dou f. Plato. Hence fwnh,eij 

There have to be 3 threads in the 3 parallel accounts of the transfiguration in Matthew 17:1-8 and Mark 9:2-8 and Luke 9:28-36, because the word 'tent' appears 3 times in total. So if there were two threads, then 'tent' would only ever mean a canvas temporary accommodation unit. 

Example invalid prophetic forms and pronoun imbalanced prophetic forms (potentially invalid if followed by a substitution of one of the words in the double designation later in the account which makes not sense as a result)

13 Then the disciples perceived that he spoke to them about [peri] John, the Baptist [this is not a double designation due to the ambiguity with John the brother of James, one of the 3 witnesses to the Transfiguration.. The scriptures are ONLY ambiguous when God designs them that way because both possible meanings are true in some thread of the account] (Matthew 17)

The famine, the that ('that' can be used as an adjective or a pronoun, but is not an adjective, it is a determinant)
Some of the men, the Galileans (some, all etc. are not nouns).
Against-the prophet, against-Moses
My servant, Moses (Pronoun imbalance)
Abraham, her husband (Pronoun imbalance)
to-Nebuchadnezzar, the king
The dragon (accusative), the serpent (nominative)
Lord, the God of us, the almighty (Pronoun imbalance)
The cows, the [ones] ascending after them (Pronoun imbalance)
The enemy, the [one] having sown them (Pronoun imbalance)
The woman, the this (pronoun imbalance)
The woman, this (pronoun imbalance)
This [one], the woman (pronoun imbalance)
A man there was, a householder (not successive)
A hostile [one], a man  (indefinite adjective, could be a hostile man)
The ram that you saw, [the] owner of the two horns (pronoun imbalance)
The soil, the fine (this is just the fine soil)
The dragon, the great (this is just the great dragon)
The serpent, the original (this is just the original serpent)
The heads of grain, the withered [ones] (this is the withered heads of grain)
The spirit, the unclean [one] (this is the unclean spirit)

When substituting single designations one must substitute the whole designation including the definite article (the) and the possessive operator (of). The single designation to be substituted must be in the same case as the substituting designation in Greek (or possibly just precisely the same word), unless the Greek word for the Designation is indeclinable. In Hebrew both the substituting word and the substituted word must be absolute or both must be construct (this does not apply to the successive designation itself). In Greek and in Hebrew both a definite designation cannot substitute an indefinite designation but an indefinite designation can substitute a definite one.

Hebrew nouns with the inseparable prepositions (k as, l to, b in, m from) cannot make successive designations because both designations would need to have the prepositional prefix and then the nouns would not be successive having a preposition between them. Hebrew nouns with pronominal suffixes (suffixes which are pronouns) cannot make successive designations because they are not plain nouns (we realised this when we saw that they do not work in Genesis 16 or Numbers 12). Or more likely because one designation is possessed by a pronoun and the other isn't. In the Greek too, if one designation has a pronoun and the other doesn't then the result is not a successive designation because the pronoun imbalance would introduce a possibly meaningless pronoun into sentences containing the designation without the pronoun, on substitution.

[[If the result of the substitutions has a double 'the', such as 'the the Nazarene', then one shortens this to 'the Nazarene'. One can justify this 'the the' fix on the basis that these substitutions on the double designations themselves always result in a repeated word or phrase which is similarly shortened to one recital. For example: Jesus, the Nazarene, becomes: The Nazarene, The Nazarene, which becomes: The Nazarene, in the second word thread, and becomes: Jesus, Jesus, which becomes: Jesus in the first word thread. Or one can justify it on the basis that in Greek, the the Nazarene means, the [one], the Nazarene, which means, the Nazarene.]]??? 

Invalid substitutions:
Mary (nominative) and Mary (vocative)
Jesus and 'of Jesus'
King (absolute) and King (construct)
King, the King

For example the successive designation: Nebuchadnezzar, the king, causes a substitution to occur in the phrase: The King was very pleased, but not in the phrase: Our king is wonderful (because 'the' is absent). 

The Successive Possessive Designations Principle

Successive designations can be possessive of course. Take the first verse in Matthew for example:

1 The book of the history of Jesus Christ, son of David, son of Abraham (Matthew 1).

Jesus, Christ, son of David, son of Abraham is a quadruple designation for our saviour. But all of the multiple designations are used as adjectives possessively describing the noun 'history'. So this is not a successive designation as we have defined that prophetic form. But it is nonetheless a multiple designation, so what should we do with it? Well we puzzled over this one for some time until the example in Matthew 1 above gave us the answer. Possessive successive designations do not create word symbolic threads as the non possessive ones do. But they do substitute as a successive designation does in the word symbolic threads that are created by the non possessive successive designations. In Matthew 1 there are two word symbolic threads which are created by the successive designations...

David, the king
Joseph, the husband of Mary
Jesus, the [one] called Christ
.

So in Word 1 verse 1 is: 1 The book of the history of Jesus son of David, son of Abraham (Matthew 1).
Whereas in Word 2 it is: 1 The book of the history of Christ, son of David, son of Abraham (Matthew 1).

The 3rd and 4th designations for Jesus (son of David and son of Abraham) do not substitute since there is no 3rd of 4th word symbolic thread.

The Double Declaration Principle

There is a further prophetic form that works in the same way as a Successive Designation, we call it a Double Declaration. The Double Declaration Principle states that:

If any non trivial word is recited twice successively then the pair acts as a Successive Designation (even if it contains no nouns).

This is true because plainly the account reads sensibly with either one of the successive declarations missed out. Examples of this prophetic form are:

Truly, truly, I say to you
Impale [him], Impale [him]

Justification

So where is the scriptural justification for this outrageous scheme to pervert the scriptures and twist them to our taste, substituting holy words here there and everywhere in accordance with a scheme of men, the puritan asks, and rightly so. Do we not fall foul of the very last words in the book?

Well the last few verses of Revelation 22 have 4 word symbolic threads to them, since our sacrifice and saviour said:

16 I, Jesus, sent my angel to bear witness to you people of these things for the congregations. I am the root and the offspring of David, the star, the bright, the morning.

17 And the spirit and the bride keep on saying: Come! And let anyone hearing say: Come! And let anyone thirsting come; let anyone that wishes take life's water free.

18 I am bearing witness to everyone that hears the words of the prophecy of this scroll: If anyone makes an addition to these [words], God will add to him the plagues that are written in this scroll,

19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God will take his portion away from the trees of life and out of the holy city, of the things [good or plagues?] which are written about in this scroll (Revelation 22)

We looked at these verses in the 3rd proof of the symbolic structure principle above. Literally, for the literal meaning or the event symbolic meaning of an account, no words can be altered. Furthermore some words have been added and removed so that some people will get the plagues and lose their portion from the trees of life and the holy city. But in one of the word symbolic threads, the ambiguous verse 19 should be read:

19 and if anyone takes away from the words of the scroll of this prophecy, God will take his portion away of the [bad] things [the plagues] which are written about in this scroll, [which come] from the trees of life and out of the holy city (Revelation 22).

Now whereas 'the words of the prophecy of this scroll' stand for the literal and event symbolic meanings of the bible, 'the words of the scroll of this prophecy' stand for the word symbolic threads. So we can and do take away words from these threads and thereby avoid the plagues on Babylon and on mankind in general! (But we cannot add words to them). For the LWs are trees of life individually and a holy city collectively. 

Example 1

Let us apply the Successive Designations Principle to the following made up and non scriptural example:

Sarah, Abraham's wife went shopping with Hagar, the Egyptian..
Hagar picked up a nice cooking pot
Abraham's wife picked up a bag of rice
Sarah, Abraham's wife, paid for them
She then took her maidservant home
Hagar, the Egyptian boiled the rice in the pot
Her mistress gave the rice to Abraham
Abraham said: What a great meal my wife!
Sarah said: My maidservant cooked it.
Abraham said: My wife and Hagar work well together.

This splits into first and second Word Symbolic accounts as follows:

1st Word Symbolism (1st Word Symbolic thread):

Sarah, went shopping with Hagar
Hagar picked up a nice cooking pot
Sarah picked up a bag of rice
Sarah, paid for them
She then took Hagar home
Hagar, boiled the rice in the pot
Her mistress gave the rice to Abraham
Abraham said: What a great meal my wife!
Sarah said: My maidservant cooked it.
Abraham said: My wife and Hagar work well together.

2nd Word Symbolism (2nd word symbolic thread):

Abraham's wife went shopping with the Egyptian.
The Egyptian picked up a nice cooking pot
Abraham's wife picked up a bag of rice
Abraham's wife, paid for them
She then took the Egyptian home
The Egyptian boiled the rice in the pot
Her mistress gave the rice to Abraham
Abraham said: What a great meal!
Abraham's wife said: My maidservant cooked it.
Abraham said: My wife and the Egyptian work well together.

For the whole story on Genesis 16, the first part of the symbolic drama referred to by Paul in Galatians 4, please read [210]. If you actually try and write one of these you will see that the Successive Descriptions Principle is quite restrictive to what the account can say. We had to rewrite the above a few times to get it to work! The account must make sense with all of the substitutions. For example Abraham could not have said: Thanks Hagar! Because then in the second word symbolism he would have said: Thanks the Egyptian! which is nonsense! (Hebrew has no vocative, this problem would not occur in Greek due to the vocative case). So here at last is a grammatical proof of the bible code, and a test for canonicity. For more of this sort of thing - see [49].

Example 2

The two great interpreters of dreams in the holy book are Joseph and Daniel. They are the two archetypical bible decoders. Get to know them and you get to know about this amazing code.

12 Forasmuch as an extraordinary spirit and knowledge and insight to interpret dreams and the explanation of riddles and the untying of knots had been found in him, in Daniel, whom the king himself named Belteshazzar. Now let Daniel himself be called, that he may show the very interpretation (Daniel 5).

Daniel chapter 5 has two designations for Belshazzar, the king of Babylon. These are: The King and Belshazzar. In each Word symbolic meaning, Belshazzar stands for someone, the king stands for someone else, and Belshazzar, the king is a double designation which stands for the symbolic meaning of 'Belshazzar' in the first word symbolism and the symbolic meaning of 'The king' in the second. If you do not realise this then the account is all tied up in a knot and you get nowhere. Once you do realise this, then you can untangle the account into its two different Word Symbolic strands. For our imperfect attempt at the untangling of Daniel 5, which you are unlikely to follow as yet! - see [164].

The classic example of Successive Designation Symbolism is Revelation 12. Here we read:

9 So [down] was hurled the dragon, the great, the serpent, the archaic, the one called Devil and the Satan, the one misleading the entire inhabited earth; he was hurled down to the earth, and his angels were hurled down with him (Revelations 12).

There are 4 designations for Satan in this one verse: 

The dragon, the great [one] i.e. the great dragon
the serpent, the archaic [one] i.e. the original serpent
the [one] called [the] Devil and the Satan (participle used as an adjective describing a state)
the [one] misleading the entire inhabited earth (participle used as an adjective describing an action). 

These are 4 valid designations for the same angel. 

We are not going into the symbolism of this chapter at this point, save but to point out that the dragon represents Satan's angelic administration over mankind, the serpent represents his corrupt members of God's true people (as in the original case of Eden), the Devil (meaning slanderer) is his earthly administration, and plain old Satan is plain old Satan (meaning resister). Bearing this symbolism in mind please read this:

15 And the serpent [true religious corruptor] disgorged water like a river from its mouth after the woman, to cause her to be drowned by the river.
16 But the earth came to the woman's help, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed up the river that the dragon disgorged from its mouth (Revelation 12).

Now you are beginning to pull this book apart, to untangle its knots, to decode it. There is a reason that the designation 'serpent' in verse 15 is changed to the designation 'dragon' in verse 16. For a fuller explanation of Revelation 12 - see U151.

Example 3

1 For the kingdom of the heavens is like a man, a householder, who went out early in the morning to hire workers for his vineyard (Matthew 20).

So we have a man and a householder. Now the rest of the account refers variously to 'the man', 'the householder', and 'him'. So by the Successive Designations Principle we have two word symbolic threads to Matthew 20 - see [192].

Example 4

1 Now Sarai, Abram's wife, had borne him no children; but she had an Egyptian maidservant and her name was Hagar (Genesis 16).

The two successive designations for Sarah, means that there are two Word Symbolic threads in this account - see [210]

Example 5

42 And the Lord said: Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom his master will appoint over his body of attendants to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time? (Luke 12).

o pistoV oikonomoV o fronimoV  (Luke 12)
The faithful steward,        the discreet [one]

The two successive designations for this steward means that there are two Word Symbolic threads in this account - see [34]. 

Example 6

11 Abraham, Abraham (Genesis 22)
2 Jacob, Jacob (Genesis 46)
13 Conspiracy, conspiracy! (2 Chronicles 23)
4 And he said: Moses, Moses (Exodus 3)
22 Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and expel demons in your name, and perform many powerful works in your name (Matthew 7)

These double declarations work the same as your regular successive designations except that both successive designation are the same. They are merely a special case of Father, Abraham for example. 

So there are two further Abrahams, two further Jacobs, fathers of 12 tribes, two further impalements, two further conspiracies, two further Moses' etc. In the case of the impalement, the further two are represented by the two robbers impaled one on each side of Jesus. In the case of Moses, Jesus was one greater Moses, and there is another.

[C7a] The Descriptions Principle

If a character or item, represented by a countable noun, in an account makes two or more non successive appearances with differing descriptors, one of which can be no descriptor, (which descriptors can be adjectives or participles used as adjectives) then for each thread of the account each appearance in that thread takes a different meaning.

Example 1: The cows, fat cows, bad cows, good cows etc. of Genesis41. 

Jesus and Jesus the Galilean are two descriptions of Jesus. Jesus and Lord and the righteous [one] are two designations and a description of both designations. Jesus and Jesus of Nazareth are two descriptions of Jesus

[C7b] The Successive Descriptions Principle

Definition: A Symbolic Meaning of a word, is a further meaning to the literal meaning which meaning is related to the literal meaning in a symbolic way

Definition: A Fulfilment of a symbolic meaning of a word, is a particular example of that symbolic meaning. 

Definition: A word symbolic thread of a scene/subaccount is a word symbolic meaning of the entire scene/sub account.

Definition: A further fulfilment of a word symbolic scene/subaccount is a second temporal occurrence of the word symbolic meaning of that scene/subaccount

The double or triple or quadruple description (which we use to mean two, three, four successive descriptions), is the second most important prophetic form in the bible (in the sense that it defines the number of fulfilments of the word symbolic threads defined by the successive designations principle). Here is the definition and the effect of this form... 

If a countable noun is described by 2/3/4 successive descriptors in the form 'noun descriptor and descriptor and descriptor' or 'noun descriptor, descriptor, descriptor' (which descriptors are adjectives or participles used as adjectives), then all the word symbolic threads have two fulfilments to the entire thread. The first fulfilment temporally of the thread takes only the first description of the countable noun (first in position in the account as written) and substitutes all incidences of the second description (which occur after the double description), to be the first description (until any further successive description redefines these substitutions). The second fulfilment temporally of the thread takes only the second description of the countable noun (second in position in the account as written) and substitutes all incidences of the first description in the prophetic form (which occur in the account after the successive description) to be the second description (until any further successive description redefines these substitutions).

There can only be two successive descriptions not 3, due to the 2 sets of 6 layer show bread of Leviticus 24 - see c29.  

6 And you must place them in 2 sets of layers, 6 [loaves or layers?] to the layer set, upon the table of pure gold before Jehovah. (Leviticus 24 NWT)

Fulfilment 1 Fulfilment 2

Literal

Event Symbolic

Word1 Word1
Word2 Word2
Word3 Word3
Word4 Word4

The 6 loaves are the literal, event symbolic and 4 word symbolic meanings that a bible account can have. The 2 piles are the 2 possible fulfilments for each of the 4 Word Symbolic threads.

So there is no scripture of the form: noun adjective and adjective and adjective (or we would have 3 sets of showbread). This appears to be demonstrated by Genesis41

18 And here ascending from the river were 7 cows fat-fleshed and beautiful in form, and they began to feed among the reed/grass.
19 And here there were 7 other cows ascending after them, poor and bad/evil in form and thin-fleshed. For badness I have not seen the like of them in all the land of Egypt.
20 And the skinny and bad cows began to eat up the first 7 fat cows (Genesis 41)

This has a triple description of the 7 bad cows, but it is not in the form noun adjective and adjective and adjective. Whereas the double description: skinny and fat cows - is in the correct prophetic form. 

A double description cannot have a pronoun imbalance for the same reasons that a double designation cannot have one, namely one of the substitutions could introduce a meaningless pronoun into the account.

Example prophetic forms

The faithful and discreet slave (literally: the faithful slave and discreet)
Wicked and adulterous generation
A thief and a plunderer (literally: thief is and plunderer)
The brother of James and John
7 heads of grain, [ones] withered and thin [ones] and [ones] scorched
The God and father of him (The God of him and the father of him)
Lord of Lords and King of Kings
Fire-red and hyacinth-blue and sulphur-yellow breastplates
The law of sin and of death
Look! I am laying in Zion a chosen, honoured chief-cornerstone (1 Peter 2:6)

Example 1

The famous example is 'The faithful and discreet slave' of Matthew 24:45. The one word symbolic thread, has two fulfilments which relate to two slaves, a faithful slave and a discreet slave. The two descriptors 'faithful' and 'discreet' define two separate slaves in two separate fulfilments of the one word symbolic meaning - see [34].

45 Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master appointed over his domestics, to give them their food at the proper time? (Matthew 24).

o pistoV doulos kai fronimoV (Matthew 24)
The faithful slave and discreet

In Luke we have two successive designations for the appointed one: ‘the faithful steward’ and ‘the discreet one’, so we know from the Successive Designations Principle that there are two greater symbolic meanings for the slave in two word symbolic threads.

In Matthew we have one designation: ‘the faithful and discreet slave’. But this designation describes the slave in two ways: faithful & discreet. So we have two successive descriptions of one slave in Matthew and two successive designations for one slave in Luke. Successive designations give further word symbolic meanings, and successive descriptions gives further word symbolic fulfilments.

And look! Using this code here,  we have already described the 4 true Christian administrations of Abraham's seed from Jesus' death to Armageddon. The 4 true Christian Religions. We call them FDS1, FDS2, FDS3, FDS4 in this website/book, standing for the first to the fourth Faithful and Discreet Slave. There were two slaves, two true religions in each of the two presences. Matthew refers to FDS1 and FDS3 and Luke refers to FDS2 and FDS4. The apostle Peter was the first head of FDS1, the apostle Paul was the first head of FDS2, these were both in the first presence. Charles Russell, who founded the Watchtower, was the first head of FDS3 (although he was never appointed over all of Jesus' belongings, but the second president of the Watchtower Joseph Rutherford was), and Gordon is the first head of FDS4, the Lords' Witnesses. For more on this - see [34]

Example 2

33 So now let Pharaoh look for a man discreet and wise and set him over the land of Egypt (Genesis 41).

This was Joseph in the literal meaning, who is described successively as being discreet and wise. In the word symbolic meanings a greater land of Egypt has two further rulers, a discreet one and a wise one - see [304].

Example 3

2 And here ascending out of the river Nile were 7 cows beautiful in appearance and fat-fleshed, and they went feeding among the Nile grass.
3 And here there were seven other cows ascending after them out of the river Nile, ugly in appearance and thin-fleshed, and they took their stand alongside the cows by the bank of the river Nile (Genesis 41).

Joseph gave us the meaning of the literal dream in the same chapter, which meaning is in fact the event symbolic meaning. He revealed that we should take a cow for a year in that case. But both sets of 7 cows are described successively in two ways: beautiful and fat, ugly and thin. So there are two fulfilments of the cows in this dream in the one word symbolic thread. We have a reasonable but somewhat outdated understanding of this account - see [304].

Example 4

3 If ye have tasted that the Lord [is] good/effective:
4 A living stone toward whom ye are approaching, rejected indeed by men, but chosen, honoured, by/beside God
5 And ye yourselves, as living stones, are being built up a spiritual house into a holy priesthood, to carry up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.
6 Wherefore it is encompassed in the scripture: Look! I am laying in Zion a chosen, honoured chief-cornerstone: And the [one] believing over him should certainly not be ashamed.
7 Therefore to yeu, the [ones] believing, is the honour. But to [ones] not believing: A stone which the [ones] building rejected, this [one] was born into a head of a corner
8 And a stone of a stumble, and a rock-mass of scandal. These [ones] stumble, disobeying the word, into which they were also placed [the law of the church]
9 But ye [are] a chosen race [FRCs: Kingdom citizens by faith], a royal priesthood [the saints, the sons of the spirits], an holy nation [the Kingdom priests, the sons of water], a people into preservation [rather than extinction: Kingdom citizens by love, LRCs], in order that ye might declare the virtues of the one having called you out of the darkness into the wonderful light of him: (1 Peter 2 LWT)

See U457 for the explanation.

[C7c] The Successive Articulations Principle

If a phrase containing a verb is successively articulated (the two articulations being separated by either nothing or by the word 'and'), then there are two greater meanings to the articulation which appear to be either a fundamental part of the bible code or fundamental to church doctrine and prophecy

Compare this with Joseph's explanation of the meaning of a dream repeated twice (firmly established and speeding to do it).

32 And the fact that the dream was repeated to Pharaoh twice means that the thing is firmly established on the part of the [true] God, and the [true] God is speeding to do it. (Genesis 41 NWT)

Example 1

8 Now come, write it upon a tablet with them, and inscribe it even in a book, that it may serve for a future day, for a witness to time indefinite (Isaiah 30).

The action of reducing something to writing is successively repeated here. This is the Successive Articulation Principle telling us that there are two prophetic fulfilments to the account, which 'serve for a future day'.

Example 2

17 By the decree of watchers the thing is, and [by] the saying of holy ones the request is (Daniel 4).

We are being told successively in two synonymous ways that the angels decreed this one.

Example 3

Phrases do not have to be repeated word for word to qualify, but must be conceptually the same in the second recital. Because Amos has said:

3 Will two walk together unless they have met by appointment?

4
Will a lion roar in a forest when it has no prey?
Will a young maned lion give forth its voice from its hiding place if it has caught nothing at all?

5 Will a bird fall into a trap on the earth when there is no snare for it?
Does a trap go up from the ground when it has absolutely caught nothing?

6 If a horn is blown in a city, do not also the people themselves tremble? 
If a calamity occurs in the city is it not also Jehovah who has acted/caused [it]?

7 For the sovereign Lord Jehovah will not do a thing unless he has revealed his confidential matter/secret to his servants, the prophets

8 There is a lion that has roared! Who will not be afraid?
The sovereign Lord Jehovah himself has spoken who will not prophesy? (Amos 3)

The forest is the hiding place of the lion, the roar is the giving forth of its voice, if it has caught nothing then it has no prey. These repeated concepts in slightly different words are how the sovereign Lord Jehovah reveals his confidential matters, his secrets to his servants the prophets today. A repeated recital does not need to use exactly the same words! Incidentally God causes every calamity and every good thing, being behind it all. But he does not directly cause every calamity or every good thing.

Example 4

The last creative act of God, on the day that Adam sinned was:

21 And Jehovah God proceeded to make long garments of skin for Adam and for his wife and to clothe them (Genesis 3).

The literal meaning is that God was their tailor. One consequence of this is that it is not a sin for women to wear fur coats. Beautiful women who wear fur coats are hated because of Jealousy, not because an animal has been killed purely for its skin. Remember that Adam and Eve were vegetarians when God killed the animal for it's skin to clothe them. But the concept of clothing them is repeated, being recited first in terms of making long garments. So there is a greater way in which God clothed them. This greater way was that he created new bodies for them which instead of being indefinitely long lasting bodies which did not age, as were their previous bodies in the garden, were just long lasting, and were ageing. Adam lived for 930 years (Genesis 5:5). So these new ageing bodies, shorter versions of which we all inhabit today, were their long garments of skin as it were.

Example 5

8 However, let this one fact not be escaping your notice, beloved ones, that one day is with Jehovah as a thousand years and a thousand years as one day (2 Peter 3).

In the literal meaning, God lives forever, and so to him one day is just like 1,000 years. But this phrase is repeated, and so by the Successive Articulation Principle, there is a greater way in which one day is as 1,000 years to God. This greater way is that one day represents 1,000 years in some scriptures. For example the Kingdom of God is a Sabbath which lasts for 1,000 years. 

6 And you must lie upon your right side in the second case, and you must carry the error of the house of Judah forty days. A day for a year, a day for a year, is what I have given you (Ezekiel 4).

In the literal meaning, the 40 days of Ezekiel's laying on his right side represents 40 years or error of the house of Judah. But in the greater meaning, we know that the phrase: 'A day for a year' has a greater meaning. This meaning is that God has given 'a day for a year' to all would be Ezekiel's, 'prophets' who want to interpret the bible. A day for a year is an acceptable substitution and may give you the correct interpretation of any scripture in the symbolic meaning. It is a symbolism that God uses, we are being told.

Example 6 

6 Into their intimate group do not come, O my soul. With their congregation do not become united, O my disposition, because in their anger they killed men, and in their arbitrariness they hamstrung bulls.
7 Cursed be their anger, because it is cruel, and their fury, because it acts harshly. Let me parcel them out in Jacob and let me scatter them in Israel (Genesis 49).
11 Tying his full-grown ass to a vine and the descendant of his own she-ass to a choice vine, he will certainly wash his clothing in wine and his garment in the blood of grapes (Genesis 49).

Example 7 

12 The error of Ephraim is wrapped up, his sin is treasured up (Hosea 13).

[C7d] The Successive Alternatives Principle

If an account contains a series of successive alternatives, then each alternative must occur at least once in one thread. Each alternative must be realised in one or other meaning of the account.

Example 1

See 'tribulation or persecution' in the accounts of the sower - see U63

Example 2

35 Therefore keep on the watch for you do not know when the master of the house is coming, whether late in the day (the first watch of the night) or at midnight (the second watch) or at cockcrowing (the third watch) or early in the morning (the fourth watch) (Mark 13).

See 'whether late in the day (the first watch of the night) or at midnight (the second watch) or at cockcrowing (the third watch) or early in the morning (the fourth watch). ' in the account of the slaves appointed by the master - see U34.

[C7e] The Repeated Articulation Principle

If a verbal phrase is articulated twice non successively (separated by a word other than 'and') in one account, then it takes a greater meaning different from the literal meaning in all the word symbolic threads of the account. This greater meaning is a key symbolism in the word symbolic threads. (And there must be at least one word symbolic thread).

Example 1

10 These generations/descendents of Shem. Shem son of 100 years and fathered Arpachshad 2 years after the deluge.
11 And lived Shem, after his fathering Arpachshad 500 years. And fathered sons and daughters.

12 And Arpachshad life [yx a noun] 35 year. Then he became father to Shelah.
13 And after his fathering Shelah, Arpachshad continued to live 3 years and 400 year. Meanwhile he became father to sons and daughters.

This means shem fathered Arpachshad and Arpchshad fathered Shelah is a second manner. See U102.

[C7f] GrammatoV, its a grammatical code

27 And the uncircumcised [person] that is such by nature will, by carrying out the Law, judge you who with its written code [grammatoV] and circumcision are a transgressor of law (Romans 2).
29 But he is a Jew who is one on the inside, and [his] circumcision is that of the heart by spirit, and not by a written
code [grammatoV]. The praise of that one comes, not from men, but from God (Romans 2).

6 who has indeed adequately qualified us to be ministers of a new covenant, not of a written code [grammatoV], but of spirit; for the written code [grammatoV] condemns to death, but the spirit makes alive (2 Corinthians 3).

Paul is saying that literally the law was a 'grammar'. But then a grammar is the code of a language. Now using the bible code itself we see that the greek word 'grammatoV' appears only twice in each of the accounts at Romans 2 and at 2Corinthians 3, so by the repetition principle below, there is a greater GrammatoV, than the law of Moses. There is a greater grammar to the bible. This greater grammar is the grammatical bible code, the grammar of the symbolism of the bible, a symbolic grammar if you like. The point is that these two accounts are both saying that the bible code is a grammatical code. And this indeed is what we have discovered. In a nutshell...

The designations principle and the successive designations principle are the symbolic grammar of the nouns
The descriptions principle and the successive descriptions principle are the symbolic grammar of the adjectives
The articulations principle and the successive articulations principle are the symbolic grammar of the verbs

[C8] The Noun Counting Principle

Definition: The literal meaning of an account OR the event symbolic meaning of an account AND every word symbolic meaning of an account combine to make the total number of threads or strands or meanings of that account..

A literal account has a literal thread and may have between one and four word symbolic threads. A non literal account, such as a parable, a vision or a dream, has an event symbolic thread and may also have between one and four word symbolic threads. No section of any account has both a literal thread and an event symbolic thread, although an interpretation has one thread which is both literal in some places and event symbolic in others (but not both at once). 

All bible accounts obey the following noun count rule of the countable nouns which are defined to be the nouns which are acting as nouns (not as possessive adjectives). These nouns define the word symbolism of the word symbolic threads. 

The total number of meanings that a countable noun takes in all the threads of an account is the highest factor of the number of recitals of that noun in the account, which is less than or equal to the number of threads.

Number of recitals of countable noun 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7
Number of threads in account 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Number of literal + symbolic meanings of the noun 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 1 1 1

If a countable noun has two literal meanings such as the word 'dead' in the scripture: let the [judicially] dead bury the [physically] dead, or such as the Hebrew word for woman (Xya), which also means 'man' in Deuteronomy 25 etc., then one may have to subtract 1 from the word symbolic meanings from the table above. We are not yet sure about that.

Adjectives have symbolic meanings which are generally dominated by the nouns they describe.
Verbs have symbolic meanings which are generally dominated by nouns.
Adverbs, pronouns, prepositions, conjunctions, etc. are invariant in all symbolisms. They have symbolic meanings which are merely their literal meanings.

Nouns used possessively, such as the word 'Abraham', in the phrase Abraham's wife, do not count as nouns since they are being used as possessive adjectives.

Specifically, since this is a grammatical code...

1. Any noun at all in the genitive in Greek which is being used as an adjective is not counted. Eg: 'Hearing of my words', 'Having occurred of flood' uses 'words' and 'flood' possessively. 'The [one] of Zebedee' uses 'Zebedee' possessively. 'He came into contact with the coffin' has coffin in the genitive in Luke 7, but the genitive case can be used for the ablative in Greek (wonderful isn't it?). So 'coffin' is not used possessively in that case. 

2. Nouns in the genitive due to prepositions such as epi, apo are counted 

3. Quantifiers such as: Half of (the earth), a 3rd of (the earth) a quarter of (the earth), all of (the earth), every of (the people), one of (the prophets) etc do not turn nouns into adjectives, so the nouns still count even if they are in the genitive (except 'all of' in Hebrew - see 5.). 

4. Any noun which is in the absolute preceded by a construct state (and therefore is a possessive adjective) in the Hebrew is not counted. The Hebrew 'construct' '-la' meaning 'to', being the 'construct' of 'la', meaning 'towards', which is a preposition, does not turn a noun into a possessive adjective (we think due to 'Joseph' in Genesis 40). In fact as is the case in Greek, no Hebrew preposition in the construct makes its absolute noun into a possessive adjective and therefore makes it uncountable.  

5. The construct '-lk', meaning all of, or the whole of, being the proper construct of '-llk', meaning 'to complete', which is not a preposition, does turn a noun into a possessive adjective. 

6. As in the case of successive designations, Hebrew nouns with pronoun suffixes (husband-of-her, maidservant-of-me etc.) are not countable 'because they are not plain nouns'. In general Hebrew Prepositions which are in the construct state, do not cause the succeeding absolute to be a genitive. 

7. The words: Jehovah and God only ever mean Jehovah and God, for any further meaning would be symbolic idolatry!

It is important to realise that the number of recitals of a noun used as a noun governs the number of symbolic meanings that it takes in the different threads, but does not govern the number of fulfilments of these symbolic meanings that it might take. The number of fulfilments is determined by the Successive Descriptions Principle.

[C9] The No Coincidences Principle

There are no coincidences in the bible. Every apparent coincidence is appointed by God

20 As regards whatever our hearts may condemn us in, because God is greater than our hearts and knows all things (1 John 3).

Since God knows all things he is aware in particular of all of the coincidences in the bible. Since he is not given to deliberately misleading us (unless it is in our interest), we must assume that such scriptural similarities are a matter of design, rather than coincidence. The prophet Amos is saying:

3 Will two walk together unless they have met by appointment?

i.e. are there any coincidences in God's actions, and therefore in the bible?

4 Will a lion roar in a forest when it has no prey?
Will a young maned lion give forth its voice from its hiding place if it has caught nothing at all?

These two lines are saying the same thing, and it is not a coincidence

5 Will a bird fall into a trap on the earth when there is no snare for it?
Does a trap go up from the ground when it has absolutely caught nothing?

These two lines are saying the same thing, and it is not a coincidence

6 If a horn is blown in a city, do not also the people themselves tremble? 
If a calamity occurs in the city is it not also Jehovah who has acted/caused [it]?

The horn was blown when a calamity was about to occur as a warning. God is indirectly behind everything.

7 For the sovereign Lord Jehovah will not do a thing unless he has revealed his confidential matter/secret to his servants, the prophets (Amos 3:3-7).

This applies to calamities on cities of his people. So he warns us all through his prophets, in a secret way, using apparent coincidences. But at the end of the day in the bible if two walk together then it is not a coincidence it is by appointment.  

Example 1

18 And Jehovah God went on to say: It is not good for the man to continue by himself. I am going to make a helper for him, as a complement of him (Genesis 2).

26 But the helper, the holy spirit, which the Father will send in my name, that one will teach you all things and bring back to your minds all the things I told you (John 14).

We know that it is not a coincidence that God himself called Adam’s wife his helper, and that John called the holy spirit a helper. It means that the holy spirit is someone’s wife. Well if God is our father then we must also have a mother. Paul identifies his mother as the Jerusalem above:

26 But the Jerusalem above is free, and she is our mother (Galatians 4:26).

So the Jerusalem above is God's wife obviously, and so it is the Holy spirit. But the Jerusalem above is just God's administration of all of his loyal heavenly people. Just as the Jerusalem below was his administration of all of his loyal earthly people at one time. So the Holy spirit is all of God's holy angels, it is all of the holy spirits. So there it is, the precise identity of the Holy Spirit, from the No Coincidence Principle.

The Holy Spirit is a living group of beings, it is not a force as some religions (such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses) believe, because it pleads for us:

26 In like manner the spirit also joins in with help for our weakness; for the [problem of] what we should pray for as we need to we do not know, but the spirit itself pleads for us with groanings unuttered (Romans 8:26).

Who ever heard of a force that pleads? No, it is our mother who pleads with our father, God, for her children! It is so beautiful. She is no part of a mysterious trinity as most of Christendom would have us believe. She is all of the holy angels who are sealed. She is none other than the first lady of the heavens. And the trinity doctrine was designed by Satan and fed to unreasoning men and women to hide her beauty from us, due to his jealousy. Because he was born without her help, he never had a mother.

But with clear thinking and with eyes of faith we can see our mother's face. For her's is the face that launched a billion angelic ships for our spirits to sail in. And as regards beauty, her face would bring tears to the cheeks of Helen of Troy herself if only she could see it. So who can forgive us for the outrageous lies that we swallow?

Example 2

For example, the sect of Nicolaus is mentioned in the counsel to Ephesus and to Pergamum in Revelation 3. The only other mention of his name is as one of the 7 ministerial servants in Acts 6:

5 And the thing spoken was pleasing to the whole multitude, and they selected Stephen, a man full of faith and holy spirit, and Philip and Prochorus and Nicanor and Timon and Parmenas and Nicolaus, a proselyte of Antioch (Acts 6).

6 Still, you do have this, that you hate the deeds of the sect of Nicolaus, which I also hate (Revelation 2).

This is not a coincidence. God is fully aware of this situation. It may not of necessity be the case that the Nicolaus of Acts 6 develops for himself a sect, but it is the case that we can learn about the sect by reading Acts 6, it is of help to us. If it is not literally of help, then it is symbolically or cryptically of help.

[C10] The Prophetic Times Substitution Principle, the Generalisation of Daniel4

The phrase 'n times' in an account can stand for '360n times' or 'n/360 times' or 'n/30 times' or '30n times' in the greater meaning. Where a time can be a day a month or a year. In other words we can substitute a day for a year a day for a month, a year for a day or a month for a day in the greater meaning of any scripture. 

We deduce this from the following scriptures...

14 And God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years: (Genesis 1 KJV)
14 And God went on to say: Let luminaries come to be in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night; and they must serve as signs and for seasons/appointed times and for days and years. (Genesis 1 NWT)

22 according to the days on which the Jews had rested from their enemies and the month that was changed for them from grief to rejoicing and from mourning to a good day, to hold them as days of banqueting and rejoicing and sending of portions to one another and of gifts to the poor people (Esther 9).

19 He has made the moon for appointed times. The sun itself knows well where it sets (Psalm 104).

34 By the number of the days that you spied out the land, 40 days, a day for a year, a day for a year, you will answer for your
errors 40 years, as you must know what my being estranged means (Numbers 14).

6 ...And you must lie upon your right side in the second case, and you must carry the error of the house of Judah 40 days. A day for a year, a day for a year, is what I have given you (Ezekiel 4)

The phrase: a day for a year a day for a year, is not just saying take a day for a year. For if it was then the second recital should be powerless. It is saying two things. To see what these are consider the two phrases below...

Take 7 days a day for a year and you get 7 years.
Take 7 years a day for a year and you get 7 days.

In the first phrase we substituted a day to be a year. In the second we substituted a year to be a day. These are the two meanings of the phrase: A day for a year, a day for a year. The twin recital is telling us that the substitution can work either way in the greater meaning. In Daniel4 we take a day to be a year - see U120. In 1Samuel11 we take a year to be a day - see U271c.

We read in Revelation 12:

14 But the two wings of the great eagle were given the woman, that she might fly into the wilderness to her place; there is where she is fed for a time and times and half a time away from the face of the serpent (Revelation 12).

Where ‘times’ is obviously in the plural (since Greek has no dual number as Hebrew does). But earlier in the same chapter we read:

6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, that they should feed her there a thousand two hundred and sixty days (Revelation 12).

In the actual vision, (but not in it’s symbolic meaning) the two periods are the same period and so we are being told by holy spirit that the phrase ‘a time, times and half a time’ is 1260 days of the BLC (Biblical Lunar Calendar), which is 3½ lunar years of 360 days. But a year is a time, a cycle, of the earth around the sun. So 3½ years is 3½ times. So 3½ times is 1260 days. So 7 times is 2520 days. So n times is 360n days in this case. But in fact a time can be either one revolution of the earth on its axis (a day) or of the moon around the earth (a month) or of the earth around the sun (a year) - see the Numerical and Times Principles.

The first example of the Prophetic Times Substitution Principle - The 3 Prophetic Times of the Temple Times

11 Accordingly Gad went in to David and said to him: This is what Jehovah has said, 'Take your pick,
12 whether for 3 years there is to be a famine; or for 3 months there is to be a sweeping away from before your adversaries and for the sword of your enemies to overtake [you], or for 3 days there is to be the sword of Jehovah, even pestilence, in the land, with Jehovah's angel bringing ruin in all the territory of Israel.' And now see what I should reply to the One sending me (1 Chronicles 21).

The three periods of punishment before Jesus’ sacrifice, all three of which last for three times (be it a day, a month or a year) stand for the three times of the temple times, which run from the commissioning of Solomon’s temple to the rebuilding of the temple of Jesus' body, the appointment of FDS1 on 33Nisan16. So Solomon’s temple was commissioned 1080 years (3 x 360 years) before 33Nisan, i.e. in 1048Nisan. In fact 1048Nisan16 would have been the end of the 3 day plague which began on 1048Nisan14, in an archetype of Jesus’ death and resurrection. We know that Solomon’s temple was inaugurated in 1026Tishri, at the festival of Booths:

1 And it came to pass in the 80th year and 400th year after the sons of Israel were come out from the land of Egypt, in the 4th year, in the month of Ziv, that is the 2nd month, to reign Solomon over Israel, and he built the house to Jehovah (1 Kings 6 Literal)

38 And in the 11th year, in the lunar month of Bul [Heshvan], that is, the 8th month, the house was finished as regards all its details and all its plan; so that he was 7 years at building it (1 Kings 6).

2 So all the men of Israel congregated themselves to King Solomon in the lunar month of Ethanim [Tishri] in the festival, that is, the 7th month.
3 So all the older men of Israel came, and the priests began to carry the Ark
4 And they came bringing up the ark of Jehovah and the tent of meeting and all the holy utensils that were in the tent; and the priests and the Levites came bringing them up (1 Kings 8).

The first regnal year of Solomon was 1036, the 11th was 1026 (7 years of temple building after 1033Iyyar2, 480th year of 1Kings6:1 after 1513Nisan14, when the sons of Israel came out of Egypt). The temple was fully functional in 1026Heshvan and inaugurated the month before in 1026Tishri. Had it not been ready in the 7th month then it would have been inaugurated at the Passover. But this did not occur so it must have been ready then.

There are always 22.5 years between the commissioning of a temple and its inauguration from the fundamental pattern of Adam and of Jesus' lives - see U41. So Solomon's temple was commissioned in 1048Nisan BC.

So the census was finished on 1048Nisan14 and David purchased the temple site on 1048Nisan16, since this must be an archetype for the death of Jesus on Nisan14 and his earthly resurrection on Nisan16 at the end of which day he paid the ransom to purchase Adam. Also a commissioning to build a temple is a Holy appointment and so must occur on first fruits - which is 1048Nisan22 according to the BLC but this may be 1 day out (being based upon a 3,000 year NASA moon phase extrapolation with an associated error of around 2½ hours or 8978 seconds - https://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/LEcat5/uncertainty.html and our algorithm itself can be one day out - see U4)

Registration completed                         David purchases temple site, builds altar, offers sacrifices.      Jesus sacrificed by Caiaphas        The temple of FDS1 is appointed
1048Nisan14 (Plague death begins)     1048Nisan16 (Plague death ends)                                              33Nisan14 (Jesus' death begins)   33Nisan16 (Jesus' death ends)
X______________________________X_________________________________________________X___________________________X
                     3 day plague                                       3 Prophetic Times (3x360=1080 years)                           Knock down this temple and is 3 days I shall rebuild it

The Classic example of the Prophetic Times Substitution Principle - Daniel 4

In Daniel chapter 4, Nebuchadnezzar, who is the King of Babylon and the King of God's people the Jews, who are prisoners in Babylon, is removed from his throne for a period of 'seven times' and then he is re instated as King. The phrase ‘seven times’ appears 4 times in the account:

16 Let its heart be changed from that of mankind, and let the heart of a beast be given to it, and let 7 times pass over it (Daniel 4).

23 'And because the king beheld a watcher, even a holy one, coming down from the heavens, who was also saying: Chop the tree down, and ruin it. However, leave its rootstock itself in the earth, but with a banding of iron and of copper, among the grass of the field, and with the dew of the heavens let it become wet, and with the beasts of the field let its portion be until 7 times themselves pass over it,
24 this is the interpretation, Oh king, and the decree of the Most High is that which must befall my lord the king.
25 And you they will be driving away from men, and with the beasts of the field your dwelling will come to be, and the vegetation is what they will give even to you to eat just like bulls; and with the dew of the heavens you yourself will be getting wet, and 7 times themselves will pass over you, until you know that the Most High is Ruler in the kingdom of mankind, and that to the one whom he wants to he gives it. (Daniel 4 NWT)

32 And from mankind they are driving even you away, and with the beasts of the field your dwelling will be. Vegetation they will give even to you to eat just like bulls, and 7 times themselves will pass over you, until you know that the Most High is Ruler in the kingdom of mankind, and that to the one whom he wants to he gives it (Daniel 4).

This period of 7 times is 2520 days in the literal meaning, 7 Biblical Lunar years. So Nebuchadnezzar was a foreign king over God's exiled people who lost his kingship over them and over his own people and then regained it after 2520 days.

Now God ceased having a vassal king that represented him over his people sometime before Nebuchadnezzar besieged Jerusalem and burnt the temple in 586Ab10 BC (13th August). In fact the first king over the Jews who did not represent God was Jehoiakim who acceded sometime between 608 Tishri BC (September/October) and 607 Elul (August/September), in fact it was on 608Chislev10 (13th November) - see [97]. So the last agricultural/secular Tishri1 year of God's Kingship started in 608Tishri, and the first Tishri1 year without God as king over the seed of Abraham started on 607Tishri1 (23rd September). Jehoiakim was appointed by Pharaoh Nechoh of Egypt and was a vassal of his, see - The Chronology from Solomon to Zedekiah.

So the big question for God's people as prisoners in the foreign land of Babylon, having been deported there by Nebuchadnezzar after he burnt Jerusalem and Solomon's temple, is not how long will it be until we get Nebuchadnezzar back as our king? But, it is rather, how long will it be after God ceased being our king, in the ay of Jehoiakim, before he again becomes our king through a vassal King who actually represents him?

It is this period that has been taken as the greater meaning of Daniel chapter 4 by many Second Adventists, who realised of course that the vassal King that the Most High God wants to give the kingdom of mankind to at the end of this period of Kingship malediction is Jesus. This appointment is then possibly the 'second coming' or the 'second presence' of the Christ. The Watchtower originally thought that the end of this period would be Armageddon (not unreasonably on the basis of Daniel 4 alone).

Historically, what 'second adventists' have done is to take Nebuchadnezzar to represent: God's vassal king over his people (wince that is what he was for the 7 years of the literal fulfilment upon him). They then say that the 2520 day period, which represents the time during which God does not have a vassal king over his people, is obviously way too short and so should be taken at 'a day for a year', using the Prophetic Times Substitution Principle of the Code. Therefore, the period during which God's people do not have a vassal king representing God over them is 2520 years long.

This would mean that Jesus becomes God's vassal king over his people in 1914Tishri, 2520 years after 607Tishri1 (there was no 0 BC, it went 1BC then 1AD). Incidentally, no religion on this earth until the Lords' Witnesses has had the correct Chronology for the kings or the correct understanding of whom the last vassal king of Judah representing God was. We must credit the Reverend John Aquila Brown. Charles Taze Russell, Ed Schnopp and Dr Steven E. Jones for their major roles in this understanding. Please see [120]. 

In fact Jesus did not become God's vassal king in heaven over God's true people, who were no longer physical Jews, but by now had become the Jews by covenant, the spiritual Jews, the sons of the JAC, the saints, at the end of 2520 years in 1914Tishri because the Gentile Times was punctured by a 98 year Maccabean gap from 144Tishri1 to 46Tishri1 - see U120. So the discontinuous Gentile Times ended on 2012Tishri15. But Jesus did not become the King over spiritual Israel (the saints, the sons of the JAC) at that time either due to the 4 year Jewish Ministry gap of Jesus and by the 4 year Gentile Ministry gap of Paul, during, which 3½ year ministries the demons were deposed and expelled from the heavens and their ark, to possess humans. So we now have the quad gapped discontinuous Gentile Times ending on 2020Tishri15. Jesus is appointed/installed as Caesar over Adam and non adamic Cain on 2020Tishri20/Chislev9 and 2020Heshvan16/Tebbeth5. 

But nonetheless Elijah3 in the form of Charles Russell, the founder of the Watchtower was baptised in water from heaven on 1871Heshvan21, and baptised from heaven in Holy Spirit on that same day. Then the 2nd presence began by restarting the 100 year Asher Proselyte continuation Call on 1890Sivan11 and the 2nd 3EC JW being sanctified into the HLC on 1890Sivan14. So indeed Elijah3 did come first before Jesus

11 And they began to question him, saying: Why do the scribes say that first Elijah must come?
12 He said to them: Elijah does come first and restore all things; but how is it that it is written respecting the Son of man that he must undergo many sufferings and be treated as of no account? (Mark 9).

Verifying that the Kingship malediction period is 2520 years from Leviticus 26

There is an independent confirmation that 2520 years is the correct symbolic interpretation of Daniel 4 to be found in Leviticus 26 - see [121]. This is a contract under the law of Moses between God and the whole Nation of Israel collectively. One of the penalties for breaking this contract was a 2520 year Kingship Malediction on God's people, wherein God did not act as King over the sons of Abraham, who are enlarged to mean under through either of his first two covenants - see [9]. The 2520 year penalty is a sevenfold retribution for a 360 year combined idolatry error of both the houses of Israel and Judah added together, which is deduced from Ezekiel 4. In this chapter the Holy Spirit tells us to interpret the actions of the prophet taking a day for a year. So it is not unreasonable to interpret the actions of King Nebuchadnezzar, which being in the bible are prophetic, in the same way. So that his 2520 day loss of kingship stands for a 2520 year loss of kingship, as we have seen above.

The History of the First Bible Key

The phrase 'n times' can be 360n years in a bible account.

The phrase ‘x times’ in the bible can mean 360x years. When it does, these 360 year periods are called Prophetic Times. Amazingly this is where mankind in general and the Jehovah’s Witnesses in particular have been blind.

The JWs know that ‘x times’ means 'x periods of 360 years' in Daniel chapter 4, and so do many other Christian and Jewish religions and theologians. But no one ever thought of applying this 'key' to any other incidence of the phrase ‘x times’ in the bible. This is because people who understood the symbolism of Daniel 4, did not believe that the bible was in a code. Technically no one had grasped the Consistency Principle of the code.

This is of course the same mistake that bible scholars and the Watchtower have made in the case of all greater meanings. They believe that Daniel 4 has a greater meaning, they know from Paul's words in Galatians 4:24  that Genesis 16 has a greater meaning, but they have failed to realise that perhaps Daniel 5 or perhaps Genesis 17 and just maybe every other chapter in the bible has a greater meaning too! This is again because these people did not see that the bible was written in a code, and technically no one had grasped the Symbolic Structure Principle. Why did no one ask the question:

If Daniel 4 has a greater symbolic meaning, then does Daniel 5 have one too? Would this have been a giant leap of inordinate intellectual perspicacity? Look what the good book has to say on this matter:

10 For upon you men Jehovah has poured a spirit of deep sleep, and he closes your eyes, the prophets, and he has covered even your heads, the visionaries. 
11
And for you men the vision of everything becomes like the words of a book, that has been sealed up, which they give to someone knowing writing saying: Read this out loud, please. And he has to say: I am unable for it is sealed up. 
12 And the book must be given to someone that does not know writing, saying: Read this out loud please. And he has to say: I do not know writing at all (Isaiah 29).

Those who do know writing today are the modern day Pharisees, the elders of the third true church (now a false church). They cannot see the meaning of the book, which is the bible, because they are asleep with a bag over their heads. But the one who does not know writing, who has not been taught in the pharisaical schools for leaders in the Watchtower, this one does not say that he is unable. So we deduce that he is able. He stands for the leader of the 4th true congregation. The first members of this congregation were Gordon, Tony and later Massoud.

Gordon and Tony, two Lords' Witnesses, when there were only two of us (although before the 4EC baptism into the LWs began), grasped this bible key in February/March 1992, just after the Watchtower joined the United Nations as an NGO, thereby committing the transgression that causes them desolation of Daniel 8, and becoming part of the harlot riding the beast of Revelation 17. Gordon and Tony then charged through the bible substituting '360 years' for 'times' everywhere, and deduced the following:

The Great Prophetic Times Periods

Name X times Start Event Finish Finish Scripture Section
Exedenic Times 7 times 3993Nisan16 BC Eviction from Eden 1473Nisan15 BC Grain eaten in promised land Genesis 4:15 U133
Alienation Times 7 times 2488Sivan BC Genesis 6:3. No more gifts of the spirit 33Sivan5 Pentecost: Gifts of the spirit poured out Leviticus 4:6,17 U129
Continuous Gentile Times 7 times 607Tishri15 BC First secular year under Nechoh 1914Tishri15 WW1. The Signs of the Times of Matthew 24 begin as predicted by Russell in 1876. Daniel 4:17 U120, U121, U123
Discontinuous Gentile Times 7 times 607Tishri15 BC First secular year under Nechoh 2020Tishri15 Jesus can now be installed as Caesar over humans on earth Daniel 4:25 (98 year Maccabean gap from 144Tishri15 -46Tishri15 and the 4 year Jewish Ministry gap from 29Tishri15 to 33Tishri15 OR 4 year Gentile Ministry gap from 66Tishri15 to 70Tishri15) and 4 year non adamic lease gap from 2012Tishri15 to 2016Tishri15 U121, U123
Discontinuous Davidic Israeli Gentile Times 7 times 586Tishri15 BC The capture and deposing of Zedekiah in 586Tammuz 1941Tishri15 WW2 ends on 1945May8 (1945Iyyar30). 1948May14 (1948Sivan3), the Modern state of Israel is declared  Leviticus 26 (2 year gap when Jehoiachin 's throne was raised up in Babylon - Jeremiah 52:31-34, 2Kings25:27-30 AND 4 year Ministry gap of Jesus) U121
Temple Times 3 times 1048Nisan16  David buys temple floor 33Nisan16 Temple floor of TCC1 laid. 1 Chronicles 21:12(3 days, months, years) U40
Pharaoh's Times 10 times 1593Nisan14 BC Pharaoh order babies into Nile 2008Nisan14 End of the ARC world Genesis 31:7 U31
Lamech's Times 11 times 3928Nisan14 BC Cain Kills Abel 33Nisan14 Caiaphas sacrifices Jesus Genesis 4:24, Matthew 18:22(77 times compared to 7 times) U133#Lamech
Abraham's Times 11 times 1943Nisan14 BC 1AC inaugurated 2018Nisan14 Must then add the sentence count of the execution of the command, 31x in months to the 11 Prophetic Times and get to 2020Heshvan15, the resurrection of the 4th HLC bride, the final resurrection of the 3rd Holy Spirit, who will possess the Kingdom through the 2NCs. Genesis 15 (3 year old heifer+ram+she-goat + 2 birds) U271-11#29
Waterless Times 4 times 435Iyyar21 The 2EC water baptism ends in TCC2 1875Iyyar21 The 3EC water baptism begins in TCC3 Revelation 7:1 with 4 angels standing upon the 4 extremities of the earth hold back the 4 winds. U271-12#96
U151#7
Clarification Times 7 times 497Adar21 BC Last prophet to get the word of Jehovah directly (Malachi). Nehemiah, Ezra and Esther did not claim to have that word  2024Adar21 Clarification of God's word in the furnace of silver ends with the sealing of the last 2NC on 2024Adar21 Psalm 12:6 U271aq
Babel's Times 2 times 2233Sivan BC The languages at Babel were confused and the maximum lifespan of adamic men was halves from 480 to 240 years. The earth was divided in the days of Peleg 1513Sivan7 The Law of Moses became operational. God's people were no longer unrestrained Genesis 11:6-7, Genesis 10:25, Revelation 18:2 Intro15
 

The rest of our early understandings, many of which were wrong, are in 'Letter to the Society'.

The Blindness of the Watchtower

The reason that the Watchtower never worked this out in scriptural terms is that God blinded them because they lost their love for him. For their founder Charles Russell was not the Laodicean Messenger, as is inscribed on his gravestone, but was in fact the Ephesian messenger (see [15,16]), the angel of the first congregation of the second presence (which he believed would be the last). And the counsel to him from Jesus was:

4 Nevertheless I hold this against you, that you lost the love you had at first (Revelation 2).

Isaiah prophesies that the JWs will become blind and deaf:

10 You are my witnesses, is the utterance of Jehovah: Even my servant whom I have chosen, in order that you may know and have faith in me, and that you may understand that I am the same One. Before me there was no God formed, and after me there continued to be none.
11 I--I am Jehovah, and besides me there is no saviour.
12 I myself have told forth and have saved and have caused [it] to be heard, when there was among you no strange [god]. So you are my witnesses, is the utterance of Jehovah, and I am God (Isaiah 43)

18 Hear, you deaf ones; and look forth to see, you blind ones.
19 Who is blind, if not my servant, and who is deaf as my messenger whom I send? Who is blind as the one rewarded, or blind as the servant of Jehovah?
20 It was a case of seeing many things, but you did not keep watching. It was a case of opening the ears, but you did not keep listening (Isaiah 42).

This is why Jesus said to Peter:

37 And he came and found them sleeping, and he said to Peter: Simon, are you sleeping? Did you not have strength to keep on the watch one hour? (Mark 14).

The reason that the Watchtower did not see these in psychological terms was because Russell set the goals of the Society as follows:

The work in which the Lord has been pleased to use our humble talents has been less a work of origination than of reconstruction, adjustment, harmonisation (Kingdom Proclaimers).

An honest and humble appraisal (although saying that you’re humble in circumstances where humility is considered to be a virtue is more immodest than it is humble!!) But why should the past restrict the future? Why should Charles Russell cut short the hand of God in that way. Is there anything that is too extraordinary for him? Jesus thought not:

36 And he went on to say: Abba, Father, all things are possible to you; remove this cup from me. Yet not what I want, but what you want (Mark 14).

This is rather like a motivational speech very well given by Will Carling about the British Lions at an Amway conference that Gordon Attended. The Lions set as their goal, a place in the Final of the World Cup in South Africa. And they got there. And then they lost the final because they had not set the winning of that match as their goal.

Russell was not the first Adventist to realise that Daniel 4 related to a period of 2520 years. Neither was he the first to get the start date of 607 correct. But he was the first and only Adventist to get the end date of this period at (least of the continuous version of it) absolutely correct to the Hebrew month 1914Tishri and to set up a religion which had the guts to declare it, guts which they have now lost, along with their faith and their love. The incredible thing is that he did this believing that Jerusalem fell to Nebuchadnezzar in 606 BC, when it in fact fell in 586. He worked things backwards from 536Tishri, a false date for the end of either of the two 70 year land Sabbath exiles. He did not even know there were two of them! Basically he made a series of mistakes and yet got the right answer. Now there is the activity of the holy spirit and the love of our God ! For the history of the main second adventist prophecy - see [120].

But what Russell did absolutely marvellously was to adopt the following crucial philosophy for bible research, although it is a matter of faith and logic as well. He proposed that:

"The way to test your interpretation, is not against doctrines of churches but against all other scriptures relating to the subject matter of your interpretation. When you have harmonised them all then you have God’s interpretation."  

He was not the first to have this idea either (Isaac Newton had it for example). God very rarely gives us the whole picture in one piece. He prefers to give us jigsaws. This we have made a principle of the code called the Jigsaw Principle!

Technical Note:

The problem with the naive interpretation of the symbolic Nebuchadnezzar as being God's vassal king over Abraham's true seed, who is Jesus at the end of the 2520 year period, is that Daniel says to him:

27 Therefore, O king, may my counsel seem good to you, and remove your own sins by righteousness, and your iniquity by showing mercy to the poor ones. Maybe there will occur a lengthening of your prosperity (Daniel 4).

Jesus had no sin, but was unblemished, and he had no iniquity, so this counsel cannot apply to him.

The solution to this problem is to realise that the 7 Prophetic Times fulfilment is a Word symbolism and so we have the latitude to assign a different symbolic meaning to each designation for King Nebuchadnezzar. 

'Lord of me', and 'My Lord the king' do not suffer any passages in the account which cannot apply to Jesus. Daniel 4 is the account of the loss and regaining of several kingships over God's people. We are not going into them here however. The purpose of the above was to show how the Designations Principle is necessary to find the true interpretation of Daniel 4. However there is a scripture in Ezekiel which shows us that God's kingship over his people is ruined three times. It is:

25 And as for you, Oh profane, wicked chieftain/prince of Israel, whose day has come in the time of the error of [the] end,
26
this is what the Sovereign Lord Jehovah has said: Remove the turban, and lift off the crown. This will not be the same. Put on high even what is low, and bring low even the high one.
27 A ruin, a ruin, a ruin I shall make it. As for this also, it will certainly become no [one's] until he comes who has the legal right, and I must give [it] to him (Ezekiel 21 - NWT adapted by NIVHEOT).

So the crown comes off, when the head one is not a king (from God's standpoint). Three greater ruins, are made of the kingship: a ruin, a ruin, a ruin, using the Successive Repeated Designation Principle. The one with the legal right is Jesus in the literal meaning. 

 

[C11] The Numerical Principle and the Times Principle

A given number of living or inanimate or temporal items in a bible account can stand symbolically for that number of 'Times'. A 'Time' can stand literally or symbolically for a day, a month or a year (occasionally also for an hour) - any single unit of time (It cannot stand for a Week which is 7 units of time)

14 And God went on to say: Let luminaries come to be in the expanse of the heavens to make a division between the day and the night; and they must serve as signs and for seasons and for days and years (Genesis 1).

The planetary luminaries of the Sun and the moon define years and months. The earth itself defines 'days', although it is the rotation with respect to the Sun that we actually see. So a day is one time of the earth around itself. A month is one time of the moon around the earth. A year is one time of the earth around the Sun. All three are ‘times’ of revolution, cycles. These are God’s celestial time pieces. In scientific terms a 'time' is a 'cycle'.

So in the bible a ‘time’ can mean a day a month or a year.

19 He has made the moon for appointed times. The sun itself knows well where it sets (Psalm 104).

The penalty that God prescribed through Gad, to David, for his part in the registration sin was:

11 Accordingly Gad went in to David and said to him: This is what Jehovah has said: Take your pick, 
1
2 whether for three years there is to be a famine, or for three months there is to be a sweeping away from before your adversaries and for the sword of your enemies to overtake [you], or for three days there is to be the sword of Jehovah, even pestilence, in the land, with Jehovah's angel bringing ruin in all the territory of Israel. And now see what I should reply to the One sending me (1 Chronicles 21).

All three penalties were '3 times' in duration, and they prefigure the three times of the temple times - see [40]. These times were, days, months and years.

A special case of the Numerical Principle occurs when one time (a temporal item) stands symbolically for another.

34 By the number of the days that you spied out the land, 40 days, a day for a year, a day for a year, you will answer for your errors 40 years, as you must know what my being estranged means. (Numbers 14 NWT)

6 And you must complete them. And you must lie upon your right side in the second case, and you must carry the error of the house of Judah 40 days. A day for a year, a day for a year, is what I have given you. (Ezekiel 4 NWT)

22 according to the days on which the Jews had rested from their enemies and the month that was changed for them from grief to rejoicing and from mourning to a good day, to hold them as days of banqueting and rejoicing and sending of portions to one another and of gifts to the poor people. (Esther 9 NWT)

Joseph, the 11th son of Jacob whose name was changed to Israel, was sold into slavery by his brothers and ended up in prison in Egypt with the chief of the bakers and the chief of the cupbearers of Pharaoh. The chief of the cupbearers dreamed about three twigs, and the chief of the bakers dreamed about three baskets. Joseph interpreted these parts of their dreams as follows:

As regards the cupbearer:
Then Joseph said to him: This is its interpretation: The 3 twigs are 3 days (Genesis 40:12).

As regards the baker:
18 Then Joseph answered and said: This is its interpretation: The 3 baskets are 3 days (Genesis 40).

So Joseph, the first bible decoder recorded in the holy book, is telling us that a given number of twigs or baskets can stand for a given number of days or times or cycles. Then Pharaoh himself had one dream about 7 fat cows and 7 thin cows (this was not a dream about women), and then a second dream about 7 fat ears of grain and 7 thin ears of grain. Guess how Joseph interpreted these parts of these dreams:

26 The 7 good cows are 7 years. Likewise the 7 good ears of grain are 7 years. The dream is but one (Genesis 41).

So the 7 cows and the 7 ears of grain were 7 years or 7 times or 7 cycles. So a cow or an ear of grain or a twig or a basket can be a time which can be a day or a year. Now we apply the all powerful Consistency Principle, and it is not hard to generalise this to:

A given number of living or inanimate things in a bible account can stand for that number of times, i.e. days or months or years

27 Who of you by being anxious can add one cubit to his life span? (Matthew 6).

Well a cubit is a measure of length, but Jesus here uses it as a time. He is in fact giving us the numerical principle of bible interpretation. He who is anxious about the things of the Lord, a son of Mary, one who pays attention even to one cubit, the height of the Tsohar, realises that it adds something to the lifespan of the sons of Adam. In fact it takes one day (a day for a cubit) to be raptured out of the ark.

Examples

1. The 1.1 million men drawing sword of 1Chronicles21 stand for 1.1 million BLC days of 1AC entry from the presentation of the census to David on 1048Nisan14 BC, the start of the 3 day plague to 1048Nisan16, when David purchased the temple floor from Ornan the Jebusite and stopped the plague. Although actually the plague ended after 70,000 people had been killed by it in circumstance where their redemption value was the debt owed by the people to Jehovah for not paying the half shekel per head registration tax of Exodus 30:11-16 on 1.57 million people. 1048Nisan16 was 3 Prophetic Times of the Temple Times before Jesus rebuilt his temple on 33Nisan16. 

5 Joab now gave the number of the registration of the people to David; and all Israel amounted to 1,100,000 men drawing sword, and Judah 470,000 men drawing sword (1 Chronicles 21).

So 1.1 million BLC days would take us to 2008Heshvan6. But entrance into the 1AC ended on 2008Nisan14, the end of the original ARC lease world, before the marriage of Jesus to his first presence wife on 2008Nisan22. Then there are a further 200 days of 1AC entry which are not covered during this period. These are the 195 days inclusively of Kingdom 1AC/OMC entry for FRC/LRC sealing (rather than FRC sealing). They run from 2028Heshvan29/30 to 2029Sivan14/15 - see U154 and finally the last week of Daniel 9:27, 7 days inclusively from 2033Nisan4-10 for Adam and 2033Iyyar4-10 for Cain in the last chance saloon. For more on the 1Chronicles21 - see U40.

2. 1901 Jehovah now spoke to Moses [Elijah4], saying:
2 Speak to the sons of Israel [all the saints, 1NC and 2NC], and they should turn back and encamp to faces of Pihahiroth [Mouth of the channels in Hebrew and Place where reeds grow in Egyptian - LWs] between/in midst of Migdol [Tower - Watchtower] and between/in midst of the sea [the mass of mankind] to faces of Baal-zephon [Baal of the North, the contest of 1Kings18]. In front of it yeu are to encamp upon/by the sea [So go and camp between the Watchtower and the mass of mankind in view of the contest of 1kings18 and read the LW website].
3 And Pharaoh [ES2] will certainly say to/for/about the sons of Israel, 'They are wandering in confusion in the land. The wilderness has shut/closed in upon them [the LWs have become trapped by their attempts to get the bomb date].'
4 And I shall indeed let Pharaoh's heart [body part: sentence count trigger] become obstinate, and he will certainly chase after them and I shall get glory for myself by means of Pharaoh and all his military force; and the Egyptians [JWs] will certainly know that I am Jehovah. And they did correctly.
5 And it was reported to the king of Egypt that the people had run away. And the heart of Pharaoh and his servants was changed/turned [singular] towards the people, and they said: What is this that we have done [in] that we have sent Israel away from slaving of us? [we have lost all the saints, the sons of Israel, the 1NCs, the HLCs and the 2NCs. This was completed on 2022Elul11, 300 + 300 denarii of perfumed oil on the Jesus' feet of John12 after 2020Tebbeth11, the start of the stolen 4EC for 2NCs in Reverted Laodicea] (Exodus14 adapted from NWT and Hebrew)

600 chosen chariots of Exodus 14:7 do not stand merely for 600 days for they each have a 3rd man and Pharaoh also took his people with him (we count everything taken by Pharaoh) and so we have 600 chosen chariots and 1800 men upon chosen chariots. These make 2400 days. But they are not called men they are called thirds.

6 And he proceeded to make namely his chariot ready [1x. This maybe his generalized chariot, i.e. his army of chariots], and he took namely his people with him [2x].
7 And he proceeded to take 600 of chosen/proven chariot and/even all of chariot/chariotry of Egypts [NOT 1x.2x=2x - we know the number of them - it is 600.  So this must be 1x.] and thirds [masculine plural] upon all of him [Literally 600 chosen chariots with 1800 men aboard making 2400x. But counts as a further 1800x + 1x for upon all of him, the chariotry] 

Verse 6: 1x+2x = 3x
Verse 7: 600x+2x+1800x+3x+1x (Pharaoh's chariot is also a chariot of Egypt) = 2406x

The 3rd man either a 2NC (3rd in collection to 1NCs and HLCs) or is a late Watchtower LRC Passover partaker on 2019Tammuz14.

600x of chosen chariots chasing after Israel, even all the chariots of Egypt, are the priests from the Watchtower, those who eventually gain an Isaaic 4EC baptism by 2026Tishri5, the end of the Isaaic 4EC for those outside the 3rd Holy Spirit. But the last chosen chariot arrives at Zoar in time to request a 4EC baptism on 2026Elul14 from 1Kings 18:40...

40 Then Elijah said to them: Seize ye namely prophets of the Baal! A man will not be delivered from them! At once they seized them, and Elijah then brought them down to the torrent valley of Kishon and slaughtered them there (1 Kings 18 NWT).

3x.(3x.450x+450x)+3x.450x+450x+450x = 5400x + 2250x = 7650x or 21¼ years from 2005Sivan14, the fall of the Watchtower, when all JWs became prophets of Baal, to 2026Elul14, the Passover before the start of the 3rd presence on 2026Elul16. The Isaaic 4EC ends on 2026Tishri5 for Kingdom priests. It must end for JWs on 2026Elul14. 

So the last JW to be baptised arrives at the church or request baptism on 2026Elul14. But the last JW 4EC Kingdom priests is actually baptised on 2026Tishri5. So we baptise the first chasing JWs on 2024Shebat5, 600 days before 2026Tishri5. These are the 600 chosen chariots of Exodus14 - see U358.

4EC entry ends on 2026Tishri5, 574 days of Bethzatha from 2024VeAdar2.
Watchtower FRC Zoar entry ends on 2028Shebat10 for the 2028Shebat14 late Watchtower FRC Passover in the 19th adamic Nisan1, then Abrahamic Elul1 then, Isaaic Tishri1 year of Gordon over the 2NCs
Watchtower LRC Zoar entry ends on 2029Ab10 for the 2029Ab14 late Watchtower LRC Passover in the 19th adamic Nisan1, then Abrahamic Elul1 then, Isaaic Tishri1 year of Gordon over the 2NCs - see U271-11#38 .

8 And Jehovah bound/hardened the heart of Pharaoh, the king of Egypt [1x], and he went chasing after/behind [rxa] the sons of Israel [13x+1x=14x], and/while the sons of Israel were going out in/by hand uplifting [out of Adam into Abraham. 13x in 5x = 65x] 
9 And Egypts [dual, 2x] went chasing after/behind them [12x+2x=14x], and reached them camping upon the sea, all the horse of chariot of Pharaoh and his cavalrymen and his military force, upon/at Pihahiroth to faces of/before/opposite Baal-zephon (Exodus 14 NWT). i.e. all the horse of chariot of Pharaoh and his cavalrymen and his military force reached them [whilst they were] camping upon the sea upon Pihahiroth opposite Baal zephon

Verse 8: 1x+14x+65x = 80x
Verse 9: 14x+1x+3x+1x+12x+12x.2x+1x+1x = 14x + 43x = 57x
Total of Pharaoh's taking and chasing from Verse6-8  3x+2406x+80x = 2489x from 2022Elul11, the end of Watchtower 2NC entry into Reverted Laodicea, the end of Israel leaving the Watchtower, to 2029Ab10, the late Watchtower LRC Passover entry day for the 3rd Watchtower LRC man. The end of Watchtower salvation through Zoar

The chariots are charging through the scriptures. The are ridden by research groups. The Holy Spirit needing 2 or 3 gathered together (riding in a chariot). The wheels of the chariot are the new form of locomotion, the new form of bible interpretation. These charioteers must adopt the new LW and bible code methods of interpretation and throw away their old interpretational methodology.190

3. Groups of 50 and 100 in the feeding of the 5,000 in Mark6

169Groups of 50 and 100
TCC1: 50 years from late 29 ( after Jesus' installation to feed on 29Heshvan21) when 5,000 1NC male saints (baptised by John) had become disciples of Jesus, to 79Tishri14, when the 1EC water baptism ended. They continue reclining for a further dry 4½x of Daniel12, on yellow grass until 84Nisan14, when TCC1 (the Roman Catholic church) fell as a true church.
TCC2: 50 years of FDS2 feeding of 1NCs from 109 AD to 159Tishri10, the end of the 2nd presence due to the last 1NC leaving his human body and being transferred into his angel (green grass all through).
TCC3: 100 years from 1901Heshvan21, the installation of FDS3 to feed, to 2001Chislev14, when the 3EC water baptism ended. They continue to recline for a further dry 3½x of Daniel12 on yellow grass, until 2005Sivan14, when the Watchtower fell as a true church.
Laodicea: 100 months from 2003Shebat21, the installation to feed the 1NCs, to 2012Sivan21, between  the death of Adam and the death of Cain in true churches
TCC4: 50 days from 2026Tishri16 (which must be 4th row laying day) when 5,000 male 1NCs are in Zoar, to 2026Chislev5, when the 3rd Holy Spirit takes over Isaac (all the Isaaic 4ECs) - see U271-11#6.

2026Tishri14 is 4th row baptism day for the 3rd Holy Spirit
2026Tishri15 is 4th row conversion day for the 3rd Holy Spirit
2026Tishri16 is 4th row Isaaic stone laying day for the 3rd Holy Spirit

5 loaves and 2 fishes
TCC1/TCC2: 5 loaves are the food of the administrations of the 5 presidents of FDS1, Peter, John, James, Timothy, Epaphras. 2 fishes are the food of the administrations of the next two heads of the church who were the first two Popes, who wear their fish hats, the first two Bishops of Rome, St Linus from 67-76 AD and St Anacletus from 76 to 84Nisan14, when the Roman Catholic church fell as a true church - see U233. Peter was never a Pope, he was never a Bishop of Rome because his ministry was to the Jews - see U42. Or perhaps the food of Elijah1 (John the baptist) and Elijah2 (Paul) both of whom fed TCC1 (which was appointed/installed to feed the 1NCs on 29Tishri2/Heshvan21) and both of whom were fountains of living water, having a water baptism from heaven..
TCC3/TCC4: 2 fishes are the food of the administration of Elijah3 (Russell) and Elijah4 (Ritchie). 5 loaves are the food of the administrations of the 5 post Russell presidents of the Watchtower: Rutherford, Knorr, Franz, Henschel. Don Adams until the fall of the Watchtower during his presidency (on 2005Sivan14)..

  The 2 fishes are AOL and AOP, the Angel of Laodicea (Caleb) and the Angel of Philadelphia (Gordon). The 5 loaves are the food of the administrations of the angels of Smyrna, Pergamum, Thyatira and Sardis in Revelation 2,3 and Don Adams who humbly described himself as a mere administrator. He had no presidential authority. But he did hold the title. So he was not a star in Jesus' right hand of Revelation. Therefore the Watchtower fell as a true church during the administration of Don Adams from 2000Heshvan5 to 2014. In fact it fell on 2005Sivan14.

Fragments left over
TCC1: 12 baskets full of fragments (calendar months) are whole sacred years from 85Nisan1 to 97Nisan1 and not to 98Nisan1
TCC2:  ??
TCC3: 12 baskets full of fragments (calendar months) are filled secular years from 2005Tishri1 (after their fall on 2005Sivan14) to 2017Elul10) the fall of Laodicea as a true church, after a part of the 12th month of the Tishri1 secular year, a fragment of a fragment)
TCC3: 8x of fish fragments are 8 sacred years from 2005Sivan14 to 2013Adar10, the end of the 4EC baptism for Laodicea, the end of the 2nd presence - during which the 1NCs had a water baptism hence fish.169

The 1st presence ran from 29Tishri10 (when Michael entered into Immanuel and so Jesus was present in the flesh) to 79Tishri14 and 89Tishri14 to 159Tishri10. 
Michael was commissioned to build the temple of FDS1 on 10Tishri2, 22½ years before 33Nisan16, when FDS1 was appointed.

Compelling disciples to board a boat and go to the other side of the lake whilst dismissing the crowds, is the first true religion becoming false and Jesus telling the loyal ones to get into a new outfit, a new church whilst leaving the hangers on behind in a dismissed church. The new church Bethsaida, is the house of fish, the church of the fishes - who must therefore be the first 2 presidents of FDS2 and not the first 2 popes. Although there were 2 popes with their silly fish pope hats during the 50 years of the feeding of FDS1. For more see U67.

4. The 7 fat and thin cows of Pharaoh twice.

27The 28 cows and the 28 ears of grain: The Dream + the fulfilment

All 7 ears of grain must be on the one stalk of Isaaic FDS4, which finishes feeding when it ceases earthly interaction for the 2nd 2NC marriage on 2028Adar2-8

Laodicean fulfilment (words in red are excluded from this fulfilment by the Successive Descriptions Principle of the bible code)

274EC
baptism
begins
2000Elul16
X______________
Laodicean apostle Roger Knight is
4EC Baptised. Jesus through JW 1NCs
is now standing over the 4EC baptism.
7 beautiful of appearance and fat of flesh
cows start feeding in saintly reed/grass
2002Elul16
X_________________________________
7 beautiful of appearance and
fat of flesh cows end. 7 bad of
appearance and
thin of flesh
cows start eating the
beautiful of appearance and fat
2009Elul16
X_________________________
Laodicea
falls
Pharaoh
wakes up
2012Sivan14
X__________
Isaaic Zoar is appointed over non
adamic Isaac. Jesus stands on
the land of Isaaic Zoar. 7 fat of
flesh and
beautiful of form cows
start feeding in saintly reed/grass
2016Elul16
X___________________________
Abrahamic
Laodicea
falls. Pharaoh
wakes up
2017Elul10
X___________
7 fat of flesh and beautiful of form
cows end. 7 poor and bad of form
and thin of flesh
cows start.
The thin and bad cows eat
7 the cows the first the fat
2023Elul16
X____________________________
Reverted
Laodicea
falls
Pharaoh
wakes up
2023Tishri21
X__________
7 poor and
bad of form
and
thin of flesh
cows
end
2030Elul16
X__________
Laodicea ends as a
church before a further
cow is completed
2030Elul16 -
2031Elul16
X________________X
2 years [of] days7 years7 years7 years7 years1 year

Laodicean fulfilment: 2000Elul16 - 2002Elul16 - 2009Elul16 - 2016Elul16 - 2023Elul16 - 2030Elul16: Pharaoh wakes up on 2012Sivan14 and 2017Elul10 and 2023Tishri21, 450 prophets of Baal before 2024Tebbeth21. Pharaoh transfers from reappointed Laodicea to reverted Laodicea on 2019Adar21.

21 cows ascend from the river (into true church worship) from 2002Elul16 to 2023Elul16. But there is no 22nd cow said to be from the river. So reverted Laodicea falls as a true church during the 22nd year from 2023Elul16 to 2024Elul16. But not in the case of Zoar/the last chance saloon.

1000 days of John6 feeding 2NCs from 2020Tebbeth11 to 2023Tishri21, the fall of Reverted Laodicea as a true church. Split 300 +300 denarii of Perfumed oil on the feet to 2022Elul11 and 115 days to the end of the stolen 4EC on 2022Tebbeth6 and 9½ months of the far bank to 2023Tishri21.
So the 5½ years from 2013Adar10 to 2019Elul10 are split into the ending bank of Abrahamic Laodicea and a 20 day gap and the starting bank of reappointed Laodicea, 1260 and 20 and 700 days. So Laodicea was appointed as a true church 1260 days before 2005Adar1, which was 2002Elul1, 15 days before 2002Elul16, when they stole the 4EC. And Abrahamic Laodicea fell as a true church 720 days before 2019Elul10 (the restart of the 2nd presence) on 2017Elul10. 

Reverted
Laodicea is
appointed
over the 1ACs
Russell visits.
2019Ab27
X______________
Reverted
Laodicea is
appointed over
1NCs at 12th
1NC first fruits
2019Adar21
X____________
Reverted Laodicea
is installed over
1NCs and
appointed
over HLCs
2020Iyyar16
X________________
1st HLC is
4EC baptised
into Reverted
Laodicea
2020Sivan12
X____________
Peter leaves fallen
reappointed Laodicea.
200 cubits to land begin
See John21 - U208
2020Sivan21
X____________________
Last HLC
(4th bride)
is Passover
executed.
2020Heshvan14
X_____________
1st 2NC is 4EC baptised into
Reverted Laodicea. 
300+300 Denarii of John12 begin.
200 cubits of John21 to land end.
1000x of 5000/5 loaves of John 12 start
2020Tebbeth11
X________________________________
Last 2NC is 4EC baptised into
Reverted Laodicea. 300+300
Denarii of John12 end. 2489x
of Pharaoh's chasing of
Exodus14 to 2029Ab10 start
2022Elul11
X_________________________

4EC baptism ends
for Reverted Laodicea
2022Tebbeth6
X____________________
Reverted
Laodicea
falls. 
1000 days
of John6 end
2023Tishri21
X27_________
9½ month near bank of Daniel12 153 big 1NC/HLC fish of John 21 300+300 Denarii of John12 on feet9½ month ending banksee U304

1000 days of 5 loaves into 5000 men of John6 from 2020Tebbeth11 to 2023Tishri21.
6350 days (127 Pentecosts of Esther9) from 2005Adar1, the theft of the 4EC baptism, the baptism of the 2nd Laodicean by 'Roger Knight' the apostle to Laodicea, to 2023Tishri21. Jurisdiction through the law of the 4EC as judged by Laodicea. 
runs from 2005Adar1 to 2017Elul10 then 2020Sivan12 to 2023Tishri21
3300 treaders down of 1Kings5 from 2012Tishri5 to 2017Elul10 in Laodicea and 2019Tishri5 to 2023Tishri21 in reappointed and reverted Laodiceas and 2024Adar12 to 2025Iyyar21 in Zoar until all the Laodicean 2NCs are raptured and the gifts of the spirit are poured out. The 450 prophets of Baal of 1Kings18 take us from 2023Tishri21 to 2024Tebbeth21, the end of the seizing of the prophets of Baal by the people rather than by Elijah4, the end of the rapture of non LW non Laodicean 2NCs. So from 2024Adar12 (the Isaaic 4EC baptism of the first unsanctified Laodiceans, Zoar is treading down the Laodicean 2NCs - isolating them in Hebron of Zoar, denying them entry into the Isaaic congregation.

Abrahamic Laodicea
is installed over
non adamic Abraham
2012Tishri5
X__________________
40 days of Laodicea spying on
LWs begins 12 years of Betrayal
after 2003Shebat21, their
installation to feed the 1NCs
2015Shebat21
X____________________________
40 days of spying end
40 month Laodicean
wilderness penalty
begins
2016Nisan1
X__________________
Abrahamic
Laodicea
falls as a
true church
2017Elul10
X___________
40 month Laodicean wilderness
penalty ends. Laodicea
is reappointed over the 1ACs,
reappointed as a true church
2019Ab1
X__________________________
Laodicea is
reinstalled
over
Abraham
2019Tishri5
X__________
Reverted Laodicea
falls as a true church
450 prophets of Baal
seizing period starts
2023Tishri21
X__________________

End of seizing
of 450 2NC
prophets of Baal
2024Tebbeth21
X______________
Laodiceans start
being downtrodden
by Zoar
For hiding us
2024Adar12
X________________
The End of the rapture
of Laodicean Benjamin
(the 2NC reserves)
Gifts of the spirit poured out
2025Iyyar21
X27_____________________
1775 days1456 days 69 days 1775 + 1456 + 69 = 3300
treaders down of 1Kings5

LW fulfilment (words in red are excluded from this fulfilment by the Successive Descriptions Principle of the bible code)

Ephraim
Gentile call
to 2NCs
into the LWs
2003Sivan14
X_____________
Watchtower falls.
Jesus is now standing
over the 4EC baptism
in the LWs. 7 beautiful
of appearance and fat of
flesh
cows start feeding
in saintly reed/grass
2005Sivan14
X____________________
7 beautiful of appearance and
fat of flesh
cows end. 7 bad of
appearance and thin of flesh cows
start. 7 bad of appearance and
thin of flesh
cows start eating
beautiful of appearance and fat
LWs and Laodiceans die
to Adam. Pharaoh wakes up
2012Sivan14
X____________________________
Abrahamic
Zoar dies
to Abraham.
Pharaoh
wakes up
2016Ab14
X_________
7 bad of appearance
and thin of flesh cows 
end. 7 fat of flesh
and beautiful of form
cows start feeding in
saintly reed/grass
2019Sivan14
X__________________
7 fat of flesh and
beautiful of form cows
end. 7 poor/weak/needy
(due to mark exclusion)
and bad of form and thin
of flesh
cows start.
The thin and bad cows eat
7 the cows the first the fat

2026Sivan14
X_____________________
Zoar ends.
Pharaoh
Wakes up
2031Nisan5
X_________
Entrance
into last
chance
saloon
begins
2031Nisan5
X___________
Last chance saloon
ends
Pharaoh wakes up
1st death Passover
Absolute end of
Adam
2033Nisan14
X________________
Kingdom
of God
is installed
over
Abraham
2033Sivan5
X__________
7 poor/weak/needy
due to Mark
exclusion
and bad of form
and thin of flesh

cows end
2033Sivan14
X27_____________
2 years [of] days7 years7 years7 years7 yearssee U304

LW fulfilment: 2003Sivan14 (Ephraim call into the 2NC) - 2005Sivan14 - 2012Sivan14 - 2019Sivan14 - 2026Sivan14 - 2033Sivan14. LW fulfilment. Pharaoh wakes up on 2012Sivan14, 2016Ab14, 2031Nisan5 and 2033Nisan14/Iyyar14.

Secular Fulfilment (words in red are excluded from this fulfilment by the Successive Descriptions Principle of the bible code)

The 1st LW
Passover after
we were installed
to feed the 1NCs
1999Nisan14
X______________
Jesus is standing over
the river of the 1AC
baptism. 7 beautiful of
appearance and
fat of flesh
cows start feeding
in the satanic reed/grass
2001Nisan14
X______________________
Jesus is standing on the edge of
the 1AC baptism river. 7 beautiful
of appearance and
fat of flesh
cows end. 7 fat of flesh and
beautiful of form cows start
feeding in the satanic reed/grass
2008Nisan14 (1AC baptism ends)
X___________________________
Pharaoh's extended
6004 year lease
over Adam ends
So he wakes up
2012Nisan16
X________________

Jesus stands on the land
of Abrahamic Zoar. 7 bad of
appearance and
thin of flesh
cows start eating the beautiful
of appearance and
fat
2015Nisan14
X________________________
Pharaoh's 50 month non
adamic restoration lease
as Caesar over Adam
ends. So he wakes up
2016Ab14
X____________________
7 bad of appearance
and
thin of flesh cows end
7 poor and bad of form
and
thin of flesh cows start
The thin and bad cows eat
7 the cows the first the fat
2022Nisan14
X______________________
FRC salvation ends
on 2029Iyyar14
7 poor and
bad of form
and
thin of flesh
cows end
2029Nisan14
X________________
Pharaoh's post Gentile
Times lease as Caesar
over Adam ends
So he wakes up
2033Nisan14
X27_________________
2 years [of] days7 years7 years7 years7 years4 year see U304

The question is: 'Is the 7 cows, the first, the fat', a double designation??? Well it certainly is a double description because the descriptors in that prophetic form can be separated by a comma or 'and'. and it cannot be both a double description and a double designation. So it is not a double designation.

Secular fulfilment: World hunger seems to go 14 fat cows to 2015Nisan14 then 14 thin cows to 2029Nisan14. So it goes 7 fat cows (dream) 7 fat cows (recital), 7 thin cows (dream), 7 thin cows (recital). The 2nd group of 7 cows begins with Pharaoh standing on the lip/border/edge of the river. We take this as 2008Nisan14, the edge of the 1AC river, the end of the 1AC water baptism. Whereas 2001Nisan14 has Pharaoh upon the river, since the 1AC baptism is ongoing and Jesus runs the heavenly church of the 1AC. Cows ascending are not female globalist politicians gaining office! But are 1AC globalist politicians from the river of that baptism gaining globalist office. Things started going badly for the globalists in 2016 with Brexit and with the election of Trump.
1999Nisan14 - 2001Nisan14 - 2008Nisan14 - 2015Nisan14 - 2022Nisan14 - 2029Nisan1427

 

 

[C12] The Jigsaw Principle of the Code

A church doctrine is correct only if it satisfies every scripture in the bible relating to the subject of the doctrine.

God very rarely gives us the whole picture in one account. Normally one has to piece together information from different accounts to get the full picture. But when one has logically harmonised one’s interpretations of every scripture on a given subject then one has the true interpretation and the true understanding of that subject. This is the best way to work out congregational doctrine etc.  This principle follows from the Consistency Principle, because if the bible was inconsistent in the literal meaning, then it would be of no use. But it is consistent as far as we are aware. There may be some errors in the best manuscripts we have today, but God is aware of them and they will be corrected if this is necessary, possibly by the bible code itself!

Many false religions have been founded on one or two scriptures and have ignored this principle. By a false religion we mean one which claims that their baptised members have their sins forgiven by God, but actually they do not. We mean a religion incapable of baptising its members into the First or the Second Abrahamic Covenants.

Charles Russell's Extinguishing of the Fires of Hell using the Jigsaw Principle

Charles Russell, who founded the Watchtower said:

A God that would use his power to create human beings whom he foreknew and pre-destinated should be eternally tormented, could be neither wise, just nor loving. His standard would be lower than that of many men (Kingdom Proclaimers).

He was credited by many as the man who put out the fire in hell! He did this by comparing all of the scriptures relating to:

Gehenna (The Greek word properly translated as 'Hell')
Sheol (The Hebrew word properly translated as 'The Grave')
Hades (The Greek word properly translated as 'The Grave')
Death

Hell, Gehenna:

The Greek word for Hell is Gehenna (geenna). Gehenna is the Greek for the Hebrew: Geh Hinnom, which means the valley of Hinnom, which was a valley directly over the south wall of Jerusalem. This valley was the burial place for the dead of the city.

‘To avoid pestilence…constant fires were kept burning there’ (William D Mounce, Analytical Lexicon to Greek NT).

6 And he himself made his own sons pass through the fire in the valley of the son of Hinnom, and practiced magic and used divination and practiced sorcery and made spiritistic mediums and professional foretellers of events. He did on a grand scale what was bad in the eyes of Jehovah, to offend him (2 Chronicles 33).

31 And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, in order to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, a thing that I had not commanded and that had not come up into my heart.
32 Therefore, look! days are coming, is the utterance of Jehovah, when it will no more be said [to be] Topheth and the valley of the son of Hinnom, but the valley of the killing; and they will have to bury in Topheth without there being enough place (Jeremiah 7).

So it is a burning burial ground. This prophecy was fulfilled in destruction of Jerusalem by Titus as described by Josephus. They ran out of space in Gehenna, and piled up the corpses in large houses in the city, around 600,000 were thrown out of the gates of the city by 70Tammuz1, during the last siege of Jerusalem according to the Jewish Historian Josephus - who was at the siege (The complete works of Josephus can be downloaded from this site (www.bibledecoded.com) or purchased from bookshops).

Scriptures which indicate that we do roast in Hell:

43 And if ever your hand makes you stumble, cut it off; it is finer for you to enter into life maimed than with two hands to go off into Gehenna, into the fire that cannot be put out (Mark 9).

10 And the Devil who was misleading them was hurled into the lake of fire and sulphur, where both the wild beast and the false prophet [already were]; and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever (Revelation 20).

Scriptures which indicate that we don't roast in Hell:

5 For the living are conscious that they will die; but as for the dead, they are conscious of nothing at all, neither do they anymore have wages, because the remembrance of them has been forgotten (Ecclesiastes 9).

3 Do not put your trust in nobles, Nor in the son of earthling man, to whom no salvation belongs.
4 His spirit goes out, he goes back to his ground; In that day his thoughts do perish (Psalm 146).

For the rest of this Jigsaw please see [13a].

[C12a] The History of the English Bible from John Wycliffe to King James

The first man to translate the bible from Latin into English was John Wycliffe, whose translation came out in 1382 (www.wycliffe.org/history/jwycliff.htm). John Wycliffe was an Oxford Professor, he also invented bifocal eye glasses! He therefore improved not only our spiritual vision but also our physical vision!! (www.greatsite.com/engbibhis/main.html). Wycliffe's belief was that:

[i] The sacred Scriptures be the property of the people, and one which no party should be allowed to wrest from them.

[ii] The authority of the Scriptures is independent on any other authority, and is preferable to every other writing, but especially to the books of the church of Rome. 

[iii] It is impossible for any part of the Holy Scriptures to be wrong. In Holy Scripture is all the truth, one part of Scripture explains another.

The public reading of Wycliffe's translation was manifested in the Lollard movement. Hence the expression to 'Loll about'. For the Lollards would stand around in public reading Wycliffe's translation. The subsequent persecution of him and of those who possessed his bible was extraordinary. The first law enacted to stop people reading God's word was passed in 1401 by Henry IV, and called De Heretico Comburendo, 'about the burning of Heretics'....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_haeretico_comburendo

Many were burnt at the stake with copies of his translation around their necks as a result of this law. During the reign of Henry V (1413-1422) an Act was confirmed by which:

English Sheriffs were forced to take an oath to persecute the Lollards, and the Justices must deliver a relapsed heretic to be burned within 10 days of his accusation (Armitage a History of the Baptists, 1890, I, p323).

The Lollards were those who valued the teachings of the bible over the doctrines of the Church of Rome. They read and preached in English from Wycliffe's Bible. In 1414 a law was passed as follows:

All who read the scriptures in their mother tongue should: Forfeit land, cattle, life and goods from the heirs for ever !! (Eadie: History of the English Bible).

In 1416 Archbishop Chichele at Oxford declared that the clergy should make:

A thorough search in the parish twice a year, for all persons that: Hold any either heresies or errors, or have any suspected books in the English tongue (Blackburn, History of the Christian Church 1880 p346).

However Wycliffe himself had the support of Queen Joan (1328-1385), of Queen Ann (the wife of Richard II), and ultimately of God himself:

In May 1382, Wycliffe was called before yet another synod of ecclesiastical authorities. This is called the Blackfriars Synod, because it was held in the monastery of Blackfriars in London. When the 47 Bishops and monks and religious doctors took their seats, a powerful earthquake shook the city. Huge stones fell out of the castle walls and pinnacles toppled (John Wycliffe and the Lollards - Fundamental Baptist Information Service).

Wycliffe's argument to the Catholic authorities for translating the bible into English was as follows:

You say it is heresy to speak of the Holy Scriptures in English. You call me a heretic because I have translated the Bible into the common tongue of the people. Do you know whom you blaspheme? Did not the Holy Ghost give the Word of God at first in the mother tongue of the nations to whom it was addressed ? (Fountain, John Wycliffe)

The Council of Constance declared Wycliffe a heretic on 4 May 1415, and banned his writings, effectively both excommunicating him retroactively and making him an early forerunner of Protestantism. The Council decreed that Wycliffe's works should be burned and his bodily remains removed from consecrated ground. This order, confirmed by Pope Martin V, was carried out in 1428. Wycliffe's corpse was exhumed and burned and the ashes cast into the River Swift, which flows through Lutterworth. 

In 1506 William Tylsworth was burned for his faith in the Word of God and his own daughter was forced to ignite the fire. In 1519 six men and a woman were burned for:

Teaching their children the Lord's Prayer and the ten commandments in English (Eadie: History of the English Bible).

The Lollard's Tower, where people possessing an English bible were tortured and killed, still exists today in Lambeth Palace, the London home of the Archbishop of Canterbury. But despite all of this persecution, Wycliffe's bible was still being read at the time of the next great bible translator William Tyndale (1484 - 1536), the Father of what eventually became the King James Bible. He studied classics and theology both Magdalen Hall Oxford from 1506 to 1515 and at Cambridge from 1517-1521. Whereas the writer studied Natural Sciences and Pure Mathematics at Magdalene College Cambridge from 1975-1979 and Magdalen College Oxford in 1979. Tyndale's first translation had to be finished abroad, but 3,000 copies reached England in December 1526. Around 1522 after he left Cambridge he famously said in response to a Catholic friar as quoted in "The acts and monuments of John Foxe": :

"If God spare my life, ere many years I will cause a boy who driveth the a plough to know more of the scriptures than you do."

The persecution then continued. John Tewkesbury had been reading Wycliffe's bible since 1512, and had obtained a copy of the Tyndale New Testament in 1526. He was first arrested in April 1529 and tortured and crippled. He was finally burned on December 20th 1530 for: Distributing copies of the word of God and believing in salvation by faith in Christ alone  (www.whidbey.net/~dcloud/articles/williamtyndale.htm). 

Tyndale was imprisoned in May 1535. Whilst he was in prison, three editions of his new testament were printed. He was strangled and the burnt at the stake on October 6th 1536. At his death he prayed out loud:

Lord open the King of England's Eyes !

On October 4, 1535 John Rogers and Miles Coverdale who were loyal disciples of Tyndale, finished Tyndale's translation of the Old Testament into English and printed abroad the first complete English Bible, known as the Coverdale Bible. John Rogers then changed his name to Thomas Matthew (an interesting name for a bible translator!) and printed the Coverdale Bible again, under this nom de plume, since Tyndale's work was banned. This edition is called the Matthews Bible

In 1539, 3 years after Tyndale was executed, his spoken prayer was answered. Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Cantebury, hired Miles Coverdale, at the bequest of King Henry VIII to publish what was called the Great Bible. 

These were Tyndale's words as a prologue for his translation of Jonah:

As the envious Philistines stopped the wells of Abraham, and filled them up with earth, to put the memorial out of mind, to the intent that they might challenge the ground; even so the fleshly minded hypocrites stop up the veins of life, which are the scripture, with the earth of their traditions, false similitudes and lying allegories. And that, of like zeal, to make the scripture their own possession and merchandise. And so shut up the kingdom which is in God's word, neither entering in themselves, nor suffering them that would. (Willam Tyndale) 

However bequest from King Henry did not end the persecution of bible translators! Because the persecution originated not with the crown but with the Church. When Bloody Mary (Queen Mary) came to the throne, being possessed to return England to the Roman church, she burned both John Rogers (Thomas Matthew) and Thomas Cranmer at the stake.

Meanwhile Miles Coverdale had taken refuge in Geneva in Switzerland. There, in exile, he and John Foxe with the protection of John Calvin and John Knox produced the Geneva Bible, which was first published in 1560. It was Queen Elizabeth I whose reign brought this persecution to an end. The English Bible History site (www.greatsite.com/engbibhis/main.html) says this about the Geneva bible and William Tyndale:

The Geneva Bible was the first Bible to add verses to the chapters, so that referencing specific passages would be easier. Every chapter was also accompanied by extensive marginal notes and references so thorough and complete that the Geneva Bible is also considered the first English "Study Bible". William Shakespeare quotes thousands of times in his plays from the Geneva translation of the Bible. The Geneva Bible became the Bible of choice for over 100 years of English speaking Christians. Between 1560 and 1644 at least 144 editions of this Bible were published. Examination of the 1611 King James Bible shows clearly that its translators were influenced much more by the Geneva Bible, than by any other source. The Geneva Bible itself retains over 90% of William Tyndale's original English translation. The Geneva in fact, remained more popular than the King James Version until decades after its original release in 1611! The Geneva holds the honor of being the first Bible taken to America, and the Bible of the Puritans and Pilgrims.

The King James Bible, although the work of 50 scholars, is very close to Tyndale's original Translation:

In the Gospel of St. Mark and the Epistle to the Hebrew there are not more than 80 words (in Tyndale's translation) ... which are not found in our Authorised Version of the Bible (Moulton - History of the English Bible).

The Authorised version is the King James Version. The English Bible changed the World in the early 17th century. Multitudes of commoners were driven to learn to read by their desire to study the bible. The 16th century historian John Foxe, who had supported Miles Coverdale whilst he was producing the Geneva Bible observed:

Everybody that could bought the book or busily read it or got others to read it to them if they could not themselves, and divers more elderly people learned to read on purpose. And even little boys flocked among the rest to hear portions of the holy Scripture read.

It is important that the story above is told and the antics of the church are exposed. We are fortunate today that a greater freedom of religious belief and worship exists in many countries than was enjoyed in the 14th, 15th and 16th centuries. The Church of that time did not want the common man to be able to understand the bible, they wanted it to remain a mystery to them written in a foreign language. In that way the church could play God to its flock, which is what they wanted to do, what they did back then and what they are doing today. The 'Trinity' turns a logical book into an incomprehensible marvel. It renders it as meaningless as if it was written in Latin. Arius, Wycliffe, Tyndale, Newton, are the enlighteners from God. The church has become a daughter of the darkness.  

Both John Wycliffe and William Tyndale wanted the ploughboy to know as much about the bible as the priest. So does God and so do we. Hence this book/website. For there is a bible within the bible and there is a holy code within the holy scriptures. Therefore we have written out this hidden bible today for the same ploughboy and for the same stable girl whose heart and mind and soul John Wycliffe and William Tyndale valued more highly than their own.

[C13] Binary (Yes/No) Question Principle

Any unanswered question asked in the scriptures with two possible answers (normally yes and no), has the answer in one word symbolic thread, being the opposite of the answer in the literal meaning or event symbolic meaning 

In other words whichever answer is true in the literal/event symbolic meaning, the alternative answer must be true in the greater meaning (the word symbolic meaning). In other words both answers are true in some meaning. The principle follows from the Power Principle of the code which basically states that every word of scripture has power. 

12 For the word of God is alive and exerts power (Hebrews 4).

All scripture is alive and exerts power, even literally false alternatives. Therefore these alternatives must be true in a further meaning. In fact one can deduce that the bible is in a code just from the fact that every word must exert power and there are literally false alternatives.

Examples

9 Jesus answered, Are there not twelve hours in the day? If anyone walks in the day [daylight day], he does not stumble because he sees the light of the world. (John 11 GLT)

Yes, there are 12 hours in the daylight day and there are 24 hours in the calendar day. The day light day ends with its evening at darkness. The calendar day ends with its evening at sunset. This is a classic example of the Binary Question Principle. Both answers are true.

Stephen explains this principle just before he gets a vision of heaven saying...

35 This Moses, whom they disowned, saying, 'Who appointed you ruler and judge?' this man God sent off as both ruler and deliverer by the hand of the angel that appeared to him in the thornbush (Acts 7).

The rhetorical question has the answer: Nobody. But the greater fulfilment has the answer given to us by Stephen, namely: Jehovah himself. The bible is a maximal meaning book. A question creates an ambiguity and no ambiguity in scripture is an oversight. So a binary question which is unanswered in the account takes both answers, one in the literal/event symbolic thread and the other in a word symbolic thread.

Take for example the great words of Nicodemus, a man whose love exceeded his pride:

4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a second time and be born, can he? (John 3)

Well literally, no, of course he cannot. But symbolically, yes, that is precisely how one is born again angelically. Born from the womb of his heavenly mother, his angelic mother. Born as an angel. 

That is also how one is born again non adamically. We become the child we would have been if Adam and Eve had not sinned. In other words we become the child that would have been born to the non adamic versions of our parents. So we effectively enter into the womb of our mother a second time, after she has been gene zapped. Essentially every cell in your body goes back to the womb and is gene zapped and reborn as the non adamic version of yourself. 

6 What has been born from the flesh is flesh, and what has been born from the spirit is spirit (John 3).

What has been born from fleshly women is men and what has been born from the spirit woman, the holy spirit, is angels. When you are born again angelically, God creates an angel in heaven through his wife, the holy spirit for you, Amen. See - How is one born again, and see - The Trinity is just God's family. When you are born again non adamically,. God zaps your genes. you immediately die to Adam, and on the 3rd day inclusively you finish becoming non adamic Abrahamic

That is the level of beauty that you will see if you are pure in heart and if your love exceeds your pride. Look how Nicodemus was repaid for one act of faith. It was enough. But his works did not stop there:

39 Nicodemus also, the man that came to him in the night the first time, came bringing a roll of myrrh and aloes, about 100 pounds [of it].
40 So they took the body of Jesus and bound it up with bandages with the spices, just the way the Jews have the custom of preparing for burial (John 19)

Perhaps the odourless aloes fixed the scent of the aromatic myrrh? Why was it 100 (Roman) pounds? We presently think these are 100 days from 2019Elul30, when the first 1NC reserve jumps of the overhang of the false church of the Watchtower (after 2,000 swine of Mark5 from 2013Adar10, the end of the 2nd presence) to 2019Tebbeth10, the end of the 1NC reserve water baptism in reappointed Laodicea? Nicodemus (conqueror of the people, the president of Laodicea) is POL. AOL is Caleb who feeds the autonomous congregation, the angel of Laodicea. POL, the president of Laodicea was not AOL we think. This is a numerical symbolism - see the Numerical Principle. Presumably the Myrrh is the understandings of the LWs and the aloes is the fixing or accepting of these by Laodicea? 

We know that Nicodemus was born again, because we know something about God’s love, we would be blind if we could not see the love of Nicodemus. Which brings us nicely to another Binary (Yes/No) Question:

50 Nicodemus, who had come to him previously, and who was one of them, said to them:
51 Our law does not judge a man unless first it has heard from him and come to know what he is doing, does it?
52 In answer they said to him: You are not also out of Galilee, are you? Search and see that no prophet is to be raised up out of Galilee (John 7).

No Nicodemus was not out of Galilee (precious few Pharisees were). But the antitypical Nicodemus is out of the antitypical Galilee. These Pharisees must have forgotten what they read in Isaiah9

1 However, the obscureness will not be as when the land had stress, as at the former time when one treated with contempt the land of Zebulun and the land of Naphtali and when at the later time one caused [it] to be honoured -- the way by the sea, in the region of the Jordan, Galilee of the nations.
2 The people that were walking in the darkness have seen a great light. As for those dwelling in the land of deep shadow, light itself has shone upon them. (Isaiah 9 NWT)

2 But John, having heard in jail about the works of the Christ, sent by means of his own disciples 
3 and said to him: Are you the Coming one, or are we to expect a different one? (Matthew 11)

19 So John summoned a certain two of his disciples and sent them to the Lord to say: Are you the Coming one or are we to expect a different one? (Luke 7).

In the literal meaning, yes Jesus was the ‘coming one’, in the sense that he was the one prophesied as coming to restore Israel. But in the greater meaning, there will be several different ones.

5 For instance, which is easier, to say: Your sins are forgiven, or to say: Get up and walk? (Matthew 9)

9 Which is easier, to say to the paralytic: Your sins are forgiven, or to say: Get up and pick up your bed and walk? (Mark 2)

Obviously the former. But in the greater meaning they are both the same thing because:

‘Get up’ is the baptism into the name of the father Abraham, the bath of the flesh, the water baptism, the forgiveness of sins in the past, giving one a clean standing before God.

‘Pick up your bed’ is: Have a resurrection into the kingdom of God. This is the finishing of the water baptism, the righteous decree in the flesh, the free gift of citizenship of the Kingdom of God, the forgiveness of all sins up to Armageddon, the granting of the entrance Visa through the ambassador Abraham.

‘Walk’ is the baptism into the name of Jesus, or Paul or Gordon etc, the sanctification in holy spirit, being born again, the forgiveness of all sins until time indefinite, the walking before God with a clean conscience, the creation of an angelic son of God, the entrance into the holy family of God, through a covenant mediated by a mediator.

33 Who will file accusation against God's chosen ones? God is the One who declares [them] righteous (Romans 8).

In the literal meaning no one. In the greater meaning Gordon! See ['The Faithful and Discreet Slave cut in two']

And Pilate enquired of Jesus Are you the king of the Jews? (Mark 15:2).

Literally, no, he wasn't at that time. Symbolically, yes, on 2020Chislev16/Shebat5 he is appointed/installed as Caesar to Abrahamic Jews on earth (2NC sons of the JAC) and on 2020Tebbeth16/Adar5,  he becomes Caesar to Isaaic Jews on earth - see U121 and see U123, he becomes Caesar to all the spiritual Jews, the covenant sons of Jacob, the saints, he sons of the JAC, in the ark. He alluded to this in his answer:

36 Jesus answered: My kingdom is no part of this world [it is in the ark and in the next world]. If my kingdom were part of this world, my attendants would have fought that I should not be delivered up to the Jews. But, as it is, my kingdom is not from this source (John 18).

38 So Pharaoh said to his servants: Can another man be found like this one in whom the spirit of God is? (Genesis 41)

Literally no, Joseph was unique. But in the greater meaning, yes, there will be another Joseph, an antitypical Joseph, a greater Joseph..

31 Still, many of the crowd put faith in him; and they commenced saying: When the Christ arrives, he will not perform more signs than this man has performed, will he? (John 7)

Literally no because of course Jesus was the Christ that the Jews had been waiting for. But when Jesus comes again in Kingdom power, in the body of his wife, to separate the sheep from the goats, he will actually do more signs than were done in his ministry to the Jews.

9 Later on Jehovah said to Cain: Where is Abel your brother? and he said: I do not know. Am I my brother's guardian? 

Literally no he was not his brother's guardian, because although older brothers are supposed to look after their younger ones, these two were both grown up by the time Cain killed Abel. But actually he was the high priest over Adam's family because he was the only one of them who was not dead (until he murdered Abel). And Jehovah is a God of the living not of the dead. So he was the spiritual guardian of Abel, but not his physical guardian. 

And in the greater meaning a further Cain kills a further Abel in circumstances where he is again his brother's spiritual guardian. This is the Watchtower killing Laodicea, destroying their 4EC water baptism and denying their 2NC spirit baptism. The Watchtower, the sons of the 3EC, are the brothers of Laodicea, the sons of the 4EC. They are also the guardian of Laodicea, being its sacred head - see U133#Guardian

But the largest scriptural example of a Binary Question comes from Paul...

28 And God has set the respective ones in the congregation, first, apostles; second, prophets; 3rd, teachers; then powerful works; then gifts of healings; helpful services, abilities to direct, different tongues.
29 Not all are apostles, are they?
Not all are prophets, are they?
Not all are teachers, are they?
Not all perform powerful works, do they?
30 Not all have gifts of healings, do they?
Not all speak in tongues, do they?
Not all are translators, are they?
31 But keep zealously seeking the greater gifts. And yet I show you a surpassing way [indeed for 7x we are all EVERYTHING] (1 Corinthians 12).

There will be a time, in fact a period of 7x perhaps, in the last true church, in Zoar, when all of us take all the positions that Paul refers to! This must be the vengeance upon Cain from ??

Here is another binary question...

23 Then Abraham approached and began to say: Will you really sweep away the righteous with the wicked? [Binary question. Literally no. Word symbolically yes. Abraham negotiates for the righteous ones who miss the ark, the sons of the OMC. They are therefore swept away with the wicked ones. But then they are resurrected into the kingdom]

And another one...

32 For who is a God besides Jehovah, And who is a rock besides our God? (2 Samuel). 

Well. It is Jesus !

7 Successive Binary Questions in Psalm 88

10 For those who are dead will you show a marvel? [1st death: No] [Judicially dead but physically alive: Yes. Second dead: Yes]
Or will the Rephaim arise praising you? Selah [Even the Rephaim, the giant Canaanite enemies of Israel: No, for the most part] [But Yes, for some of them]
11 Will your loving-kindness be declared in the grave itself? [In Hades: No] [In Gehenna: Yes] 
Your faithfulness in [the place of] destruction? [In Hades: No] [In Gehenna: Yes]
12 Will a marvel by you be known in the darkness itself? [No, not in Hades. Because the 1st dead are conscious of nothing being asleep] [Yes, in Gehenna, where you can see what you wish to see some of the time, the marvels of the kingdom will be known]
Or your righteousness in the land of forgetfullness/oblivion? [No, not in Hades] [Yes, in Gehenna] (Psalm 88).

The binary question principle of the code REQUIRES both answers to be true. 

[C13a] The Question Answering Principle

Any question asked in a bible account is answered somewhere in that account - somehow - often in the very verse that asks the question!

Example 1

4 Nicodemus said to him: How can a man be born when he is old? He cannot enter into the womb of his mother a second time and be born, can he? (John 3)

That is how one is born again non adamically. We become the child we would have been if Adam and Eve had not sinned. In other words we become the child that would have been born to the non adamic versions of our parents. So we effectively enter into the womb of our mother a second time, after she has been gene zapped. Essentially every cell in your body goes back to the womb and is gene zapped and reborn as the non adamic version of yourself. 

Example 2

For how long will your people refuse to keep my laws?

28 Consequently Jehovah said to Moses: How long must you people refuse to keep my commandments and my laws?
29 Mark the fact that Jehovah has given you the Sabbath (Exodus 16)

Doh! We refuse to keep his commandments until the Kingdom of God which is the great Sabbath after the 6,000 year working week.

Example 3

19 But the [one] said to them in-response: Oh faithless generation, how long must I continue with you? How long must I put up with you? [the account will answer this question] Bring him to me (Mark 9).

The sentence count of everything that befell the son possessed by the epileptic demon of 50x gives the number of years that Jesus had to put up with that generation from 29Tishri10, his baptism by John, to 79Tishri14, the end of the first presence. It also proves that his first presence lasts less than a generation! - For more see U702.

Example 4

15321 Then Elijah approached/drew near towards all the people [1x+1x=2x. By having his 4EC baptism stolen on 2002Elul16. So that Laodiceans became his sons] and said: How long will ye [3x] be limping/passing over [1x] upon 2 different opinions [2x] [The Question Answering Principle of the code means that this question will be answered by this account] [literally passing over upon 2 branches]? If Jehovah is the [true] God [1x], [in your opinion then] walk [ye] after/behind him [1x+3x=-4x]; AND if Baal is [1x], [in your opinion then] walk [ye] after/behind him [1x+3x=4x. Some chose Baal others choose Jehovah. So these two choices add]. And the people [singular] not they-answered [3x] [plural] namely him word (1Kings18).  

Verse 21 from the question: 3x.3x+1x+3x+1x AND 1x+3x+1x +3x = 9x+5x+5x+3x = 22x from 2007Nisan14 to 2029Iyyar14, the end of FRCs having divided opinions, the rapture of the last FRCs, the 6th crop of Revelation22.

The question and answer themselves about passing over upon 2 different opinions count as 22x from 2007Nisan14/Iyyar14 first Passover of the contest of 1Kings18 to 2029Nisan14/Iyyar14, the last Passover of divided opinion for Laodiceans and for all FRCs dwelling on the earth, who finally decide that Jehovah is in fact the true God not Baal (high status human leaders). 

22 And Elijah said to the people [singular]: I myself have been left [as a] prophet to/for Jehovah, to/for myself alone [left over from those killed and as a prophet = 1x+1x+1x = 3x], and the prophets of Baal are 450 men [450x]. (1Kings 18)

There are 11x 450 days from 1992Elul11 when the first letter to the Society arrived arrived in Brooklyn (and Elijah4 began to be ignored and left alone as a prophet of Jehovah) and the first prediction date of 2006Sivan11. 

23 And let them [450x] give us [2x: Elijah + Attendant] 2 young bulls [2x.2x: 450 people give 2 bulls to 2 people], and let them choose for themselves one young bull [2x: 1 out of 2] and cut him up/divide him [2x: divide the other bull. Actually the Bull stands for prophetic endurance. This is a prophetic tenacity contest] [This verse kind of has the form of a time, times and a divided time as in Daniel12] and they will put [it, the pieces as a group][1x: it. the divided bull meat, rather than the other bull] upon the woods [3x], but they should not put fire [1x: not said to be to the woods or to the bull pieces, so to the whole sacrifice]. And I myself shall dress the other young bull [1x+1x=2x], and I must place it upon the woods [2x+3x = 5x], but I shall not put fire [to it] [2x].  
24  And ye [This must be the prophets of Baal not the people who are spectators not contestants] must call in the name of your [plural] God [450x], and I [0x/1x], I shall call in the name of Jehovah [1x]; and it must occur that the God that answers in fire is the [true] God [1x] 

And all the people [singular] [1x. The whole people] answered and [they] said [3x]: The word is good [1x] (1Kings18). 

Count the contest predicaments and actions from verses 22-24. 
Verse22: 3x (Elijah)+450x = 450x+3x
Verse23: 450x.2x.2x+450x.(2x+2x+1x+3x+1x)+3x.2x+3x.5x+3x.2x (Elijah) = 450x.13x+27x
Verse24: 450x + 3x (Elijah) +1x (God) + 1x (all of the people) + 3x.1x (people) = 450x + 8x
Total = 450x.15x +38x = 18 years 9 months and 38 days  = 6788 days.
From 2005Sivan14 (when Elijah4 is left alone as a prophet of Jehovah) to 2024Nisan22, when God answered Elijah4 with the 501st prediction of the 2nd and 3rd fire signs153.

[C13b] Multiple Options/Outcomes Principle

Any account which contains multiple options or outcomes has all the options or outcomes fulfilled in the greater meanings which were not fulfilled in the literal meanings.

For example in 1Kings18 the contest between Jehovah and Baal is who can answer with fire? In the literal account Jehovah sends it. In the greater meaning Baal sends it and God predicts when.

24 And you must call upon the name of your God, and I, for my part, shall call upon the name of Jehovah; and it must occur that the God that answers by fire is the [true] God. To this all the people answered and said: The thing is good. (1 Kings 18 NWT)

Elijah prayed for God to answer me, answer me, not for God to burn my bull, bur n my bull! So God answers Elijah4 with the correct prediction date, but Baal sends the fire of the terrorist attack.

10 Go, and you must speak to David, saying, 'This is what Jehovah has said: There are 3 things that I am directing against you. Choose for yourself one of them, that I may do it to you.'
11 Accordingly Gad went in to David and said to him: This is what Jehovah has said, 'Take your pick.
12 whether for 3 years there is to be a famine; or for 3 months there is to be a sweeping away from before your adversaries and for the sword of your enemies to overtake [you], or for 3 days there is to be the sword of Jehovah, even pestilence, in the land, with Jehovah's angel bringing ruin in all the territory of Israel.' And now see what I should reply to the One sending me. (1 Chronicles 21 NWT).

David got the plague. The other two options are fulfilled in greater meanings. Because every particle of every letter of the law will be fulfilled.

8 Again the Devil took him along to an unusually high mountain, and showed him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory,
9 and he said to him: All these things I will give you if you fall down and do an act of worship to me.
10 Then Jesus said to him: Go away, Satan! For it is written, 'It is Jehovah your God you must worship, and it is to him alone you must render sacred service.' (Matthew 4 NWT)

Jesus refused to do an act of worship to Satan. He was the one who leased those kingdoms to Satan in the first place! But someone has to fail that test, since failure was an option and all scriptural options are fulfilled. Well it was the Watchtower who failed that test. They put the throne of Satan into the temple of Jehovah by committing the Watchtower to obey the regulations of the United Nations in order to become an NGO affiliated to the UN Department of Information. They did that in order to gain all the kingdoms of the world - for evangelising to and for running a branch of the Watchtower from.

Likewise with the other tests. If you are a son of God hurl yourself down from the extremity of the Watchtower. The saints will have to do that. And tell these stones to become loaves. Yes, all the stones of the Zoar temple must become loaves just like the 5 presidents of the Watchtower, the 5 loaves of the feeding of the 5,000. They must all start baking decoded food in their kitchens of personal and of group research.

Aaron's Budding Flowering and Nut Ripening Rod  

2 Speak to the sons of Israel and take from them one rod for each paternal house from all their chieftains, by the house of their fathers, 12 rods. You will write the name of each one upon his rod.
3 And Aaron's name you will write upon Levi's rod, because there is one rod for the head of the house of their fathers.
4 And you must deposit them in the tent of meeting before the Testimony, where I regularly present myself to you.
5 And what must occur is that the man whom I shall choose, his rod will bud, and I shall certainly make subside from against me the murmurings of the sons of Israel, which they are murmuring against you.
6 So Moses spoke to the sons of Israel, and all their chieftains went giving him a rod for each chieftain, a rod for each chieftain, by the house of their fathers, 12 rods; and Aaron's rod was in among their rods.
7 Then Moses deposited the rods before Jehovah in the tent of the Testimony.
8 And it came about the next day that when Moses went into the tent of the Testimony, look! Aaron's rod for the house of Levi had budded, and it was bringing forth buds and blossoming flowers and was bearing ripe almonds.
9 Moses then brought out all the rods from before Jehovah to all the sons of Israel, and they went looking and taking each man his own rod. (Numbers 17 NWT)

So God chose one out of the 12 rods. But in the greater meaning all 12 rods will bud and blossom and ripen nuts. The other 11 were rejected in the literal account and so are accepted in the greater meaning. All 12 tribes of Zoar will be priestly and all 12 tribes will be kingly. There will be no exclusivity of either priesthood or kingship to any one tribe. There will be no greater tribe of Levi or of Judah. The almond is edible food but it takes effort to eat it. So these 12 greater priesthoods will produce edible spiritual food. But the food will be tough to chew. It will require effort to absorb it. The almond represents food that is hard to ingest.

[C14] Reader Questions from the Holy Spirit

These are questions that are asked of various characters in the bible, but that are really meant for the various readers of the bible. These are questions asked by the holy spirit of the bible reader:

Any reader question asked in a bible account is answered by that account due to the Question Answering Principle

8 ...You with little faith. 
9 Do you not yet see the point, or do you not remember the five loaves in the case of the five thousand and how many baskets you took up?
10 Or the seven loaves in the case of the four thousand and how many provision baskets you took up? (Matthew 16)

Yes, the bible reader says to himself, how stupid and blind the apostles were, doh! Did they ever get the point at first? Fine, condemn them if you will. But was this account recorded for the benefit of the characters in it or was it recorded for the Christians who would read it after the book was written? Who is Jesus really speaking to here? Not just his disciples in the boat who forgot to bring along the loaves, the bible wasn't written for them. 

So tell us please oh ye reader with much faith, much more than the disciples: Do you know what the significance of the 12 baskets is in the case of the 5,000 and the 7 baskets in the case of the 4,000? What do they stand for?

If you do not know, then Jesus is talking to you. He is saying look, these numbers are important. He is saying, if you want to understand the greater meaning of these two feeding miracles, which obviously relate to spiritual feeding miracles of true religions, then think first about the numbers of the provision baskets. Think about how many there were. That is the key.  

To interpret this we apply the Numerical Principle to the baskets. Jesus is basically asking the reader if he has grasped the Numerical Principle! The meaning of numbers of things in the bible! So the 12 baskets are 12 days or 12 months or 12 years or administrations of food which does not come directly from Jesus, but comes as leftovers. Likewise the 7 baskets are 7 days or 7 months or 7 years or administrations of food not directly from Jesus but from leftovers. For a clue consider the interpretation that Joseph made of the 3 baskets of bread upon the bakers head, an interpretation which he ascribed to God...

18 Then Joseph answered and said: This is its interpretation: The 3 baskets are 3 days. (Genesis 40 NWT)

Then consider God's words to Moses and Aaron in the wilderness after the spying report.

34 By the number of the days that you spied out the land, 40 days, a day for a year, a day for a year, you will answer for your errors 40 years, as you must know what my being estranged means. (Numbers 14 NWT)

Then consider Ester 9:22

22 according to the days on which the Jews had rested from their enemies and the month that was changed for them from grief to rejoicing and from mourning to a good day, to hold them as days of banqueting and rejoicing and sending of portions to one another and of gifts to the poor people. (Esther 9 NWT).

So a basket can be a day, a month or a year. For the whole story as far as we presently see it please - see [67]

42 And they began saying: Is this not Jesus the son of Joseph, whose father and mother we know? How is it that now he says: I have come down from heaven ? (John 6).

Well, how is it?? The Holy Spirit wishes you to think about this, and to ask yourself the very same question. Consider please the scripture below: 

23 From the offspring of this [man] according to his promise God has brought to Israel a saviour, Jesus
24 after John, in advance of the entry of that one, had preached publicly to all the people of Israel baptism of repentance (Acts 13).

This means that John the baptist preached publicly in advance of the entry, the coming down from heaven of an angel, God's firstborn and only begotten son, the angel Michael, into the human Jesus. Angelically possessing him at his baptism.

22 And the holy spirit in bodily form as a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you (Luke 3).

Q: What vehicle for a son of God is corporeally like a dove?
A: An angel.

32 John also bore witness, saying: I viewed the spirit coming down as a dove out of heaven, and it remained upon him (John 1).

Jesus was not called 'God’s son the beloved' until after the dove had descended from heaven. This dove symbolised the entrance of the angel Michael into Jesus.

6 But the righteousness resulting from faith speaks in this manner: Do not say in your heart: Who will ascend into heaven? that is, to bring Christ down. 
7 Or: Who will descend into the abyss? that is, to bring Christ up from the dead (Romans 10)

The answer to both is Gabriel who angelically possessed John the Baptist for the purpose of presiding over the entrance of Michael into Jesus at his baptism. We are getting a bit deep here. For the full story see - Jesus was Michael, and John was Gabriel.

6 For who in the skies can be compared to Jehovah? Who can resemble Jehovah among the sons of God? [Michael means: Who is like God? And the answer is... Michael, who became a God to be worshipped on 33Sivan5. This must have happened on Pentecost for that is the festival of divinity. A Jubilee with gifts of the spirit, a release from the restriction of the angelic body for Michael] (Psalm 89).

48 What able-bodied man is there alive who will not see death? [Enoch, Immanuel etc] Can he provide escape for his soul from the hand of Sheol? [literally No, Gabriel resurrected Michael to God as an angel] [Yes, Jesus resurrected his wife] Selah [means musical pause, literally lift up - your attention from the music] (Psalm 89).

A Rather More Simple Reader Question from the Holy Spirit

26 For what benefit will it be to a man if he gains the whole world but forfeits his soul? or what will a man give in exchange for his soul? (Matthew 16)

Jesus asked this question of his disciples, but quite obviously he is asking it of every man and woman who can read. This will be fulfilled when the Mark of the Beast is enforced. Because that enforcement gives us the choice between gaining the whole world (economic inclusion) and losing our soul in Hell during the Kingdom of God (unless we reconsider at a later date during the 6 months of the test), or losing the whole world (economic exclusion) and gaining our soul for the Kingdom of God.

[C15] The Parallel Account and Subaccount Principle - Spot the Difference

We combine all the parallel accounts of the same literal events to make one overall account which is one whole cake, with each individual parallel account being a distinct non overlapping slice of that cake in each thread. Being one cake, the parallel accounts share the same symbolic meanings in all threads that they each have.

Since all the parallel accounts are combined into one account, the literal and event symbolic meanings are common, and the word symbolic meanings of each noun apply to the combined account. If a scene in the combined account does not have a thread which another scene does have, then that scene is omitted from that thread.

If any scene has a successive designation or a successive description, then this prophetic form only affects the particular scene that it is in, not the entire account, unless it is only a one scene account.

The countable noun count for the Repetition Principle is the global total for the entire account (because symbolism is account wide). So if a countable noun is repeated a total of 3 times in all of the parallel accounts in a combined account wherein each parallel account has 3 threads in total (i.e. one literal/event thread and two word symbolic threads), then the noun takes 3 different symbolic meanings in these threads.

Parallel Parables do not have to have been recited at the same time or in the same place or to the same audience. These things are irrelevant to a parable. Identical parables are parallel parables. Not sure how identical they have to be to be parallel.

For examples of sets of parallel accounts with differing number of threads - see the parallel accounts of Bartimaeus, one of the two the blind persons cured on the road to/from Jericho [49] - this set of accounts we do not understand! See also the signs of the times in Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21 - this set of accounts we do understand from a code standpoint.

Pre-packaged Parallel/Series Subaccounts: Combined parallel accounts are just a special case of multi scene accounts, such as Daniel 4 and Genesis 41. These two have dreams and recitals of dreams, which are both describing the same thing. So the dream and the recital are two parallel subaccounts of these accounts - actually two series subaccounts to be precise. So they share the same symbolism in all threads (literal/event and word) and their countable noun counts add. These cases, since they are created by God himself tell us what to do with parallel accounts in general and with parallel accounts which have differing numbers of threads in particular. One simply uses the threads that are there.

In the 4 Gospels, in Kings & Chronicles, in Ezra and Nehemiah, there are parallel accounts of the same events. For example the feeding of the 5,000 is mentioned 4 times, once in each Gospel! Matthew is parallel to Mark and Luke is parallel to John - see U67. The thing to do with these accounts, using the Power Principle, is to play 'spot the difference'. Because any differences are not mistakes, or omissions wherein God overlooked something, and thought he had better put an account in Mark just in case Matthew made a bit of a mess of it. They are deliberate. 

For an example of how this works see - U63 or U34 'The Faithful Slaves', or U32, U71, U75.

[C16] The Omission Principle

If an account describes sets up two events and goes on to describe what happens in the first event but omits to describe what happens in the second (and any parallel account omits to describe it), then the second event is resolved in the Word symbolic meaning.

This is essentially a special case of the multiple Options/Outcomes Principle: Any account which contains multiple options or outcomes has all the options or outcomes fulfilled in the greater meanings which were not fulfilled in the literal meanings.

28 Samson now called to Jehovah and said: Sovereign Lord Jehovah, remember me, please, and strengthen me, please, just this once, Oh you the [true] God, and let me avenge myself upon the Philistines with vengeance for one of my two eyes (Judges 16).

Fine! But what about the other eye!

6 So David said: Anyone striking the Jebusites first, he will become head and prince. And Joab the son of Zeruiah got to go up first, and he came to be head (1 Chronicles 11).

Fine! But why didn’t he become the prince?

19 Next he commanded the crowd to recline on the grass and took the 5 loaves and 2 fishes, and, looking up to heaven, he said a blessing, and, after breaking the loaves, he distributed them to the disciples, the disciples in turn to the crowds. 20 So all ate and were satisfied, and they took up the surplus of fragments 12 baskets full (Matthew 14).

Great, wonderful, miraculous, but what did he do with the 2 fishes?? They are stated as being eaten in the parallel account in Mark 6. So in this case we cannot deduce that the 2 fishes were eaten in the Word Symbolic meaning of Matthew 14.

27 He is rescuing and delivering and performing signs and wonders in the heavens and on the earth [Joel2, Acts2, the first birth pang, the first sign, but this account has only an earthly sign, so in the word symbolic fulfilment there we get a heavenly sign! ] for he has rescued Daniel from the paw of the lions (Daniel 6).

7 All the high officials of the kingdom, the prefects and the satraps, the high royal officers and the governors, have taken counsel together to establish a royal statute and to enforce an interdict, that whoever makes a petition to any God or man for 30 days except in you, Oh king, should be thrown to the lions' pit (Daniel 6).

The account then goes on to describe in great detail the story of the interdict, but says nothing about the royal statute.

[C17] Helpful Tips

  1. Get an electronic bible, preferably Bible Linguistics from www.biblelinguistics.co.uk. With this you can type in say: 'Holy spirit' and find every scripture mentioning it. This sort of capability is invaluable in bible research. You can download other electronic bibles from the web, but the translations may not be accurate enough. If you do not like computers, then you will need a comprehensive concordance and a New World Translation Bible, and a Greek Interlinear bible and a Hebrew Interlinear bible - see [books] We hope to have our paper bible available soon.

  2. When decoding an account, do not try to squeeze a symbolic meaning into a fulfilment which you already understand. Even if you succeed you will have learned nothing new. We have made this mistake hundreds of times. Many religions know of no other way. To the Watchtower almost every time period in the second presence starts or ends in 1914, and whenever there are two groups in the bible, then one is the anointed remnant and the other is the great crowd. Do not be like this. Let the account lead you, this is letting the holy spirit lead you! Set your mind free. Accept any crazy interpretation in the creative phase and criticise it later - this is classic brainstorming technique.

  3. ‘Look!’ This is a word that occurs 958 times in the NWT of the bible. When it occurs, treat it as a exhortation from the holy spirit itself to you. For that is what it is!

  4. ‘A man, a householder’. ‘An enemy, a man’. This is wonderful and cryptic and disguised. It is a double designation and one of the two greater meanings refers to an angel. It is saying look there are two guys and one is a man. Which is really saying, the other is an angel.

  5. ‘Gather together’. ‘Assemble’. These words when they occur are often a cryptic request from the spirit to add up all of those who are gathered together or assembled. The spirit is saying that their sum stands for something.

  6. Distinguish between event symbolism and account symbolism. Event symbolism is the symbolism that Charles Russell and the second Adventists used on Daniel 4. They use the elements of the events themselves as symbolising elements in the greater meaning. But account symbolism, uses the elements of the account of the events to symbolise elements in the greater meaning. So a king who is referred to as Nebuchadnezzar, as King Nebuchadnezzar, and as the King, can stand for two different people separately and together, i.e. three different people/groups of people in the account symbolism but only for one person in the event symbolism.

  7. Distinguish between a further symbolic meaning and a further fulfilment. A further symbolic meaning is effectively a whole new account, a further fulfilment is a further instance of an existing account.

  8. If something happens at a certain hour, then there are a day associated with that hour which is either 12x or 24x as long as the hour (depending upon whether it is a daylight day or a calendar day).

9 Jesus answered: There are twelve hours of daylight, are there not? If anyone walks in daylight he does not bump against anything, because he sees the light of this world (John 11).

[C18] The Symbolic meaning of 7

If there are ' 7 things' in a bible account, then these things are successive in time in all event symbolic and word symbolic meanings.

Counting time in sevens was God's idea, he invented the week as recorded in Genesis 1. The 7 creative days of the creative week are the first thing in the bible (these are not literal 24 hour days because, for one thing, there was no earth on the first 'day'!) It is not a natural thing for man, who counts in base ten, or in dozens, to count time in sevens. God instigated this 'base' for counting time.

Time is what he counts in sevens, with a release after 7 times, counting to 7 exclusively or after 6 times counting 7 inclusively this being the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a concept which relates always to time. In the Hebrew language, the word for 'seven' and the word for 'Sabbath' are from the same root. Therefore the very language of God's people was and is declaring that 7 has to do with time. The concept that 7 relates to 7 things occurring one after the other with a release after or during the 7th one (depending on whether we count inclusively or exclusively), is enshrined in the language of the Old Testament.

But we fear that we have not laboured this seemingly trivial point enough. The Watchtower Society has 7 standing for 'divine completeness', but they miss the sense in which this completeness occurs, which is the temporal sense. It is a completeness in time, with the 7 repetitions occurring one after the other, consecutively, successively. For example, Daniel 9 literally says:

24 Seventy sevens, he is decreed for people of you and for city of holiness of you
25 From issuing of decree to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until anointed one, ruler, sevens seven, and sevens sixty-two (Daniel 9 - NIVHEOT).

It is implicit, it is understood that these sevens refer to time, and are therefore consecutive. It does not have to be spelt out. Similarly in the definition of the Jubilee, we see:

8 And you must count for yourself seven Sabbaths of years, seven times seven years, and the days of the seven Sabbaths of years must amount to forty-nine years for you (Leviticus 25).

A 'Sabbath' of years is here defined as 7 years. The holy spirit is actually equating, identifying 7 with the Sabbath. The Sabbath is a function of time, therefore the holy spirit is declaring 7 to be also a function of time, as regards its scriptural symbolism or significance.

So since Tuesday happens entirely after Monday, and since these two days have never coincided or even overlapped a little, and likewise for the whole week, the whole 7, the whole sabbath of days, we can deduce that 7 things means 7 successive things in scripture. For an example of the symbolism of 7: see [37].

[C19] Elementary Sentence Counting and Cryptic Scriptures

We have so far discovered three dimensions of the holy book. The literal dimension, the event symbolic dimension and the word symbolic dimension. But there is a fourth.

There is a numerical count defined on certain phrases in the bible. This count only works in the Hebrew and the Greek. It is not the count of Eli Rips or Michael Drosnin or other equidistant Hebrew letter sequence researchers, which can be found at www.biblecodes.com. This count is a part of the 4th dimension of the bible.

The 4th dimension, is a cryptic dimension, it is not a symbolic dimension. For the scriptures do have a cryptic side, a newspaper crossword type side. This dimension appears to take the form of a series of discrete cryptic insights rather than a meaning or value for every word in every account as the other three dimensions give.

Now if you can see all four of these dimensions of the holy book then you are seeing the bible in colour rather than in black and white. For in our physical eyes, which God himself designed as a prophetic declaration of our spiritual vision (for everything the Jehovah does or declares is a prophetic declaration since as he is living all of his words and works are likewise living) we have cones, which see sharply in black and white, and we have rods, three types, which see slightly less sharply in colour. Is it red, green and blue? All of this structure is prefiguring the structure of the way in which we will see the bible, for the bible is a 4 dimensional book. The first dimension is the literal dimension and this corresponds to our cones, the ones that see in black and white, very sharply, unambiguously. The next three dimensions are the symbolic, the cryptic and the coded numeric dimensions, the red, the green and the blue rods. It is a beautiful book in glorious Technicolour. It is like Paul said:

18 In order that you may be thoroughly able to grasp mentally with all the holy ones what is the breadth and length and height and depth
19 and to know the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge (Ephesians 3).

4 dimensions. For Einstein discovered that the 3 dimensions of space are related to the 4th dimension of time via the Lorenz transformation. This results from the fact that the speed of light is a constant to all observers whether the light source is driving forwards in his Ford Escort with his halogens relative to the observer or orbiting backwards in his space shuttle with his laser beam. But the constancy of the spiritual source of light, the bible, which rather than emitting light at a constant speed independent of its relative motion, is a constant source, independent of time, emitting light at different speeds, is also manifested in 4 dimensions and these are:

For the same God made both types of light. The bible is a very fractal book, since it is pattern upon pattern, and yet man only discovered fractals in the last 20 years. Now Crick and Watson discovered slightly before the discovery of fractals, the molecular structure of the code of life, our genetic code, a 4 base code, written in terms of:

Furthermore, we see optically via rods and cones. Rods see in 3 colours,  Red Green and Blue, and Cones see more sharply but in black and white. So the 4 dimensions of our vision are...

Then we have the 4 fundamental forces which define interactions between light and matter in the visible universe. These are..,

The strong nuclear force is of a very different type to the weak nuclear force. It is not merely a stronger version of the weaker force. So we have 4 dimensions of space-time, 4 dimensions of human vision, and 4 bases of our genetic code & the 4 walls of the super temple of all Christianity with the 4 cornerstones but only one foundation stone, and we have the 4 living creatures in heaven: Courage, Power, Love and Wisdom (Ezekiel 1, Revelation 4), we have the 4 Horsemen of the apocalypse. Now perhaps the reader will see what truly is the breadth, the length, the height and the depth, the 4 dimensions, of the bible code.

Perhaps he will realise that the works of Einstein discovering the structure of the universe, and Crick and Watson, discovering the structure of the human body, prophetically establish that there will be a further spiritual equivalent among God's covenanted people, who will discover the linguistic structure of the bible code, the word of God. 

For if Crick and Watson have been allowed to see the physical code of life, then we have been allowed to see the spiritual code of life. And it is the same God, Jehovah, who has made both of these codes, through his son. And his prophet, the now angelic apostle Paul, the one who has declared the 4 bases of the bible, has also declared this order of revealing, by saying:

46 The first is, not that which is spiritual, but that which is physical, afterward that which is spiritual (1 Corinthians 15).

It would appear that 4 stands for fundamental structure in the bible, just as 7 stands for temporal succession.

Why is the sun 400 times bigger than the moon when it is 400 times further away from the earth than the moon. What a coincidence! How come these two completely unrelated bodies exactly fit over each other in a solar eclipse?

You will not find the answer in the department of astrophysics. You will find it in the book of Isaiah.

21 Do you people not know? Do you not hear? Has it not been told to you from the outset? Have you not applied understanding from the foundations of the earth?
22 There is one who is dwelling above the circle of the earth, the dwellers in which are as grasshoppers, the one who is stretching out the heavens just as a fine gauze, who spreads them out like a tent in which to dwell (Isaiah 40).

26 Raise your eyes high up and see. Who has created these things? It is the one who is bringing forth the army of them even by number, all of whom he calls even by name. Due to the abundance of dynamic energy, he also being vigorous in power, not one [of them] is missing (Isaiah 40).

But do not think that we wish to condemn astrophysics, on the contrary we wish to save it. In order to understand the universe one needs first to understand that it was God who set the speed of light at 3 x 108 metres/sec. He set it at this value before Adam was born, 4027Tishri10 BC, to stop us screwing up the universe until we had learned how to behave.

At some time before Adam was born, light travelled a lot faster as we have mentioned above. The universe has not been around for billions of years at all. The speed of light was reset by God as a cage for men. 

Just because it takes one constant value today does not mean that it has always taken this constant value, once you admit that there may be a God. But physics does not admit this. Until it does, it will never discover the truth about the universe. However if you can find it in your heart to believe that it was God who set the speed of light, rather than random chance, then please go to section U234, the Munrose Hypothesis, where we deduce the date of the Big Bang as being 147,327Chislev14 BC in real years (taking into account the changes in the speed of light for ech creative day) which was 23,454,562,478 BC in apparent time (assuming the speed of light has never changed), and find out what the initial value of the speed of light was during the Big Bang itself (it was not c= 300,000 km/s ! it was 360,000c) from Genesis 1. 

And another thing! What do you think God could be symbolising by having the whole universe held together by gravity, a universal unquestioning attractive force? Where would the universe be without gravity? The same place the world would be without love. And that is where we are going right now!

And another thing, seeing as our scientific and technological advancement has been so rapid in the last few thousand years, how come our art is now worse than that of the cave man??

So returning to the count on the bible:

25 And they will be given into his hand for a time, times and half a time (Daniel 7).

7 It will be for an appointed time, appointed times and a half (Daniel 12).

14 There is where she is fed for a time, times and half a time (Revelation 12).

We can do no better here than to quote Gordon's first letter to the Watchtower Society, that they actually received, to describe the meaning of this strange way of saying: 3½. If the man on the Clapham omnibus is asked: What is half of seven? he replies: It is three and a half. He does not reply: It is one plus ones plus a half of one. It is therefore manifestly apparent that the true God, who is most certainly able to do anything that the man on the Clapham omnibus is able to do, having created that man, is saying a lot more than ‘Three and a half times’, when he says: A time, times and half a time. Hopefully the man on the Clapham omnibus will one day know what this greater meaning of this central expression in the bible really is - see U152.

5 And she gave birth to a son, a male, who is to shepherd all the nations with an iron rod. And her child was caught away to God and to his throne.
6 And the woman fled into the wilderness, where she has a place prepared by God, that they should feed her there 1,260 days.
|
14 And the 2 wings of the great eagle were given the woman, that she might fly into the wilderness to her place; there is where she is fed for a time and times and half a time away from the face of the serpent.
15 And the serpent disgorged water like a river from its mouth after the woman, to cause her to be drowned by the river. (Revelation 12 NWT)

In the event symbolic meaning the times times and half a time of feeding in the wilderness of verse 14 is the 1260 days of verse 6. So a time times and half a time is 3½ times. So 'times' is 2 times or 720 days.

So this particular plural counts as a double, in this equation. Therefore, one of the things that is certainly being said is that plurals count as two times in Greek, since the word 'times' is interpreted as 720 days in the above scriptures. In this context singulars count as one time and halves count as half a time. However in the word symbolic meaning the plural could be any number greater than or equal to 2. - see U165.

The reason a Greek plural (without any further specification) counts as 2x is, that it must stand for at least 2 items. 
A Hebrew plural (without any further specification) counts as 3x because Hebrew has the dual number for 2x. 

List and Comparison Counts

So here it is, the history book with no dates. For as we all know Sir Winston was an order of magnitude more precise in his history of the English speaking people, than was his God and father in his history of the Hebrew speaking people.

Yes. We can all see the deficiency in God's work. Because we have better vision than he does. Next time he writes something he should take a few lessons from us before inspiring his prophets to put pen to paper. Indeed in every scripture on every page of the bible God is asking the reader the question: Do you think I am an idiot? And thee answer that we all give him is. YES. If only you had consulted with me before you wroteGenesis1 I would have told you to put the length of each creative day in that chapter. If only you had consulted with me before you wrote the 2nd book of Samuel! I would have reminded you to put the date of David's first regnal year in the account. If you you had sought my advice before inspiring Luke to write his Gospel. I would have reminded you to put the date of Jesus' birth in the account. Dear oh dear. All this ignorance for so many years could have been avoided with a few short conversations with your truly one imagines

Except that Daniel pipes up and says: No wicked shall understand (Daniel 12). How would that be fulfilled if everything was presented literally? The disciples asked Jesus why he spoke to the crowds only in illustrations.

10 So the disciples came up and said to him: Why is it you speak to them by the use of illustrations?
11 In reply he said: To you it is granted to understand the sacred secrets of the kingdom of the heavens, but to those people it is not granted.
12 For whoever has, more will be given him and he will be made to abound; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken from him.
13 This is why I speak to them by the use of illustrations, because, looking, they look in vain, and hearing, they hear in vain, neither do they get the sense of it;
14 and toward them the prophecy of Isaiah is having fulfilment, which says, 'By hearing, you will hear but by no means get the sense of it; and, looking, you will look but by no means see.
15 For the heart of this people has grown unreceptive, and with their ears they have heard without response, and they have shut their eyes; that they might never see with their eyes and hear with their ears and get the sense of it with their hearts and turn back, and I heal them.'
16 However, happy are your eyes because they behold, and your ears because they hear. (Matthew 13 NWT)

Likewise the chronology of salvation and of all bible event is not presented literally. It is presented as an illustration which we have to decode. In this way God can selectively reveal salvational, doctrinal and chronological truths only to those whose heart is responsive and not to those whose heart is antagonistic. So put on your Sherlock Homes deerstalker hat and your miss Marple reading glasses and let's go see how responsive our hearts really are...

25 and they will be given into his hand [metaphorical] for a time, and times and half a time (Daniel 7)

7 It will be for an appointed time, appointed times and a half (Daniel 12)

14 there is where she is fed for a time and times and half a time away from the face of the serpent (Revelation 12).

The 3 scriptures above are actually the definition of how to count a scriptural list. 

If we now apply the Consistency Principle to this, then what this crazy phraseology is saying is not that 3.5 times is being expressed as a singular time, a plural time and a half time, but that everything in the bible can be expressed as a singular time a plural time or a half time - if a sentence count is triggered.

For Solomon has said:

1 For everything there is an appointed time, even a time for every affair under the heavens (Ecclesiastes 3).

This is a repetition. So yes there is an appointed time for everything, but applying the Repetition Principle there is also another meaning to this scripture, a further fulfilment. This is that there is a time count on every sentence in the bible. 

Ecclesiastes 3: Solomon says there is a Time for Everything

1 To/For the all/every/any an appointed time [1x for the length of the entire human experience +1x for the time], and a time for any/every desire under the heavens [3x.(1x+3x+1x) = 15x]:
2 a time for birth and a time to die; a time to plant and a time to uproot what was planted; [4x]
3 a time to kill and a time to heal; a time to break down and a time to build; [4x]
4 a time to weep and a time to laugh; a time to wail and a time to skip about; [4x]
5 a time to throw stones away and a time to bring stones together; a time to embrace and a time to keep far away from embracing; [3x+3x+1x+1x = 8x]
6 a time to seek and a time to lose; a time to keep and a time to throw away; [4x]
7 a time to rip apart and a time to sew together; a time to keep quiet and a time to speak;[1x+2x+1x+1x=5x. We divide 1 thing we join 2 things]
8 a time to love and a time to hate; a time for war and a time for peace.[4x]  (Ecclesiastes 3 NWT)

The meaning of this scripture is that the scriptures have encoded within them the chronology for everything to which they refer.

Total = 2x+15x+4x+4x+4x+8x+4x+5x+4x = 50x. This should most definitely be 50 for the Jubilee count. 

Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 is telling us that the WHOLE DEAL takes 50 times. So the temporal length of the 4D space-time universe is 50 creative days.

David also spoke of this count under inspiration saying:

12 Show us just how to count our days in such a way as to bring a heart of wisdom in (Psalm 90).

Because days or years or months are all times, see - The Times Principle of the code. So the request is equivalent to: Show us how to count 'times'. So let’s be like the tribe of Issachar, and the wise men of Persia:

32 And of the sons of Issachar having a knowledge of how to discern the times to know what Israel ought to do, there were two hundred head ones of theirs, and all their brothers were at their orders (1 Chronicles 12)

13 And the king proceeded to say to the wise men having knowledge of the times, for in this way the king's matter [came] before all those versed in law and legal cases (Esther 1)

Jesus said to his disciples:

7 It does not belong to you to get knowledge of the times or seasons which the Father has placed in his own jurisdiction (Acts 1).

But to us, this knowledge does belong. So we can apply a count to every word in the bible, assigning it one time if it is singular, two times if it is plural and half a time, if it is a half of something. 

The philosophy of the count on each sentence is that the count is: The number of times represented by the sentence, which is the number of situations or actions in the sentence. 

Here are the list counting rules as far as we presently understand them...

1. The list must have 3 or more items in it (since all 3 lists above have 3 items in them).
2. The list may have only 2 items in it if one item is body part, such as hand 5x, foot 5x, eyes 2x, loins 2x, face 5x.
3. All items in the list count as singulars, duals, plurals, halves or fractions.
4. The result is a measure of time or a number of repetitions.

5. A body part triggers a count.
6. A number triggers a count.
7. A comparison triggers a count (such as the beast was like a Leopard)
8. A command followed by its execution triggers a count (such Joshua commanded the people to shout and the people shouted. Elijah said to all the people approach me. And all the people approached him).
9. A heading followed by further description triggers a count being a form of comparison - is the next action part of the heading or not? (such as he mocked them and said: call in a loud voice etc)
10. Look! or Behold! starts a new count!

When a count is triggered one counts the whole sentence or perhaps the whole story related to the thing that has triggered the count.

With triggered qualified counts, you count the sense of the sentence rather the precise words used. This is the opposite of word symbolism!

List types include...

Objects of one verb.
Each item has a repeated noun.
Each item has a repeated preposition

Greek singular counts 1x
Greek Plural counts 2x
pollakij (many times) counts 3x

Hebrew Singular counts 1x
Hebrew Dual counts 2x
Hebrew Plural counts 3x

The king ate the potato = 1x
The king ate the potatoes = 3x in Hebrew and 2x in Greek
The kings ate the potatoes = 3x.3x=9x in Hebrew and 2x.2x=4x in Greek.

All the earth means the whole of the earth which counts as 1x in Greek and 1x in Hebrew

All the Hebrews means all the ones of the Hebrews which is 3x in Hebrew.

The hand has 5 fingers and so counts 5 times. It means 4x-5x, 5x or less but not 4x. A stretched hand means 5x-6x, 5x or more but not 6x (Exodus 14, and Jesus betrayed into the hands of sinners being 20 years max).
A king ruling over 5 kingdoms, counts 5x since his kingdoms are effectively the fingers of his dominion.
A mouth speaking 5 languages counts 5x, since these languages are effectively the fingers of his speech.

A hand [5x] holding oranges [2x] counts as 10x
A hand [5x] holding orange [things] [2x] counts as 10x

A hand [5x] holding oranges [2x] and green [things] counts as 20x.

A hand [5x] holding oranges [2x] and lemons [2x] counts as 20x. The count is forced on the first item because 'hand' is a body part. The list is too short to be self triggering, but is triggered by the body part.

Weeping is 1x
Watering of the eyes is 2x
Gnashing of the teeth is 32x for 32 human teeth.

The King of the Jews counts 1x/3x
The God of the Hebrews counts 1x/3x
The God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob = the God of Abraham, the God of Isaaic and the God of Jacob which counts 3x.
House of Israel counts as 1x
Israel counts 1x.
tribes of Israel 12x
The sons of Israel counts 13x.

Goliath from the camp of the Philistines = 3x
Goliath from the camps of the Philistines is 3x
One out of the 7 rulers is 7x
One of the Jews (Hebrew plural not dual) is 3x (partitive genitive)
One of the synagogue rulers (Greek plural no dual) is 2x (partitive genitive)

The serpent, the original, the one called the devil and Satan = 1x.1x.2x = 2x
Another beast, [a] second [one] = 2x+2x = 4x
Another beast, [a] small [one[ = 2x+1x = 3x 

Actions in a state = State x Actions: Go into the roads and fences and bring them in is 2x.2x=4x for the state and 2x for the action. The count is 4x.2x=8x.

Lists which define a general category and then list specific items in that category are comparisons and so count. We think inclusively because all the items are included in the category.

Lists which repeat any word with each item are begging to be counted! We think these may count exclusively.

38 At that the fire of Jehovah came falling and went eating up the burnt offering and the pieces of wood and the stones and the dust, and the water that was in the trench it licked up (1Kings 18)??

We now think that the counting dimension of the code only applies to lists and to comparisons. For example...

6 And Jehovah himself had caused the camp of the Syrians to hear the sound of war chariots, the sound of horses, the sound of a great military force (2Kings7)

Counts being a list of 3 things.

Haggai, the prophet, ate 5 carrots counts 1x.1x.5x

Elijah went up [1x] and bent down [1x] and put his head between his knees [1x+2x] and said: I want to eat 7 bananas [7x] 

Counts as (1x+1x+1x+2x).7x=5x.7x=35x. Because his 7x speech is made in a state counting as 5x.

 I saw, and Look! a horse  = I saw (a vision) and Look thee (at the vision)! (In the vision there was) a horse = 1x+1x.1x = 2x

Heavens counts as 3x for a Hebrew plural sometimes and than 2x for a Hebrew dual other times (see U123

14 Behold, the heavens and the heavens of the heavens, the earth and all in it, [belong] to Jehovah your God. (Deuteronomy 10 GLT)

This perhaps means the atmosphere (the heavens) and God's home (heaven) in stellar space (the heavens)

The atmosphere, stellar space, and God's home (dark matter) would constitute 3 heavens.

Operators

A upon B = B+A
A under B = B+A
If we place 2 blocks on the top of 10 block we get 12 blocks.
If we place 2 blocks underneath the top of 10 blocks we get 12 blocks. That appears to be the required visualisation. See U165 the moon beneath her feet

A before B = B+A
A after B = B+A  (Bethzatha verse 4 requires it see U112#20 and the 6314 sentence count of 1Kings18:21-24). Before and After are just side by side comparisons.

A in B = AxB
The women in the houses in Hebrew counts 9x for 3 women in 3 houses.
The women in the houses in Greek counts 2x for 2 women in 2 houses.

A in the middle/midst of B = ½B+A+½B = A+B, a sandwich.

A until B = A then A+B = A+A+B = 2A + B IF TEMPORAL??
A until B = from A to B = to A and to B = A + B IF SPATIAL
A until B = AxB depending upon context

They (Hebrew) kept eating chips until the 7th day of the week = 3x.7x = 21x.

A as/like B = A + B

Being in state A and doing B due to that state = AxB

If A then B = not (A and not B) which counts as A + not B which counts as A + B

He took A out of B = A+B

A was flowing out of B is AxB

A forms a circle around B = B + Ax1 time.= A+B

Fred was in/inside the house = 1x
Fred was outside the house = 2x

The great dragon, the original serpent, the one called the devil and Satan = 1x.1x.2x=2x

The woman, the concubine of him, the sister of Hannah, the daughter of Jacob = 1x.1x.1x.1x=1x Designations multiply
The woman, concubine of him, sister of Hannah, daughter of Jacob = 1x+1x+1x+1x=4x: Descriptions add

A tree, height of him great, leaf of him beautiful, visibility of him to the end of the earth = 1x+1x+1x+1x = 4x.

The man had a shield = 1x+1x = 2x
The King gave the man a shield = 1x (one thing given)

tree in the land = 1x
tree in the midst of the land = 1x + ½x + ½x = 2x (perhaps)

He will be thrown into the fiery furnace = 1x
He will be thrown into the midst of the fiery furnace = 1x+½x + ½x = 2x. (perhaps)

Falling upon ones face or standing upon ones feet does add a person to the count of face or feet.

He fell upon his face = 1x+1x=2x (1Kings18:39)
He stood upon his feet = 1x+5x+5x = 11x. (Revelation11:11).

He said to the older men: Have ye seen the sun = He said: Have ye (older men) seen the sun = 3x NOT 3x.3x=9x.

Another beast (Daniel7) or Other God (Daniel3:29-30, the Dunghill Dismembering Decree Day - see U171) or another horse (Revelation6) count as 2x, like a 2nd beast or God or horse.

Sitting out of right (parts) = 1x like sitting in London. The parts are a polite plural, like faces in Hebrew.

Negation:

Elijah ate the fish = 1x
Elijah did not eat the fish = 1x

A man having 1 Shekel counts as 1x+1x - 2x
A man owing 1 Shekel counts as 1x+1x = 2x
A man not having 1 Shekel counts as 1x+1x = 2x - see U931.

Lest: Genesis19 is a counting exercise in the meaning of !Pe  Pen. in Hebrew meaning a removal

The question is does A Pen B mean A lest B which means do A or suffer B (this is Not do A or B). Or does it mean A avoids B which means do A and do not suffer B? It counts as the latter.- see U154#1

Hand: Counts a 5x for the 5 fingers.
Foot: Counts a 5x for the 5 toes.

Mouth: Counts as teeth + tongue. 
So a human mouth counts as 33x (32 teeth).
A lion's mouth counts as 31x (30 teeth)
A bear's mouth counts as 43x (42 teeth)
A dove's beak count as 1x (no teeth).

Actions and States

He gave him a potato = 1x for 1 action.
He had a potato = 1x+1x =2x for a guy and a potato.

He has a trumpet = 1x+1x =2x
He receives a trumpet = 1x
The one having received a trumpet = 1x
The one having a trumpet = 1x+1x = 2x

Count confirming scriptures

The 8 Isomorphic Happinesses of Matthew5 count as 8x, which are 8 years precisely by the 8 Isomorphic Happinesses Principle. But the sentence count of those happinesses is 96x which is 8 years in months - see U271-11#42.

The Sheep and Goats of Matthew25 count as 264x for the sheep of Verses 36-40 and 264x for the goats of verses 41-45. So it is a count confirming account - see U902.

Singular words representing plural items

The people (singular) had a feast. Then the people (singular) they (plural) went home. We use all the information we have in the account to represent unspecified numbers of items as accurately as we can. So this counts as

Greek: The people (singular) [2x] had a feast. Then the people (singular) they went home [2x].

Because we know that there are at least 2 people since 'they' went home.

Polite plurals

The Hebrew word for before/in front of him is wyn"p'l meaning to faces of him. Faces is a Hebrew plural which normally counts as 3x. But plainly this guy has only one face unless he is being triplicitous! So it counts as 1x not 3x.

Also sit out of my right [sides] is a polite way of saying sit out of my right side.
Also her masters were in the house, is a polite plural. 
These are all examples of the Royal 'we' essentially.

Jerusalem is a special case because it appears in the singular and in the plural in scripture.

2 e;stin de. evn toi/j ~Ierosolu,moij evpi. th/| probatikh/| kolumbh,qra h` evpilegome,nh ~Ebrai?sti. Bhqzaqa, pe,nte stoa.j e;cousa (John 5 WHO)

711 After these (things) was festival of the Jews, and went up Jesus into Jerusalem [Ierosoluma] [singular]. (John 5 KIT)
2 Is but in the Jerusalems [1x/2x: A polite plural? Jerusalem can be feminine singular ierosoluma or neuter plural ierosolumoi or indeclinable in Greek ierousolum. Here it is dative neuter plural ierosolumoij. Here it applies to the Jerusalem above in the ark and the Jerusalem below on the planet, the LW earthly administration and the LW ark based administrations - which is the same administration. So it is not merely a polite plural, it is an actual plural - we think. For the pool, the ark based 4EC baptism, is both above and below, in the ark and on earth] at/upon the for-sheep [gate] [1x. epi + dative - of position - in the region of] pool [1x] the [one] being said-upon/named [epilegw] [literally said upon] in Hebrew Bethzatha [house of olives - which is run by the mount of olives] [2x], 5 colonnades having [1NC, HLC, 2NC, ELC, 4EC: WITH 5x NOT OF 5x - pools do not generally have colonnades - 1NCs, HLCs, 2NCs, ELCs, 4ECs]
3 In these a multitude of the sick [ones], blind [ones], lame [ones] and withered [ones], was lying down (John 5 KIT).

WE ARE ALL DISABLED IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER EVEN THE MEMBERS OF THE 3RD HOLY SPIRIT (BUT NOT THE HOLY SPIRIT ITSELF AS A GROUP)

4 Because an angel [] according to season/appointed time [kairoV] [1x. An appointed time - of a festival? - from time to time] would come down into the pool [1x] and disturb the water [1x]. Then [oun] the first [one] [1x] to step in after disturbance of the water [1x] would become cured from which [w-|] sickness [noshma] out of all of them [dhpote - a particle of generalisation - Strongs] [2x] had seized him. [Saints come into the church first. It is first come first serve] [Vatican B does not have this verse but the Alexandrinus early Latin versions and the Syriac Peshitta have it] [This is not the MO of God. You must have faith to be cured yes. But the demons could cure too using the level playing field card. But to have cripples waiting around every day and jumping in the pool whenever a leaf fell into it, may be very funny to demons. But it is not the love of God]. [The noun count does work with it and does not work without it. The sentence count is zero. So perhaps this demonic game is canonically recorded since it tells us how saints are chosen??] (John 5 LWT).

Verse2: Pool, the one being said- upon Bethzatha, in Jerusalems, upon sheep gate having 5 colonnades is 2x.((1x+1x).(1x+1x.1x)+5x) = 2x.9x=18x. Or 2x.(1x.1x+1x+5x) = 14x OR 2x.(1x.2x+1x+5x) = 16x
Verse3:  5x.(2x+2x+2x+2x)  = 40x. 
Verse4: 1x.2x.(1x+1x) = 4x  'AFTER' MUST ADD as we have seen with the 6767 days of the sentence count of 1Kings18:21-24 - see U271-11#72.

The noun counts of Verse4 show that it is canonical - see john.html Also verse 7 requires verse4 to be canonical.

Total of verse 1-4: 14x/16x/18x+2x.5x.8x.(3x+4x) = 14x/16x/18x + 560x = 574x/576x/578x from 2024VeAdar2 to 2026Tishri5/7/9 inclusively.

From the first Isaaic 4EC baptism of an ark dweller (Caleb, the temple floor), to the end of the Isaaic 4EC for earth dwellers. The 1NCs are baptised until 2026Heshvan5. On 2022Tishri18, Elijah4 realised that it takes 7 days to install an Isaaic 4EC baptiser (to baptise transitively). So we can only baptise transitively on the 8th day of his being baptised. This creates the queuing system that Bethzatha is all about. Nobody actually goes into the pool in this account. They are all queuing up in the colonnades. 

It takes 7 days to install an Isaac 4EC baptiser, because he is unclean by his own dead adamic or Abrahamic soul upon baptism and because wives take 7 days to install before they can procreate and because males in Israel were circumcised on the 8th day, when they were registered into Israel and were clean. After 2022Tebbeth21, the email prohibiting baptism until 2022Shebat5, is when the Queuing began - VERY BRITISH! Form an orderly queue please. 

2023Elul16: The 'put the baptism on hold for the moment' email on 2023September4 at 18:00 (2023Elul16 UK 2023Elul17 Kenya) - because that is fill up the jars with water - get ready but do not pour yet!
2023Tishri13: The permission to baptise Isaaically by email on 2023October1 at 13:41 (2023Tishri13).
2023Tishri25: The Abrahamic 4EC baptism of the Masai10 (still under the LW Exedenic Times from 2017Tishri15 to 2024Tishri15).. 

The Jordan stopped when the feet of the ark carriers reached the Jordan, and the ark (the 3rd Holy Spirit) was carried across on dry ground. This is fulfilled again by baptising nobody other than 1NCs and HLCs on the 8 days of their baptism and nobody but 2NCs and ELCs of the days of their baptism. We do not baptise a saint and a sinner on the same day. Not that the saints are sin free. They are just regarded as such by God due to the efforts they have made in that regard - see U271-11#27

The end of the non adamic
abrahamic conversion of
true church Cain. All the
people have now approached
Elijah4 genetically.
2012Tammuz16
X_________________________
Abrahamic Zoar is installed over the
2NCs. Elijah4 now has authority to
take 12 2NC apostles. 12 years
precisely of 12 stones according to 12x
or 13x of tribes of sons of Jacob begin
2012Shebat21
X________________________________
3rd 1NC marriage
Passover. 3rd bride
is executed
2019Tishri14
X_________________

881 days of 1Kings18:33-35
of 4 jar filling and pouring
instruction and execution start
2024Nisan24
X_________________________
LW Isaaic
Exedenic
Times from
2016Tishri15
ends
2023Tishri15
X___________
All 12 apostles are
now taken/chosen
2NC Pentecost of
the Tebbeth1
 secular year.
2024Shebat21
X_________________
The first ark based 2NC
Caleb/AOL is baptised
as the temple floor
2024VeAdar2
X_____________________________
881 days of 4 jar filling and
pouring instruction and
execution end. 
574 days of Bethzatha end
Isaaic 4EC ends on earth
2026Tishri5
X71____________________
87 months of 1Kings18:30-33881 days of 1Kings 18:33-35 less 574 of Bethzatha574 days of 4EC in Bethzatha in
Jerusalems above & below

The 3rd Holy Spirit must surely be appointed/installed over the 2NCs before we become Caesar to the Kingdom?

The temple is built upon the foundation of the 12 apostles in 7 days of 1Kings 6:38
2NC and Zoar Pentecosts are counted in BLC days71.

Counting Examples

ACTS 1 

The Way of the Sabbath from the Mount of Olives to the Upper Room

11212 Then they returned [on 33Iyyar25] to Jerusalem from a mountain called the Mount of Olive-grove [Zoar - Bethzatha], that is near Jerusalem [the ARK], having way/road of Sabbath [from it] [way of Sabbath is 7x. Really the way of the Sabbath is the way to the Sabbath resting in the ark under Jesus as Caesar].
13 And when [ote] they had entered into the upper chamber [the ARK], they went up where they were staying, Peter as well as John and James and Andrew, Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew, James [the son] of Alphaeus and Simon the zealous one, and Judas [the son] of James 
14 all these [11x] were persevering of same-mind in the prayer, together with some women [2x] and Mary [1x] the mother of Jesus and with his brothers [2x for those interested or 4x for all of them: James Joses Simon Judas] (Acts 1 LWT)

55 Is this not the carpenter's son? Is not his mother called Mary, and his brothers James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? [Binary Question] (Matthew 13 NWT)

Verse 12: 11x+7x = 18x
Verse 13: 11x+11x.11x = 132x
Verse 14: 11x+2x+1x+4x = 18x
Verse 13-14 Total = 18x+132x+18x = 168x from 2026Sivan17, the arrival of the 1NC apostles on earth, to 2026Chislev5, when they finish taking over Zoar.

The Ark rapture, the WAY of the Sabbath is really the way TO the Sabbath of God's rest in the Ark112.

14 These all were persevering like-mindedly to the prayer together with women and Mary to the mother of the Jesus and together with the brothers of him. (Acts 1 KIT)
15 And having stood up in the midst of the brothers, Peter said - and the crowd of names upon it (the praying) was all together about 120 [?]: (Acts 1 NWT)
15 And in the days these having stood up Peter in midst of the brothers [of the Isaaic 4EC baptism] said, was and crowd of names upon the very (prayer) as 120 (Acts 1 KIT)
15 kai en taij hmeraij tautaij anastaj petroj en mesw twn adelfwn eipen hn te ocloj onomatwn epi to auto wsei ekaton eikosi (Acts 1 Sinai)
16 Men, brothers, it was necessary for the scripture to be fulfilled, which the holy spirit spoke beforehand by David's mouth about Judas, who became a guide to those who arrested Jesus, (Acts 1 NWT)

Peter stood up by 4EC baptism in the midst of the brothers who are standing by Isaaic 4EC baptism in the pool called Bethzatha

3rd Bride enters into Ark3
for the 3rd 1NC marriage
Human extraction begins
2019Tishri17
X_____________________
Peter reaches the bottom
of Jacob's ladder and spends
40 days in the wilderness
2026Sivan17-Tammuz27
X________________________
Peter stands up by
Isaaic 4ECbaptism
120 names
of Acts2 begin
2026Ab5/7
X_______________
1st to 6th row of
the 3rd Holy Spirit
is Isaaic 4EC baptised
2026Elul16/21/30
2026Tishri7/14/21/28
X__________________
7th row HLCs are
Isaaic 4EC baptised.
3rd Holy Spirit takes
over Abraham in Zoar
2026Heshvan5
X__________________
3rd Holy Spirit completes
its takeover of Zoar. It is
installed over Isaac in Zoar
120 names of Acts2 ends
2026Chislev5
X______________________
The resurrection of
sealed last chance
saloon Cain.
Human extraction ends
2033Iyyar22
X51_________________
7 years less 72 days 7 years less 73 days

On 2022Tishri18 we realised that there was a 7 day installation period after one's Isaaic 4EC baptism.
We are all disabled, even those in the 3rd Holy Spirit, waiting for the pool at Bethzatha - The Queuing Pool - Very British.  The 3rd Holy Spirit are disabled too - individually - but NOT collectively. We all are disabled individually until we become Gods. 

The day of Jehovah (Joel2 and Zephaniah 1 and Malachi4 and Amos5 and Isaiah13)

130The Great Day of Jehovah, the Fearful Day of Jehovah and the Day of Jehovah of Joel1/2/3, Zephaniah1, Malachi4, Amos5 and Isaiah13. Obadiah, Ezekiel13, Acts2, 2Thessalonians2, 2Peter3

The Fearful Day of Jehovah is 6 years of Zephaniah 1:14-16 from 2025Shebat6/7 (2026January29-31), the start of the 33¼ month ride of the 4th horseman of the apocalypse (the trigger event for the 1044 day Great Tribulation of Matthew24 and Revelation7 from 2025Shebat8 to 2028Tebbeth2) to 2031Shebat6/7: 2032January23-25. Whereas the Great Day of Jehovah is 17 years long from 2016Ab14-16, the Zoar died to Abraham and was converted to become non adamic Isaac, to 2033Iyyar14, the end of the world, the absolute end of Cain. Whereas the Day to Jehovah of Armies is 95 months of Isaiah 2:11-17 long from 2025Iyyar21, the end of the rapture of the 2Nc reserves, the pouring out of the gifts of the spirit, the elevation of God and his people, to 2033Nisan14, the 1st death Passover. Whereas the Jericho Campaign of Jesus and his 3rd Holy Spirit against the World runs for 6 whole adamic secular years from 2026Tishri1 to 2032Tishri1, then for 7 months in the 7th campaign year to 2033Nisan, then the Jericho Jubilee release is 2033Iyyar10, the last day of entry into Kingdom salvation, entry day into the late 1st death Passover.

The sad/great/epiphanaic day of Jehovah is a day of gloominess, darkness, thick cloud etc. This must result either from the US and rom Bill Gates 'solar geo-engineering' blocking out the sun in order to turn this planet into Mars or from a huge volcanic eruption which puts a worldwide ash cloud into the atmosphere. Here is the Reykjanes Peninsular Volcanic eruption 2 miles from Grindavik starting 2023December18 at 22:17 - https://en.vedur.is/about-imo/news/a-seismic-swarm-started-north-of-grindavik-last-night (2023Tebbeth2)

1 And during that time Michael will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of the sons of your people. And there will certainly occur a time of distress [2028Heshvan14 to 2029Heshvan14] such as has not been made to occur since there came to be a nation until that time. And during that time your people will escape [via the 12 crops of Revelation22], every one who is found written down in the book [of Kingdom salvation]. (Daniel 12 NWT)

5 who are being safeguarded by God's power through faith for a salvation ready to be revealed in the last appointed time [kairoj] [Peter's version of the Time of the End]. (1 Peter 1 NWT)130.

502 I shall without fail finish everything off the surface of the ground, is the utterance of Jehovah.
3 I shall finish off earthling man and beast. I shall finish off the flying creature of the heavens and the fishes of the sea, and the stumbling blocks with the wicked ones; and I will cut off mankind from the surface of the ground, is the utterance of Jehovah
|
14 The great day of Jehovah is near [1x], and it is hurrying near(er) greatly [1x]. The sound of the sad day of Jehovah is bitter [1x]. There a strong man cries-out-audibly/clearly [1x].
15 That day is a day of fury/outburst [1x]
a day of distress and anguish [2x]
a day of storm and desolation [2x]
a day of darkness and gloominess [2x]
a day of cloud and thick gloom [2x],
16 a day of shofar/trumpet and alarm/terror signal [2x], upon the inaccessible cities [3x] and upon the high corner towers [3x].
17 And I will cause distress to mankind, and they will certainly walk like blind men; because it is against Jehovah that they have sinned. And their blood will actually be poured out like dust, and their bowels like the dung.
18 Neither their silver nor their gold will be able to deliver them in the day of Jehovah's fury [which is the day of Jehovah, since according to Joel2 that day is a day of fury]; but by the fire of his zeal the whole earth will be devoured, because he will make an extermination, indeed a terrible one, of all the inhabitants of the earth [Yes, by the 'fire' of his zeal. By Passover execution and by non 1AC Adam lava flood execution and by the final failed OMC execution on 2033Nisan14/Iyyar14] (Zephaniah 1).

Israel = 1x. House of Israel = 1x. Sons of Israel = 12x. All the sons of Israel = 13x.

By the 8 Happinesses principle, to the 6 instances of "a day of ...", the deadly part of the day of Jehovah lasts for 6 years precisely, which must begin as the start of the ride of the 4th Horseman on 2025Shebat6/7 and so ends on 2031Shebat6/7, 8½ months before the end of WW3, on 2032Tishri22/23.

Verse14: 1x+1x+1x+1x = 4x of the Great Day of Jehovah being near, from 2012Sivan14-16 to 2016Ab14-16, the period Abrahamic Zoar.
Verse15: 1x+2x+2x+2x+2x = 9x
Verse16: 2x + 3x + 3x = 8x
The Great Day of Jehovah of Verse 15-16: 9x+8x = 17x from 2016Ab16, when Zoar became Isaaic, to 2033Nisan14/2033Iyyar14 the end of the world, the absolute end of Adam/Cain.

The period of proximity of the Day of Jehovah is the period of extermination by God of Adamic and Cainian LWs to become Abraham. It runs from the adamic to Abrahamic conversion of Zoar on 2012Sivan14-16, to the Abrahamic to Isaaic conversion of Zoar on 2016Ab14-16. The the Great Day of Jehovah runs for 17 years from 2016Ab14-16 to the end of the final extermination of Adam/Cain on 2033Nisan14/Iyyar14, the 1st death/late 1st death Passover, the end of entry into the 1st death, the end of non kingdom citizens being alive upon the planet, the end of the 6th recreative day. Everyone on the planet cops it during the 21 years from 2012Sivan14 to 2033Iyyar14, in one way or another.

Those who enter Zoar cop it by death to Adam/Cain and a sleeping/Hades free or Hades resurrection to non adamic Abraham. So the FRCs (those with faith), the LRCs (those with love) and the double failures (those without love or faith) all die during the day of Jehovah. There is no escape. The 21 years period of God killing humans from 2012Sivan14 to 2033Iyyar14 is also referred to in Isaiah13.

4 The noise of a multitude in the mountains, as of a great people! A noise of tumult of the kingdoms of nations gathered together; Jehovah of Hosts is calling up an army for the battle.  (GLT)
5 They come from a distant land, from the end of the heavens, Jehovah and the weapons of His wrath, to destroy all the earth. (GLT adapted)
6 Howl, you people, for the day of Jehovah is near! As a despoiling from the Almighty it will come. (NWT)
7 Due to this all hands themselves will drop down [20x], and the whole heart itself of mortal man will melt [1x]. (Isaiah 13 NWT adapted)

So the period of the proximity of the Day of Jehovah counts as 20x+1x = 21x from 2012Sivan14-16 to 2033Nisan14.Iyyar14, the period during which God kills (by non adamic baptism or by lava flood absolutely everyone whom Satan does not kill. But the Great Day of Jehovah does not begin until 2016Ab14-16 and the Day of Jehovah, the day of despoiling of man, does not begin until 2025Shebat6/7, the start of the ride of the 4th horseman, and runs for 6x precisely to 2031Shebat6/7.

1 Blow ye a trumpet/shofar in Zion [3x: for Rosh Hashana, the only one they had at that time]
And shout ye in hill of holiness of me [3x: for Rosh Hashana]
Let them tremble, all of ones sitting of the land [3x: for Rosh Hashana, the festival of trumpets, shouting and alarm, terror]
Because he comes, day of Jehovah [1x]
Because close (he is) [1x]

Verse1: (3x+3x+3x).1x.1x = 9x. from 2016Tishri1, the first Rosh Hashana in Isaaic Zoar (appointed/installed over Abraham on 2016Tishri16/Chislev5 but an Abrahamic to Isaaic conversion does not involve entry into the 1st death, and so does not defile us. So we keep our constant feature. So we remain a true church with a 4EC baptism but with no appointments for our new Isaaic incarnations), to 2025Shebat6/7, the start of the 33¼ month ride of the 4th horseman of the apocalypse to 2028Heshvan14, and the start of the 6 year Day of Jehovah to 2031Shebat6/7..

2  Day of darkness and gloom (he is) [2x]
Day of cloud and darkness of/from clouds [lp,r"[] masculine singular a combination of lp;a' darkness, and @yrI[' a cloud] [having a plural meaning: Darkness of clouds or thick clouds according to Gesenius] (he is) [2x/4x] 
Like dawn spreading upon the mountains [is] a great and strong people. One like it has not been made to exist from the indefinite past, and after it there will be none again to the years of generation after generation (Joel 2: GLT)

Verse2 re Day of Jehovah: 2x+2x/4x=4x/6x. These must be 4/6 years of darkness and gloom and cloud and blackness. This is the volcanic and nuclear winter from the Great Tribulation of Matthew24 and from the Unprecedented Tribulation of Mark13 and from the lava flood of Genesis 7/8. 

11 The haughty eyes of earthling man must become low [2x], and the loftiness of men must bow down [3x, bow down is singular]; and Jehovah to separation of him, must be lifted up in that day [2x].
12
Because day to Jehovah of armies [1x.3x=3x] upon everyone self-exalted and lofty
    and upon everyone lifted up and low [1x.3x+3x+3x+3x+3x=15x];
13 and upon all the cedars of Lebanon the lofty and the lifted up
    and upon all the massive trees/oaks of Bashan [3x+3x+3x=9x]
14 and upon all the lofty mountains
    and upon all the hills the lifted up [3x+3x=6x]
15 and upon every high tower
    and upon every fortified wall [3x+3x=6x]
16 and upon all the ships of Tarshish
    and upon all boats the desirable [3x+3x=6x]
17 And the haughtiness of the earthling man [1x] must bow down, and the loftiness of men [3x] [it] must become low []; and Jehovah, to separation of him must be lifted up in that day [2x]  (Isaiah 2)

Verse 11-17: 5x+2x.(15x+9x+6x+6x+6x)+6x = 95x. From the start of the Day to [not of] Jehovah of Armies, the day of elevation of Jehovah and separation on 2025Iyyar21, the pouring out of the gifts of the spirit at the end of the rapture of the 2NC reserves, to 2033Nisan14, the 1st death Passover.. .

So the Day to Jehovah of Armies runs for 95 months.

18 And the valueless gods themselves will pass away completely.
19 And people will enter into the caves of the rocks and into the holes of the dust because of the dreadfulness of Jehovah and from his splendid superiority, when he rises up for the earth to suffer shocks.
20 In that day the earthling man will throw his worthless gods of silver and his valueless gods of gold that they had made for him to bow before to the shrewmice/moles/burrowers and to the bats, (Isaiah 2 NWT adapted from the Hebrew).

Whereas the Day of Jehovah, a.k.a. the fearful day of Jehovah of Joel2 (as opposed to the great Day of Jehovah) runs for 6 years precisely from the start of the ride of the 4th horseman of the apocalypse on 2025Shebat6/7 to 2031Shebat6/7.

The final Jericho campaign by the 3rd Holy Spirit on this world runs for 6 adamic secular years from 2026TIshri1 (after the 3rd presence begins on 2026Elul16) to 2032Tishri1. Then for 7 months in the 7th campaign year to 2033Nisan14, the 1st death Passover, the absolute end of Adam. Then the Jubilee release is 2033Iyyar10, entry day into the late 1st death Passover, the last day of entrance into Kingdom salvation, the end of the release of Kingdom citizens from this world. Then the world ends on 2033Iyyar14.

Verse 20  Those who take the Covid-19 vaccine as a cure for a man made virus (a double CGG codon in a furin cleavage site does not occur in any natural virus. It does occur in bacteria and humans and cows) are seeking salvation from the genes of mice and bats whence it was made and whence the vaccine spikes are copied. Jehovah of Armies is put on high by the rapture and ark resurrection of the FRCs, half of mankind. And ALL the plastic meaningless media manufactured satanic status of man so beloved by women will be destroyed. 

So putting Joel2 and Zephaniah1 and Isaiah2 and Acts2 together:

11 And Jehovah himself gave his voice before his army. For his camp is exceedingly great/numerous. For powerful is [one] working his word; for the day of Jehovah is great and exceedingly fearful, and who will measure/contain/endure him/it? (Joel 2 LWT)
20 the sun will be turned into darkness and the moon into blood before to come day of Lord [Jehovah or Jesus], the great and epiphanaic/conspicuous (Acts 2 LWT).

Well the one working his word can measure it as follows...

1. The period of proximity of the Day of Jehovah runs for 4 years of non adamic Abrahamic conversion from 2012Sivan14-16 to 2016Ab14-16. 
2. The Great Day of Jehovah covers all judicial execution for 17 years from 2016Ab14 to 2033Iyyar14.  And it involves the collecting of the great and strong people, the Zoarites who resist the demonic bullshit of the age.
3. The Fearful Day of Jehovah runs for 6 years precisely of tragedy from 2025Shebat6/7 to 2031Shebat6/7, from the start of the 33¼ month ride of the 4th horseman.
4. The Day to Jehovah of Armies runs for 95 months of Isaiah2:11-17 from 2025Iyyar21, the end of the rapture of the 2NC reserves and the pouring out of the gifts of the spirit, which elevate Jehovah, to 2033Nisan14, the 1st death Passover.
5. The Day of the 3rd presence of the Lord runs for 80 months on 2026Elul16, 1st row baptism day, to the late 1st death Passover on 2033Iyyar1450.

For more on the Day of Jehovah see U272.

Ecclesiastes 3: Solomon says there is a Time for Everything

1 To/For the all/every/any an appointed time [1x for the length of the entire human experience +1x for the time], and a time for any/every desire under the heavens [3x.(1x+3x+1x) = 15x]:
2 a time for birth and a time to die; a time to plant and a time to uproot what was planted; [4x]
3 a time to kill and a time to heal; a time to break down and a time to build; [4x]
4 a time to weep and a time to laugh; a time to wail and a time to skip about; [4x]
5 a time to throw stones away and a time to bring stones together; a time to embrace and a time to keep far away from embracing; [3x+3x+1x+1x = 8x]
6 a time to seek and a time to lose; a time to keep and a time to throw away; [4x]
7 a time to rip apart and a time to sew together; a time to keep quiet and a time to speak;[1x+2x+1x+1x=5x. We divide 1 thing we join 2 things]
8 a time to love and a time to hate; a time for war and a time for peace.[4x]  (Ecclesiastes 3 NWT)

The meaning of this scripture is that the scriptures have encoded within them the chronology for everything to which they refer.

Total = 2x+15x+4x+4x+4x+8x+4x+5x+4x = 50x. This should most definitely be 50 for the Jubilee count. 

Ecclesiastes 3:1-8 is telling us that the WHOLE DEAL takes 50 times. So the temporal length of the 4D space-time universe is 50 creative days.

 

Revelation 18:11-13 (Greek Interlinear)

For a full treatment of Revelation see U151

13111 And the traveling merchants of the earth are weeping and mourning upon/over/concerning her [epi + accusative], because there is no one to buy their [gomoj] full-stock/entire cargo/freight anymore [the earth is the financial system, the sea is individuals, boats are publicly listed corporations. These corporations are floated upon the stock market when they make an IPO. Their full stock is the stock in the company, their shares. The travelling merchants are the stock brokers].
12 a full-stock [gomoj] of gold and silver and precious stone and pearls and fine linen and purple and silk and scarlet; and everything in scented wood and every sort of ivory object and every sort of object out of most precious wood and of copper and of iron and of marble;
13
also cinnamon and Indian spice and incense and perfumed oil and frankincense and wine and olive oil and fine flour and wheat and cattle and sheep, and horses and coaches and slaves and [there is no one to buy] souls of men
[Cargo list counts as 41x.]
of gold1x
and of silver1x
and of precious stone1x
and of pearls2x
and of fine linen1x
and of purple1x
and of silk1x
and of scarlet1x
and every scented wood2x
and every ivory vessel2x
and every vessel out of precious wood and of copper and of iron and of marble2x+2x+2x+2x
and cinnamon1x
and Indian spice1x
and incenses2x
and perfumed oil1x
and frankincense1x
and wine1x
and olive oil1x
and fine flour1x
and wheat1x
and of sheeps2x
and of horses2x
and of coaches2x
and of bodies (genitive)2x
and souls (accusative) of men2x
Total41x

The travelling merchants are weeping and mourning upon/over/concerning her (4x) because of 41x of a full stock. This makes 4x.41x =164x. These days start at the start of the hour of devastation of riches (when they still have a full stock of them) from 2024Adar14 to 2026Nisan14 - see U151#18. So they run from 2024Adar14 to 2025Ab28, which is 2025August24/25 before WW3 begins on 2025Shebat20/21 (2026February12-14). THIS MUST BE WHEN THE STOCK MARKET GOES TO ZERO! For money is a false God which must be judged!131

The Great Crowd in the 5 Colonnades of John 5

711 After these (things) was festival of the Jews, and went up Jesus into Jerusalem [Ierosoluma] [singular]. (John 5 KIT)
2 Is but in the Jerusalems [1x/2x: A polite plural? Jerusalem can be feminine singular ierosoluma or neuter plural ierosolumoi or indeclinable in Greek ierousolum. Here it is dative neuter plural ierosolumoij. Here it applies to the Jerusalem above in the ark and the Jerusalem below on the planet, the LW earthly administration and the LW ark based administrations - which is the same administration. So it is not merely a polite plural, it is an actual plural - we think. For the pool, the ark based 4EC baptism, is both above and below, in the ark and on earth] at/upon the for-sheep [gate] [1x. epi + dative - of position - in the region of] pool [1x] the [one] being said-upon/named [epilegw] [literally said upon] in Hebrew Bethzatha [house of olives - which is run by the mount of olives] [2x], 5 colonnades having [1NC, HLC, 2NC, ELC, 4EC: WITH 5x NOT OF 5x - pools do not generally have colonnades - 1NCs, HLCs, 2NCs, ELCs, 4ECs]
3 In these a multitude of the sick [ones], blind [ones], lame [ones] and withered [ones], was lying down (John 5 KIT).

WE ARE ALL DISABLED IN ONE WAY OR ANOTHER EVEN THE MEMBERS OF THE 3RD HOLY SPIRIT (BUT NOT THE HOLY SPIRIT ITSELF AS A GROUP)

4 Because an angel [] according to season/appointed time [kairoV] [1x. An appointed time - of a festival? - from time to time] would come down into the pool [1x] and disturb the water [1x]. Then [oun] the first [one] [1x] to step in after disturbance of the water [1x] would become cured from which [w-|] sickness [noshma] out of all of them [dhpote - a particle of generalisation - Strongs] [2x] had seized him. [Saints come into the church first. It is first come first serve] [Vatican B does not have this verse but the Alexandrinus early Latin versions and the Syriac Peshitta have it] [This is not the MO of God. You must have faith to be cured yes. But the demons could cure too using the level playing field card. But to have cripples waiting around every day and jumping in the pool whenever a leaf fell into it, may be very funny to demons. But it is not the love of God]. [The noun count does work with it and does not work without it. The sentence count is zero. So perhaps this demonic game is canonically recorded since it tells us how saints are chosen??] (John 5 LWT).

Verse2: Pool, the one being said- upon Bethzatha, in Jerusalems, upon sheep gate having 5 colonnades is 2x.((1x+1x).(1x+1x.1x)+5x) = 2x.9x=18x. Or 2x.(1x.1x+1x+5x) = 14x OR 2x.(1x.2x+1x+5x) = 16x
Verse3:  5x.(2x+2x+2x+2x)  = 40x. 
Verse4: 1x.2x.(1x+1x) = 4x  'AFTER' MUST ADD as we have seen with the 6767 days of the sentence count of 1Kings18:21-24 - see U271-11#72.

The noun counts of Verse4 show that it is canonical - see john.html Also verse 7 requires verse4 to be canonical.

Total of verse 1-4: 14x/16x/18x+2x.5x.8x.(3x+4x) = 14x/16x/18x + 560x = 574x/576x/578x from 2024VeAdar2 to 2026Tishri5/7/9 inclusively.

From the first Isaaic 4EC baptism of an ark dweller (Caleb, the temple floor), to the end of the Isaaic 4EC for earth dwellers. The 1NCs are baptised until 2026Heshvan5. On 2022Tishri18, Elijah4 realised that it takes 7 days to install an Isaaic 4EC baptiser (to baptise transitively). So we can only baptise transitively on the 8th day of his being baptised. This creates the queuing system that Bethzatha is all about. Nobody actually goes into the pool in this account. They are all queuing up in the colonnades. 

It takes 7 days to install an Isaac 4EC baptiser, because he is unclean by his own dead adamic or Abrahamic soul upon baptism and because wives take 7 days to install before they can procreate and because males in Israel were circumcised on the 8th day, when they were registered into Israel and were clean. After 2022Tebbeth21, the email prohibiting baptism until 2022Shebat5, is when the Queuing began - VERY BRITISH! Form an orderly queue please. 

2023Elul16: The 'put the baptism on hold for the moment' email on 2023September4 at 18:00 (2023Elul16 UK 2023Elul17 Kenya) - because that is fill up the jars with water - get ready but do not pour yet!
2023Tishri13: The permission to baptise Isaaically by email on 2023October1 at 13:41 (2023Tishri13).
2023Tishri25: The Abrahamic 4EC baptism of the Masai10 (still under the LW Exedenic Times from 2017Tishri15 to 2024Tishri15).. 

The Jordan stopped when the feet of the ark carriers reached the Jordan, and the ark (the 3rd Holy Spirit) was carried across on dry ground. This is fulfilled again by baptising nobody other than 1NCs and HLCs on the 8 days of their baptism and nobody but 2NCs and ELCs of the days of their baptism. We do not baptise a saint and a sinner on the same day. Not that the saints are sin free. They are just regarded as such by God due to the efforts they have made in that regard - see U271-11#27

The end of the non adamic
abrahamic conversion of
true church Cain. All the
people have now approached
Elijah4 genetically.
2012Tammuz16
X_________________________
Abrahamic Zoar is installed over the
2NCs. Elijah4 now has authority to
take 12 2NC apostles. 12 years
precisely of 12 stones according to 12x
or 13x of tribes of sons of Jacob begin
2012Shebat21
X________________________________
3rd 1NC marriage
Passover. 3rd bride
is executed
2019Tishri14
X_________________

881 days of 1Kings18:33-35
of 4 jar filling and pouring
instruction and execution start
2024Nisan24
X_________________________
LW Isaaic
Exedenic
Times from
2016Tishri15
ends
2023Tishri15
X___________
All 12 apostles are
now taken/chosen
2NC Pentecost of
the Tebbeth1
 secular year.
2024Shebat21
X_________________
The first ark based 2NC
Caleb/AOL is baptised
as the temple floor
2024VeAdar2
X_____________________________
881 days of 4 jar filling and
pouring instruction and
execution end. 
574 days of Bethzatha end
Isaaic 4EC ends on earth
2026Tishri5
X71____________________
87 months of 1Kings18:30-33881 days of 1Kings 18:33-35 less 574 of Bethzatha574 days of 4EC in Bethzatha in
Jerusalems above & below

The 3rd Holy Spirit must surely be appointed/installed over the 2NCs before we become Caesar to the Kingdom?

The temple is built upon the foundation of the 12 apostles in 7 days of 1Kings 6:38
2NC and Zoar Pentecosts are counted in BLC days71.

The Great Crowd of Revelation 7:9

699 After these (things) [2x] [sealings of the 144,000 1NCs and 2NCs and reserves] I saw [1x], and look! crowd much [1x], which to number it and not one/not even one [oudeij] was able [1x: So they include the non priestly FRCs], out of every nation [pantoV and eqnoV are both singular] and [out] of tribes and [out] of peoples and [out] of tongues [within nations?] [2x+2x+2x+2x=8x],
(ones) having stood in sight of [enwpion] the throne [1x+1x=2x] and in sight of [enwpion] the Lamb [1x+1x=2x: lambs can see]
(ones) having been thrown around [periballw] robes white [1x: 1 robe each around the bodies of the representative people - the count of the crowd]
and palm [branches] in the hands of them [1x.5x+1x.5x=10x];
10 and they are crying out to voice great, saying The salvation [is due] to the God of us [1x. Jehovah NOT Jesus - there are non Christians in this group] to the (one) sitting upon the throne [2x: Jesus NOT Jehovah] and to the Lamb [1x: Elijah4, who runs the departure lounge]. (Revelation 7 KIT)

Verse9-10 from look!: 2x+1x+1x+8x.(2x+2x).2x+8x.10x+8x.(1x+2x+1x) = 4x+64x+80x+32x = 180x from 2028Heshvan10 to 2029Iyyar10 for FRC entrance into the 1st 6 crops of the tree of life or Revelation22
And from 2029Iyyar10 to 2029Heshvan10 for LRC entrance into the last 6 crops of the tree of life of Revelation22

11 And all [pantej] the angels had stood to circle [1x: Making one circle containing] of the throne and of the older persons [24 of them] and of the 4 living [creatures] [a circle of 1x+24x+4x = 29x], and they fell in sight of the throne upon the faces of them [[2x.(1x+1x+1x) = 6x: Each one falling upon face before throne]
and worshiped to the God. 12 saying Amen (truly to verse 10); the blessing and the glory and the wisdom and the thanksgiving [rather than wealth of Revelation5] and the honour and the power and the strength to the God of us [7x] into the ages of the ages; amen (truly) Revelation 7 KIT)

Verse 11-12: 2x.29x+6x+2x.(4x+7x.4x+7x.4x) = 58x+6x+2x.60x = 184x from 2024Heshvan17 - the 17th day of the 2nd month of Genesis 7:11, when some springs are busted open or when the floodgates of the heavens are opened? to 2025Iyyar21, the end of the rapture of the 2NCs, the collection of all the angels to stand to circle of the throne in the ark. 

11 And I saw [1x], and I heard sound of the voice [Gesenius] of angels many [1x] in/to [dative] circle of the throne and of the living [creatures] and of the older persons [1x: One circle of the 1x+4x+24x=29x], and was the number of them myriads of myriads and thousands of thousands [a witness to 100x, the comparison between 100,000,000 and 1,000,000],
12 saying [1x for the circle that they make] in/to voice great Worthy is the Lamb [Elijah4 killed to the 3EC, or FDS4 killed to Adam and resurrected to Abraham then Isaac: 1x] the (one) having been slaughtered [1x: sacrificed by the Watchtower to silence him] to receive the power and wealth and wisdom and strength and honour and glory and blessing [7x. Whereas Jesus is worthy of worship being a God. There is no question as to his worthiness]. (Revelation 5 KIT)

I saw = 1x. 
The sound of the voice of many angels in circle of 29x = 29x. 
myriads of myriads and thousands of thousands = 100x by comparison of the two.
So John hears the sound of the voice of 100x of angels in a circle of 29x making 2900x in total from 2025Nisan24 to 2033Iyyar14
Verse 12: 7x. These are the 7 years of the gifts of the spirit from 2025Iyyar21 to 2033Iyyar14 less the 12 month honeysun of the 2NC marriage from 2028Adar9 to 2029Adar9. 

2025Nisan24 is the 7th day counting from 5th row baptism day on 2025Nisan18. So all the 2NCs are installed as Isaaic 4EC priests on that day. That is when we are all worthy to receive the gifts of the spirit for 7 years.

13 And concluded/answered [apokrinomai, apo and krinw] [to decide from, to conclude] one out of the elders [24x] saying to me: These (ones), the (ones) having been thrown about the robes the white [a further specification of these ones. White outer robes about them, means sealed. This was a conversation about outer garments only, not about underwear - the inner robe] who are they and wherefrom came they [who are these ones, the ones wrapped in robes, and where did they come from: (2x+2x.2x).(1x+1x)=12x]

14 And I have said to him [24x: One of the elders]: Lord of me, you have seen [oidaj from eidw[1x, Lord of me, not one of the elders]

And he [1x] said to me: These [2x: Redefined from 4x of verse13] are the (ones) coming out of the tribulation the great [present tense - into Zoar and then the ark. ALL of them come out of the Great Tribulation]

And they washed the robes of them [2x: disrobing to wash, one robe each, robe standing for faithful character here, This is a baptism into the 1AC/OMC, NOT into the 4EC which cleans the flesh. And a sealing into the FRC/OMC] and they whitened them in the blood of the Lamb [2x: The relevant lamb. Melchizedek, the lamb of the FRC. They wash their robes in the blood of the 1AC/OMC. They whiten them in the blood of the FRC/LRC. Robes are not flesh. But the law they obey is that of Zoar] (Revelation 7 KIT)

Their love is human deep not divine deep. It is shallow because they do not recognise its source. It is a 2nd hand emotion for the 2nd law of God. Clothes are made by man, the body is made by God. Love of man cleans the clothes, love of God cleans the body. Love of man is shallow and plastic compared to love of God. But it is love and that is good enough for salvation. These are the OMCs, the glassy sea..

12 Accordingly, as God's chosen ones, holy and loved, clothe yourselves with the tender affections of compassion, kindness, lowliness of mind, mildness, and long-suffering. (Colossians 3 NWT). 

15 Through this they [2x] are in sight of/before [evnw,pion equivalent to o` evn wvpi w;n, one who is in sight] the throne of the God [2x.(1x+1x) = 4x: In the ark], and they are rendering service to him of day and of night in the divine habitation of him [2x+2x=4x] [So they are either priests or in the outer courtyard. They are worshippers], and the (one) sitting upon the throne [2x] will tent upon them [1x+2x=3x].

16 Not they will hunger yet/further [2x.2x] not-but they will thirst yet/further [2x.2x], not-but not should fall upon them the sun [1x+2x=3x] not-but all/any burning heat [1x+2x=3x],
17 because the Lamb [1x], the (one) up [ana] middle/midst [meosj] of the throne [2x] will shepherd them [2x], and will guide them upon of life fountains of waters [2x+2x.2x=6x. Apostles] and will wipe out the God every tear out of the eyes of them [2x.2x.2x=8x]. (Revelation 7 KIT)

They stand before the throne is 2x.(1x+1x) = 4x
They kneel before the throne is 2x.(1x+1x) = 4x
They are standing before the throne 2x.(1x+1x) = 4x
They are [existing] before the throne 2x.(1x+1x) = 4x
They are [situated] before the throne 2x.(1x+1x) = 4x

Verse 13: 24x.(2x+2x.2x).2x = 24x.12x= 288x  
Verse 14: 24x.1x+1x.(2x+2x+2x) = 24x+6x=30x
Verse 15: 4x+4x+2x.3x=14x
Verse 16-17: (2x.2x+2x.2x+3x+3x).(1x.2x.(2x+6x)+8x) = 14x.24x = 336x
Total for great crowd coming out of great tribulation: 288x + 30x.14x + 336x = 288x + 420x + 336x = 1044x. The length of the Great Tribulation of Matthew24, which extends until the end of the ride of the 4th horseman, the end of nuclear war.. So it runs from 2025Shebat8 to 2028Tebbeth2 covering 4 winters.

To render service in the temple you must be a worshipper. So you must be obeying the 1st law. So you are an FRC not an OMC. You do not have to be officiating at the altar as a priest. 

15 Whenever therefore you might see the disgusting thing of the desolation the (thing) spoken through Daniel the prophet having stood in place holy, the (one) reading let him be minding,
16 then the (ones) in the Judea let them be fleeing into the mountains,
17 the (one) upon the housetop not let him come down to lift up the (things) out of the house of him,
18 and the (one) in the field not let him return behind to lift up the outer garment of him.
19 Woe but to the (ones) in belly having and the (ones) giving suck in those the days
20 Be praying but in order that not should occur the flight of you of winter and not to Sabbath; (Matthew 24 KIT)
20 proseucesqe de ina mh genhtai h fugh umwn ceimwnoj mhde sabbatw (Matthew 24 VatB)
21 will be for then tribulation great of what sort not has occurred from beginning of world until of the now not-but not not should occur.
22 And if not were cut short the days those, not likely was saved all flesh; through but the chosen ones will be cut short the days those. (Matthew 24 KIT)

14 However, when you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation standing where it ought not let the reader use discernment, then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains.
15 Let the man on the housetop not come down, nor go inside to take anything out of his house;
16 and let the man in the field not return to the things behind to pick up his outer garment.
17
Woe but to the (ones) in belly having and to the (ones) giving suck in those the days.
18 Be you praying but in order that not it might occur of winter;
19 will be for the days those tribulation of which sort not has occurred such from beginning of creation which created the God until the now and not not should occur.
20 And if not shortened Lord the days, not likely was saved all flesh. But through the chosen (ones) whom he chose he shortened the days. (Mark 13 KIT)

So the Great Crowd of Revelation 7:9 are the ark raptured/resurrected FRCs AND the ark resurrected LRCs. The FRCs have the palm branches in their hands (worship, the 1st law) and come out by rapture before the Great Tribulation and by resurrection during it. The LRCs have washed their robes, their human interactions (the 2nd law), by OMC baptism and made them white by LRC sealing, but they have not washed their bodies, their divine interactions (the 1st law). They come out during the Great Tribulation. So Rutherford was not so far out.69

Paul's list of non Kingdom inheritors

1639 What! Do ye not know that unrighteous ones will not inherit God's kingdom? [2x.2x=4x] Do not ye be misled [2x] [Because] Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor softies/cowards/effeminates, nor man- liers [arsenokoithj] [2x.2x=4x],
10 nor thieves, nor greedy persons, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit God's kingdom [10 plurals. Literally Paul uses inherit in the ownership sense for Kings, Lords and Priests (sons of Isaac or Jacob)- But not for citizens (sons of Abraham only). This does not preclude citizenship for the unrighteous. Sure these bad guys will not inherit the kingdom. But that does not mean they will not be saved into it - if they have a good heart despite awful works. One can live in a house that one has not inherited you know. It is called being a tenant]
11 And yet that [unrighteous] is what some of you were [2x]. But ye have been washed clean [2x: In water] in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ and in [en] the spirit of our God [2x] (1 Corinthians 6).

The List Specification Principle does not apply due to the inserted phrase: Do not be misled?

The first unrighteous citizens of the kingdom, the 7th crop of the tree of life of Revelation22, are transformed on 2029Sivan14-16, the Laodicean LRC Passover, and the last ones on 2033Iyyar14, the late 1st death Passover..

List count of verse 9-10 is 2x.2x+2x.20x = 44x.
Verse 11: 2x+2x+2x = 6x. 
Verse 9-11: 44x+6x = 50x. the last adamic Jubilee from 2028Heshvan10, the start of he Accepting year, to 2033Nisan14, the 1st death Passover for Adam. The period of OMC entry from LRC salvation for Adam.

Kingdom OMCs for LRC sealing are regarded as unrighteous until they are sealed, when they are declared righteous by love of brother. This is because they do not obey the first law to love God.163

Daniel 5 and Belshazzar's idolatry list

22 And as for you, his son Belshazzar [POL] [1x], you have not humbled your heart [1x], because [lbeq\ ] you knew all this [1x. Also FDS3 knew all this and did not humble their heart].
23 But upon/against the Lord of the heavens you exalted/lifted yourself [2x], and they brought before you even the vessels of his house [3x.3x]; and you yourself [1x] and your grandees [3x], your concubines [3x] and your secondary wives [3x] have been drinking wine from them [3x], and thou hast praised mere Gods of gold [1NC saints - plurality of these so Gods of gold and Gods of silver etc.] and of silver [2NC saints], copper [priests], iron [rulers], wood [researchers] and stone [regular JWs, dead stones], that/which are not beholding and are not hearing and are not knowing [absolutely ignorant of end time bible meaning] [counts 1x.3x.6x.3x=54x]. 

And the God in whose hand your breath is [5x, God has a metaphorical hand with 5 metaphorical fingers?] and to whom all your ways [belong] [3x] you have not glorified.

The period of Belshazzar not humbling his heart but exalting himself upon/against the king of the heavens runs for: 3x.3x+10x.3x+3x.6x.3x+5x+3x=9x+30x+54x+5x+3x=101x. MENE MENE TEKEL
Not sure where these fit!

24 Consequently from before him [we are all before him at the Passover] there was being sent the extremity of a hand [5x - the end of his authority], and this very writing was inscribed [on the wall of the operation law of the church].

Laodicea means people of judgement so this judgement was always going to happen. It was their destiny.

The dryness of Haggai

11 And I kept calling for dryness [1x] upon the earth [1x], and upon the mountains [3x], and upon the grain [1x], and upon the new wine [1x], and upon the oil [1x], and upon [that] which the ground brings forth [1x], and upon earthling man [1x], and upon domestic animal [1x], and upon all the toil of [the] palms [Palms is obviously dual. Is the all the toil of each palm? One can toil with one palm if one wants? Perhaps this is 2x or perhaps 1x ?] [A Classic list count of dryness upon something 12x/13x, from 2001Chislev14 to 2013Adar10, the end of the Watchtower water baptism to the end of the Laodicean water baptism?].' (Haggai 1).

Sitting on 12 thrones judging 12 tribes of Matthew19

154Sitting upon 12 thrones judging 12 tribes of Matthew19

27 Then having answered the Peter said to him Look! We have let go off all (things) and we followed to you; what really will be to us?
28 Jesus said to them: Truly I say to you, In the re-creation, whenever the Son of man sits down upon his throne of glory [1x+1x=2x], you, will sit also you, the [ones] having followed me [12x(1x+1x) = 24x], upon 12 thrones [12x], judging the 12 tribes of Israel (Matthew 19).

28 The but Jesus said to them Amen I am saying to you that [oti] you, the (ones) having followed to me: In the re-generation/re-creation/back-generation, whenever might sit down the Son of the man upon throne of glory of him, will sit also/and/even you upon twelve thrones judging the twelve tribes of the Israel. (Matthew 19 KIT)

Verse 27: 2x.(12x.2x+13x+12x) = 98x.
Verse28: 12x.12x.(12x+12x.(1x+1x)+12x+2x) = 7200x
Total: 98x+7200x = 7298x: 20 years and 3 months and 8 days from the start of non adamic judging by Zoar on 2012Heshvan5 (our installation to rule over Abraham) to 2016Ab14 (our death to Abraham). Then from 2016Chislev5 (out installation to rule over Abraham, after an installation gap of 3 months 21 days) to 2033Sivan4. Then the Kingdom of God is installed over Abraham on 2033Sivan5

29 And everyone whoever let go off houses or brothers or sisters or father or mother or children or fields on account of the of me name, many times more things he will receive and life everlasting he will inherit.
30 Many but will be first (ones) last (ones) and last (ones) first (ones). (Matthew 19 KIT)

The son of man sits down upon his glorious throne as Caesar to Adam on 2012Sivan5, after the end of Satan's 6,000 year lease to 2012Nisan14.

Matthew 19:16-20:16 and Mark 10:17-31 and Luke 18:18-30 are parallel. So the counts are difficult - see U930.

But there is an immediate number repetition of 12 and a comparison of 12 throne/tribes with one Son of man/glorious throne. So there are witnesses to 12x and 13x precisely here in the recreation. Just as there is the with day and hour (13x) versus the day or hour (12x). See U659.html#57

Jesus turned a condemnatory 10 commandments into the salvational 12 commandments by elevating loving God and loving one's brother to the status of commandments154.

Solomon's Lifestyle

4 And/when the queen of Sheba [meaning 7] got to see all the wisdom of Solomon [1x] and the house that he had built [1x],
5 and the food of his table [1x] and the seating of his servants [1x] and the table service of his waiters [1x] and garments of them [3x] and his cupbearers [3x] and his ascent/burnt offering [1x - it will be ascent. Burnt offerings are not to impress queens. They are to impress God] which went up [to/from] house of Jehovah, and there proved to be no further/repeated/more/additional spirit in her [1x] 13x of the Laodicean congregations being appointed to feeding or rule over her (the 2NCs] (1Kings 10).

6 And she said to the king: True has the word proved to be that I heard in my own land [Laodicea, the 7th congregation of Revelation3] about your matters and about your wisdom.
7 And I did not put faith in the words until I had come that my own eyes might see; and, look! I had not been told the half [ of LWs/Zoar begin appointed to feed/rule over the 2NCs]. You have surpassed in wisdom and prosperity the things heard to which I listened [officially in Laodicea]

Laodiceas were appointed/installed  to feed the 2NCs from 2006Iyyar22/Tammuz11 to 2012Sivan14 and 2012Ab22/Tishri11 to 2017Elul10 and 2020Tammuz19/Elul8 to 2023Tishri21, making 14¼ years
Zoar appointed to rule over and feed the 2NCs 1996Nisan18/Sivan7 - 2012Sivan14 then 2012Chislev2/Shebat21 to 2016Ab14 then 2016Tebbeth2/Adar21 to 2026Chislev5 (the Laodicean Jericho Jubilee release) is 29 years 5 months

Sheep and Goats

Event Symbolism (the King is the Son of Man)

7 For a man ought not to have his head covered, as he is God's image and glory; but the woman is man's glory. (1 Corinthians 11 NWT)

31 When [otan] the Son of man arrives in his glory [with his 1NC and HLC wives in Zoar from 2026Elul16 to 2026Heshvan5], and all the angels with him [Including dry 2NC Benjamin raptured by 2025Iyyar21/22], then [tote]  he will sit down upon his glorious throne [over Abrahamic in Zoar on 2026Tishri5 over Isaac in the Isaaic Zoar Sabbath month and on 2026Heshvan5 over Abraham. The throne is sacred not secular].
32 And all the nations will be gathered before [emprosqen literally en pros in-towards] him [on 2026Heshvan5, when he takes over Zoar fully. All the angels of the 3rd Holy Spirit are with him. All his glory, his wife, has arrived. The trench of 2 measures of seed of 1Kings18 is full. Even dry 2NC Benjamin has been raptured], and he will separate them [not the nations as group but the people in the nations] from one-another/each other [allhlwn genitive plural] [2x. He will perform one separation of two people], just as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats [2x+2x].
33 And he will put the sheep [sons of the FRC, those who pass the faith test] out of his right [parts] [1x: divine/royal plural - but this is right hand so counts 5x] [does not use the word ceir for hand], but the goats [sons of Gehenna AND of the OMC, those who pass the final LOVE test of this parable] out of his left/honoured/goodwill [parts] [euwnumoj] [1x: divine/royal plural - but this is left hand so counts 5x] [hand is absent].

Liddell: euv&w,nu²moj, on, (o;numa, Aeol. for o;noma) of good name, honoured, Hesiodus, Pindarus., etc.
2. of good omen, prosperous, fortunate,
peri idewn (on ideas, supposedly by aristotle), Plato.
II. euphemistic for
avristero,j (which was a word of ill omen), left, on the left hand, Herodotus, Sophocles, etc.; evx euvwnu,mou ceiro,j or evx euvwnu,mou, on the left, Herodotus.

Liddell:  avristero,j a,( o,n, left, on the left, Lat. sinister, evpV avristera, towards, i.e. on, the left, Il.; evpV avristera. ceiro,j on the left hand, Od.; evx avristerh/j ceiro,j on the left hand, Herodotus; or simply, evx avristera/j Sophocles; evj avristerh,n( evn avristerh/| Herodotus.
2. metaphorical. boding ill, ominous, because to a Greek augur, looking northward, the unlucky signs came from the left, Odusseus (Derivation. uncertain.) 

euwnumoj means fortunate, of good omen, boding well and is a euphemism for aristeroj which literally means left or bad omen to the Greeks. So the Holy Spirit is going out of its way to say, the guys on the left are going to be fortunate too! aristeroj can mean left hand which is normally aristeroj ceir

Looking at the usage of avristero,j and euwnumoj above it becomes clear that the Greeks used epi for on/at the right hand/side and the used ex for out of the right hand/side. But how can one be out of right parts? Well, in the same way that a baby is out of a woman. You have to have been in right parts to come out of them. And one cannot be in any right part except the hand. So the expression out of right [parts] always means out of the right hand (which you previously were in). Jesus did not kick the sheep over to his right, for he was the fine shepherd! He took them with his hand and then released them out of his hand onto that side. So out of right [parts] is a polite plural for the right hand and therefore counts as 5x.

From his sitting down on his throne in Zoar to judge on 2026Heshvan5
Verse 32: 2x.1x+2x+4x = 8x  (he will separate them one from another = 1x+2x = 3x per nation = 6x. In that place they will slaughter one another = 2x.(1x.2x) = 4x of Revelation 6:8)
Verse 33: 2x.5x+2x.5x = 20x (he will put the sheep in South London and the goats in North London)
Total: 8x+20x = 28x NOPE
OR
From his sitting down on his throne in Zoar to judge on 2026Heshvan5
Verse 32: 2x+1x+2x.3x+4x = 13x  (he will separate them one from another = 2x.(1x+2x) = 6x: 3x per nation. In that place they will slaughter one another = 2x.(1x.2x) = 4x of Revelation 6:8)
Verse 33: 2x.5x+2x.5x = 20x (he will put the sheep in South London and the goats in North London)
Total: 13x+20x = 33x YES

Nations gathered before him is (nation + nation) gathered + him = 3x??

34 Then [tote] the king will say to those out of his right [parts = hand] [all of them. NOBODY has two right hands or two right sides. This is a polite, divine or royal plural, a polite divine royal plural actually] [2x.5x=10x]: Come, ye who have been blessed by my Father [2x] [Abraham, to be Kingdom citizens], inherit [ye] the kingdom prepared for ye [2x.2x] from the founding of the world [inheritors benefit from the death of the bequeather. This is not having an inheritance in the Kingdom, which is owning a part of the kingdom which is having authority in the kingdom. It is having the blessing of father Abraham which is citizenship of the Kingdom. The sons of the ARC are tested by Passover attendance as all of them must attend one of the marriages]
35 For I became hungry and ye gave me something to eat [3x]; I got thirsty and ye gave me something to drink [3x]. I was a stranger and ye received me hospitably [3x],
36 naked [I was], and ye clothed me [3x]. I fell sick and ye looked after me [3x]. I was in prison and ye came to me [3x] [6x predicaments and 12x loving responses in 6 groups of 3x]

2x.5x.(2x+2x.2x).18x=60x.18x = 1080x

37 Then [tote] the righteous ones [the sons of the CRC and FRC] [2x] will answer him saying, 'Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you [4x], or when did we see you thirsty, and give you something to drink? [4x OR 4x = 4x]
38 When [pote] did we see you a stranger and receive you hospitably [4x], or naked, and clothe you? [4x OR 4x = 4x] [A reader question which the account answers]
39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to you? [2x OR 2x and 2x = 4x] [Total is 2x.(4x + 4x + 4x) = 2x.12x = 24x]
40 And answering [aorist participle] the king will say to them [2x], Truly I say to ye [2x], upon how many/much ye did it [the 2x above] to one of these, my brothers, the least [2NC saints are brothers to the angelic body of Michael, which Jesus no longer has and non adamic humans are fleshly brothers to his human body which he longer has either] [2x.2x.2x] ye did it to me [2x.2x.1x] [ye did it to me, just as  ye did it to one of the least ones out of these].

37 Then will answer to him the righteous (ones) saying Lord, when you we saw hungering and we fed, or thirsting and we caused to drink?
38 When [pote] but you we saw stranger and we gathered, or naked and we clothed?
39 When but you we saw falling sick or in prison and we came toward you?
40 And answering, the king will say to them Amen I am saying to ye, upon how many/much ye did to one of these the brothers of me the least (ones), to me ye did. (Matthew 25 KIT)

2 Do not forget hospitality, for through it some, unknown to themselves, entertained angels (Hebrews 3)

Verses 34-40: 1080x + 24x+2x.2x.(2x.2x.2x+2x.2x) = 1080x + 24x + 48x = 1152x

41 And then he will say to the [ones] out of his left [places = hand] [euwnumoj] [all of them] [2x.5x=10x: Polite or Royal or divine plural of hand]: Depart from me, ye who have been cursed, into the indefinitely lasting fire prepared for the Devil and his angels [2x.3x=6x] [Gehenna, Hell].
42 For I became hungry, but ye gave me nothing to eat [3x], and I got thirsty, but ye gave me nothing to drink [3x].
43 I was a stranger, but ye did not receive me hospitably [3x]; naked, but ye did not clothe me [3x]; sick and in prison, but ye did not look after/consider me [me is 2x. So 2x+2x.2x=6x] [18x in list form from the same verb. total count is 2x.5x.6x.18x=1080x].
44 And then they [2x: the ones out of left places, the ones he spoke to] will answer saying: Lord, when did we [2x] see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison and did not minister to you? [1x OR 1x OR 1x OR 1x OR 1x OR 1x AND 1x=2x] [alternative tests] [A reader question which the account answers]
45 Then he will answer them saying, 'Truly I say to ye, To the extent that ye did not do it to one of these least ones, [not said to be least ones of my brothers, just least ones. These are the ones in the lowest salvation covenant, the sons of the 1AC. The goats refuse to help people faithful or loving people who are in need - not only the ones who refuse the mark of the beast and are therefore in need - but anyone in need who has shown charitable love or faith in a divine creator and therefore entered into the 1AC. These testing stones are not Jesus' angelic brothe